Fridays

Amir G, Money with Happiness

2019-05-24T12:49:41+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Many people associate money with happiness and think that the more money one has, the happier they should be. Do you agree with this statement? Give relevant examples from your own experience. A vast majority of members of society believe in a close correlation between wealth and life satisfaction. In fact, the supporters of this idea believe the rich can enjoy their life much more than others. When it comes this notion, I argue that although well-off individuals have more choices in their lives, this does not necessarily mean they are happier than others. This short essay elaborates on this heated debate. Though an overwhelming majority of people strongly hold the idea that affluent families are more satisfied with their life owing to their financial power, I do not agree with this notion completely. Spending too much time on work to earn more money, many an affluent individuals suffers from a variety of physical and mental exhaustion. Hardly a month goes by without a new scandal revealed by the media ruining the billionaires’ personal lives. Perhaps this is why majority of the rich and famous start taking drugs despite knowing the consequences of drug abuse. That being said, being rich is not that much horrible. I maintain that earning money up to a certain level can provide us with a variety of facilities such as more leisure time, a luxurious place to live, and delicious food, hence its importance. Many enjoy spending a large amount of their handsome income to on charities on the humanitarian grounds claiming that this gives them a prolonged emotional pleasure. I personally believe that not only is this kind of spending to the donors’ benefit, but it also is to the benefit to of the whole society. Hardly can a poor person can find out about the pleasures the rich experience. By way of conclusion, I must confess I that although strong financial abilities can solve a wide range of plights we may encounter in our everyday life, it can plague myriads of unpredictable problems if the wealth does is not managed wisely. Undoubtedly if the wealth is obtained from unlawful means we would say “with the wisdom of hindsight, had I known this much of wealth end upwould lead my life into disaster, I would not have spent my life on it”.

Bita, Shopping

2019-05-24T12:49:28+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Shopping is now one of the most popular forms of leisure activity in many countries for young adults. Why is this? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development? Today, shopping is the an inseparable part of the modern life, especially for spending pastime, and not only about the goods individuals need. The importance of time is not recondite to anyone and I think that people should care about how they spend their time. In the beginning, it should be said, there are many different reasons for advocating spare time to buying and we can see almost the youngsters care for accomplishing it rather than their elder counterparts parts. First of all, roughly all of the young generation wants/aspires to be more attractive and show their best appearance from their own, so they try to buy any new clothes and jewelry. Moreover, they are influenced by their peers, thereby going to the window shopping, and setting the meeting in the shopping malls have become a regular plan for filling spare-time. Secondly, “time” cannot be retrieved back and allocation of the whole the free time to shopping can be waste of the time, money and energy in different ways. Although shopping can make people happy, it is a short term pleasure. While, instead of repetition of this manner, individuals can get involved with some more efficient activities in fields of sport and art such as, football, volleyball, painting, music, so that, they can improve their teamwork, intellectual, and physical skills. To put it in a nutshell, I personally opine that neglect of time can have the irreversible effects for both individuals and society. To this end, authorities, governments and families should be motivated individuals especially young ones to do/engage in/pursue activities which is are more profitable physically, intellectually and socially.

Iman, Highway or PubTrans

2019-05-24T12:49:16+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay. On feet or back to any kind of carriages, doubtlessly, the mobility is one of those abilities which are irreconcilable in defining human-kind, to the extent that it can be claimed many of human activities revolved around the ways dealing with this inseparable property of our being throughout history. Although it necessitated forces us to find efficient ways meeting this very need, there is no decisive answer to the question of how it is better on this issue. My experience in my own growing burgeoning country rendered made me a pessimistic critic on of improving roads and highways. Due to my city ‘s increasing population and its imbalanced kind of growth these past years, making new ways not only have solved our problems like traffic and pollution but also encourage people to use their own vehicles. It gets worse when it comes to the quality of these constructions which can be counted as some of the main culprits of the heavy traffics our citizens suffer from. Even more, this overinvesting in personal ways of transmitting gives rise to an unforgivable neglect of the public transportation which has fanned the flames of sparked to our disinterested outlook to them. Moreover, suffering from hazardous effects of fossil fuel vehicles, it worth generally to point the environmental aspects of commuting too. Apart from any circumstances, we all are responsible to our coming children ‘s life. Rarely can we find a man who prefers to live a world depleted from its resources and drowned in pollution. Of course, both kinds of transferring are necessary for our lifestyle, by which I mean I prefer to access public transportation at the same time I have the choice of my car in special conditions. Going to a deadly significant job interview which can change my life, ostensibly does not leave me the choice of public transfer in a hot day on an old bus, whereas a suitable public transportation system would encourage me to use it for everyday commuting to my workplace, instead of bearing heavy traffics. In a nutshell, there are some general fact which should be morally accepted all around the world like the cleanliness of environment or resources protection on the one hand and some special conditions like the form of a city which impose some compulsions on the other hand to face this decision. I think the ability to strike the a delicate balance between these criteria will be the final goal.

Mahtab, Help From Government

2019-05-24T12:49:00+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Do you agree or disagree: people would meet many problems in their daily life and they would solve them by themselves or from the help of their families; the help from the government is not necessary. Problems are undergoing change day by day. Due to developments, the approaches people take to resolve their issues have improved. Governments were a prime candidate who were responsible for all problems in the past, but this has changed through time. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on why we should not expect the government to help people invariably. First, the private sector has developed through time and taken on some responsibilities. Many people believe that efficiency of the private sector is much more than the government because the citizen sector works more focused and is more able to investigate the responsibility which has assumed, so its productivity and creativity are further more than governments. Furthermore, its duties are much less than those of the state, as a result, it can make the best use of its potential and facilities to do its duties professionally. Therefore, people can be assisted in their daily problems by the citizen sector. In that case, the difference between the private sector and the public sector is that the former works deeply and the latter performs widely.Second, some experts explain that receiving help from the government means/translates dependence which itswhose result is holding people back. In fact, had were the government been in charge of everything, it would have monopolized all resources and economy. Consequently, the competition would be reduced and people would be deprived of quality services. For example, some online taxi companies which are private have were established in Iran six years ago which have had a key role in the betterment of public transportation. To conclude, I opine that governments have a more prominent roles which the private sector does not have enough power to play them, thus, the public sector should not get caught up with problems which can be solved by the other sector. They can impose the laws facilitating competition for the citizen sectors to aid it with minor problems and prevent them from breaking the rules. In fact, the public sector should introduce the laws which is are in favor of consumers, oversees the firms’ performance, and leads to fair competition. Finally, it can give companies a loans to set up their business. In that case, the public sector should provide financial help, ask the organizations for financial reports, and not get involved in the implementation phases.

Modern Technology

2019-05-24T12:48:47+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of modern technology on our life and health? It is widely acceptable that in this cutting-edge era technology plays an important role in our life. Obviously, it has numerous merits, but in contrast it contains a few downsides, so in this essay I am willing to discuss both views and give my own opinion. At the outset, technophiles hold a strong opinion on the positive effects of technology in today’s life. Some advocates state that high-tech technology boosts individual lifespan. For instance, in the past majority of people lost their life because of lack of knowledge and instruments to cure patients, whereas nowadays with a flourish advances of technology scientists and doctors can detect a diagnosis and treatment of illnesses. Likewise, a second plus point could be that it enhances general awareness of people in context of having a healthy lifestyle. For example, not everybody cannot afford to pay for visiting doctors or going to a gym so high-tech gives the opportunity to everyone to surf on the internet and download the videos from YouTube or some other valid websites for doing exercise and self-therapy. By contrast, it is often argued that one of the downsides is sleep deprivation. Of course, everyone has a gadget of some sort that has an unquenchable thirst for overusing it, so people spend lots of time surfing on the internet or playing with their devices even when they are in the bed, grafting . itwhich renders them sleeplessness whereas sleeping well is a prerequisite of health. The second drawback is caused less physical activity caused by high-tech devices. We face to widespread diseases like obesity, strain necks, eye weakness that stems from sitting many hours in front of laptops or tablets or a screen. To sum up, I personally opine that technology has a great impact on mankind for curing diseases and informing people, but we must utilize it in a correct direction/the right way and thereby we can prosper and serve the purpose for of being an advanced country.

Mohamad, Women

2019-05-24T12:48:35+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

It may be a whole new world to our ancestors who would have found this perhaps as unbelievable and uncanny as their wildest dream that women would be some day real rivals for men in the work world. As the long-lasting balance between men and women has shifted in the work area, so should the roles man and women play in performing household tasks. First, given the fact that women now truly work as the rival of men, it would be extremely unfair to expect them to play their previous roles anymore. The public perception that women are were responsible for doing chores around the house was so extremely rampant when they had no other responsibilities outside as co-supporter of the family and were determined to find that satisfying. However, this pattern has changed in recent decades as women have tried to win their independence and propose a redefinition of their function as the members of society. Secondly, women can be more productive at work when household chores are equally distributed between them and their male counterparts. As now a large variety of critical, high-ranking jobs are held and run by women, lending a hand by the other gender could help women boost their productivity and performance at work. A female doctor, for instance, could be a textbook example of women who carry out critical tasks. Overwhelmed, exhausted and frustrated by attempting to prove themselves as heroes in both battlefields, she can lose concentration while operating a surgery which can put her patients' lives in danger. In conclusion, embracing the transformation of the business world, men should cease to regard women as second-rate citizens and start to get more involved in house-related duties.

Mohammad Razavi, Shopping

2019-05-24T12:48:21+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Shopping is now one of the most popular forms of leisure activity in many countries for young adults. Why is this? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development? It is normal that people purchase their needful/needed articles, like food and clothes. But do we spend more time on shopping than it is required? Is the shopping filling in all of our leisure time? and is it positive? For the recent last question I incline to the opinion that this excessive consumption is the bane for of our life. It seems that all people consider shopping as a hobby not for meeting their requirements. I believe that on in the whole of the world, people are more consumerist than before. Frankfurtian theorists believe that with the decreaseby decreasing of in the social consciousness level, consumerism is reinforcedincreasing in society and vice versa. After the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Capitalism conquereds the entire world. In this situation, free market imbues her its culture industry in the spirit of society. Ipso facto, people spendt their time on shopping more than any things else. Our eagerness to for art, philosophy and literature is dramatically reduced and instead of watching dramatic arts, we keep an eye on commercial offers with the an open-mouth and athe closedmind. In this view, this development is not a natural procedure but it is imposed on society by capitalism. Enthusiasm of purchasing is leading to a homogenized society by a significant decrease in decreasing of social consciousness. In a homogenized society all people have the same ideas and aims which is not gained by self-thought, but induced by a new dictatorship system that should be named the domination system of economy. In conclusion, this state of consumerism is a great peril of our social life whose consequence is slavery for/to mass production. We should radically rethink our consumption patterns and keep well away from popular modes.

Mosadegh, Legal Age for Marriage

2019-05-24T12:48:08+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people feel that legal age at which people can marry should be at least 21. To what extent do you agree or disagree? The marriage has been a significantly important part of the human life which has always been a controversial and critical matter for people. Although all countries have some political and religious rules for it, some people have their own belief and tribal rituals. I, personally, believe that no matter what the countries’ rules say, the essence of humanity is more important than that. There is a fact that the lawful age for matrimony differs in various countries. Some who claim that adults can marry after the age of twenty have their reasons. It is obvious that the marriage procedure not only should be considered in terms of physical maturity of individuals, but also it can require mental maturity. Furthermore, having offspring is the other aspect of the coupling and it also requires physically, monetary monetarily and emotionally supports supporting entirely which parents should precisely pay attention to it. However, the age is only a number which cannot determine the mind growth and different abilities of individuals. In fact, there is a need to regulate exactly a minimum limitation for it. In some countries, according to some religious aspects, the minimum age for girls to marry is under 10 years and it is unacceptable in terms of human right. Sadly, they will not have enough time to have their pleasurable childhood and will have to take enormous responsibilities to tackle which is a depressive situation. Besides, they struggle with their study, so marriage will burden a lot of pressure on them. Moreover, in some indigent countries and family to be exact, child marriage especially for girls is an inevitable situation, because in that way, they can lessen their family expenditures and perhaps with a new arrival membercomer can easily cope with their personal family issues. In conclusion, it is crystal clear that all regulations should be introduced in favor of human beings without discrimination between both genders, but, regrettably, now, there is some customs which break the law of humanity. Surly, introducing an appropriate lawful age for matrimony brings about a bright future for the whole of the world.

Vahid, Shopping Centers

2019-05-24T12:47:55+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centers or malls to do their shopping. Is this a positive or a negative development? With the fickle world of business directly affecting different parts of a country's economy, barely can we find a store survived surviving from these circumstances. Challenging targeting the status quo about the shopping habits of people, new huge shopping centers have brought about considerable benefits including the variety of products and (the)higher quality which I wholeheartedly believe they outweigh the negative effects. First of all, shopping centers are stocked with dozens of varieties and provide you with a wide array of options enabling you to freely search for your desired product and retrieve goods yourself off the racks and shelves using self-service. Moreover, with the quality brands all gathering in a specific place, individuals would opt for the high standard products. In addition, regarding entertainment facilities provided in such places, parents would rather leave their children in there and involve themselves in shopping. Furthermore, some gastronomy facilities are created in order for families to have their meals, thereby spending more time shopping. However, having a broader view about this issue, I have to admit that this trend has caused some profoundly paramount drawbacks the most important of which is the depression of local economies. That such massive centers belong to a specific group of people who enjoy a staggering number of financial resources is an undeniable fact making/rendering local people to be deprived of their own market, hence their bankruptcy. A concerted effort is needed to devise some carefully and comprehensively designed schemes to support these businesses. In conclusion, the fact that our shopping habits have undergone a number of positive transformations cannot be denied, albeit at the cost of brick-andmortar shops and no doubt had they updated their work along with modern centers some years earlier, they would have not been weakened by them.