Fridays

Capital Punishments, Sahar Farjoudi

2018-05-18T14:10:34+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree to this opinion? The requirement of having a more secure globe is becoming more sensible in today's life. Severe crimes are happening every day suffering hurting the victims whether financially or physically. To prevent and decrease the offences, official punishments like execution has have been passed, but it this is not sufficient. Control lose loss has caused lots of death or body impairments in car accidents, street fights or even business troubles. Even though imposing capital punishments on these sorts of happenings leads to more cautiousness, it has not reduced their occurrence. Indeed, the attitude of "the more punishment, the less crimes" is only true about trivial offences. Even in a socially developed and safe community, people do not commit crimes due to higher levels of awareness, not the deadly consequences like death penalty. In other words, although the fear of crimes' tragic outcome, although can be a way of their prevention, it is not the definite solution. Enhancing knowledge, life style and welfare have the most striking effects on society's security in all aspects. Eradicating destitution and illiteracy are two major contributors to achieving this goal. In countries of excellent education and social welfare, people enjoy their living and are not concerned about their primitive needs of life, so they live in tranquility and peace, while in poor conditioned nations, committing crimes seems the only way of survival, no matter how severe would be the punishment. To sum up, that capital punishment can induce fewer offences is an unindisputable fact, but it is not the mere/sole and most effective approach. In other words, increment raising public the society's members' awareness and providing life facilities are priorities to achieve the purpose of having a safer society.

Cars vs Cycling, Amir G

2018-05-18T14:10:22+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think cars are a better way of transportation around the city, while others prefer cycling. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Nowadays people have a variety of choices of means of transports to travel around the urban areas. Due to their definite advantages, bikes have its their own supporters while many still prefer to drive a car. Although there are certainly valid arguments against considering bikes as a means of transportation I, personally, believe driving a car is not an informed choice. Those who are of the idea that cars are still the better option than bikes mainly opine that not everyone can ride a bicycle. Senior citizens, children and people with even minor disabilities might have difficultyies using bikes. Despite the clear physical disadvantages of driving a car this means of transport allows us to travel with at least four other passengers which clearly this is not feasible by bikes. Only in this way are family trips possible. Nevertheless, people who are against traveling by vehicles claim that cycling is the greenest solution amongst other methods. Perhaps the most important advantage of cycling is the benefits to our health and the old Mother Nature. Breathless and tired of sedentary lifestyle, people in polluted modern cities can improve their physical health by not using cars. The more environmentally friendly means of transportation, the less pollution and consequently healthier generation. Based on the arguments cited above, I believe riding a bike have has myriad benefits which leads to a healthier, individuals besides less polluted cities. I hold the idea that not only can choosing bikes improve can boost our physical health but it also benefits others’ health by causing zero carbon footprint. I feel even only if a portion of people chose bikes, their decision would have a prominent impact on the environment.

Group or Not, Iman Fada

2018-05-18T14:10:10+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When people solve problems as a group, they come up with better solutions that than if they were to try to solve the problem individually. “Humankind is a social being.” There is a complicated dispute among sociologists about this claim. Whether this is true or not, obviously, the majority of humankind chooses to live together for some reason. I think one of them could be the power of team working in problem solving as I explained below: First of all, people have lived various lives; therefore, they have encountered disparate circumstances that led them to some invaluable experiences. This simple fact, could be really useful when people get into troubles. When you ask others about an especial situation, actually you are gathering some data to solve the problem you have. For example, I have a friend who was really confused about marriage, so he started to ask us about it. I can remember when he was talking with a divorced friend of usours. The dialogue starts with this: “At least I can show you one of the misdirections!” Hence, he could reserve save his life by avoiding this experience. Secondly, I believe that ideas mature in dialogues. On the one hand, people can benefit from different points of view, when they join each othertogether. As a simple example, when I was trying to design my room’s ceiling oddly enough to enhance the poor light of it, an electrician told me there are were new light products which are were luminous several times more than what you have and we can replace them easily. On the other hand, this is the basis of criticism, otherwise there is no necessity in discussion. This aspect is more abstruse. Actually it refers to an evolutionary process which leads a thesis to perfection through its anti-thesis, like what is going on in knowledge. A good theory will be the ground of for discussion in for the sake of the novelty of newer ones. Like the birth of neostructuralists from the elders in order to explain how different powers play their roles in social life. To sum up, I can stand for the claim. Maybe constructing and keeping a group is really tough and turbulent, but the outcome is almost satisfying. This is what mankind have has chosen to do.

Music, Hengameh Yavari

2018-05-18T14:09:57+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

-music is played in every society and culture in the world today. Some people think that music brings only benefits to individuals and societies. Others, however, think that music can have negative influence on both Discuss both these views and give your opinion If we go through the history of the music, we could always discover it in every generation .in this day and age, we could see the great growth of the music industry in every corner of the world. Music is that kind of arts which always has great influence on all ages of society and its it is inseparable from everyday life. Some people believe that the music has positive impacts on all people while others are of the thought that it has negative influence, especially the teenagers. The songwriters or singers express their feelings or their thoughts through their lyrics which can be about love, politics and other things concepts and we can figure them out them while listening to their songs. However, the music is something which we make memories with it and hardly ever could we could find someone who don’t havewithout a memory with a song .there are so many people who consider music as an obligation of in life because it directs the life path into the a positive way. Nowadays, we could hear some lyrics which containings inappropriate words or sentences which leads to changes of behavior or thoughts. These songs target young people’s behaviors and some of the crimes that we face these days are due to these songs .these are reasons which why some people are against the music. In conclusion, I believe that music is part of our life. it has pros and cons but I’m of the opinion that we should pay attention to the music that we choose .in this case we won’t will face fewer any problems in our life.

Prison or a Better Education, Amir Adel

2018-05-18T14:09:46+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Prison is the common way in most countries to solve the problem of crime. However, a more effective solution is to provide people with a better education. Do you agree or disagree? Sending criminals in to prisons has been a handy methods for many years to keep these people from the rest of society and decreasing the rate of crime. Although this way have has been a success to some extent, we should solve it by one fundamental means. Primarily, it seems that the main reason for commitment commission of crime is the lack of awareness which an individual has about their his world around world. This ignorance directs a person to do some actions that are not acceptable in society and usually banned. Now when we try to increase general knowledge of people, we could steer them to be compatible members in our communities. One of the early steps to educate an individual begins from families. If parents who raise a child endeavour to teach essentially moral principles, this child can show reasonable reactions in facing ups and downs. Secondly, by increasing the number of educated people in society, we would face less crime according to many researches. The rate of crimes is usually lower in educated communities in compared with others and this fact encourages governors and us to give more privileges to the development of the education system and persuade young people to continue their education. Not only does a The higher level of education not only do decrease the unemployment rate but also increases incomes through the middle class. In conclusion, while it would seem that we still require prisons as the only way to deal with some offenders and some exceptionally anarchistic members of society, this it is education that finally aids us in beingto be a safe and secure.

School Vacations, Miaad Lalooni

2018-05-18T14:09:16+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe school children should be given multiple short vacations, while others believe they should get one long vacation. Give the advantages of both and express your own point of view. While some people believe that students should be away fromof school for a long time once in a year, others think it is better to divide students' theitr holiydays into several shorter ones. Both views have some advantages and disadvantages which is are discussed in this essay. Having a long vacation each year is the most common system in the world nowadays. It creates an opportunity for both students and schools to prepare themselves for the next year. Students have enough time to follow their interests that their lessons don't include them, and schools can be improved or repaired without disrupting their teaching programs if it is necessary. Furthermore, having more time to planning, parents can arrange their holiydays so families are able to spend some time with each other or have a trip. Finally, a long vacation can be a chance for students to participate in other social activities that are as important as studying, but they need time and energy so children can't join them during an academic year. Although having multiple short vacations for students is not as popular as a long one, it could have some superiority. Firstly, pupils are able to recover themselves mentally a physically several times in a year so their performance may increase. Secondly, a long holiday may be boring for children while they enjoy every moment of a short one. Finally, it is much easier for parents to manage to be at home for a short time although however they should work during this periodstudents' holydays. In conclusion, as it is mentioned, both systems have some advantages that make them valuable. I believe having a single longer holiday can prepare more benefits as regardssince/given it has been implemented in many countries for many years.

The Amount of Salaries, Saman Jourablou

2018-05-18T14:09:00+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Since past to nowfor the past several decades, the inequality has been one of the most controversial issues among the countries. In other words, this problem has ended up in some revolutions against the governments during the history. Anyway some people believe as ifthat a minor group of society earn dramatically high salaries is good for the country, while the others are of this opine that officials should make laws to prevent high salaries in order to balance the amount of income between the society members. On the one hand, some think that the specific groups in the of country who are more talented than others or have higher educational degrees should earn more than the others. Moreover, for instance, in a company which employees in high positions earn much more than their lower counterparts,; the second group would be motivated to upgrade themselves whichand finally leads to a dynamic society. On the other hand, the opponents claim that inequality in a society will increase the a sense of envy/regret to the lower classes in the of country, so the rate of crimes will growth. In addition, such a great gap between the level of income among the citizens will affect the GDP. In other words, at the time the most of the wealth of a country be is concentrated in a minor section of society; the major part could not afford to produce products the productions with high quality and of course more quantity. In my view, one of the effectively practical solutions for the above problem is like a law which now is running in Australia. Imposing more tax for on citizens who earn higher income. It makes the tax which is received from rich people will be spent on to establishing more facilities for individuals who earn less. As a result, the inequality will be bridged/decrease.

University Role, Shahroq

2018-05-18T14:08:48+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe the aim of university education is to help graduates get better jobs. Others believe there are much wider benefits of university education for both individuals and society. Discuss both view and give your opinion. People have different views about the role of university education and how it should affect graduates’ prospect. Whereas some people hold the view that the sole purpose of universities is helping graduates land on a decent job, it seems to me that the university education’s contribution is far more than that and its impacts extend on to both individuals and society level. On the one hand, there are several reasons why having a satisfying job is vital for graduates. Firstly, attending university is prohibitively expensive. While studying, many students are obliged to take out a loan to pay for tuition and fees, accommodation, and buying books and stationeries, all of which are necessary to finish their courses. Students and their families would not shoulder these financial burdens unless they made sure graduates would be able to earn enough in a lucrative position to pay their debt. Secondly, doing a university degree is a tremendously hard work and students should apply themselves for many years. Those who embrace these difficulties, in all likelihoods, would expect not only a head start but also more satisfying job experience upon their peers who are absorbed effortlessly to the job market right after high school. Finally, a vast majority of vacancies in leading enterprises, which offer the most competitive and desirable posts, are being filled with people with university degrees. More people, as a result, equate universities’ role to help people to find better jobs. On the other hand, the tertiary education would be of the even more benefits to individuals and society. For one, ordinarily, educated people are among the most prestigious citizens of every community, so they are obviously admired and treated with more respect, thereby enjoying more opportunities when it comes to their position in society. Furthermore, edified and trained in the a more diverse environment with a variety of ethnics ethnicities and cultures, university graduates are more likely to turn up as well-rounded individuals with broader social skills, for in university environment and campuses, students with different nationalities and races have the chance to work and live together. On the social side, it has is widely accepted that the higher the rate of educated people, the more developed the country. Educated people are normally among highly seasoned people of each society and can enhance a country’s future in both technological and cultural domains if they utilizeing their expertise. In conclusion, although the importance of job opportunities for educated people cannot be overlooked, I argue that individuals and society would far more benefit by the university education.

Vacation, Ardalan Foroutan

2018-05-18T14:08:35+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

?Some people believe school children should be given multiple short vacations, while others believe they should get one long vacation. Give the advantages of both and express your own point of view. The process concept of holidays is an integral part of children’s education. A number of people agree children should be in on the a rather long term Holiday to some extent. However, some believe that it they had better be shorter. We will consider both sides of discussion in this essay. On the one hand, those who support short vocations cite the potential benefits that those bring to children., One of which is to lessen the risk of children being children far away schools, for instance, annual holidays in the USA’s schools are merely 15 days which contribute to learners do not unconsciously being disadvantaged take an educational toll on by this situation by fora lack of being at school, and forgetting their lessons in over time. Another argument is emotional relationships that pupils are used to having with their peers there. This is considereds as a remarkable role in upbringing up and educating a child, due tobecause he who might aspires to has have some friends at school that long-term vacation causes his him to be deprived. By contrast, opponents of this view point out that short-term vacations give insufficient time to children. It is not advisable, or even undermining deletorious to the children’s wellbeing in their holidays. Moreover, critics of multiple short vacations also highlight the difficulty in concentrating helping students concentrate on their courses symptomatic of their discontinuous education. Finally, it must be said that device devising a plan for going on a trip needs adequate opportunity; as a result, ever-rising amounts of time of the time off is the best option to be fulfilled this function by students’ parents. In conclusion, I would tend to side with the opponents of multiple short vacations. It seems to be unreasonable to lose the golden time in pupils’ life till so that they could travel more long-time, without any educationg during the corresponding period. It will impulsively unwittingly cause academic underperformance.