Fridays

Alireza, Cities

2019-02-15T13:07:50+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Many people leave their homes in the countryside to live in large cities. What factors make people want to move to the city? How realistic is it to control the numbers of people moving to the city? …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …… Today, many citizens migrate from the countryside to settle in capital or large cities, the reason of this phenomenon is most of facilities ,work opportunities ,universities and shopping center congregates in cities. There are many factors make younger people in the range of 18 to 40 years old to leave their homes in the countryside such as migrate for search and find a better job, well-paying work and study in a main universities with an expert teacher , equipped laboratories and workshops , for the older citizens and people who have a disability live in the countryside are difficult , because usually countryside don’t have many facilities for this group to have an easy movement and comfortable life. Also many younger people who live in the countryside become boring, because they don’t have any exciting moment in their life, lack of entertainment’s place for instance cinema , theatre saloon and shopping center force them to move to the cities to enjoying and spend their time in the city’s atmosphere. In conclusion, if government have an investment and the political will to improve facilities for older and disable people, extend the university and entertainment place and job opportunities for younger people, this migration will be decrease and most of citizens will encourage to live in their own cities, otherwise this is an evitable migration and it has bad consequences for the government.

Amir G, Crime Rate is Increasing

2019-02-15T13:06:49+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Nowadays the crime rate is increasing, especially among teenagers. What are the reasons behind it? How can we reverse this trend? What punishment methods should be used, in your opinion? Our world never has seen this much of wealth, but the rate of crimes has grown dramatically during the last few decades, and this has made many experts in sociology and psychologists to try to shed light on the root causes of this mysterious paradox. When it comes to this notion, I maintain that officials along with ordinary people have to change their viewpoint to this controversial issue if we truly want to reduce this rate. Regrettably, people these days are committing more crimes than before, and perhaps one of the significant reasons of it is the advent of the Internet and e-commerce. In this day and age an overwhelming majority of individuals use the Internet to sell or buy a wide range of commodities ranging from their daily needs to cars or even villas. While these trades are going on every day on the cyber spacein cyberspace, hardly a day goes by without hearing a fraud on such trades. The worst possible part of this kind of growing crimes is the age of the accused. According to one of the latest research conducted by FBI not only are the age of the accused lower than 25, but also majority of them are tertiary graduated. Another factor many critics consider a pivotal reason leading to this escalating rate of crime is the mass media covering the luxurious lives of criminals became reach overnight by activities such as embezzlement, drug or weapon trafficking. Drawing their dream life, and tired of working hard, many ordinary people commit a crime without knowing about the consequents of their criminal activities. I think only when financial sources and educational facilities are distributed evenly across the globe, can we expect to lower the current rate of crimes. To cut a long story short, this alarming rate of crimes demands people from all walk of life to take steps to prevent it from further increase. I strongly hold the idea that the current rate of crimes is higher than expected, and this trend will not stop from growing unless both authorities and people cooperate with each other to legislate more appropriate laws besides increasing public awareness, or else these crimes can ruin humankind achievement for an otherwise perfect world.

Azam Rostami, Public Health

2019-02-15T13:06:37+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Public health has become one of the major concerns of all governments in the last decades. In order to improve that, when the question arises as to whether funding on more sport amenities would be the best way or not. I personally believe the more sport facilities are available, the more healthier citizens we have in the society. Virtually, we all have a hectic lifestyle nowadaysnow a days, in which we spend one third of our day at work and go back home straightly and collapse in front of the television. this sedentary lifestyle has brought us serious health problems, like obesity. There is no doubt that if there be a sport club nearby, with a flexible time table, most of us probably prefer to spend our time more actively and productively other rather than killing our time by surfing the Internet or watching pointless TV programs. Diversity of sports available, in addition, which cover all interests and ages could act as persuasion for busy citizens to enroll in their favorite sport field. For my sister, for instance, that has a phobia of swimming, a convenient complex sport center would provide her with other options. It should not be ignored that there are others factors other than distance and variety,. high enrollment fees for example, discourage low income families and students, to from joining sport clubs. Absolutely, investment on in public land to build jogging paths, cycling centers and other sport amenities could be a great help for those who are not able to afford to pay for a gym. Of course, people who needs more to do exercise, always make an excuse to avoid it, but more sport facilities available would be a reward for those who consider about their fitness. To conclude, in my opinion, availability of sport facilities locally could encourage modern-busy citizens to be more physically active when they be do not want to getaware of that they won’t stuck in traffic jams.

Beheshteh, Poverty

2019-02-15T13:06:14+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Every country has poor people and every country has different ways of dealing with the poor. What are some of the reasons for world poverty? How can the poor be helped Today, most if not all, nations throughout the globe are struggling with the world poverty. It is true to claim that all members of societies along with governments must shoulder the responsibility, thereby eradicating or ameliorating the so called situation. The stark reality of poverty stems from various phenomena including conflicts or political upheavals as well as natural disasters. Countries undertaking the former are more likely to be pushed into the poor communities in comparison with those of which haveing peace and stability. Struggling with prolonged conflicts, citizens’ lives are scattered like leaves in the wind, since they might need to leave any belongings behind to survive. Syria, for example, is able to fully portray the lives of people protracted displaced/impoverished by war. In the realm of the latter drought or flood, for instance, would aggravate the condition of those whose mere source of income is through agriculture. Failing harvest after harvest might drain the farming population of from money and assets. Ultimately, finding themselves eroded mentally and financially, disaster-stricken ones backslide below the poverty line which is regrettably the dire story of some African countries. Seeking out a way to annihilate or at least to lessen the load, governments must exert some promising measures which could range from exempting the poor from tax to paying monthly income. In other word, authorities must support them to in reinvigorate reinvigorating and establishing a better life which all human beings deserve. However, expecting governments to intervene, does not debunk the notion of others’ responsibility of donation, particularly those who are havingwith sufficient salary. Overall, communities might turn into poor ones due to various reasons,and in order to change for the better, not only is it governments’ duty, but it is also any individual’s s’ responsibility to tackle the issue.

Bita, Construction of Homes by People

2019-02-15T13:06:02+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In some cities people can build and design homes and office buildings however they like. This is preferable to having strict controls over the design and construction of housing and office buildings. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Whether people should build and design their own homes in their city or give it to the city’s authorities by applying restrictions is a controversial issue. Actually, I advocate the idea of designing homes by their owners. First if of all, increasing the belonging sense to their homes, citizens are permitted to design their own buildings. Consequently, these people will maintain their houses in a better way than ones that are endured tough controls over build of their housing. Another advantage is variety which can improve the appearance of the city. Although diversity in immense degree could have visual turbulence, it causes beauty and manifestation of the individual identity in the city in a balanced way. Moreover, this way leads to more creativity, so that the various styles of architecture, forms and materials have a chance to apply. Besides, although imposing strict restrictions on the designing of the buildings leads to a harmony in the city, not only can it may give rise to a monotonous urban landscape, for instance, the same rhythm for all the facades, shapes and forms of the buildings, but also, it can it neglect the tastes of the different strata stratum of society. To put it in the a nutshell, I personally opine that if cities can experience unity and plurality simultaneously, they would will change into the a more responsive environment for living. It means, authorities can apply the overall regulations and codes which control constructions and methods of building for observing the standards,. in at the same time, citizens can build their homes whatever however they want but in the defined framework.

Children’s Education

2019-02-15T13:05:51+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

TPO 28 - 377 word – second part of reading Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past. Agree or disagree? When I was younger, I would definitely have said that parents back then were not involved in their children’s education as much as parents today are, but no longer do I think that way and I am not agree with the above statement. First of all, although getting involved in children’s education is not only a bad idea, but rather sometimes it is necessary and is a key factor for their brain to develop, but modern parents have much more responsibility than parents in the past. Their career and modern life takes so much of their time and energy which is why they cannot involve in their children’s school works despite themselves. For instance, my parents tried their best to join me in my school works in order for me to be more successful in my education, but they did not do the same thing for my sister who is 10 years younger than me because they were busy enough with their jobs and some other issues. Secondly, based on some surveys which have been done on some school-kids, kids of this generation were growing faster than those of other generation. It means that these day kids are more clever than kids in the past and they can do their education stuffs by themselves and do not need much help. Moreover, schools today have more efficient techniques for teaching children and kids and they can get involve in their peers’ schoolwork and help them with their education problems and vice versa. For example, I can remember that my sister’s school offered my parents to let my sister stay longer at the school in order to help her with her school works. On the other hand, by not involving in our children’s education we lose our connection with our children in some ways and we cannot lead or help them with their school issues and make our parent role to fade in their lives. Some people believe that parents today are aware of this phenomenon and try to involve in their children’s education more than past. In conclusion, nothing can fill parents’ place in children’s life, so parents should try their best in facing with modern life problems and get involve in every part of their children’s life.

Iman, Food

2019-02-15T13:04:52+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants. Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Eating, as one of the basic needs of human beings, demands lots of efforts of us to be met. Meanwhile, restaurants make it much easier to access foods, I strongly try to stand on my cooking abilities at home duo due to the reasons I explained bellow. First and foremost, there is nothing comparable to health for me which does not come to the restaurants’ priority unfortunately. Whatever they seem to be, they are business enterprises at lastafter all, so they need to be flourished financially which leads them to attract people by every means possible. Adding harmful components to foods like ostensibly edible colors, overusing some tasty ingredients like salt and sugars and unreliable cooking methods like frying, all are some of their tricky manners to provide their customers with pleasurable foods. Seldom can you find a person who does these things to himself at home just for the sake of pleasure. Secondly, I am not financially solvent enough to handle everyday meals outdoor. Many of costs like labor wages and salaries, residential rents, equipment and even their benefits will be imposed onto the fixed price of a particular food prepared in restaurants that make it multiple rather thancompared to that of homemade food. Moreover, whereas one qualified outdoor dish a week affects middle-class people’s pockets dramatically at least due to the current economic situation, people will incline toward fast food consumption. No sooneras soon as had anybody surfsed the internet on this topic, than he/she encountersed the uncountable list of determinations of these types of outdoor foods specifically. To sum up, of course I like to have a meal at food stands occasionally and take advantages of their time saving or delicious tasting or even their pleasant spaces and utilities with which a food comes with some extra facilities as music, but I prefer to eat at home normally, why so inasmuch as, not only does it guaranty my health more but also it saves more money for me.

Mahsa Molaei, Petrol

2019-02-15T13:04:41+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Test 3- Book 8 Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? ----------------------- Nowadays, it has been an undeniable fact that almost all of the metropolitans world over suffer from significant urban problems like traffic congestion and accordingly, pollution. Some people claim that exorbitant fuel prices can be addressed as a solution to the mentioned moot points. I, personally, disagree with the above statement wholly as long as there are viable alternatives to solve this ever concerning problems. Different attitudes toward increment in petrol prices and also other efficient measures which can be adopted will be considered precisely in this essay. Some individuals point out that if the government increased the price of gas, petrol-driven cars’ number would decline because it makes private cars neither cost effective nor convenient means of transportation. Although they admit that there is no effect on the richer social strata by enacting this policy, the number of the poor and middle-class average level people are large enough to see a remarkable change in traffic jams. There will be no longer be clogged main streets only when dose the number of one-driver cars declines at any price.(first) However, opponents argue that unaffordable prices can act only as a short term policy. Regarding inevitable importance of traffic and its negative side effects, governments need to adopt a repertoire of sustainable measures in order to eradicate these issues. By increasing the petrol’s price, only the poor is are projected to be poorer and it ipso facto increase the gap between the poor and the rich in society which contributes to more social discrimination. Besides, public transport fares are directly influenced by the higher price of fuels which potentially makes it too expensive for the poor to be afforded. Advocates of fixed and reasonable fuel price, I included, believe that there are viable alternatives to main problems of metropolitan centers like developing not roadbased transportation and also making public transportation more accessible for all walks of life. For instance, if there are is a ubiquity of public vehicles, it is more likely that people prefer them, compared with their own car. Moreover, to ease traffic congestion, governments have to develop public transportation which are is not road based like the subway or air trains. To conclude, although some citizens mentioned that we can witness less traffic and air pollution just by increasing petrol costs, this action is not only detrimental to the poor but also increases the gap between the poor and the rich. Therefore, it is crystal clear that by adopting the mentioned solutions, we can have a more homogenous society with less traffic and more green days.

Mosadegh, No Meat & Fish Better For World

2019-02-15T13:04:26+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people choose to eat no meat and fish. They believe that this is not only better for their own heath, but also benefits the world as whole. Discuss this view and give you own opinion. Since ever ancient times , how being healthy and strong enough have constantly been an important issue for human beings. After a long time, humans were able to find out that by cooking all types of edible materials, they could obtain proper taste and have better digestion. Today, the most significant issue is people how to gain the necessary and complete range of nutrients from their daily meal. Among this, some people choose to be a vegetarian, while some other groups prefer to eat both meats red type or white ones and vegetables together. Individuals who desire to have an only meat diet are rare. There is no doubt that humans are an omnivore creature and then having a balance diet is more acceptable than the other ones. On the one hand, there are some people who are extremely environmentally-friendly and always are worried about hazardous which threat the environment. Sometimes, some of the new researches about foods reinforce them insist on their opinion. It is a fact that humans like other carnivorous groups of animals need to receive a huge amount of protein daily and it is known that animals’ protein are a rich source of that. It is deniable that for obtaining this source of nutrients, there is no choice except to kill beasts. Individuals who say this is not philanthropic act toward animals and they prefer to be vegetarian and also they believe that not only may they be infected by some various viruses of animals, but it affects ecosystem’s circle. Decreasing in vegetation and eroding the upper level of soil which is not appropriate for the environment and farmers too. On the other hand, there are a lot of different notions about animals’ proteins and the benefits of them which every individual needs to have on their daily regime, but this is important to know, besides, their benefits; excessively eating of animals’ meats especially red ones cause Goat disease. People who love eating meats just mostly think about the taste regardless of the situation which is killed one creature because of their this false need. Probably, they claim that no matter how many animals hunted in this way, it is the secret of survival on the Earth for species. To sum up all the statements above, there is no doubt that the live of every kind of specie relate to each other like an enormous circle, for instance, rock circle and, sudden elimination of one of them has its effect on the circle. Because human beings are omnivore, there is a necessity to strike balance and cosume vegetables and meat together. Although this balance is a requirement for humans, maybe, it has tremendous impact on their ecosystem due to excessive and uncontrollable population of them.

Mostafa Torabi, Increasing Population

2019-02-15T13:04:14+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

The continued rise in the world’s population is the greatest problem faced by humanity at the present time. What are the causes of this continued rise? Do you agree that it is the greatest problem faced by humanity? Nowadays, we’ve heard a lot of news about the problems due to constant increase in human population on the earth. Nobody can deny the role of improved medical services in this issue and personally I believe this problem is not a case by itself but our policy. In previous centuries, lack of proper medical cares was the main reason of death among people. Many children died at an early age. Ordinary diseases like the flu could easily kill people. But today with significant advancements in all fields of science, including medical science, the rate of death has fallen continuously. What is more, in comparison with previous centuries, other conditions of people life like nutrition and lodging have been improving at the present. Some people argue that this continued rise in population is the most important issue faced by mankind. If we look into some developed countries like Australia, we’ll see a balance between population and welfare. To illustrate, I believe that increasing population is not a problem alone. But the method that we choose for this phenomenon is more important. In other words, problems as lack of food or house can be addressed by using new scientific methods. Or even by using educational programs, birth rate can decrease. On the whole, today we are faced with the increasing rate of population in the world. The main cause of this event is related to improved medical services as well as advancements in other life aspects. Even so, I think politics that may be taken about this issue are predominant. The population is not a tragedy by itself, but our policies are determinant.