Mondays GMAT-GRE-TOEFL-IELTS-آموزشگاه زبان صبای سحر-چمران جنوب، بلوار جلال آل احمد، جنب داروخانه شبانه روزی جلال آل احمد، پلاک 87، طبقه سوم تلفن: 42-88679341 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/213-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-02-25 2024-05-02T17:46:52+00:00 IELTSTOEFLCENTER info@ieltstoeflcenter.com Joomla! - Open Source Content Management Advertising, Amir Gilani 2017-05-18T05:11:55+00:00 2017-05-18T05:11:55+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/213-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-02-25/1244-advertising-amir-gilani <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.02.25/Advertising, Amir Gilani.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. During the last ten years prohibition of advertisement have considered a controversial topic in developing countries. This notion just like every other phenomena in our world has its own supporters and opponents. The opponents/former reason that advertisement/advertising has a major role in moving the economicy gears/wheels while the supporters of banning the advertising are strongly against this, believinge that it can increases the consumption of unnecessary commodities/a culture of consumerism. The ones who are of the idea that advertisement can boost the economy believe that it can help the economy to grow by creating lots of jobs in different levels of society, and in addition to that advertising increases the rate of sales sells which leads to circulatinge the cash flow in a society. This group of people think that not only is do advertisingement is beneficial to producers but also it is a new source of revenue for television channels, public transportation companies as well as artists. This group of people also claim that the colorful banners across the highways have made their city more attractive. On the other hand, there are is another group of people who are trying to ban advertisement in every aspect of it because they believe that it has destructive effect on small factories. They reason that the drawbacks of advertisement are more than the merits. In other words they think due to exciting advertisements multinational companies are becominge bigger and bigger while the new or small factories are subjected to disappearance. Another disadvantage of advertising is that the advertisements protect prevent consumers against of having an informed choice. To make a long story short, I think banning the advertisements serves as a double-edge sword. In other words, while advertisingement has lots of drawbacks, there are lots of advantages that no one can deny. In fact I believe instead of banning advertisements we have to work on people's general knowledge so that the advertisements do not affect their life.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.02.25/Advertising, Amir Gilani.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. During the last ten years prohibition of advertisement have considered a controversial topic in developing countries. This notion just like every other phenomena in our world has its own supporters and opponents. The opponents/former reason that advertisement/advertising has a major role in moving the economicy gears/wheels while the supporters of banning the advertising are strongly against this, believinge that it can increases the consumption of unnecessary commodities/a culture of consumerism. The ones who are of the idea that advertisement can boost the economy believe that it can help the economy to grow by creating lots of jobs in different levels of society, and in addition to that advertising increases the rate of sales sells which leads to circulatinge the cash flow in a society. This group of people think that not only is do advertisingement is beneficial to producers but also it is a new source of revenue for television channels, public transportation companies as well as artists. This group of people also claim that the colorful banners across the highways have made their city more attractive. On the other hand, there are is another group of people who are trying to ban advertisement in every aspect of it because they believe that it has destructive effect on small factories. They reason that the drawbacks of advertisement are more than the merits. In other words they think due to exciting advertisements multinational companies are becominge bigger and bigger while the new or small factories are subjected to disappearance. Another disadvantage of advertising is that the advertisements protect prevent consumers against of having an informed choice. To make a long story short, I think banning the advertisements serves as a double-edge sword. In other words, while advertisingement has lots of drawbacks, there are lots of advantages that no one can deny. In fact I believe instead of banning advertisements we have to work on people's general knowledge so that the advertisements do not affect their life.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Climate Change, Shahla 2017-05-18T05:11:36+00:00 2017-05-18T05:11:36+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/213-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-02-25/1243-climate-change-shahla <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.02.25/Climate Change, Shahla.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">-climate change is now an accepted threat to our planet. But there is not enough political action to control excessive consumerism and pollution, do you agree? Our planet is the best option for the life between the other planets in the solar system and it needs to be preserved. It means that all of the people have a critical role in the kismet of the earth. Now, in order that this destiny has a good ending/termination, many of the humans cooperate together for salvation of the earth. On the other hand, there they are those who that use up their energy for that to salvage the earth. Their plans consume a lot of money and therewith it is hard to execute these plans. In our society, if we have the culture of using resources which are vital for living that for to continue the life is very necessary, we wouldn't will not need to worry about our planet being uninhabitable, nor would we need to spend a lot of money on/for our plans. Nevertheless, we are at in a point where we that can't to return behind. In this position, we may it must have to lose a normal tidy life in that the population of a lot of societies day by day becomes more than ever ago and pollution is a serious problem there. I think there is enough political action and we need to expend a lot of money more than usual in this way. The cause of it that doesn't have the ideal result is that people have a narrow vision to nature and don't think about the future generations. In other words, when we don't have a perspective about future incoming planet which is why that expending money or a variety of plans don't have favorable result. As a conclusion, all of things depend on/upon to us. I say to you, when you change, your life will change, too. It means for a better life all of mans humans must endeavor and it needs to a collective collaboration/campaign stir.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.02.25/Climate Change, Shahla.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">-climate change is now an accepted threat to our planet. But there is not enough political action to control excessive consumerism and pollution, do you agree? Our planet is the best option for the life between the other planets in the solar system and it needs to be preserved. It means that all of the people have a critical role in the kismet of the earth. Now, in order that this destiny has a good ending/termination, many of the humans cooperate together for salvation of the earth. On the other hand, there they are those who that use up their energy for that to salvage the earth. Their plans consume a lot of money and therewith it is hard to execute these plans. In our society, if we have the culture of using resources which are vital for living that for to continue the life is very necessary, we wouldn't will not need to worry about our planet being uninhabitable, nor would we need to spend a lot of money on/for our plans. Nevertheless, we are at in a point where we that can't to return behind. In this position, we may it must have to lose a normal tidy life in that the population of a lot of societies day by day becomes more than ever ago and pollution is a serious problem there. I think there is enough political action and we need to expend a lot of money more than usual in this way. The cause of it that doesn't have the ideal result is that people have a narrow vision to nature and don't think about the future generations. In other words, when we don't have a perspective about future incoming planet which is why that expending money or a variety of plans don't have favorable result. As a conclusion, all of things depend on/upon to us. I say to you, when you change, your life will change, too. It means for a better life all of mans humans must endeavor and it needs to a collective collaboration/campaign stir.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Ebooks, Nazak Ayoughi 2017-05-18T05:11:17+00:00 2017-05-18T05:11:17+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/213-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-02-25/1242-ebooks-nazak-ayoughi <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.02.25/Ebooks, Nazak Ayoughi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">More and more people prefer to read e-books than paper books. What are the reasons for this? What problems can this cause for libraries? In thisa modern society in which the innovations and improvements of digital devices and the technology of them are is rising at an unprecedented rate, that people prefer more reading e-books to paper ones is highly predictable. At the first sight, it seems digital books have more merits in comparison with their paper counterparts. Their most tempting feature of them is that they are notably easy to reach. Accessing to the internet besides having a credit card, readers would be able to purchase what they want in a fraction of a second. This advantage helps people search for their subject by typing only a few words of it through the massive number of books published all around the world matching with those key words. Not only does this approach assist people in spending almost no time for searching while they are seating sitting at their computers, but also this would be much cheaper than printed books due to less consumption of paper. In addition, the less we use papers, the more we would be in harmony with nature to conserve the environment. The most important reason for favoring e-books in my opinion is that we can have hundreds of books accessible any time from mobile, laptop or tablet which everyone has at least one. of them. It they are is not heavy to carry and plus all the data (books) can be totally safe by replicating them in cloud memories or even on a high capacity hard memory resting in at your drawer at home. On the other hand, using eBooks a lot and consequently can result in detrimental body damages. The light coming out of the digital gadgets in long run would have harmful effects on eyes. Because of this preference, libraries are losing their fans. Having all the books in some gigabytes as a personal library, people feel no need to suffer going to such a quiet and huge place in order to find their book if the library has it. So,, so they become less crowded and less favorable every day. The worst fact is many jobs will be lost in near future. Generally speaking, Although this facet of technologicaly improvement has many advantages, we should not neglect its the downsides of it specifically when it comes to our health.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.02.25/Ebooks, Nazak Ayoughi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">More and more people prefer to read e-books than paper books. What are the reasons for this? What problems can this cause for libraries? In thisa modern society in which the innovations and improvements of digital devices and the technology of them are is rising at an unprecedented rate, that people prefer more reading e-books to paper ones is highly predictable. At the first sight, it seems digital books have more merits in comparison with their paper counterparts. Their most tempting feature of them is that they are notably easy to reach. Accessing to the internet besides having a credit card, readers would be able to purchase what they want in a fraction of a second. This advantage helps people search for their subject by typing only a few words of it through the massive number of books published all around the world matching with those key words. Not only does this approach assist people in spending almost no time for searching while they are seating sitting at their computers, but also this would be much cheaper than printed books due to less consumption of paper. In addition, the less we use papers, the more we would be in harmony with nature to conserve the environment. The most important reason for favoring e-books in my opinion is that we can have hundreds of books accessible any time from mobile, laptop or tablet which everyone has at least one. of them. It they are is not heavy to carry and plus all the data (books) can be totally safe by replicating them in cloud memories or even on a high capacity hard memory resting in at your drawer at home. On the other hand, using eBooks a lot and consequently can result in detrimental body damages. The light coming out of the digital gadgets in long run would have harmful effects on eyes. Because of this preference, libraries are losing their fans. Having all the books in some gigabytes as a personal library, people feel no need to suffer going to such a quiet and huge place in order to find their book if the library has it. So,, so they become less crowded and less favorable every day. The worst fact is many jobs will be lost in near future. Generally speaking, Although this facet of technologicaly improvement has many advantages, we should not neglect its the downsides of it specifically when it comes to our health.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> History & Architecture, Sara Kasaei 2017-05-18T05:10:48+00:00 2017-05-18T05:10:48+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/213-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-02-25/1241-history-architecture-sara-kasaei <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.02.25/History &amp; Architecture, Sara Kasaei.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation's history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress? Architecture is an inevitable part of all cultures. Throughout the ages, humans have illustrated their thought in their constructions, so demolishing them would be a hugely irreplaceable mistake. Observing the past could usefully contribute to technology in terms of morality and positive manners. Historical buildings are often portrayed to be a major part of nations' identity. They could demonstrate our forefathers' lifestyles both money-wise and politically wise in that a noticeable amount of each government's s' budget has been spent in order to present their wealth and ideology. For instance, cities like Rome and Milan in Italy which where not only could help us reminisce about the Roman Empire's roman empire's golden era, they have brought national pride for all Italians. Moreover, these old but well-preserved buildings would be a brilliant opportunity for developing tourism which could absorb millions of visitors annually. What this approach would bring about is employment and consequently economic growth in a perfectly sustainable way; namely Colosseum and Pantheon. What needs to be taken in tointo account is that history cannot be a detrimental factor for technological developments. Modern discoveries have enabled mankind to contribute their existence on the earth (?). The more informed this progress occurs with the assistance of our past generations' experience, the higher the chance of provision of a well-developed, peaceful world. What is more, new preserving materials and techniques would be highly beneficial in the maintained maintenance process of an archeological/historic/ancient building; such as palaces, mansions or churches. In addition, by delving into the past powers destinies, comprehending them and developing moralities amongsocieties; technological researches could be lead to being used in philanthropic activities rather than wars and violent behaviors that have caused thousands of innocents being killed each year during our contemporary era. In brief, preserving the precious historical monuments should be a must for the sake of individuals and societies in all countries as a link to engage us with our past and true identity. Technology could be used to increase the efficiency of these places in order to be a constant reminder of/for grasping positive attitudes.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.02.25/History &amp; Architecture, Sara Kasaei.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation's history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress? Architecture is an inevitable part of all cultures. Throughout the ages, humans have illustrated their thought in their constructions, so demolishing them would be a hugely irreplaceable mistake. Observing the past could usefully contribute to technology in terms of morality and positive manners. Historical buildings are often portrayed to be a major part of nations' identity. They could demonstrate our forefathers' lifestyles both money-wise and politically wise in that a noticeable amount of each government's s' budget has been spent in order to present their wealth and ideology. For instance, cities like Rome and Milan in Italy which where not only could help us reminisce about the Roman Empire's roman empire's golden era, they have brought national pride for all Italians. Moreover, these old but well-preserved buildings would be a brilliant opportunity for developing tourism which could absorb millions of visitors annually. What this approach would bring about is employment and consequently economic growth in a perfectly sustainable way; namely Colosseum and Pantheon. What needs to be taken in tointo account is that history cannot be a detrimental factor for technological developments. Modern discoveries have enabled mankind to contribute their existence on the earth (?). The more informed this progress occurs with the assistance of our past generations' experience, the higher the chance of provision of a well-developed, peaceful world. What is more, new preserving materials and techniques would be highly beneficial in the maintained maintenance process of an archeological/historic/ancient building; such as palaces, mansions or churches. In addition, by delving into the past powers destinies, comprehending them and developing moralities amongsocieties; technological researches could be lead to being used in philanthropic activities rather than wars and violent behaviors that have caused thousands of innocents being killed each year during our contemporary era. In brief, preserving the precious historical monuments should be a must for the sake of individuals and societies in all countries as a link to engage us with our past and true identity. Technology could be used to increase the efficiency of these places in order to be a constant reminder of/for grasping positive attitudes.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Parenting, Amir Adel 2017-05-18T05:07:14+00:00 2017-05-18T05:07:14+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/213-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-02-25/1240-parenting-amir-adel <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.02.25/Parenting, Amir Adel.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Many people believe that women make better parents than men and that this is why they have the greater role in raising children in most societies. Others claim that men are just as good as women at parenting. Write an essay expressing your point of view. Today, especially after women's entry into the male's areas which where traditionally belonged to men, more and more men also attempt to do women's duties at home for helping their spouses and raising children is one of these. Now, the question is whether these novices are the same as women in being an expert parent.? For thousands of years, it was these were women who have accepted/assumed the role of raising children in the early communities and this is the evolution science which gives us hard evidences for this claim. During of million years before emerging of the early modern human, our ancestors gradually divided their tasks between men and women and it this was females who accepted to look after babies and teach them the basic skills for living. According to the latest last findings, this kind of apportionment is still found in the closest human relatives like chimps and gorillas and also in the isolated tribes in Africa or South America. Moreover, natural selection proves that today's mothers have genes which have been remained from their ancestors who had been selected based on their abilities for raising children in the best way. However, although nature has empowered women to nurture the next generation, the modern life is modifying everything, even if they were passed by our genes. Nowadays, most women work out of home and some of them are breadwinners. Therefore, in this circumstance men have to learn more about nurture/raising/rear children and this trend almost has have begun. Now men know a lot of things about raising a child like feeding, playing, teaching and even telling stories before sleep. They are learning to manifest their senses and they try not to not be a just "rough man" who is the symbol of a warrior and power. In conclusion, although these are women who have the real talent to bring up children owing to the hard-wired talent, men also are endeavouring to develop this skill and this is not feasible which one day men and women would exchange their roles.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.02.25/Parenting, Amir Adel.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Many people believe that women make better parents than men and that this is why they have the greater role in raising children in most societies. Others claim that men are just as good as women at parenting. Write an essay expressing your point of view. Today, especially after women's entry into the male's areas which where traditionally belonged to men, more and more men also attempt to do women's duties at home for helping their spouses and raising children is one of these. Now, the question is whether these novices are the same as women in being an expert parent.? For thousands of years, it was these were women who have accepted/assumed the role of raising children in the early communities and this is the evolution science which gives us hard evidences for this claim. During of million years before emerging of the early modern human, our ancestors gradually divided their tasks between men and women and it this was females who accepted to look after babies and teach them the basic skills for living. According to the latest last findings, this kind of apportionment is still found in the closest human relatives like chimps and gorillas and also in the isolated tribes in Africa or South America. Moreover, natural selection proves that today's mothers have genes which have been remained from their ancestors who had been selected based on their abilities for raising children in the best way. However, although nature has empowered women to nurture the next generation, the modern life is modifying everything, even if they were passed by our genes. Nowadays, most women work out of home and some of them are breadwinners. Therefore, in this circumstance men have to learn more about nurture/raising/rear children and this trend almost has have begun. Now men know a lot of things about raising a child like feeding, playing, teaching and even telling stories before sleep. They are learning to manifest their senses and they try not to not be a just "rough man" who is the symbol of a warrior and power. In conclusion, although these are women who have the real talent to bring up children owing to the hard-wired talent, men also are endeavouring to develop this skill and this is not feasible which one day men and women would exchange their roles.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Pets, Mastaneh 2017-05-18T05:06:53+00:00 2017-05-18T05:06:53+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/213-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-02-25/1239-pets-mastaneh <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.02.25/Pets, Mastaneh.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">many people have pets,other people don't have.in your opinion is it good idea to have a pet or not? In many countries keeping a pet is very common. There are different reasons that some people keep pets at home. I believe that having a pet is extremely beneficial and can be a new experience. Clearly there are many problems in this regard. Keeping a pet needs more free time to take them to walk in the fresh air and they need to be washed. It may cost exorbitantly due to needing especial food and medical exams. They must be checked by a veterinarian. However, there are positive reasons for owning pets. Some animals such as a dog or cat are good accompany when you are walking. You can get exercise when you take it for a walk/walking. Patting pets gives us a sense of relaxation. Sometimes a person who has a dog feels safe while he is alone. Keeping a pet increases responsibility, especially in children. Anyone who loves or has a pet knows that a pet can be an enormous comfort when the situation is unpleasant. Pets can set free your mind while you are coming home from a busy day. They give you love, laughter and happiness. As Against so many benefits which give your mind and soul peace they need you because of their basic needs. In conclusion, keeping a pet has merits and demerits. Owning a pet in an apartment is difficult and their care is time-consuming. But my opinion is that their advantages can easily outweigh their disadvantages. I opine having a pet is better than not having one.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.02.25/Pets, Mastaneh.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">many people have pets,other people don't have.in your opinion is it good idea to have a pet or not? In many countries keeping a pet is very common. There are different reasons that some people keep pets at home. I believe that having a pet is extremely beneficial and can be a new experience. Clearly there are many problems in this regard. Keeping a pet needs more free time to take them to walk in the fresh air and they need to be washed. It may cost exorbitantly due to needing especial food and medical exams. They must be checked by a veterinarian. However, there are positive reasons for owning pets. Some animals such as a dog or cat are good accompany when you are walking. You can get exercise when you take it for a walk/walking. Patting pets gives us a sense of relaxation. Sometimes a person who has a dog feels safe while he is alone. Keeping a pet increases responsibility, especially in children. Anyone who loves or has a pet knows that a pet can be an enormous comfort when the situation is unpleasant. Pets can set free your mind while you are coming home from a busy day. They give you love, laughter and happiness. As Against so many benefits which give your mind and soul peace they need you because of their basic needs. In conclusion, keeping a pet has merits and demerits. Owning a pet in an apartment is difficult and their care is time-consuming. But my opinion is that their advantages can easily outweigh their disadvantages. I opine having a pet is better than not having one.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Throw Damaged, Aryam Ghavamian 2017-05-18T05:06:31+00:00 2017-05-18T05:06:31+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/213-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-02-25/1238-throw-damaged-aryam-ghavamian <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.02.25/Throw Damaged, Aryam Ghavamian.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">These days many of us prefer to throw damaged things away, whereas in the past people used to repair damaged items and keep them for a long time.
 Explain why you think this change has happened. What are the effects of this change in attitude? It is true that in the modern world people less hardly tend to repair their damaged items as before and they prefer decide to replace them with the new ones. I believe there are some principal factors which are leading them into this way and it would have obviously some severe influences on the environment. One of the main reasons why people prefer to neglect their out of order gadgets is the time. We are living in an era when the time is invaluable and irreplaceable for every individual. If they need to spend a lot of time fixing to fix an old product, they would rather to buy a new one in a shorter time just by two or three clicksing on a web site and get it by the free delivery service. So it is clearly reasonable to see they are choosing the second option. In addition, the cost of repairing the damage is typically high which persuades conduct them to take a look at the online new product list with the same or lower price. On the other hand, in developed countries, the companies play effective roles in encouraging to encourage people to purchase new products. They constantly try to meet their business targets by selling more products. For instance, they draw public attention via attractive advertisements in new technological devices with higher performance to inspire them to buy instead of fixing items. The effects of this process will be definitely on the environment/this approach will take its toll on the environment. The air pollution caused by factories is one example in great production .Furthermore, the factories would need a lot of raw materials and they will exploit all resources which is significantly harmful for the planet. There may not remain any natural resources for the next generations by excessive use of current resources. In conclusion, finding the old products in recycle bins is caused by the cost and the required time to fix the damaged and importantly the company's growth plans. It is clear that factories have to produce more new products and simultaneously more waste to the planet which is obviously harmful to earth.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.02.25/Throw Damaged, Aryam Ghavamian.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">These days many of us prefer to throw damaged things away, whereas in the past people used to repair damaged items and keep them for a long time.
 Explain why you think this change has happened. What are the effects of this change in attitude? It is true that in the modern world people less hardly tend to repair their damaged items as before and they prefer decide to replace them with the new ones. I believe there are some principal factors which are leading them into this way and it would have obviously some severe influences on the environment. One of the main reasons why people prefer to neglect their out of order gadgets is the time. We are living in an era when the time is invaluable and irreplaceable for every individual. If they need to spend a lot of time fixing to fix an old product, they would rather to buy a new one in a shorter time just by two or three clicksing on a web site and get it by the free delivery service. So it is clearly reasonable to see they are choosing the second option. In addition, the cost of repairing the damage is typically high which persuades conduct them to take a look at the online new product list with the same or lower price. On the other hand, in developed countries, the companies play effective roles in encouraging to encourage people to purchase new products. They constantly try to meet their business targets by selling more products. For instance, they draw public attention via attractive advertisements in new technological devices with higher performance to inspire them to buy instead of fixing items. The effects of this process will be definitely on the environment/this approach will take its toll on the environment. The air pollution caused by factories is one example in great production .Furthermore, the factories would need a lot of raw materials and they will exploit all resources which is significantly harmful for the planet. There may not remain any natural resources for the next generations by excessive use of current resources. In conclusion, finding the old products in recycle bins is caused by the cost and the required time to fix the damaged and importantly the company's growth plans. It is clear that factories have to produce more new products and simultaneously more waste to the planet which is obviously harmful to earth.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table>