Fridays

Successful People, Arash Hakimi

2016-08-26T10:23:50+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Only people who earn a lot of money are successful. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Different people have different reasons for being successful and I don’t think that money itself is the cause of success in life. In order to comprehend the idea, at first we should have a definition of success. In my opinion success is the achievements of humans in their endeavors and successful people are those who attain most portions of their goals. As goals are not necessarily financial, successful people may not be rich at all. Some individuals who have changed the world were not wealthy. For instance, Nelson Mandela was going to improve equality among of his people in his country and overthrowing the apartheid regime. He persisted in on his beliefs firmly and finally he gained what he wanteds. His success was not because of his money but his volition/will/resolve made him the man recorded in history. Moreover, there are many wealthy people who are very unhappy in their personal life. Earning money is relative and always there are many people who earn more/less money than you. Even Bill Gates known as the richest person in the world got his reputation from hard working, targeted effort and persistence against all odds. Hence, although in many cases success leads to wealth, successful people are not known due to their wealth. To conclude, earning a lot of money renders you powerful (makes you more powerful) and you may have more opportunity in the future, but it doesn’t change you into a successful person necessarily. In addition, using money as the only scale to measure a man‘s success seems to be improper.

Some People Feel Lonely Living in High-rise Apartments Block, Sarang Rose

2016-08-26T10:23:31+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Task: some people feel lonely living in high‐rise apartment blocks, while others prefer this kind of living. Give your opinion and examples from your own experience. Nowadays, many individuals believe that living in sky‐scrapers have many benefits, while others claim that living in such places makes people more isolated, so residents are more depressed. From my perspective, in terms of life style living in apartments is more convenientce for citizens. Firstly, from my point of view these days the most important issue among the citizens is safety. Because of life style people spend the majority of their time out of their home, so being assured about the safety of their possession is a must and the high‐rise apartments meet this request. In addition, access to amenities such as gyms, restaurants and recreational centers is much/a lot more easier when a person is living in a sky‐scrapper, so individuals are more happier when they are have both assured about the safety and entertainments access. However, secondly, living in a flat house has its own advantages too. First of all, the relation among the neighbors is are more friendly compared with that in high‐rise buildings, hence they can spend their time when they are alone or require a companion. Also, residents have more private areas such as the yard, the garden, and a pool which creates a special atmosphere to do/engage in activities such as gardening or swimming. As a conclusion, I strongly believe that although the residents of flat houses are more happier than those that in high‐rise apartments, living in sky‐scrappers is a better choice due to life style in cities. Generally speaking the advantages of living in high rise apartments outweigh those of the benefits of living in a flat house.

Fast food, Jalal Asghari

2016-08-26T10:22:59+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problem as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Our ancestors used to eat more vegetables and move more than us,. then they were healthier than us, and nowadays, fast food is the a main reason of our cholesterol related diseases and we should combat this common place issue. Fast foods as a reaction of food providers to developments inof transportation systems and hectic lifestyles came to be a real concern for modern societies and not only is it free from/void of of nutrition, but it also is a completely fatty substance and harmful. In my opinion, imposing strict policies on providers and consumers does not have has much a role to play in decreasing its overuse using. It is said that, providing proper role modeling and education are more effective than governmental forces. Before the advent of this phenomenon by Mc Donald brothers, people used to eat more vegetables and low‐calorie foods which were by far healthier and I suppose that turning a blind eye to on those nutrients is not a rational decision. Then governments can give remits for traditional foods’ ingredients and have policies for advertising. Again, as an educational measure, junk foods must be forbidden in schools, both primary and secondary. Because this type of food is an accessible thing for to the poor, to eat and preventing them from of eating junk foods can harm them and therefore, the authorities should force restaurants to change the contents of these foods and use more vegetables and nutrients. Furthermore, this group of people do not have enough money to cure their hurt and vascular diseases which come with high‐calorie eating, and it will be a doubled cost for society. To some sum up, although passing new laws to limit the amount of high‐calorie foods can help to have a healthier society, having proper educational plans and advertisement can benefit society more effectively. Word count = 293

Cultural Similarities, Arefeh Saberi

2016-08-26T10:22:37+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share the same fashion, advertising, brands, eating habits and TV channels. Do the disadvantages of this trend outweigh the advantages? It is undoubtedly the case that the world today has become a global village. With the over‐accelerated pace of globalization, many aspects of culture are becoming increasingly similar throughout the world. One of the most fundamental causes of far‐reaching cultural homogeneities is technologiesy like the internet and satellite which have brought this world quite small.so close. hence, with such global widespread cultural contacts, people in all corners of the world are increasingly exposed to similar products, but you've got to admit that, by this exposure people have more choices than ever before. for example in the market there are many various variable goods with different ranges of prices which are compatible to all various classes of society. Another substantial benefit is that by mass communication there is a possibility of no more culture shocks for immigrants. For example with the spread of medias like TV; the people via movies which are being been displayeding on in satellite TV obtain practicable information about the food other communities eat or other aspects of their lifestyle. Informed by this beneficial knowledge, people would have a more comfortable life. Although this issue has these some benefits, there are more significant drawbacks which do outweigh the benefits. For one, at this rate of globalization our culture will disappear altogether. A lot of people are worried about globalization and the impact it could have on the local people. It just pushes popular cultures to the masses and spreads it even further. For example when people go travelling to far‐flung places, they want to see something exotic, not the same icons they see around at home, so that, some original countries which are so proud of glory of their culture and customs have begun to resist forced assimilation. For example, France as a civilized, old country has have been endeavoring to maintain the French language alive; qualifying in the privileged, top universities, applicants have to have mastery over dominate their native language. Last but not least, otherwise, with penetration of imbuing much broader cultural globalization, not only would national traditions be undermined, there would also be also a serious threat to customs and social values, so that it will ruin/destroy vanish the essence of cultural diversity. AREFE