Fridays

Armin, Literature

2021-03-12T18:29:11+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people say that school children should be mainly taught about the literature (e.g. fiction and poetry) of their own country because it is more important than that of other countries. To what extent do you agree? Some people are of the opinion that pupils should be chiefly educated at local literature rather than worldwide 's literature. I sympathize with the notion that students had better get accustomed to international literature. However, there are some merits in the study of domestic literature, as will be explained in this assay. Due to globalization and the information age, everything hinges upon technology and telecommunication in this day and age. School children can get the most of their lives; only if they are taught global literature do they enable themselves to expand their communication with foreign people and lay their hands on cutting-edge and recent data that could be utilitarian for them. As an illustration, in first-world countries, school children have been studying curricula with respect to other countries' literature; That is why they have a better comprehension of other foreigners than that of less-developed countries. If students are cognizant of the literature pertaining to the poem, fiction, culture of their own countries, they will benefit from that. In fact, patriotism and a sense of belonging to their own countries might be a product of learning indigenous literature. For example, in Iran, due to teaching students concerning national literature, students take pride in their country profusely as it can be. As it can be rarely noticed rarely in the nations that deal with national literature to such an extent. To sum up, although a few advantages can be obtained by getting student school children acquainted with the literature of their own countries, the study of Worldwide literature outstrips the opposite side.

Niloo, Eating Restaurants or Cooking Home

2021-03-12T18:28:59+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In areas where there are many restaurants, some people prefer to buy their meals in restaurants very frequently, rather than cooking and eating meals at home. Other people prefer to cook most of their meals at home and only rarely eat in restaurants. Which one would you choose why? Hardly ever can anyone call into questions the significant role of food in people's health in their life. The questions arise as to whether eating at a restaurant for meals can be beneficial or cooking at home. Even though nowadays people are coping with their hectic lifestyle and having a meal at restaurants can be more effective for them in terms of time-saving, personally where I want to choose between these two options I would go for latter for some reasons which I will explain at length in the subsequent paragraphs. First and most obvious is, being healthier. In other words, a meal which cookeds at home is healthier since it would include high quality ingredients. The best example is, not only use do restaurants use low-quality oil based on money-saving but also they use it for many times which culminates in individuals' overweight. Therefore, it goes without saying that cooking meals at home is more useful for humans' health. Another remarkable aspect which I should point out is about the fact that eating at restaurants is not economically. In apposite words, fundamentally, having high value-added-tax and giving tips makes leads to losing a lot of money compared to cooking at home. Besides, in my opinion cooking is one of the sources of escapism which is conducive to expressing feelings. As we all know cooking is love. Moreover, when I am cooking at home, I am away from hustle and bustle of streets which means when I go out for eating at restaurants, I almost always get stuck in traffic but by having a meal at home I can vegging out/collapse in front of TV, so it is a given fact that cooking at home is more convenient.In final analysis, although some people prefer to eat at restaurants for their meals in terms ofdue to saving time, I strongly believe otherwise maintaining that this mindset is nothing but a tunnelvision which ignores the importance of the abovementioned facts and also from in my view the advantages of cooking at home greatly outweigh the drawbacks and I behoove urge people to cook their meals at home to save their money and being healthier.

Niloo, Young LeisureTime Off School

2021-03-12T18:28:32+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some young people have free time in the evening after school or on days off from school. Which of the following activities would be most beneficial for young people (age 14-18) to do in their spare time? Why? -Gaining practical work experience either at a part time job or by volunteering in the community -Learning to play a sport -Learning to play a musical instrument. Hardly ever can anyone call into questions the significant role of students' activities in their future life. The questions arose arise as to which of these options can be beneficial for their life. Even though all of these choices have positive effect on young children's life, I think the second ones can be more effective for some reasons which I will explain at length in the subsequent paragraphs. The first and most obvious is, in today's modern life the number of technology users is increasing especially at in/during adolescent adolescence (with the advent of the technology especially the internet the number of it users is raising rising especially at in adolescentadolescence) which causes their overweighing overweight that derives from inactivity, so playing sport at in their free time can decrease it. In other words, nowadays young children have a less physical activities activity because of being involving involved with a modern technology, so learning to play a sport makes them gravitates them to have more healthy life which impacts not only on their bodies but also their minds. Therefore, it goes without saying that playing a sport for leisure time can release young people from hustle and bustle of life for some hours which hasadvantages for them based on mental and physical health (bodily). Another aspect which I should point it out is about escapism. In apposite words, fundamentally children by playing sports on their days off from school can take the edge off an education pressure which is vital for being neither discouragement nor tired from studying. Besides, playing sports can be useful for teenagers to not only boost their creativity but also also being more socialize, thereby meeting new people and making novel friends. From my own experience, when I was at high school, I had quite tough time owing to the fact that I had to take a university entrance exam, so there was plenty of pressure on me from myselfmy own and my family which by doing yoga I could clear my mind and not lose my patient patience in my goals. In final analysis, although some people believe that the advantages of the other two other points is greatly outweigh than this one, I strongly believe otherwise on the basis of the reasons that were mentioned above and personally, I urge behoove parents to encourage their young children to play sports on their days off from school.

Part-time Job

2021-03-12T18:28:22+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them take a part-time job. Teenage years are one of the most challenging stages in human development. It is a course in which several important features of personality are shapeds, expectations for adulthood are adjusted and the ability to take responses is created. Parents play a vital role in preparing teenagers for their upcoming adult life by encouraging their children to take a part-time job. This can be helpful in many ways which I will be discussing in the following essay. Firstly, adult life is all about taking responsibility and accepting the consequences of your actions. This is a prominent aspect of this course of life and taking part-time jobs from early days in teenagerhood, can build up these abilities. In the second place, a part-time job is a great source for teenagers to make social interaction. During teenage years, peers and friends are the most influential persons. These jobs can make offer this opportunity for them to bond, for instance, with other teenagers who work at the same place and learn a great deal/many things from each other. Equally important, the value of money can be learned. Teenagers by taking part-time jobs can understand that money is a valuable thing asset and therefore it should not be spent carelessly. I believe that this is an enormous step that should be obtained before stepping into adulthood. As an illustration, a teenager who works hard in a month and paid a certain amount of money, realizes that money does not grow on trees/come from nowhere, you should work hard to get that and therefore it should be valued. In addition to what is mentioned above, it is of note to say that parents, before assigning their children for a job, should be aware of the job's requirements and the teenager's capabilities. Putting a teenager for example in a situation which he/ she is totally unfamiliar with, can cause more damage than goods. Although she was aware, she did the job. In conclusion, taking a part-time job is a good practice for teenagers to be prepared for their adult life,. Therefore, parents should encourage them to do so. Overconsumption of electricity is a wrong practice.

Self-employed

2021-03-12T18:28:13+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Nowadays many people choose to be self-employed, rather than to work for a company or organization. Why might this be the case? What could be the disadvantages of being self-employed? These days a large number of people choose to start their own business instead of being an employee. From my point of view, there are many reasons behind this phenomenon and self-employment could have some merits and demerits together. There are many reasons behind the rise /increase in the number of start-up companies. First and foremost, people want to earn more money so/and achieving this goal is more likely to possible by working in big or well-known companies. Since these kinds of companies need individuals who have high academic qualification degrees, as well as abundant working experiences, therefore, many people who seek a good job have been rejected. So then they prefer to start their own business. Another reason refers to the age of technology that provides many job conditions. The internet has provided many kinds of possibilities in terms of making money. For instance, people may work as freelancers or start their own business on social networks like Instagram so they could start up their own business easily in comparison to the past. Sabaitc.com However, there are some drawbacks for self-employed people. To begin with, there is no guarantee for people who start up their business to earn enough money. To put it clearlyby contrast, if people work for a company, there will be more likely to have a regular wage. While having your own business may face lead to different challenges or bankruptcy/insolvency broke down. In addition, they have no economic resources in comparison to working for a company that provides pension plans and health insurance, so. So, self-employee employment could be a risky trend path which means, it could become more ; less successful than working for another company. Take many triumphant companies as an example; many of them have started up with self-employees or very small businesses organizing with one or more young persons. In conclusion, Hiring conditions and priorities, as well as higher incomes, make people strive for entrepreneurship, although they will also face problems such as a lack of financial guarantees.

Shaghayegh, Cities

2021-03-12T18:28:03+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some cities create new housing for their growing populations by constructing a smaller number of high-rise buildings. Other cities create more of low-rise buildings. Which solution is better, in your opinion? Since the population is rising every single day, urban areas should provide a wide range of accommodation for their residents. Some cities prefer to construct fewer multi-story buildings, while others choose to build a larger number of single-stories for their citizens. Now, the question is which one could be regarded as the/a best better feasible resolution. An obvious positive point of skyscrapers is that a large number of people could live there while a small space is occupied. Due to this distinctive characteristic, central parts of big cities, where land is scarce and highly demanded, have generally benefited from it. New York City is one tangible example, constant constructions of high-rise buildings in its down-town have has led to reduction of rent in this area. On the other hand, the problem in this case is not only should residentsliving in a tower follow restrict regulations and rules but also their, privacy is undermined/rare. Furthermore, the cost of maintenance of these buildings is substantial. Were if individuals have had an option to choose from, many probably would prefer to live in low-rise buildings and even build their own dream house. This type of building generally is picked up by the elderly or big families where they need to have fewer stairs to prevent or lessen injury or have more space to live conveniently. Moreover, living in a low-rise building is cheaper to maintain as opposed to tall buildings. However, they are mostly located in the suburbs; as a consequence, it would be timeconsuming to commute to the city center and likely result in a negative effect on its own residents’ quality of life. In conclusion, both types of buildings have their own merits and demerits. From my point of view, modern multistory buildings could be used in the center of cities where a large number of youngsters live and employment opportunities are more available. However, low dwellings could be regarded as hosts of senior citizens who require peace and quieter places for living. Therefore, applying both strategies seems vital.

University Students

2021-03-12T18:27:54+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe that university students should be required to attend classes. Other believe that going to classes should be optional for students. Which point of view do you agree with? Educationally speaking, although a group of people claim that university students need to attend compulsory classes, I strongly agree with those who hold that it is more beneficial when students have an option to choose whether attending a class is more useful to themnecessary or not. The idea of attending classes optionally brings about some benefits through academic life for each student. Firstly, they are free to choose which class is their field of interest, so they can join, otherwise they may lose a considerable amount of their precious time on participating in classes which they do not enjoy and learn from efficiently. It is completely essential for university students to be expert in a particular field of study in order to invest their knowledge on in their future career. The students who are poor in learning sophisticated subjects, instead of wasting their time on easier topics, may have more time to work on the harder ones. Another justification, showing the importance of optional attendance for students is that, international students can work the hours that they are required to be present for learning some convenient subjects; hence, they can make money to accommodate their basic needs in a foreign country. Another group of people believe that the idea of making classes optional at universities is wrong. In the first place, the youth generation need to learn disciplines which may come true when there are some strict rules in term of classes’ attendance. How to be organized and make/arrange/establish a schedule for the period of academic life, may also help them to be well-organized for the rest of their lives. On the other hand, some credits are a prerequisite for other ones (which are) called major credits. Students have to learn and pass those subjects to be able to choose major credits making students professional and leading them to be graduated from their field of interest. To conclude, there are different views in making university classes optional or compulsory, as it is now. While some people convey argue it is impossible, I think there are many ways that students can have the opportunity to choose that which class is essential or not. Universities can provide some visual aids for those who prefer not to attend some classes. Also, students can have self-study but if they face some difficulties or if something goes wrong, they can ask thefrom professor of about that subject via email or even in person./ I know that why you hate me/I know that when you criticize me you want to say sth.