جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In the modern world, it is no longer necessary to use animals for food, clothing or medicine. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience. These days some people argue that with new developments in science and technology we should stop using of animals in food and clothing industries or even making medicine products. However, it would appear that conditions are not all set for getting animal dependency over. Primarily, although we are able to produce a large proportion of our foods from plants, a major part of our daily meals comes from meat or other products of animals. If these types of ingredients are eliminated from people’s meals, a large of part of the world probably face food crisis and many governments cannot feed their people. Animal-based foods usually are rich in calorie and can give adequate energy that a person requires for daily activities while for the same energy we need to eat more plant-based foods. Moreover, our scientific progress in producing synthetic meat is in the first steps of its own way and there is a long way to producing this meat in industrial scale as well as ethical and religious problems in introduction of these foods to society. In the field of medicine and treatment, we heavily depends on animals. Virtually, most research in the medical area are conducted by using special animals like the mice or the pig and almost all new medicines should be tested on animals before human trial process. To date, we have not found any alternative methods for substituting for animal in drug testing and it seems that we cannot find it so soon. Lastly, in term of clothing it appears that we have more chance to get rid of guilt of animal abuse. Nowadays, we are able to wave our clothing from artificial materials and there is no need for fur or leather of animals for covering our sensitive skins unless on fashion and luxury occasions which it would seem that totally useless and unnecessary. However, convincing all people, especially rich ones that slaughtering animals only for drawing more attention is not ethical is not easy. In conclusion, although there are a lot of innovations and developments in food, medicine and clothing areas, we still rely on animals for basic needs and onlywhen we can free animal from our yoke, do provide new means for that needs and by that time, we should optimize our consumption and revise our behaviour towards animals.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In some countries, it is thought advisable that children begin formal education at four years old, while in others they do not have to start school until they are seven or eight. How far do you agree with either of these views. The standard age for children to entering to formal schools has inevitably been a controversial issue. In some country people believe that appropriate age is four, in others, the age of children to start education is more than seven years old. Both views have a lot of advantages and disadvantages. Both ideas will be discussed in this essay, but personally, I agree with latter view. In some parts of the world parents encourage their children to go to formal school earlier or they using variety of books and computer’s applications to teach them to count or learn alphabet. They believe that their children be smarter than children learning math and language in older age and also believe that their children fill their time with academic courses instead of playing their toys or computer games. On the other hand, other parents think that children should be stay at home or go to kindergarten or playhouses, when their age are under the six years old. It is true that children can learn to read alphabets or simple sentences in kindergarten but they prefer their children learning other activities same as painting, dancing, drawing, building houses with their toys or play with same age children/peers and learn how to make friends and keep them in their friend zone. These kinds of activities help them to find their talents and to be more creative than children who are learning academic courses in lower age. I, personally, believe that children have to get appropriate materials which are suitable for their age and we have to ensure that our children have got ready to follow instructional process in the formal school.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country The issue of whether a country should prioritize economic growth over other developments or not is certainly a contentious one. While there are valid arguments to the contrary, in this essay I would contend that it should place a premium on growing financial resources rather than other progressions. One the one hand, in order to survive from wildly difficult problems associated with modern and fast-paced society ranging from environmental, healthy as well as security difficulties, it is vitally essential that any government should implement all its obligations in all sense of word. Countries are delicate arrangements where all parts depend on each other and they need comprehensive management to be sustainable. Taken for granted, each sector can undermine society in its way. In other words, all these components should be considered in managing, otherwise an ineffecient country. On the other hand, in my belief the most important part of management in a country is its financial resources which should be gradually increased through every possible effort to cover its costs and peoples’ welfare as well as invest in the way of prosperity. If a country could not afford its economic requirements, any concern about other necessities and deleterious problems which are contingent on making money become irrelevant. Furthermore, it is through economic progress that government can promote healthcare and educational practices needing a budget as a prerequisite. In conclusion, I once again restate any view that attempting in the economic growth is inherently worthwhile for the government. Not only does it meet its peoples’ needs, but it can also invest in improvements and innovations as well as contribute in international charity works, hence a homogeneous society with accessible goals in a good financial health.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think the government should pay for healthcare and education, but other people claim that it is the individual's responsibility. N owadays, most governments pay for healthcare and training. Some individuals argue the government should pay on buildings and roads. Although healthcare is an important concern, the government should move down it in its priority list. Some people claim the government should fully cover the expenditure of healthcare and education. A person who faces with a hard decease should only tolerate the pain of decease not the pain of impecuniosity. The government should play a pioneering role in healing the wounds by funding and developing insurances in order to appease the pains. In addition, education is an important part of life. The government should pay attention to the training system. In other words, it should provide the necessary equipment especially for clever but poor students to continue their education. These smart pupils are the future generation who will become a responsible in the community. On the other hand, some individuals believe that healthcare and training should be paid by own people. In this case, not only they understand what they do, but also they pay attention to their healthcare. If they are checked by the doctors periodically, they would not have to pay the medicines. Therefore, it is their fault. Moreover, the government should not pay for education because it is an optional concern. Everyone has right to either study or not. In conclusion, the government should manage its budget. I personally opine it should pay for healthcare and education. Thepatients need to be assisted. Besides, education should be funded lest the smart pupils become disappointed.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Amirmehdi Akhtari Subject: some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organization. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. People nowadays concern day-in day-out regarding job and career’s matters including sticking to one company up to retirement or switching it continuously. Both groups have their own reasons which should be taken into account and will be critiqued in next paragraphs. On the one hand, human beings naturally tend to keep the work conditions in expectable track to be in a same place forever. It is apparent that we humans feel deeply fear of unknown to encounter upcoming events in new positions as if they would probably challenge all of our achieved targets and even our pride and self confidence. It has been always influencing every aspect of routine life from personal issues to professional growth in the pace of succeed. Certainly, not only is to be a loyal employee is considered to be more stable in the job market but also it will be rewarded by rising salary and upgrading grade by the top managers of the companies. One the other hand, it is highly recommended by many labor market researchers that to build up a prosperous life before getting too old, you must be open to all of the opportunities in the industry to grab the best. Indeed, high educated experts will be able to maximize the job achievements if they dare enough to expose in diverse organizations. In fact, they should fulfill those new requirement be involved with new requirement to be fulfilled and this fact will result in flourishing of all the hidden potentials, enriching the obsolete knowledge and bringing freshness to personal life. To sum up, although job progression in a same company is somehow improving based on many case studies, it would be monotonous too. Besides, attaining a new job offer in the market will be speeding up this trend surprisingly.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

People believe that media coverage of celebrities is having a negative effect on children. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? When it comes to the media showing the celebrities, people tend to have a variety of perspectives. In fact public opinion is divided into groups and opinion-makers who claim that the media has deleterious effects on children, and the opponents arguing though there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary, the merits of this coverage outweigh the drawbacks. My view is close to the latter, and this essay will elaborate this contentious topic with some relevant examples. From my point of view showing the celebrities on the media has myriad advantages for both the stars and the populace especially children. If children understand what a rough way those stars passed, and how they overcame their difficulties, they learn that continuity and perseverance is one of the possibly feasible roads to success. Only when the media covers every detail of celebrities’ lives, can we expect children learn how to fight the obstacles in their life. Moreover, these coverages can show children that their stars are ordinary people like everyone else, and not the imaginary character some created on their minds. On the contrary, showing celebrities in the mass media can have inverse impacts on children’s expectations, asking inappropriate demands from their parents. Besides that, this also has deleterious effects on their life in the long term. That all individuals do not have enough capabilities to become a star is an indisputable fact. Disappointed and depressed, many a person wastes his time to become his childhood iconic dream. Though showing the details of personal and social life of well-known people has its demerits, I hold the idea that this can benefit children if certain rules and regulations are applied by the officials preventing them media from showing programs with unsuitable contents for children.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Developing of conscience is one of the vital stages in a child’s growth which is associated to with the capability to tell right from wrong .this skill derives …. from Time and good parenting, besides my first conviction is that due to the role of punishment in this is decreased meanwhile, punishing a young child not only is ineffective but also it has many downsides that their side effects will be elaborated in details . Hence, I have to disagree approximately entirely with the given statement. In order to for the child to learn the difference between both right and wrong spending following some procedures are is essential. Firstly, it is crucial that either parents or teachers provides good modeling in their own manner. Punishment should be designed whatever whenever neither a child’s feel behaves harshly nor bully bullies others. Punishing a very young child not only is wrong and foolish ,but also it can have negative knock on effect on their mind ,moreover it leads to increase increasing their anxiety ,to behave behaving aggressively , lose losing their concentration while they are studdingstudying. There are some punishments that has have positive effects on child training though so that not only do they not have has negative impact ,but also it theymotivates them to study seriously. As a result, one of the factors that is essential on in a child’s s growth involves developing of conscience. in the meantime, parents according to the age of child choose suitable punishment that neither has negative influence nor leads to decrease their motivation .therefore, we should try does acceptable punishments so that a child avoids doing acting stubbornly.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

More and more qualified people are moving from poor to countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like enginerring , computing and medicine. Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world What is your opinion ? do you think rich countries should pay poorer countries for the people they encourage to come? What other measures could rich countries take to encourage qualified people to stay and help develope their own countries? 1st world countries are ruling the world at the momment . they took over the world by strom and somehow they became unstopable .3rd world countries are in danger. Their economy is becoming weakest than ever and under alot of pressure from other countries. Firstly , i would like to mention that 1st world countries have developed such system and power which is so fascinating and mesmerizing that attracts you somehow . how can you reject this kind of offer and not immigrate to such countries ? Not only you know that you will be able to live the dream you have always been dreaming of but you are able to even seize it. Another point to make is developed countries are using the newest technology in every aspect in the country. For example even in medical , they offer you the best treatment Not only the data i mentioned but they are able to extend you the best social service than any other country .On the other hand , its more like a massive competition . countries are compiting with one another to provide the best . other countries should be able to put forward a great service and athmosphere where their citizens are satisfied Secondly , i disagree that rich countries should pay poorer countries . rich countries have came along way to succeed while others have stoped evolving . rich countries has triggered the best resources of the poorer countries and aim to conquere as well because of the impeccable prerogatives they afford All in all , in my opinion i assume that countries should be able to make their people indulge themselves in order to have a healthy soceity and a strong human resource while others might take away this kind of assets . every undeveloped country not only should but must start a revolution and progress and become a better version of itself so they will not loose their people

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

With the advent of modernization, lots of traditions are fading rather quickly. Among them you can find many family traditions which are disappearing as well, of which one can be having meals together. In the past members of family always had meals together, simply because this was the way it should be done , but nowadays the hectic lifestyle and different working schedule of each member of the family makes it quite difficult to hang on to this custom. It is generally accepted that career has more importance in modern life than it had before, so people are more willing to take different work shifts and longer working hour. As the result, their time for family dining would be deducted. Also invention of fast foods has its own effects on this matter, as it made it easier and cheaper to buy food and eat in restaurants than to spend time and cook at home. On the other hand, having meals together in the family can lead to better bonding in members as they have more time to talk and share. In the meantime, dinning manners such as saying thank you or chewing with their mouth closed can be easily conveyed from parents to children. Also, families who eat together generally eat more nutritiously; therefore, the children are less likely to be overweight. Overall the benefits of having food together in family outweigh its difficulties. Although matching the meal time for all the members of the family seems impossible during the weekdays, fixing a time to have meal together at least once in weekends is worth the try.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Television has improved the quality of life for the ordinary person. Do you agree or disagree? People hold varying opinions as to the impact which TV has played in the ordinary people’s lives. Whereas some argue these effects have not been of benefit to people, it seems the profound effect of TV cannot be overlooked. Admittedly, people spending too much time watching TV might subject to both poor physical and mental health. From the physical point of view, it promotes a sedentary lifestyle, which means less physical activity which proved to be a contributing factor in an abundance of health complications such as obesity and back pain, to name but a few, for TV might be considered the only viable option for the entertainment purposes. Besides, it has caused seclusion in both family and society. While enjoying this kind of entertainment, an individual would less likely place a premium on the social interactions and acknowledge the crucial effects it would bring for his mental well-being. In addition, too much TV can act as a deterrent against socializing with family and acquaintances, the positive effects of which has been long emphasized by many cognitive behavior experts. But with all that being said, hardly could we put the blame on TV as a tool unless we forgot the one’s responsibility and attitude as the end user. However, it is even more important to acclaim television for both informing and educating ordinary people. TV has been a chief reliable and economical source of news for the majority of people because it is cheap and ordinarily available in the even most remote places. By broadcasting the latest news, combined with the proper analyses, we have witnessed an unprecedented awareness about current affairs among the populace, which has led to countries enjoying more democratic communities. Moreover, TV channels which produce education materials have been of great help to the people trying to acquire knowledge in a wide variety of subjects. National Geographic or Nature channel, for example, has been airing plenty of programmes, whose purpose is promoting superior lifestyle among common people. I conclusion, although television might negatively impact people’s lives in some healthrelated areas, I am holding on to the view that its improvements have been positively bolder.