Fridays

Amir G, Food Self-Sufficiency

2019-07-27T15:29:07+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people say that a country should produce food locally, while others believe that it is good to import food. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and relevant examples. While many people strongly hold the idea that every country have to make the amount of food needed to feed its people, the opponents do not agree with this idea reasoning that many factors have to be considered to make an informed choice. When it comes to this notion, my vote does not go to it at any price. I opine that this is a strategic decision demanding a deeper consideration and broader view. It goes without saying that one of the primary needs of every creature after potable water is nutrition, and most probably that is why an overwhelming majority of the populace try to convince others that food self-sufficiency is of paramount importance. As far as I am concerned, scarcely can a country produce all types of food it requires. There are myriads of factors such as the weather, type of soil, and access to water and sun at play which just a few country may have them all. A blatant example is banana, which is considered one of the most highly nutritious fruits that only grows in specific regions in a narrow stream of tropical areas. I wholeheartedly wish that all countries were able to produce the amount of food they require, but this dream regrettably would not come true; not only because of ecological grounds, but also due to lack of financial justifications. Planting rice for example requires a good deal of water, and since water is not easily available in Africa, growing rice is not practically feasible there. Tired of heavy rains and humidity, people from in India and Sri Lanka for example can sell their rice to African countries, and instead pay for a sunny holiday in an African resort. To cut a long story short, I opine that since only limited areas of the world are suitable for agriculture or animal husbandry, it is not to the benefit of all nations to produce the entire food they need. I believe becoming food self-sufficient is somehow an idealistic viewpoint which can lead a country to a dramatic environmental disaster owing to the overuse of water for agricultural purposes.

Banafsheh, Cinema

2019-07-27T15:28:56+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Banafsheh Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in the cinema. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. As we live in a modern era, technology has made it easy to attain many things over the internet and smart phones. So, many people believe that, movies can be seen on disparate smart devices. Without any supplyneeding to go to the cinema; even so, others are of the opinion that to have a pleasurable time movies should be seen in a cinema. In my opinion, watching films must be watched on the silver screens. I will discuss both sides of this argument in this essay and give my own opinion. Firstly, countless people find smart phones and tablets more convenient. There are assuredly a few advantageous advantages of to watching movies on such modern gadgets. For example, the cost of commute and edible snacks which is are not cheap will be eliminated. Moreover, by clicking away at any time in any places you can choose whatever you like and watch it. Since time is precious, this unique feature helps people to save their time. Furthermore, it will avoid prevent wasting time in traffic and standing in a cinema’s queue, in that, you can save more time. Besides, recently in my country, many applications have been produced/developed for sharing movies in which you can watch all the released movies in cinemas. Whileby contrast,; it is believed that watching movies on smart phones are more amusing and enjoyable for being economical in terms of money and time, due to having the better sound quality, wide screens and well equipped systems and cinema’s are more catchy and appealing to many people. To explain, watching films in such an ambiance with eager people watching movies is exciting and desirable. Additionally, sometimes especially for the first play show they haveinvited actors, so this will cause more excitement to watch the movies in cinemas. So, you can take photos with actors, then you will have a memorable time. Moreover, you can walk a distance to the cinema, because we are going to sit about two hours and eating eat snacks. To conclude, watching movies on a mobile devices are is cheaper, easier and more convenient which is proper for most of the people. In my opinion, watching films in the cinema is not only entertaining but also fun.

Bina, Children and Technology

2019-07-27T15:28:43+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Tpo extra 3 – part 2 – 396 words Nowadays, children rely too much on technology, like computers, smartphones, video games for fun and entertainment; playing simple toys or playing outside with friends would be better for the children’s development. Agree or disagree? Children these days depends too much on technology, like pcs, smartphones and video games in order to fill their leisure time instead of joining group games or playing with simple toys. When I was younger, I would definitely have said that using technology is a great way to entertain ourselves, but for some reasons which I will mention in the following essay no longer do I think that way. To begin with, modern life has changed our lives in many different ways that one of themone of which is that it has pushed us into a sedentary lifestyle and forced us to not to having have a healthy life routine and it also has affected our kids’ daily routine due to the fact that it seems like that computer and video games are so interesting for children and the more they play these kinds of games, the more they drown in them the more and they lose their activity, and this process has a negative impact on their muscles development. In other words, this lifestyle can limit their growth which is why I am a big opponent of video games and smartphones. Kids need to be more active and using use their energy in sports and outdoor activities in order to stay healthy for their future. My cousin’s experience is a compelling example for this idea, he is only 14 and he suffers from neck and backbone problems for his extended sitting in front of the computer. Secondly, according to some psychological research, playing with simple toys helps children’s brain to mature in a shorter time and in an a more efficient way. Moreover, playing with toys leads them to figure out their talents and improve their skills. Playing outside with friends learns teach children how to interact with their peers, not to mention its positive impact on their social behavior and social intelligence. Studies have shown that playing with friends in the first decades of one’s life can increase their one’s self-esteem and self-confidence which can lead to a better handling of their future life issues. In conclusion, playing outdoor with friends or playing with simple toys not only is beneficial, but also is essential in someone’s life in order for them to live a healthy life both mentally and physically. Having said that, playing video and computer games can be a decent choice if only you can control your desire in playing and play in short periods of time.

Kamyar Moaveni, Public Transport

2019-07-27T15:28:30+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

The urban transport system receives more funds compared to the rural transport system. Why do you think it is so? How can it be solved? As cities become bigger and more populated than ever, they consume more budgets in almost every sector, one of which is the transport system. This has led to dissatisfaction among many rural dwellers. There are some reasons behind this phenomenon and a few measures can be taken to solve this problem too, all of which will be discussed in this essay. The first answer that comes to mind in questioning possible reasons behind this issue is the matter of overpopulation. Unfortunately, most of the population of a nation lives in cities nowadays. Considering the fact that developing infrastructure in rural areas needs as much money as in urban areas, more people will benefit from developing public transport in cities. This will play a significant role in making the decision of how much money should be allocated in each sector. The other reason to be noted is that the issue of congestion is more profound in conurbations that than in villages. Almost every big city in the world is inflicted by the problem of traffic nowadays, making it necessary to take steps in tackling this problem. Turning to possible solutions, perhaps the first step should be taken in the field of tax income. Enacting laws to dedicate a fixed amount of tax income to develop transport system infrastructure in rural areas seems to be an effective measure. In this way, it can be curtained guaranteed that the rural transport sector will receive enough money. Another effective solution is to undertake campaigns by public to urge governments to invest in transport systems of rural areas. Public-private partnership seems to be another good strategy. Governments can provide incentives to encourage the private sector to invest in developing transport systems in the countryside. To summarize, it seems that due to the larger population and higher intensity of the problem, cities have been able to absorb more money to develop transport infrastructure. Enacting laws and public-private partnership seem to be effective measures in bringing back investment to transport section of rural areas.

Mohammad Parpanji, History

2019-07-27T15:28:17+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe that research into family history is useful for the next generations, while others claim that present and future are more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. The curiosity about the past has forever been within humans, emerged in their creations from ancient fairy tales and cave engravings to modern literature and art. The desire for whether knowing the birth parents or gaining a better understanding of the ancestors makes many to conduct a family history research; others, however, may not agree and believe the present and the future are of more significance. On the one hand, many believe a better understanding of one’s family history can deepen selfknowledge. Almost everyone has experienced an identity crisis at least once. Feeling lost where they live, among whom they socialize, and when they belong, like their ancestors, modern humans struggle to know themselves better with the aid of genealogy. This may justi7fy justify the intriguing desire to visit the ancestral land, even after generations. My father, as a case in point, moved from Hamedan to Tehran along with his family in his childhood, but Hamedan never ceased to attract him as his origin, and by the time he visited the cityit, I remember he seemed more tranquil as if he had solved a mystery within. On the other hand, others are of the opinion that it is more reasonable to acknowledge the present and plan the future than to dwell on the past. “Seize the moment” and “look to the future” are perhaps the popular slogans of this group as no one can change what has happened and the present matters. Being related to a royal family from the time faded in the history never guarantee a bright future, nor should a dark family background thwart the burning ambition to shine in the future. Humans’ history is replete with instances of eminent scientists or politicians who managed to work their way up the social ladder and shine at their time as diamonds, brightening their communities. Thomas Edison, the US great inventor whose inventions have facilitated life throughout the world, can be a fine example. Coming from a deprived home, he emerged from economic hardships a person who gained not only wealth but respect while living, paving the way for scientists even after his death. To conclude, although researching family history can lead to better self-awareness, I would be inclined to accept that considering the present can better help us to build a better brighter future which is crucially important.