جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Which would you choosea highpaying job with long hours that would give you little time with family and friends or a lowerpaying job with shorter hours that would give you more time with family and friends? 1‐ High paying jobs for lower ages for saving and provision god life for offspring. 2‐ Draw sufficient pension for old ages 3‐ High inflation and the probability of being jobless Taking up a well‐paid careers has a pivotal role in qualifications of our lives. Meanwhile it requires vigorous determination and even academic expertise. From what has been discussed, some prefer to have an ordinary lifestyle and have more leisure time for mingling with their family and friends instead, as opposed to this belief, some people maintain/argue/hold/sayspeak up only a hard‐working person can please an otherwise monotonous everyday activity activities. I myself maintain that a high‐paying job is an inseparable condition of a comfortable life. In the first place, it is up to us to either undergo working for long hours in the span of our youth and having a more comfortable life when we get senescent or bearing bear a harsh situation in aging years. Furthermore, the substantial point is not only do we have commitment to ourselves, also tranquility of individuals who are under our charge can even have more importance. For instance, how can we expect to have successful and cheerful children without provision of their crucial emotional needs? In other words, the parents' wages have inextricable connection with the quality qualities of the children's life environment. Secondly, in our contemporary world, various professions become complicated more and more and this requires us to keep abreast of every novel progress and information in a definite specialty. Therefore, we will lose our jobs unless we devote more time for reading and tackling with new phenomenaon like the advent of software and launching automated apparatus. Then, although we may be satisfied with a mediocre income with shorter hours, it is sounds plausible that we become jobless with the passage of time. And finally, as for another advantage of working hard, we can mention to fulfilling humans' appetite for learning. I would like to stress that one of the most axiomatic factors of numerous inventions and advancements is a sense of adventure and perfectionism. On the other hand, contrary to popular belief, we carry out different affairs not for more money or perks per se. on occasion, a sense of usefulness and efficiency is a motive for extra work. All in all, I believe that the drawbacks of the jobs with lower payments and shorter time are more than their merits. As it mentioned above, almost the solitary way to keep us and our family in comfort luxury is dedication of more time to work. In addition, in our modern world, we will lose even those careers not needinged any sophisticated specialty, if we do not spendt time for keeping up with their recent developments/amendments (advances/advancements). Finally, we carry out/shoulder/fulfil/do some duties owing to they are rewarding

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people say that the best way to iprove public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities.others,however,say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.  These days, the level of public health in modern societies has have decreased more than pervious years. Some believe in to providinge many sport facilities to improve public health but others think it would have little effect on their health. Now I would like to discuss it in more depth.  To many, stressful working conditions and sedentary lifestyles cause that physical activity to has declined from our issues and leisure leisures. Basically, sport facilities create is constructed many desirability for different age groups ages so families can utilize many tools which are present posited in the district localities and parks. Not only are they is it efficient to use, but also they are has available for all.  Certainly ,one of the reasonable factors is variety veriety of sport facilities facelities if we recall recollest school times when some particular sports were imposed on to us but we preferred would liked to select different ones.That attitude would was offended kids. Meanwhile,it is possible to provide many pleasing conditions for them. They are not interested in into wastinge time in front of TV while playing a soccer match is more attractive attractiver. In addition, to many, our recent lifestyles and time constraint/limited time little times have caused us not to that we did not consider pros and cons. We have junk food and fast food incontrast with nutritious nutriation meals which are cooked in the house.  Another important consideration is related to public transports. On the In other hand ,we would rather drive a car although we realize using public transport is beneficial for us. All of these have harmful effects on our well‐being.  In my view, although not only are they are attractive enthusiasm equipments but also they are not sufficient or enough.It can be justified as a good points. however, ways of life plays a vital roles in public health increasingly. 267 words Too stressful a condition

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Many people have complained about the large salaries paid to top executives of major companies.Why do you think top executive are well paid?Do you think their large salaries are justified? One of the most important and challenging issues in life is finding a decent job with proper income. Despite some exception, salaries would depend on the level of education, skill and experience that one has gained. Moreover, it is important how either the occupation or the skills and ability would be beneficial for society or how rare are those people who can perform such duties. the numbers of people which accomplish the responsibility are scarce. Many believe that since top managers play a vital role in company's progress, their salaries are expected to be at the higher economic scale. Furthermore, occupations as managing the companies especially multifunctional companies includinge large numbers of different employees with different levels of hierarchy are not comparable with other responsibilitiesy in the companies. Top executive managers are required to make decisions in critical seconds, take all matters into consideration for their decisions and tackle with problems in challenges which all involves a wide/vast variety of skills, experience, knowledge and characteristics that hardly would be found find in a person. As a result, payment should be commensurate with this responsibility should be paid enough that balances its harshness. Hence, managers not only are paid for their skills and experience but also for the their complexity of their performance. On the other hand, Some others believe for the best performance in a company, both executive managers and employees should do their best. without high performance of other employees, managers couldn't be successful and paying approximately 10 times more than other employees may not be fair which and would penalize others who and may develop have very bad negative attitudes on them leading which leads to lower productivity in the company. To sum up, it is true that high‐level managers should be paid much more than other employees regarding to the tough situation that they would face in their job, but it should be considered that managers could accomplish their mission with cooperation of other employees. I truly believe that while managers have a very critical role in to improvinge the company and that their salaries should be high enough to encourage them to make their effort, a balance should be taken into consideration for the satisfaction of all members

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not in others. Some people therefore think that government should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society. Those who choose to study less relevant subjects should not receive government funding. Would the advantages of such an educational policy outweigh the disadvantages? Administrations, all over the world, dedicate a certain amount of budget for supporting students with genuine talents in various fields. Having said that, concentrating on the real demands of the community, a host of experts point out that investing in those fields that are not practical in status quo cannot be fair enough for the country as a whole. Nevertheless, they do not keep this issue in perspective very well. To begin with, advocates of appropriating an educational budget to funding students with for highly demanded fields of interest cite that not only can this approach lead society to an organized plan for creating a professional generation, but also it may encourage students to attempt harder and accelerate the trend of progress. That is to say, students who grant scholarships for the government are both potential for not too distant a future and current skilled workers who service their society. For instance, these kinds of students in our country upon graduation are committed to work for the government in the certain areas that they have studied. In stark contrast, with many authority figures emphasizinge limited courses which they regard as more beneficial ones, a multitude of students with real aptitudes may be neglected which in turn can be conducive to a free fall in other fields of knowledge. Another point that should be made here is the likelihood of altering the community's requirements in near future. In other words, although some areas of studyies seem not so crucial for current circumstances, they may change to highly required ones one day. To make an example, arts were really unwanted fields a century ago in our region, though nowadays they are suitable spaces for presenting our culture to the world. In a nutshell, were I to choose between limiting and broadening governmental financial funds, I would go for the latter since it can be lead to better consequences

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Critical Perspective on "The Enormous Radio" by John Cheever this paper offers an opportunity to recognized John Cheever as one of the most important writers of the twentieth century .John Cheever in " The Enormous Radio" discusses the difficulties of mid‐twentieth marriages for reaching prosperity. The writer introduces to the reader a typical ,ordinary couple, the Wwestcotte, and gives us information about their lives. According to Althusser, a person's desires, choices, intentions, preferences, judgements, so forth are the products of social practices, he believes it is in necessary to conceive of how society makes the individual in its own image. Within capitalist societies, the human individual is generally regarded as a subject. Besides this , it is important to remind that, writer wants to explore some secret and theme for us. The story focuses on two major characters, Jim and Irene Westcott, an average couple that their fondness for music and harmony. When their radio breaks down, Jim buys another as a gift for his wife. Irene considered new radio ugly with gumwood cabinet. She was also said that the radio would will not suit/match/become fit with the decor that she had in her living room. Moreover, when she wanted to hear music ,instead she heard hear ringing telephone conversation and the quarrels of her neighbors, on the other hand, the writer explores the theme of privacy in the story. In Althusser's view, our values, desires ,and preferences are inculcated in us by ideological practice, the sphere which has the defining property of constituting individuals as subjects. Ideological practice consists of an assortment of institution called" Ideological State Apparantuses" ,which includes the family, the media, the religious organization, and most importantly in a capitalist society, the education system ,as well as the received ideas that they propagate. The broadcast of music to many apartments creates the impression that many married couples seem like the westcotte in their tastes, manner, clothes but unhappy and frustrated with their lives and with each other. Even they forget about their relationship with by depending on the radio. When the radio got a little role in on their lives, they focus on significant problems that they have had. Fixing the radio has had cost four hundred dollars and Jim tells Irene that he cannot really afford it. It highlights to the reader that not only are the Westcotts's financially strained strianed but they are beginning to lose control of their finances. Although the story begins as a work of realism, but the plot and theme can be interpreted allegorically." The Enormous Radio" cam be seen as a retelling of a biblical story of man's fall from the innocence and expulsion from the Garden of Eden, in this case, the American Garden of middle‐class responsibility. In exposing Irene, the writer exposes the underside of American life that she and her husband represent. The confrontations of their middle‐class life cannot protect the individual against either the evil in the world or the evil in oneself. To Sum up, Althusser argues that many of our roles and activities are given to us by social practice. Jim starts to list Irene's secrets, the reader learnsing that she has stolen from her sister and that she had an abortion. Thus, I would argue that Jim and Irene's life contain many problems and dark secrets as their neighbours' lives. Some time Sometime Sometimes

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. What are your opinions on this? In the history of mankind, possibly no century has witnessed a bigger concern about children than does the 21st century does. However, people in harsh economic climates are increasingly interested in their child to contribute them to the family income., it is hard to judge whether paidpay‐work for a child is wrong or valuable. In recent years, owing to economic troubles after the global recession, many children repetitively do arduous tasks, such as hard work in a factory production line instead of more appropriate jobs like home services for elderlies. Undoubtedly, the paramount issue is the nature of the job for children. However, there is a growing recognition to use services of children simply to save more money by paying them less than adults among employees. Therefore, this is an exploitation that it should be discouraged. One might argue that, roughly engaging with hard work circumstances is an educational situation for children. This view point is flawed. If learning responsibility and work experience experiment are considered to be crucial, children can acquire these by having light part‐ time jobs like helping parents in household chores. Thereby, they can enjoy their non‐compulsory activities and didactically learn tasks for their own future simultaneously. As shown above, to use children for full‐time pay work owing to more benefits by employer is an indicator of child‐abuse because not only is are children suffering, but also hard works does not contribute any valuable experiences to children. In addition, during better economic circumstances/conditions children can do light tasks to become competent citizens in future. Therefore, I morally believe that adults must drastically defend their children against rough circumstances such as full‐time paidpay‐ work.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In this day and age, the relations between people are undergoing many changes because of the technological enhancements. These improvements can be evaluated both positively and negatively according to the ways in which these alterations may occur. First and foremost, discussing the modern relationships, the primary outcome of technological growth is undoubtedly the emergence of virtual social and communicational networks which have has revolutionized and redefined the concept of relations among people. This trend can be considered positive in terms of the quantity of the persons one may communicate with,. in some cases however, it can degrade the quality of interactions with others. For instance, being on fFacebook may provide the possibility of communicatinge to a sheer number of virtual and real friends, although however, it can diminish the quality of the relations with beloved friends and confine it to virtual words written on their walls and private messages and consequently prevent them from having face to face conversation. Such a trend can be evaluated positively for those people (who are) living far from their family and friends as it decreases the sense of loneliness and homesickness. The other key impact of technological improvements on modern relations is the/this fact that because of technology people tend to lead sedentary and hectic lifestyles so that they get too busy to interact with their friends or family. One of the direct consequences of such a pervasive attitude is that people drift apart gradually. In a nutshell, the effect of technology on relations according to these facts as to that how people utilize it, , and who and in what context they are is influenced by and eventually whether their relations have become over‐dependent on technology or not, can be assessed as either a positive or negative trend.