جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing a game is fun when you win. 1‐ Learn to enjoy from process not outcome 2‐ learn us everything cannot end up with win and learning not disappointed or be sad 3‐ encourage to try again As of the dawn of the time, humanity has have had their own recreations, and since the human is an idealist creature, he often prefers to win a specific game. Having said that, being inclined to win should not deprive a person of to enjoying from a play or even a contest. First and foremost, not only does losing a game not mean a failure, but rather also we will learn to be pleased with the process of doing an activity, not just from the result. Most of the time, all of us assign some objectives and we should encounter diverse hurdles and pitfalls, whereas the odds are against the achievement of that goal. Notwithstanding the adverse probabilities, playing a game just as same as real life has two sides spectrum and we should learn to enjoy it anyway (though). Secondly, one of the indisputable advantages of playing a game is we can notice that every defeat teaches us to eliminate that definite variable causing loss. As an example, Thomas Edison did one thousand experiments in the direction of invention of a light bulb and he wrote in his diary that every failure helped him me to become close approximate to triumph. On the other hand, although losing a game is undesirable, it teaches us not to not surrender and continue up until victory is won/achieved/secured blooms (appear) And last but not least, occasionally, the alternation between a victory and failure livens ed up an otherwise monotonous regularity. The contemporary psychologists have concluded that every person should face their fear of being a loser. It is worth bearing in mind that, without experience of a loss, we cannot enjoy the delight and honor of a win. To put it in a nutshell, I maintain that the process of playing a game can be more favorable in comparison to the result. Furthermore, sometimes losing a game teaches us to combat our fright and encourages us to be more tenacious.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. More and more in the last 20 years ago the number of students has been increased significantly, while some people assert that students must be allowed to select their courses, others oppose this view and agree that authority figures must make a decision for students' books and courses. Conspicuousclearly/obviously, in this essay I will discuss both views and then I will give my own idea. People who passionately endorse the first view claim that students must know everything, not only does it helps to be up‐to‐date but also it enhances their wisdom. They are trying to say that students are capable of choosing to choose their own way and we cannot force them to study limited books. However, the first view undoubtedly with no doubt faces a lot of opposition by the individuals who believes that only science and technology and related books can save the students' life.by this they mean for being a specialist and finding a sufficient position in future, only related books are useful and extra books or whatever students like can be a waste of their time and take them away from their goals. Hence, it is better for students to use their time and effort reading appropriate books according to their field of study. Should I not be influenced by taking sides, it seems that a mixture of both views can work better. I am of at the opinion that they must have some mandatoryies/(elective/required) courses and some optional ones and someone must supervise them. A some practical disinterested advice to heed is to lead lid them to their target. To put it in a nut shell, we are all human and everyone has have the authority to choose their destination and find the best way to improve. We have the ability to offer them to find a logical way.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Does travel help to promote understanding and communication between countries? Every year a new rash of enthusiastic people go on a journey to other countries either for business or either for leisure .The tourism experts cites the a couples of major contributors to this phenomenon from Cheap and safe Transportation to the internet and mass media development.Whatever the causes are, I would like to focus more on one of the most prominent effects of going on an international trip, namely reciprocating and mutual insight between countries. First and foremost, for most, some consider tourists as the potential cultural ambassadors.no matter how long your trip lasts, you have to interact with locals and this leads to sharing what we know as the social experience. For instance you would like to buy a handy handicraft as a souvenir., certainly you will need to know more about the cultural features of your purchase to make it more sensible and as you have access to local people, it does make sense (and I personally believe is the most reliable way) to receive information about your hypothetical handmade commodity from them .Moreover, you will learn how people from other countries reach cut a deal or bargain for it. Secondly, economists maintain that tourism creates financial bonds between the host countries and their guests, resulting in implementation of rewarding business relationships between both sides. In the other words tourism triggers economic incentives motives and it convinces people to put much more effort into knowing each other, otherwise it would be impossible for them to establish an advancing and enduring commercial cooperation. To sum up, among all significant and innumerous approaches to of travelling around, it is obvious that strengthening international connections is the most valuable and praised one.it basically prevents nonsense quarrels between nations and in the event of case of occurring an unfortunate conflict they can resolve their issues/differences more effectively due to reciprocal comprehension and frequent relation between people.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. Who wants to be told something rather than the straightforward truth? The answer to the question is quite obvious since everyone either a young person or an adult, man or woman, and literate or illiterate averts telling or to being told a lie. Although in some certain, limited yet delicate situations in which telling the truth may harm precious relations between people involved with the interaction among them, telling the truth may be preferred by the majority of people. In the shadow of the relaetively plain introduction, as far as I am personally concerned, I subscribe to the view that I prefer telling the truth, in light of the following statements reasoning the truth is most important consideration in any relationship between people. First and foremost, reality is the unique valuable consideration in relations associated with business and economy where the people whose profits include the relation may benefit or be harmed. Hence, in the government, there is are inordinate legislation against those who take make action with any decceptive intent to defraud the public or any other association assocition. In the same way, the relations among the employees as well as the boss and employees must be lying lie based on in truth turth according to base on which everyone trusts each other. In the second place, as anyone may acknowledge, telling the truth is not only important in the work environment, but also among family members each of which may enjoy the atmosphere in which everybody avoids deceiving anybody else. Considering the family in which the members who comprise it, the husband continues to conceal some issues/matters features in his life, important or not, willfully or ignorantly, and even with moral intent or not, and in the same manner for the wife, it is no accident that such a family will definitely not definetly remain stable for a long time. Third, in consents where two or more people are involved in some kind of competition, telling the truth is not only the most important measure but also in many cases may be quite crucial. For example, suppose the athlete whose intent may lie in being successful in an international competition, in spite of stress, he or she should not use illegal drugs to cover his or her drawbacks, otherwise there are some strict laws against such an athlete and he or she will be defineitely deprived of any other competition in the world. Consequently, in my opinion, almost all the people cherish telling the truth in any environment.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

You have been told that dormitory rooms at your university must be shared by two students. Would you rather have the university assign a student to share a room with you, or would you rather choose your own roommate During of studying in university, the students are separated from their families for the first time and staying in a new place. Unfortunately, the most of dormitoriesy have limited facility .therefore, I prefer to choose my own roommate. Firstly, she must be close to my culture, and taste .secondly, ; we can share responsibilities and duties. Finally, we can help each other in lesson. When you live in a dormitory, maybe you have a problem because you live in a new city with a different culture and being away from your family for the first time. on the other hand, people have different opinions about something even this is 's/ it's true for two Childrens in the family so I prefer to live with my friend, my classmate or anybody who is close to my culture and I am familiar with her manner and behavior. The dormitory leads to fundamental changes in students' life. You can share responsibility such as cleaning the room, cooking, household shopping,. maybe this is the best advantage of having a good roommate, especially when you have an exam or you are sick. on the other hand, these will prepare you for the future. My Your roommate can help me you with in my your lessons or we work together on a paper because we have a lot of time for studying and researching at home in our subject. Therefore, we can be more successful in university .According to a the research in a dormitory, the students who live with their classmates are more successful than other students. In a nutshell, I personally believe that my roommate inadvertently unwanted have a huge impact on me in during of studying in university. Therefore, I prefer her to be close to my culture.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In recent years some countries have experienced very rapid economic development. This has resulted in much higher standards of living in urban areas but not in the countryside. This situation may bring some problems for the country as a whole. What are these problems? How might they be reduced? Some people believe that always economic development is an outstanding point for each country .Not only does it provide standard requirements , but also improves of the level of living. In the same way, lots of countries have economic problems but it was not related to lack luck of budgets or many limitations .Sometimes economic growth creates troubles .In recent years governmental headquarters have experienced economic development in urban areas but not in the countryside . under this circumstance ,some problems happen .I would like to discuss them it in more depth. Basically, when economic gains appears in urban areas every facilityies , resources ,factoryies and offices is transferred to these this parts gradually steadily. The first problem will be clear;, "increasing populations". So public has been keen to stay and live in urban areas, and then heavy traffic will annoy people who are were waiting behind of the red light for a long time. Another difficulty hardship action that is felt is was pollution. Air pollution comes about came around and accompaniesy us .Also, the environment falls into a dangerous situation. Moreover, some diseases for instance Asthma , and tuberculosis have developed created because of this changing. Apart from that ,the level of income and product 's prices has have not been balanced. people who earn a low income money decided to move to the countryside where /in which goods or house rents of houses are in a better situation. After all, unfortunately the area will be divided into two 2 groups. One of the most effective problems is Cclass differences. Not only does it have has it lots of disadvantages for on public behavior public, but also decreases measures of economic developments In conclusion, when the countries want to develop their economy, they must consider all the problems that might be happened in both major cities and the countryside. The government offers poor services to the countryside and not only does it not provide decent facilities for them but also deprives them of several public facilities.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Many parents use punishment to teach the difference between right and wrong to kids. Many people think punishment is necessary to help children learn the distinction. nowadays, the main priority of parents is to teach their children the ability of making distinction between right and wrong. Meanwhile, some opt for the easier way "punishment" to achieve their goal . Now a query requiring to be raised is whether punishment is basically an the efficient method or not. punishment can take a variety of forms from verbal ‐ being taunted or called hurtful names‐ to physical‐ being kicked or shoved‐ as well as indirect forms , such as being excluded from social groups or being deprived of their favourite activities. punishment is clearly unpleasant and can make a child feeling unworthy and depressed. In the extreme cases, it may lead to suicide, although it is thankfully rare. not only are victimised children more likely to experience difficulties with interpersonal relationships as adults, but also more prone to grow physically violent and convicted of anti‐social offences. Due to the drawbacks which mentioned above, some believe that under no circumstance circumastence should parents not be allowed to mete out physical punishment for any reason. On the other hand, the proponents of this approach assert that some sorts of penalization are absolutely necessary for training children to accept responsibility for their mistakes. Punishment is a decent method to teach the concept of right and wrong. However, it must be used with caution, such that for minor offences they are administered a light penalty. for example, they are not allowed to play games or watch television. in sum, in my opinion, not only is punishment not an appropriate approach in this regard, but rather also it may lead to demonstratione of stubborn persistence in the face of committing repeated mistakes. Parents can indirectly guide their children and for educating them not to do wrong ,in the first place, they as a model should do not perpetrate misdeeds it.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people saying and doing (for example through cell phone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? Technology's technological developments have pervaded many aspects/corners of our daily lives, whereas these achievements, especially in the field of electronic instruments, have been used for overseeing/controlling ordinary people and spying consumers of these high‐tech products throughout their hand‐sets or watch‐over cameras. Some say every step which have been takeb passed toward forward to mechanization, has have moved human‐kind far from individuality/privacy personalization. They assert that although old days when which there were no electronic devices in homes or in our pockets we had difficulties connecting to each other, when you had stepped inside your house and closed the door you had your privacy and there were not any spying eyes or ears on you. Furthermore, these advanced instruments have taken the information's diffusion under their control. On the other hand, there are technology's defenders which claim that every new device has have pros and cons and benefits of new electronic inventions surely outweigh their disadvantages. Besides, every instrument has have some blind spots which can be used by customers. In addition, there is not any obligation for using cell‐phones and there are rules for installing security cameras such as any mounted monitoring camera must be announced ….. informed in public by wall declaration and any claims about personal data leakage can be taken into court by claimants. From my point of view, although technological technology's achievements have colored our monotonous lives, such drawbacks like losing privacy are is worth thinking about again when new instruments which you do not know all their capabilities are introduceding for use, Albeit by with exploring these new utilities, the user can find their disadvantages and control them. Any spying device has have some pre‐requirements that with knowing those requirements you can neutralize them. In conclusion, the services that technological advancements have provided for humanity are undeniable and despite all the downsides that new electronic achievements have, their merits are more remarkable and outweigh their discoverable and controllable disadvantages. Hossein Talebi

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Financial education should be a mandatory component of the school program. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Nowadays, students are provided with lots of courses from entertaining courses to educating ones, for preparing them for a better and more efficient life. Since economic knowledge plays a vital role in every individual's life, putting financial courses in the curriculum might seem like an interesting idea. Nevertheless, some people do not agree because of a the couple of reasons. Some educationalists asserted that students who could gain a wide range of abilities in different fields are likely to be better citizens for their community. They cite financial knowledge as one of the most important means which render the children more qualified. Not only does it broaden students's mind, but also they will learn how to take economic affairs into account in all situations. Consequently, they will live with monetary consideration which guides them to have less failure throughout their life. On the other hand, some others maintain that school time is a period in which students could learn useful skills and hone their ability with lack of serious responsibilities and judgment, so obliging them to study financial courses means pushing/to push them into adulthood's materialistic world. Therefore, they might be deterred from their childlike atmosphere where they could have more enjoyable experiences. Furthermore, they might not understand the courses as much well as is needed in childhood and cannot apply them it efficiently. as a result, its it's destructive effects will carry on about financial activities which may leads to losing their self‐confidence. In conclusion, while some people believe that financial courses are necessary for children to be taught, others believe that there would be more crucial aspects that should be developed in schools such as social relationships and intellectual ability instead of materialistic matters. I, myself, think that although children should be acquainted with financial principles principals, it should may not be essential to become essential to become an obligatory course in schools. .

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? The fact that the world is being transformed into a global village is undeniable. As a result, countries or even our tastes are growing closer to each other day by day which has have plenty of advantages and trivial disadvantages. It is often said that globalization has eliminated countries' borders and engenders a competitive atmosphere to produce cheaper commodities with higher quality such that some of them even are produced with a partnership among several countries. For instance, using plenty of Chinese workforce which are much more cheaper than other countries with the technology of developed countries like the USA can bring along make these achievements. It has brought us to have the access to goods which are the best all over the world. Looking at it from a negative viewpoint, the entrance of alien merchandise in a country can change people's interests in using local products which cannot compete with big corporations in terms of quality and the price. Consequently, people would be gradually excluded from domestic products which used to be commensurate with people's taste. In this case, we are faced with losing diversity, and no matter where we live, we access the same products. I personally think that these massive changes in our lifestyle have has caused us to reach more prosperity and take advantage of new products which cannot be manufactured in our countries for many reasons from lack of required technology to unsuitable weather conditions. In To conclusion, although this new phenomenon has led to losing diversity and some local producers going bankrupt some local producers, it has provided us with cheaper and more qualified goods.