Fridays GMAT-GRE-TOEFL-IELTS-آموزشگاه زبان صبای سحر-چمران جنوب، بلوار جلال آل احمد، جنب داروخانه شبانه روزی جلال آل احمد، پلاک 87، طبقه سوم تلفن: 42-88679341 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/103-fridays-writing-workshop-1394/writing-workshop-friday-94-08-01 2024-04-30T02:20:07+00:00 IELTSTOEFLCENTER info@ieltstoeflcenter.com Joomla! - Open Source Content Management Toys for Children - Hamed Fazeli 2015-10-25T14:22:23+00:00 2015-10-25T14:22:23+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/103-fridays-writing-workshop-1394/writing-workshop-friday-94-08-01/399-toys-for-children-hamed-fazeli <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Writing Workshop Friday 94.08.01/toys for children - hamed fazeli.pdf"><img src="http://s6.picofile.com/file/8211445518/pdf_button24.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with. What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys? There is a little room for doubt that purchasing a multitude of playthings for offspring is one of the fast‐growing phenomenaon in the world. However, its detrimental impacts on children remains a source of constant debate. This essay will elaborate on both positive and negative effects of unrestricted number of toys. Optimum brain development is one of the main contributions of playthings. To many parents, suitable toys and didactic role of playthings are what they first consider when choosing toys. In fact their mindset has been recognized by many educational innocuous toys and money has been subsequently directed toward educative roles. For instance, acquisition of the alphabet and numbers is an incentive for parents to buy more suitable playthings. Therefore, excessive numbers mushrooming of toys may be is one of the primary forces contributing to appropriate child education. On the negative side, ubiquity/overabundance of proliferation of toys can lead to nurturinge infants as an indolent citizen in future. Unlike Albeit, primary needs, such as food, clothes and accommodation, which are not proper alternatives for stimulating a sense of endeavor, toys, as a reward, can increase longing for approaching prosperity. Therefore, prevalence of toys can have devastating impacts on children, meanwhile parents can gain awareness of playthings purchasing as a solution for hidden pitfalls of upbringing. In the light of these facts, one can conclude that a multitude of toys is neither a boon nor a bane bone to children characters. However, it would seem that one of the fundamental duties for parents is to make an informed choice about how many and what kind how kind of toys they buy for their young charges. Admittedly, the impact of this trend can be reflected in the next generations.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Writing Workshop Friday 94.08.01/toys for children - hamed fazeli.pdf"><img src="http://s6.picofile.com/file/8211445518/pdf_button24.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with. What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys? There is a little room for doubt that purchasing a multitude of playthings for offspring is one of the fast‐growing phenomenaon in the world. However, its detrimental impacts on children remains a source of constant debate. This essay will elaborate on both positive and negative effects of unrestricted number of toys. Optimum brain development is one of the main contributions of playthings. To many parents, suitable toys and didactic role of playthings are what they first consider when choosing toys. In fact their mindset has been recognized by many educational innocuous toys and money has been subsequently directed toward educative roles. For instance, acquisition of the alphabet and numbers is an incentive for parents to buy more suitable playthings. Therefore, excessive numbers mushrooming of toys may be is one of the primary forces contributing to appropriate child education. On the negative side, ubiquity/overabundance of proliferation of toys can lead to nurturinge infants as an indolent citizen in future. Unlike Albeit, primary needs, such as food, clothes and accommodation, which are not proper alternatives for stimulating a sense of endeavor, toys, as a reward, can increase longing for approaching prosperity. Therefore, prevalence of toys can have devastating impacts on children, meanwhile parents can gain awareness of playthings purchasing as a solution for hidden pitfalls of upbringing. In the light of these facts, one can conclude that a multitude of toys is neither a boon nor a bane bone to children characters. However, it would seem that one of the fundamental duties for parents is to make an informed choice about how many and what kind how kind of toys they buy for their young charges. Admittedly, the impact of this trend can be reflected in the next generations.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Talents-Nafiseh 2015-10-25T14:21:45+00:00 2015-10-25T14:21:45+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/103-fridays-writing-workshop-1394/writing-workshop-friday-94-08-01/398-talents-nafiseh <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Writing Workshop Friday 94.08.01/Talents-Nafiseh.pdf"><img src="http://s6.picofile.com/file/8211445518/pdf_button24.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sport person or musicians. Having a successful improvement in a certain sport or music involves various factors. Some people believe that having inborn talents plays the most more important role and some others argue that every person has the chance to be a good musician or a famous athlete without any special talent. First and foremost, those people who assert that famous musicians or athletes are successful due to their innate abilities, substantiate their claims by citing cases that did not enjoy any experts but because of their talents could be a champion or a movie star, and also those people who despite many tutors and professionals' help and strenuous exercises could accomplish no goal. I personally believe that this notion can be true about those people who possess exceptional aptitudes like Albert Einstein or Mr Shajarian, a distinguished singer. If we, however, eliminate such few examples, this claim is somehow unrealistic. On the other hand, some people argue that being interested in something, perseverance, efficient incentives, and an intellectual curriculum can offset the lack of special talents in children and help them be a brilliant star. That is why many parents try to identify their children's talents and develop them in a growing way. For instance, the Smiths's adopted an ordinary child and decided to grow her up raise her with the help of psychologists and professionals and they could develop their child's aptitude in chess such that/so that as though she became a world champion in chess. In conclusion, it is crystal clear that an inborn talent is just one of the factors which are needed for a person to be famous and successful so the other factors not only must not be undertaken, but also they have to be reinforced and developed to diminish the effects of lack of talent in a child. I completely agree with the idea that any child can excel when he gets ample encouragement, guideline and a proper environment by means of perseverance and dedication.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Writing Workshop Friday 94.08.01/Talents-Nafiseh.pdf"><img src="http://s6.picofile.com/file/8211445518/pdf_button24.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sport person or musicians. Having a successful improvement in a certain sport or music involves various factors. Some people believe that having inborn talents plays the most more important role and some others argue that every person has the chance to be a good musician or a famous athlete without any special talent. First and foremost, those people who assert that famous musicians or athletes are successful due to their innate abilities, substantiate their claims by citing cases that did not enjoy any experts but because of their talents could be a champion or a movie star, and also those people who despite many tutors and professionals' help and strenuous exercises could accomplish no goal. I personally believe that this notion can be true about those people who possess exceptional aptitudes like Albert Einstein or Mr Shajarian, a distinguished singer. If we, however, eliminate such few examples, this claim is somehow unrealistic. On the other hand, some people argue that being interested in something, perseverance, efficient incentives, and an intellectual curriculum can offset the lack of special talents in children and help them be a brilliant star. That is why many parents try to identify their children's talents and develop them in a growing way. For instance, the Smiths's adopted an ordinary child and decided to grow her up raise her with the help of psychologists and professionals and they could develop their child's aptitude in chess such that/so that as though she became a world champion in chess. In conclusion, it is crystal clear that an inborn talent is just one of the factors which are needed for a person to be famous and successful so the other factors not only must not be undertaken, but also they have to be reinforced and developed to diminish the effects of lack of talent in a child. I completely agree with the idea that any child can excel when he gets ample encouragement, guideline and a proper environment by means of perseverance and dedication.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Talent or Teaching. Farshad 2015-10-25T14:21:20+00:00 2015-10-25T14:21:20+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/103-fridays-writing-workshop-1394/writing-workshop-friday-94-08-01/397-talent-or-teaching-farshad <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Writing Workshop Friday 94.08.01/Talent or teaching. Farshad.pdf"><img src="http://s6.picofile.com/file/8211445518/pdf_button24.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">It's generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for music and sport, and others are not. However it's sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become good sports person or musician. Discuss the two ideas giving your opinion. Some argue that there is are an inner/interior power for learning in a number of individuals which is not accessible for everyone, namely genuine talent. In stark contrast, another group of experts point out that it is just an urban myth that gifted people are more prone to be successful in comparison to their ordinary counterparts. To begin with, the former group cites that not only can we divided citizens into separated bodies with different levels of mental abilities, but also we can draw a direct correlation between that and playing a useful role in the society. They firmly believe that the stronger you are more you physically and mentally be strong, the further you can go in the way of fortune. That is to say with more people who have higher IQ scores or are in good shape, a society may improve in at a faster rate/pace. For instance, reaching an ethnically pure nation, many German scientists in the past century had attempted to create a genetic pattern in young couples which in turn could be conducive to a controlled generation with vast abilities. Having said that, however, the latter group, which is mainly consists of contains sociologists, claims that each person is a product by his or her society, environment as well as family rather than his or her personal characteristics and physical traits. In other words, children who are born and raised rise in a high social class family are considerably different from those in low level ones. To make an example, we can see that a major proportion of pupils who live and study in in better neighborhoods are more likely to enter high ranking universities. In a nutshell, were I to choose between these two attitudes, I would go for a combination between them which regards aptitude and efficient nurture well‐growing as the most important factors equally.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Writing Workshop Friday 94.08.01/Talent or teaching. Farshad.pdf"><img src="http://s6.picofile.com/file/8211445518/pdf_button24.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">It's generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for music and sport, and others are not. However it's sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become good sports person or musician. Discuss the two ideas giving your opinion. Some argue that there is are an inner/interior power for learning in a number of individuals which is not accessible for everyone, namely genuine talent. In stark contrast, another group of experts point out that it is just an urban myth that gifted people are more prone to be successful in comparison to their ordinary counterparts. To begin with, the former group cites that not only can we divided citizens into separated bodies with different levels of mental abilities, but also we can draw a direct correlation between that and playing a useful role in the society. They firmly believe that the stronger you are more you physically and mentally be strong, the further you can go in the way of fortune. That is to say with more people who have higher IQ scores or are in good shape, a society may improve in at a faster rate/pace. For instance, reaching an ethnically pure nation, many German scientists in the past century had attempted to create a genetic pattern in young couples which in turn could be conducive to a controlled generation with vast abilities. Having said that, however, the latter group, which is mainly consists of contains sociologists, claims that each person is a product by his or her society, environment as well as family rather than his or her personal characteristics and physical traits. In other words, children who are born and raised rise in a high social class family are considerably different from those in low level ones. To make an example, we can see that a major proportion of pupils who live and study in in better neighborhoods are more likely to enter high ranking universities. In a nutshell, were I to choose between these two attitudes, I would go for a combination between them which regards aptitude and efficient nurture well‐growing as the most important factors equally.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Single Academic Subject - Amirehsan 2015-10-25T14:20:47+00:00 2015-10-25T14:20:47+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/103-fridays-writing-workshop-1394/writing-workshop-friday-94-08-01/396-single-academic-subject-amirehsan <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Writing Workshop Friday 94.08.01/Single academic subject - Amirehsan.pdf"><img src="http://s6.picofile.com/file/8211445518/pdf_button24.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Many people named the current era as the age of knowledge era based on the proved importance of knowledge and its role. As there are is several number of different fields of study studies, some believe that it would be more efficient for the society and its people to just allocate their limited valuable time to be professional in is just one specific major instead of learning knowledge from of multiple unrelated different subjects. From my stand point, becominge professional in is only one field is the better option on the following grounds. First and foremost, nobody is able to be perfect in every scientific field due to their characteristics. There is a famous sentences that says every person is born a unique talent to be profession in some subject and the duty of that person is to find his matched subject. For instance, I searched about many different academic fields when I was deciding about my major at the university ranging from medicine medical doctor to history and science. Ultimately, I find out that computer engineering is the best match given according to my personalityies and talents. However, my brother got his degree on medicine that made him a successful person. In the second place, today's knowledge in every academic subject is increasing with a high ratio up to this point that experts in an academic subject divide their field of study to some subfields to be able to study the necessary knowledge in just one of them. For example, at the school of computer science in our out university, there are some laboratoriesy that professors who are researching there are totally unaware of each other due to the fact that not only doare they find it impossible to be specialize in all of the subjects in their department, but also somehow they consider them as a different major according to the increasingly grand scale of the knowledge. On the other hand, it is essential for every individual to be have the sufficient understanding of each subject of study. As a tangible example, it is necessary for everybody to have some superficial knowledge of their body organs to keep them healthy. In other words, to some extentd people who are placed placing in different deferent position in the society should be aware of each other's subject to just meet their personal needs. Moreover, for some serious problems that they may encounter about each field of study it would be more efficient to refer to experts in that field instead of spending a high portion of their life to just learning the ability to solve possible problem that they might not even be faced with it in their whole life. In a nutshell, different persons have different talents which makes made the learning of an academic subject that is matched to their characteristics far much easier for them. What is more, the scope of study fields is are incredibly expanding. Studying and being knowledgeable in such a broad field is too hard or even impossible which that forces academicians to split it in several subfields. Whereas, to some necessary basic level, people should learn about different academic subjects.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Writing Workshop Friday 94.08.01/Single academic subject - Amirehsan.pdf"><img src="http://s6.picofile.com/file/8211445518/pdf_button24.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Many people named the current era as the age of knowledge era based on the proved importance of knowledge and its role. As there are is several number of different fields of study studies, some believe that it would be more efficient for the society and its people to just allocate their limited valuable time to be professional in is just one specific major instead of learning knowledge from of multiple unrelated different subjects. From my stand point, becominge professional in is only one field is the better option on the following grounds. First and foremost, nobody is able to be perfect in every scientific field due to their characteristics. There is a famous sentences that says every person is born a unique talent to be profession in some subject and the duty of that person is to find his matched subject. For instance, I searched about many different academic fields when I was deciding about my major at the university ranging from medicine medical doctor to history and science. Ultimately, I find out that computer engineering is the best match given according to my personalityies and talents. However, my brother got his degree on medicine that made him a successful person. In the second place, today's knowledge in every academic subject is increasing with a high ratio up to this point that experts in an academic subject divide their field of study to some subfields to be able to study the necessary knowledge in just one of them. For example, at the school of computer science in our out university, there are some laboratoriesy that professors who are researching there are totally unaware of each other due to the fact that not only doare they find it impossible to be specialize in all of the subjects in their department, but also somehow they consider them as a different major according to the increasingly grand scale of the knowledge. On the other hand, it is essential for every individual to be have the sufficient understanding of each subject of study. As a tangible example, it is necessary for everybody to have some superficial knowledge of their body organs to keep them healthy. In other words, to some extentd people who are placed placing in different deferent position in the society should be aware of each other's subject to just meet their personal needs. Moreover, for some serious problems that they may encounter about each field of study it would be more efficient to refer to experts in that field instead of spending a high portion of their life to just learning the ability to solve possible problem that they might not even be faced with it in their whole life. In a nutshell, different persons have different talents which makes made the learning of an academic subject that is matched to their characteristics far much easier for them. What is more, the scope of study fields is are incredibly expanding. Studying and being knowledgeable in such a broad field is too hard or even impossible which that forces academicians to split it in several subfields. Whereas, to some necessary basic level, people should learn about different academic subjects.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Part-time Work for Students,Agree or Disagree, Farshad 2015-10-25T14:20:17+00:00 2015-10-25T14:20:17+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/103-fridays-writing-workshop-1394/writing-workshop-friday-94-08-01/395-part-time-work-for-students-agree-or-disagree-farshad <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Writing Workshop Friday 94.08.01/Part-time work for students,agree or disagree, Farshad.pdf"><img src="http://s6.picofile.com/file/8211445518/pdf_button24.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people suggest that children do not understand the world of work and schools should make all teenagers spend a short time working as well as studying academic subjects. To what extant do you agree? In modern educational systems, adding vocational education to theoretical ones has become a priority seeking to ensure a skilled generation which is both knowledgeable and experienced. That is to say, many educational experts and sociologists argue that the more children encounter realistic work conditions, the better they can find their can find their further career and their field of interest as well. To begin with, producing a skillful population which can keep rotate the wheels of industry and economy turning, a large number of authority figures, all over the world, emphasise the impact of a combined study plan which contains equal amounts of theory and practice. They argue practical courses or parttime jobs for pupils may play a major role in improving their genuine talents and lead them to the most suitable area of study according to their personal merits which in turn can be conducive to encouraging rising the motivated workers who are able to work as hard as possible in order to enhance the national economy. For instance, statistics illustrates that students who have graduated from polytechnic high schools are more likely prone to achieve a successful career in comparison to either their humanities or mathematics counterparts. Having said that, however, the main culprit behind dropping out of schools among teenagers is engaging in real economic activities. In other words, students who face independency in the very beginning of their adolescence ages are truly/really in danger with choosing the earning money instead of furthering their education. Thus, not only can this approach be harmful for students' imagination but also about their future. In a nutshell, although it can be encouraging for teenagers to be more serious in their studies if they have a light work schedule, it might be extremely dangerous for their educational process. Were I to choose between the two to options, I would go for banning youngsters from additional activities due to its dire consequences.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Writing Workshop Friday 94.08.01/Part-time work for students,agree or disagree, Farshad.pdf"><img src="http://s6.picofile.com/file/8211445518/pdf_button24.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people suggest that children do not understand the world of work and schools should make all teenagers spend a short time working as well as studying academic subjects. To what extant do you agree? In modern educational systems, adding vocational education to theoretical ones has become a priority seeking to ensure a skilled generation which is both knowledgeable and experienced. That is to say, many educational experts and sociologists argue that the more children encounter realistic work conditions, the better they can find their can find their further career and their field of interest as well. To begin with, producing a skillful population which can keep rotate the wheels of industry and economy turning, a large number of authority figures, all over the world, emphasise the impact of a combined study plan which contains equal amounts of theory and practice. They argue practical courses or parttime jobs for pupils may play a major role in improving their genuine talents and lead them to the most suitable area of study according to their personal merits which in turn can be conducive to encouraging rising the motivated workers who are able to work as hard as possible in order to enhance the national economy. For instance, statistics illustrates that students who have graduated from polytechnic high schools are more likely prone to achieve a successful career in comparison to either their humanities or mathematics counterparts. Having said that, however, the main culprit behind dropping out of schools among teenagers is engaging in real economic activities. In other words, students who face independency in the very beginning of their adolescence ages are truly/really in danger with choosing the earning money instead of furthering their education. Thus, not only can this approach be harmful for students' imagination but also about their future. In a nutshell, although it can be encouraging for teenagers to be more serious in their studies if they have a light work schedule, it might be extremely dangerous for their educational process. Were I to choose between the two to options, I would go for banning youngsters from additional activities due to its dire consequences.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Nature or Nurture, Shahram.html 2015-10-25T14:19:35+00:00 2015-10-25T14:19:35+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/103-fridays-writing-workshop-1394/writing-workshop-friday-94-08-01/394-nature-or-nurture-shahram-html <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Writing Workshop Friday 94.08.01/Nature or nurture, Shahram.pdf"><img src="http://s6.picofile.com/file/8211445518/pdf_button24.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">It is generally believe that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musicians. In this modern life, humans have tried to realize their the source of their aptitude. Some says people have been born with specific abilitiesy and genius. On the other hand, others assert that everybody is able to attain a particular skill when they are in the initial step of their life. There are groups of people who believe humans have genetic differences and they have inherited them from their forbears. These genes render them available to have special talent. For instance, when we mention a successful musician surely we can find another a successful musician or artist in one of her/his ancestors. Not only is talent hereditary, but also unique and just a minority of people can own a particular gift. In contrast, some people folks are of the opinion that people would have any talents and skills if they were taught when they are young child. According to a research carried out by Dr. Hamidian, an anthologist from University of Tehran, children at the in age of between three and six have tremendous ability of learning, so parents can impart any knowledge to their pupils. As an example, Dr. Samee one of the greatest scientists in the world has asserted that in their family there is no doctor or scientist and he is thankful for being taught by parents in his childhood childish period. In my opinion believing talent is heritable deters people from improving their skills and knowledge. Humans' brain is a miracle and it can (perform miracles)(do remarkable feats) do unbelievable things. Acquiring wisdom from initial ages is hundred percent right but I feel sure that we can gain any ability in anytime of our life although it is very difficult.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Writing Workshop Friday 94.08.01/Nature or nurture, Shahram.pdf"><img src="http://s6.picofile.com/file/8211445518/pdf_button24.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">It is generally believe that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musicians. In this modern life, humans have tried to realize their the source of their aptitude. Some says people have been born with specific abilitiesy and genius. On the other hand, others assert that everybody is able to attain a particular skill when they are in the initial step of their life. There are groups of people who believe humans have genetic differences and they have inherited them from their forbears. These genes render them available to have special talent. For instance, when we mention a successful musician surely we can find another a successful musician or artist in one of her/his ancestors. Not only is talent hereditary, but also unique and just a minority of people can own a particular gift. In contrast, some people folks are of the opinion that people would have any talents and skills if they were taught when they are young child. According to a research carried out by Dr. Hamidian, an anthologist from University of Tehran, children at the in age of between three and six have tremendous ability of learning, so parents can impart any knowledge to their pupils. As an example, Dr. Samee one of the greatest scientists in the world has asserted that in their family there is no doctor or scientist and he is thankful for being taught by parents in his childhood childish period. In my opinion believing talent is heritable deters people from improving their skills and knowledge. Humans' brain is a miracle and it can (perform miracles)(do remarkable feats) do unbelievable things. Acquiring wisdom from initial ages is hundred percent right but I feel sure that we can gain any ability in anytime of our life although it is very difficult.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Men and Women Have Different Natural Abilities, Hanieh 2015-10-25T14:19:00+00:00 2015-10-25T14:19:00+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/103-fridays-writing-workshop-1394/writing-workshop-friday-94-08-01/393-men-and-women-have-different-natural-abilities-hanieh <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Writing Workshop Friday 94.08.01/men and women have different natural abilities, Hanieh.pdf"><img src="http://s6.picofile.com/file/8211445518/pdf_button24.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people think men and women have different natural abilities that make them suitable for different types of work. Others however believe that both men and women can be equally suited to do any type of work. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Differences between men and women have been always a debatable issue. There are a couple of popular attitudes, each of which has a separate trend. The First one is the traditional approach which considers women as a weaker creature with limited abilities. This group believes women could simply take responsibility which involves household chores, caring and teaching. They think the differences in genetic and physical abilities would limit women's performance in all aspects of life and job and occupation is no exception. They think not only do not they not take and complete tough responsibilities, but also they might make stressful life for them and therefore they couldn't even do their key roles such as being a mother that is peculiar to them. They consider women as they were in the past and do some chores in the house and believe the sensitive nature of women may not be proper for jobs which involve sensible deciding in tough and complicated situations. In contrary to first attitude, some others believe there is no restriction for women to choose their job and responsibilities. They believe that in spite of gender differences different gender, people should be selected for occupations based on their merits. They cite different kinds of responsibility that women took part in industrial revolution and have major roles in developing countries. Furthermore, there are lots of women with high inner capacity and physical abilities even more than men. On the other hand, this group believes in this rapidly changing world all members of society should have cooperation for making progress and women form a large proportion of the population and could have major part in this matter. In conclusion, there are two different views for women with regard to their jobs. Some believe women could accomplish responsibilities which do not need high physical abilities ,while others believe there is not exact limitation for different genders. I do believe women like men have the ability to accomplish all responsibilities they have accepted but it is better to focus on jobs and responsibilities that are closer to their natures and abilities ablilities for being outstanding in their occupations and have a the society with the most productivity.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Writing Workshop Friday 94.08.01/men and women have different natural abilities, Hanieh.pdf"><img src="http://s6.picofile.com/file/8211445518/pdf_button24.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people think men and women have different natural abilities that make them suitable for different types of work. Others however believe that both men and women can be equally suited to do any type of work. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Differences between men and women have been always a debatable issue. There are a couple of popular attitudes, each of which has a separate trend. The First one is the traditional approach which considers women as a weaker creature with limited abilities. This group believes women could simply take responsibility which involves household chores, caring and teaching. They think the differences in genetic and physical abilities would limit women's performance in all aspects of life and job and occupation is no exception. They think not only do not they not take and complete tough responsibilities, but also they might make stressful life for them and therefore they couldn't even do their key roles such as being a mother that is peculiar to them. They consider women as they were in the past and do some chores in the house and believe the sensitive nature of women may not be proper for jobs which involve sensible deciding in tough and complicated situations. In contrary to first attitude, some others believe there is no restriction for women to choose their job and responsibilities. They believe that in spite of gender differences different gender, people should be selected for occupations based on their merits. They cite different kinds of responsibility that women took part in industrial revolution and have major roles in developing countries. Furthermore, there are lots of women with high inner capacity and physical abilities even more than men. On the other hand, this group believes in this rapidly changing world all members of society should have cooperation for making progress and women form a large proportion of the population and could have major part in this matter. In conclusion, there are two different views for women with regard to their jobs. Some believe women could accomplish responsibilities which do not need high physical abilities ,while others believe there is not exact limitation for different genders. I do believe women like men have the ability to accomplish all responsibilities they have accepted but it is better to focus on jobs and responsibilities that are closer to their natures and abilities ablilities for being outstanding in their occupations and have a the society with the most productivity.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Media for Communicating Information, Sepideh 2015-10-25T14:18:19+00:00 2015-10-25T14:18:19+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/103-fridays-writing-workshop-1394/writing-workshop-friday-94-08-01/392-media-for-communicating-information-sepideh <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Writing Workshop Friday 94.08.01/Media for communicating information, Sepideh.pdf"><img src="http://s6.picofile.com/file/8211445518/pdf_button24.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">In our daily life information plays a vital role and access to the newest information is the most important in the information age, with the fast space of technologicaly development there is are more and more circulatione of information, so there are types of tools which can help us to gain the data that what we need for/in our to daily life. In my opinion, three of one's (them) are is the most effective in our life;. Books, radio and TV. Obviously all of them are not totally influential influence and they have some advantages and disadvantages. First of all, I prefer to talk about books which . Books are the oldest transmitting information in that from that they are tremendous treasure that why almost all of them are gathered with people's experience that are passed to the new generation. Although there are very few drawbacks to of books, producing books needs to cut down trees. Moreover, reading books may make us to feel bored boring because why it is quite silent offline and do not doesn't have any visual and sound sense. In comparcomparison withe books, TV and radio could be more attractive and their audiences are more. Radio is helpful in to accessing news when we are outdoor and keen on to knowing online news especially online news and current events that occur accurse in the world. Furthermore, radio is compared to TV. it is handy and people can carry it around them. In spite of aforementioned benefits, the electricity could be one of disadvantages draw sides if they want to use it at different periods legend of time the battery cannot support it and having electricity power will be necessary. Finally the last option which is more popular among people is TV. Although Nevertheless it is not my favor tool, but these days we find rarely a house that is not equipped with doesn't accommodate with TV. Television has visual and sound senses. In addition, a variety of channels could increase audience who are in widespread categories. In fact TV can be useful for educational and entertainment. However, the disadvantages of using TV outweigh is overweight its advantages. It usually brings the message which it wants and kids and young people would like to imitate their behavior that is shown has showed on in it. Sometimes smoking is assumeds a smart habit. Also very few people know what they want and almost all people waste time without following any purpose. In conclusion of, commuting information media/tools have both prone pros and cons, so on in order to solve within them we have these problems. We must learn to use them with correctly ways and avoiding becoming addicteding to them. Sepideh</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Writing Workshop Friday 94.08.01/Media for communicating information, Sepideh.pdf"><img src="http://s6.picofile.com/file/8211445518/pdf_button24.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">In our daily life information plays a vital role and access to the newest information is the most important in the information age, with the fast space of technologicaly development there is are more and more circulatione of information, so there are types of tools which can help us to gain the data that what we need for/in our to daily life. In my opinion, three of one's (them) are is the most effective in our life;. Books, radio and TV. Obviously all of them are not totally influential influence and they have some advantages and disadvantages. First of all, I prefer to talk about books which . Books are the oldest transmitting information in that from that they are tremendous treasure that why almost all of them are gathered with people's experience that are passed to the new generation. Although there are very few drawbacks to of books, producing books needs to cut down trees. Moreover, reading books may make us to feel bored boring because why it is quite silent offline and do not doesn't have any visual and sound sense. In comparcomparison withe books, TV and radio could be more attractive and their audiences are more. Radio is helpful in to accessing news when we are outdoor and keen on to knowing online news especially online news and current events that occur accurse in the world. Furthermore, radio is compared to TV. it is handy and people can carry it around them. In spite of aforementioned benefits, the electricity could be one of disadvantages draw sides if they want to use it at different periods legend of time the battery cannot support it and having electricity power will be necessary. Finally the last option which is more popular among people is TV. Although Nevertheless it is not my favor tool, but these days we find rarely a house that is not equipped with doesn't accommodate with TV. Television has visual and sound senses. In addition, a variety of channels could increase audience who are in widespread categories. In fact TV can be useful for educational and entertainment. However, the disadvantages of using TV outweigh is overweight its advantages. It usually brings the message which it wants and kids and young people would like to imitate their behavior that is shown has showed on in it. Sometimes smoking is assumeds a smart habit. Also very few people know what they want and almost all people waste time without following any purpose. In conclusion of, commuting information media/tools have both prone pros and cons, so on in order to solve within them we have these problems. We must learn to use them with correctly ways and avoiding becoming addicteding to them. Sepideh</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Life-Story by Barth, Masoumeh 2015-10-25T14:17:48+00:00 2015-10-25T14:17:48+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/103-fridays-writing-workshop-1394/writing-workshop-friday-94-08-01/391-life-story-by-barth-masoumeh <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Writing Workshop Friday 94.08.01/life-story by Barth, Masoumeh.pdf"><img src="http://s6.picofile.com/file/8211445518/pdf_button24.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Critical Survey and a Glance of Existential on "Life‐Story" by John Barth John Barth's life‐story is a fiction of the post modernist period which provides the readers with the depiction of existentialismt. John Barth's life‐story is talking about how a writer is creating his works. On the other hand, it is discussing the novel creation itself. Actually, this writer's writing refers to development of the novel itself. This paper offers a small little opportunity to highlight how John Barth's life‐story offers a critical assessment of existentialismt by applying sartre's book "being Benig and nothingness."According to the sSartre who that believes in the essential freedom of individuals and also believes that as a beings people are themselves responsible for all elements of themselves and this freedom sometimes leads to absurdity. Sartre explains that as a conscious being, the for‐itself school recognizes what it is not: it is not a being in itself. Through the awareness of what it is not, the for‐ itself becomes what it is: a nothingness, wholly free in the world, with a blank canvas on which to create its being. Based on this view, in Barth's life‐story, the narrator intrudes himself between the reader and the work of art, writing about the writing process itself. It is not verisimilitude but the very artificiality ly of fiction that Barth wishes to convey. Professor Wildman has remarked that, "Existentialism can be thought of as the twentieth century analogue of nineteenth century Romanticism ." kKierkegard, he has been called the father of existentialism. Existentialism is typically focused on individual, human lives, suffering , and choice for individual. In existentialism always anxiety and freedom are together. Anxiety is defined as the result of a response to anything that threatens the freedom, Bbut paradoxically freedom is deliberately leads to choosing his anxiety. From what has been discussed above, when Barth reviewed his long introduction, he said to himself, what a dreadful dready way to beginan a story, it shows the importance important of choice that he had , and with this choice he reached to anxiety. This choice and anxiety are themes that list by existentialism. Moreover, life‐story represents a story within story structure. In this story the narrator imagine that his life is a story and he himself is an imaginary character in the story. Hence, this leading question that how an individual is important: the importancet of individualism is another theme of Existentialism. in addition,. had he written for his reader's sake? there is a suspense. This question reminds us of another theme of Existentialism "the importancet of personal relation." "Concluding these reflection he conclude these reflection: that there was at this advanced page still apparently no ground‐situation suggested that his story was dramatically meaningless" (life‐story 6). At a the result, the narrator decided to tell his tale from start to finish in a conservative, realistic, unselfconscious way. The unconsciousness of the narrator not only makes his narrative unreliable, but also sheds doubts on the authenticity ally of one's own awareness.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Writing Workshop Friday 94.08.01/life-story by Barth, Masoumeh.pdf"><img src="http://s6.picofile.com/file/8211445518/pdf_button24.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Critical Survey and a Glance of Existential on "Life‐Story" by John Barth John Barth's life‐story is a fiction of the post modernist period which provides the readers with the depiction of existentialismt. John Barth's life‐story is talking about how a writer is creating his works. On the other hand, it is discussing the novel creation itself. Actually, this writer's writing refers to development of the novel itself. This paper offers a small little opportunity to highlight how John Barth's life‐story offers a critical assessment of existentialismt by applying sartre's book "being Benig and nothingness."According to the sSartre who that believes in the essential freedom of individuals and also believes that as a beings people are themselves responsible for all elements of themselves and this freedom sometimes leads to absurdity. Sartre explains that as a conscious being, the for‐itself school recognizes what it is not: it is not a being in itself. Through the awareness of what it is not, the for‐ itself becomes what it is: a nothingness, wholly free in the world, with a blank canvas on which to create its being. Based on this view, in Barth's life‐story, the narrator intrudes himself between the reader and the work of art, writing about the writing process itself. It is not verisimilitude but the very artificiality ly of fiction that Barth wishes to convey. Professor Wildman has remarked that, "Existentialism can be thought of as the twentieth century analogue of nineteenth century Romanticism ." kKierkegard, he has been called the father of existentialism. Existentialism is typically focused on individual, human lives, suffering , and choice for individual. In existentialism always anxiety and freedom are together. Anxiety is defined as the result of a response to anything that threatens the freedom, Bbut paradoxically freedom is deliberately leads to choosing his anxiety. From what has been discussed above, when Barth reviewed his long introduction, he said to himself, what a dreadful dready way to beginan a story, it shows the importance important of choice that he had , and with this choice he reached to anxiety. This choice and anxiety are themes that list by existentialism. Moreover, life‐story represents a story within story structure. In this story the narrator imagine that his life is a story and he himself is an imaginary character in the story. Hence, this leading question that how an individual is important: the importancet of individualism is another theme of Existentialism. in addition,. had he written for his reader's sake? there is a suspense. This question reminds us of another theme of Existentialism "the importancet of personal relation." "Concluding these reflection he conclude these reflection: that there was at this advanced page still apparently no ground‐situation suggested that his story was dramatically meaningless" (life‐story 6). At a the result, the narrator decided to tell his tale from start to finish in a conservative, realistic, unselfconscious way. The unconsciousness of the narrator not only makes his narrative unreliable, but also sheds doubts on the authenticity ally of one's own awareness.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Higher Education for Good Students, Sahar 2015-10-25T14:17:07+00:00 2015-10-25T14:17:07+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/103-fridays-writing-workshop-1394/writing-workshop-friday-94-08-01/390-higher-education-for-good-students-sahar <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Writing Workshop Friday 94.08.01/Higher education for good students, Sahar.pdf"><img src="http://s6.picofile.com/file/8211445518/pdf_button24.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people believe that a college or university education should be available to all students. Others believe that higher education should be available only to good students. Some people argue as if it is a general truth that higher education should be available only to good students, but to be frank, I cannot agree with them. There are numerous reasons why I have no confidence in them, and I would explore only a few primary ones here. The main problem with this argument is that it is ignorant of the basic fact that every single one has a right to study, otherwise it will be considered discrimination and also infringement of human rights .Moreover, instead of In spite of labelling students undeserving of entitling students for not being able to get higher education, the college or university can impose some restrictions on the ones without good grades. There can be some courses as prerequisites ones that students with lower grades are obliged to pass. Another reason why I disagree with the above statement is that I believe that no one is eligible to label students as good or bad. Maybe, they have good talents and abilities for studying, but they haven't found the opportunity space to demonstrate their capacities. Say, for example, when I was in high school, I wasn't doing well at physics but instead I was very good at math. Furthermore, at that level, teachers favoured physics over math. Consequently, I was labelled as an average student. Later on, when I began studying at university at mechanical engineering, I was at the top of the class, Thanks to my math so I worked on my shortcomings in physics. Last but not least, in my opinion Universities should put in place some share as tuition for the students with lower grades while introducing putting some share as scholarships for the ones with upper grades. I think this is the only way that studying will be fair and everybody will have a chance to study and build a better future for themselves and this condition is on the shoulder of universities to create an atmosphere in which everybody has an equal right to study. To sum up, students whether either good or bad should have an equal chance to study, since it provides them with equality against discrimination. Students may have different talents and shouldn't be judged from one aspect of their grades. It is also fair that universities allocate some student loans to good grades and instead set some more tuition for lower grades. I hope in future every student whether with good or bad grades has a right to further studying.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Writing Workshop Friday 94.08.01/Higher education for good students, Sahar.pdf"><img src="http://s6.picofile.com/file/8211445518/pdf_button24.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people believe that a college or university education should be available to all students. Others believe that higher education should be available only to good students. Some people argue as if it is a general truth that higher education should be available only to good students, but to be frank, I cannot agree with them. There are numerous reasons why I have no confidence in them, and I would explore only a few primary ones here. The main problem with this argument is that it is ignorant of the basic fact that every single one has a right to study, otherwise it will be considered discrimination and also infringement of human rights .Moreover, instead of In spite of labelling students undeserving of entitling students for not being able to get higher education, the college or university can impose some restrictions on the ones without good grades. There can be some courses as prerequisites ones that students with lower grades are obliged to pass. Another reason why I disagree with the above statement is that I believe that no one is eligible to label students as good or bad. Maybe, they have good talents and abilities for studying, but they haven't found the opportunity space to demonstrate their capacities. Say, for example, when I was in high school, I wasn't doing well at physics but instead I was very good at math. Furthermore, at that level, teachers favoured physics over math. Consequently, I was labelled as an average student. Later on, when I began studying at university at mechanical engineering, I was at the top of the class, Thanks to my math so I worked on my shortcomings in physics. Last but not least, in my opinion Universities should put in place some share as tuition for the students with lower grades while introducing putting some share as scholarships for the ones with upper grades. I think this is the only way that studying will be fair and everybody will have a chance to study and build a better future for themselves and this condition is on the shoulder of universities to create an atmosphere in which everybody has an equal right to study. To sum up, students whether either good or bad should have an equal chance to study, since it provides them with equality against discrimination. Students may have different talents and shouldn't be judged from one aspect of their grades. It is also fair that universities allocate some student loans to good grades and instead set some more tuition for lower grades. I hope in future every student whether with good or bad grades has a right to further studying.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table>