جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones in communication has negative effects on young people's reading and writing skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Some individuals are of the opinion that incremental use of technology in communication with others by cell phones and computers has a minus impact on people's ability either reading or writing. I partially agree that owing to overuse of the said devices, which have lessened their skills in these two sections by way of customary methodologies, On the one hand, today's people are entirely dependent on cutting-edge technology in terms of communication and businesses, and so forth. They have lesser reliance on classical reading and writing systems. That is to say, paper books, envelopes, and everything pertained to stationary, indicating their aptitude in those skills have gotten rusty due to not having exposure to paper or some such. As a matter of fact, their necessity has been diluted, Thereafter technology age manifested itself from 2000 onwards. On the other hand, people's reading and writing requirements have been obviating by E-books sources, coupled with texting by computers' or handsets' keyboards since technology age. These trends have fallen pervasive in this day and age, and there is no room for traditional methods. In practice, one could lay their hand on any books via social media. What's more, any connections have become more convenient and quicker, which the drawbacks of giving and taking envelopes whether by hold-up or break-down vanished. To outline, albeit the people's command on reading and writing has been reduced, better yet, most of the individuals senses no need to read by paper or to write by stationery, by virtue of steep upswing in technological devices.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

First impressions are important. Some people think that doing well in an interview is the key to securing a good job. To what extent do you agree? A group of people believes that first expressions are really matter. thus, in order to ensure a good job having a great interview can be a turning point. I do agree with the concept, However, it seems to me, well proper education background and having a strong resume is are as important as first impressions. The purpose of having an interview is to measure a candidate’s communication skills and confidence. Also, when a company or institute manages an interview for people who are willing to get job positions before hire hiring them is that they want to be familiar with candidates’ vision and mindset to be sure they choose a person who is a match with the company’s policy policies and he is the right person for the job. I think confidence, passion and more importantly, flexibility are the elements that can be recognized in the first impression which are vital for any job and employers as well. A person who has these items will have more chance to be hired. On the other hand, having a higher education and an advanced/strong/impressive resume is essential as well because most companies before arranging any interview ask for individuals’ resume and their education background in the first place in order to check their qualification. Employers will make their decision based on candidates’ experiences first and then they are going to call them for a face-to-face interview to check/scrutinize/examine their character and other skills. However, there is always a chance that a chosen person in the first part loses the chance in an interview. As a result, merely with a good impression you cannot not guaranty guarantee a decent/well-paid/good job, soalso, a perfect resume will not necessarily secure a good job as well.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas. What is your opinion? It goes without saying that the world has been divided into developing and industrialized countries. Needless to say, developed societies have a major impact on poorer ones. From my standpoint, wealth and resources in rich societies should be distributed to adjust a balance among all societies. They can help weaker countries in various fields, such as health, education and commerce. To vanish bridge the huge gap between rich and poor countries, richer countries’ governments should take the responsibility of assisting developing countries to improve/in improving their standard of living. Although developing countries play an integral role on in providing raw materials for all parts of the world, they have to purchase products from rich nations’ market. This trend can be reduced if they would have enough budget to establish their own factories/manufactories. To address this situation, wealthier authorities can give them long-term loans to accommodate their needs. In terms of health situation, developing countries have are faced facing serious problems. The amount of fundamental facilities and medicines in these impoverished societies are is below the poverty line. Developed countries are capable to of provide providing their required equipment and also know-howfield of /education related to health and hygiene in order to improve the level of health upon developing countries. As an illustration, African people suffer from different diseases which they do not have enough knowledge to treat them. Therefore, it can influence other countries, as well. When the infection spreads, all people all around the world might be endangered and afflicted. Furthermore, poor countries having the highest rate of illiterates cannot provide sufficient educational programs for their citizens. Therefore, in field of management, it can be filled by uneducated and unexperienced people. Privileged countries can help them to enhance their educational infrastructure, to a great extent. In conclusion, wealthier countries are responsible for poorer ones in many areas. As, they are too weak to solve their education, health and trade’s problems, thosewith rich resources can lead them to address their issues in the aforementioned fields.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Nowadays, more and more older people who need employment compete with the younger people for the same jobs. What problems this causes? What are solutions? There is a rat race between the youth and the elderly to secure job opportunities in this day and age. As it is the case, I will investigate the ins and outs of this issue and some feasible solutions will be submitted. On the one hand, due to cut-throat competition among aged people and young ones, the prospect of obtaining job recruitment by seniors will fall to the extent that they could not be on the same footing as adolescents because. Because younger adults are more likely to have more and superior credentials with respect to certificate, bilingualism, and other scopes pertained pertaining to technology information. Hence, employers would rather opt for junior individuals bringing joblessness in its train for senior ones, consequently. Consequently leading them into committing a crime, as they are likely to have a family to support, and they may not have an adequate income to provide the bare necessities of their families. On the other hand, several steps should be taken by the authorities and governments worldwide. For instance, did if they diminish the minimal age for retirement, and did they scale up the elderly s'elderlies’ state pension, older individuals would will not compete with others, that is to say, the youth for job employments. Last but not least, for rivalry on the same scale, and should the need arise, governors could make offer some courses for free of charge concerning older adults to make them qualify qualified them to achieve jobs either at a premium level or with a high stipend. If should/were/had pp => inversion To conclude, only when aging persons/individuals are not going to compete with younger ones are their bore necessities be provided or the respective competition taking place in the same circumstances in terms of knowledge and ability within two age groups provided that the governmental authorities constitute free centers for the elderly.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Sometimes people are assigned to work in a group on a project. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement. The group will be helped more by a person who is willing to do what other group members want than by a person who often strongly insists that things should be done in a way that is different from what the group wants to do. Use reasons and examples to support your position. Hardly ever can anyone call into questions the significant role of working in group in people's life. The question arose as to whether the group's members should ponder others' opinion or treat strictly to other ones to follow their own way. Personally, I think it would be beneficial for a group, if decisions are made by a whole group for some reasons which are illustrated at the length in the subsequent paragraphs. The first and most obvious is, two heads are better than ones which means we can consider challenges by another perspective besides ours which sounds more profitable. In other words, a person who insists to obey his way might not comprehend his way weaknesses but when issues are reached by general consensus, it can be checked out by all members' viewpoints to make informed decisions, which seems more practical. Hence, as is clear we can look at the challenge with whole new set of eyes and in doing so, we maximize our chances of success and minimize the likelihood of failure in the certain situation. Another aspect which I should point it out is about enthusiasm. In apposite words, by taking members' desires into account, they are encouraged to working as a team which is conducive to cooperating in the best way. Therefore, it goes without saying that not only are members more enthusiastic about teamwork which is culminate in being a great experience for them, but also it can bring success to the group as soon as possible, thereby collaborating to achieve that end.Last but not least, working by an individual who cares about other members' opinion is easier owing to the fact that this person is easygoing and members are more comfortable to express their feeling about different subjects. On the other hand, a person who sticks to his way can transmit anxious and discouragement to a group. From my own experience, I had a classmate who stood up for her way of thinking when we was working in the group regardless of others' preference which caused decreasing others' confidence since they thought their wishes/urges are useless. In the final analysis, although some people believe that the benefits of undertaking tasks by someone's way in the group greatly outweigh than the drawbacks, I strongly believe otherwise on the basis of the reasons that were mentioned above.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Kamal Sadeghi (2nd) Nowadays many families have both parents working. Some believe other family members like grandparents can take care of their children, while other think childcare centers provide the best care. Discuss both view and give your own opinion Today, a majority of parents are busy with their job. They need someone to care for their offspring. Although some people believe that the best choice is childcare centers, I would say that grandparents are more much better ( to care for children). On the one hand, it is argued that these busy families should rely on childcare organizations so as to care for their kids. It is maintained that sending children to these centers have has some benefits. There are babysitters who are often well trained, so they are professional childcarers. They know that what exactly they should they do for children comfort. For example, if a child needs food or some rest, which way it should have be planned is their expertise. Moreover, those children who are sent to these organizations are more likely to be independent than those of that are not sent. By the time, children who live with peers can handle the life better, independently. On the other hand, some people justifiably think that grandparents are more reliable to care for/ look after grandchildren. Firstly, since grandparents have enough experience through along with raised raising their own children, they can raise kids more easily. They know how to calm/soothe a child when crying or feed them when they are hungry. Secondly, it is the a fact that grandparents are family members. Consequently, those children who are raised under grandparents' supervision are more likely to be family-oriented. In conclusion, although childcare centers are professional and have efficient/nice services in order to for child caring, I personally believe that grandparents are a better choice for child raising. in order to do sth In order for him to do sth So as to do sth Longman exam coach

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In my opinion, in the contemporary world, it is crystal clear that you cannot live without risk because of most facts and issues that we are facing are probalistic and are depended on many factors. Regarding this importance, people should adapt themselves to these circumstances to be more comfortable and flexible in their social life. In addition, adjusting to the current situations of the world causes a lof opportunities. I will explore the reasons why I feel this way in the following essay. To commence, according to my experince, for imporving and enhancing in this sophisticated community, it is a pivotal reason to take risk in routine life in order to catch much more oppotunities. owing to this fact, there is no certain rule to become a successful person in the society withoug taking risk because despite of putting effort into your carrier or job, you are doing the same thing as the past, and by doing this, you don't qualify enough to be successful. Another noteworthy reason that cannot go unnoticed is that the personality of the successful people acquire to be creative, and they cannot accomplish the ordinary tasks for a long time. To clarify this concept, I need to be more specific. For instance, you would easily find a lot of stories about successful people’s life that the most significant trait that they have is taking risk in difficult situations and making purposeful decisions in such situations. Taking into account what was already mentioned, In my view, the more risk you take, the more achievement you gain. Hence, this is visibly clear that you will not get a higher circumstance in the community without taking risk. Furthermore, people should live in the way that what their soul need. I firmly believe that the humankind feel the need to perform something different from others for feeling the real satisfactory.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Today children are spending much more time watching TV compared to the past. Why do you think this happens? Is this a positive or a negative change? Over recent decades, television’s viewers have been growing up, particularly fresh minds. There are numerous causes for why children are fascinated by this magical box. Beyond question, this trend could bring more main positive points for their spectators/viewers or its drawbacks outweighed them? Admittedly, technological breakthroughs have changed the way adolescents being are fascinated and not only does television introduce a broad range of programs persuading plenty of children to spend their time on it but also, diverse programs are readily available for them in order to acquirelearn from. In other words, what any type of a movie or program could be found anytime anywhere as opposed to the previous time; hence, the number of youngsters spending their time on TV are is increasing substantially. Moreover, thanks to state-of-the-art gadgets the production process of a movie or animation has been boosted considerably, and there are also highly attractive. According to recent surveys, the production volume in the field of cinema has grown, and advertisements also play a crucial role in persuasion of people to watch more. A number of students were absent/the number of the students was 15. This trend has had more negative effect on youngsters which means that more time spent watching TV adversely affects the mental and physical well-being of …. Recent studies show that the obesity rates have been rising dramatically over the recent two decades among children; it also could cause further problems in their future such as depression due to lack of face-to-face communication with their peers and even anxiety. Having said this, however, the TV could also be regarded as an educational tool byin which plenty of academic subjects are found easily; consequently, the minds are trained by fully proper information and knowledge. In conclusion, advances in technology result in more time spending spent in front of the television which could be more harmful unless we regulate/as long as we do not regulate the use of it. It is incumbent upon parents to control the time and proper programs which their children use.