جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Physical appearance may play an important role in many spheres of life: in the person's success in school, in relationships with people, in the choice of a career path. Say whether you agree or disagree with it, and if you see it as a positive or negative factor. The human being has been involved with the appearance as an irreplaceable fact for centuries, as it has been demonstrated in ancient sculptures. They had been really counting valuedfor what they made them pleased, as they see them. This insight has been substituted with the more prominent realities in life which they seem to be considered this way. To some people, attention may be drawn by a charming physical appearance, however, after a while this most certainly will change. At the outset of daily relationships/interactions, for instance, individuals may be absorbed by the way that their partners looks, but after a duration of time, this is the manner that comes to the scene. Therefore, beauty probably is not the indispensable facefact,. Aat least for longtime relationships. This works for almost all the aspects of life. By the same token, in recent years people typically tend to think subjectively rather than objectively in their daily life. For example, nowadays most countries have been coping with economical breakdown. So thathence, the vast majority of employers have changed their criteria to somethings factors more profound than just beauty, and prefer to recruit a well-educated and highly motivated workforces rather than handsome ones. Although we know an array of people who were managed to obtain a decent position in many areas, it hardly lasts forever. Vividly it is graspable/understandable that taking physical appearance into account should not be an option, giving given that which whatis always remains is the behavior. Furthermore, physical appearance is not a decision made by an individual, but rather a godsenda compulsory to some extent, and people must not be discriminated against or objectifiedy by their looking. In conclusion, people are mostly primarily are attracted physical appearance which is socalled "first impression". But it is not everything, and does not prove one's eligibility. There are surely lots of more important standards to be measured.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

The rising levels of congestion and air pollution found in most of the world cities can be attributed directly to the rapidly increasing number of private cars in use. In order to reverse this decline in the quality of life in cities, attempts must be made to encourage people to use their cars less and public transport more. Discuss possible ways to encourage the use of public transport. Unfortunately, air pollution is increasing in the world's big world cities. There are many problems, but four cases will be mentioned here,. first of all, people use their cars in cities, second, factories, third, cutting trees, and forth, tall towershigh- rises. The most important problem of air pollution is that many people do not use public transportation, for example, the subway, buses, taxis and bicycle, so they prefer to go to work or university by in private cars. Decreasing Heart diseases, light streets traffic, clear sky, walking and aerobic exercise in fresh air are items that people are encouraged to use public transportation. However, Public transportation must be invested in by governments. For instance: new buses, trucks and hybrid taxis reduceing air pollution. On the other hand, all of the factories must be made in on the eastern side of the cities. Because the wind blows from the west to east. It causes clear air flow enters to cities. Cutting trees arise leads to air pollution, as well. If a tree is cut downcuts, itthe tree won't do photosynthesis, so it does is not produced oxygen gas that which purifies the air, in this case the amount of monoxide carbon gas increases, and then air pollution has beenwill be created. And, a tall buildings towers have effect on air pollution. They cause air flow mass does not to pass, hence it is motionless. The worst condition of it occurs in winter that which is named temperature inversion. In conclusion, the most important factor of in air pollution is that people use their private car. According to the above, I hope they will be encouraged to use public transportation more and more.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Over the last decades, due to advancements in the transportation-related technology, the notions of where governmental investment must be increased in does not seem not to be controversialantagonist problems, whereas it is a dilemma between the rail network and road system. For instance, some factors such as convenience, time of traveling and pollution, in other words, cost-benefit analysis should be taken into consideration to make a feasible decision. On the one hand, flexibility is the most unique features of roads. However, the time cannot be adjusted in the railway system. Moreover, not only are roads available for 24 hours a day, but also transportation via them is more affordable than rail one. Additionally, the individual attribute of no-destination road trips only belongs to roads, while railways deprive people of that extremely enjoyable and incredibly exciting favour. In addition, roads provide door-to-door service which is unfortunately not available in its rail counterpartcontestant. On the other hand, although roads construction is less costly, they are one of the main culprits of air pollution which leads to hazardous serious concerns, likefor example, both health and environmental problems. Thus, roads cause many relevant costs in longterm. And also railway transportation is least affected by weather conditions and traffic jams, so it is considerably faster and more reliable, whilst they can cause some hiccups in road freight which lead to delay. Consequently, moving in on roads has more freedom, but it cannot be safe as rail traveling. Therefore, in fact, raising funds in the railway system, owing to its safety, faster transportation, ability of carrying larger volumes over greater destinations and markedly less pollution is economically and environmentally beneficial.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or dis agree with this statement? The question of how the governments should spend money on different types of transportation infrastructures has emerged as one of the most controversial discussions of the modern era. Some people believe that governmental budgets must definitely goes for railways instead of roads, which I strongly agree with. In this essay I will explore some of my reasons in particular. People are dying in car accidents every day. Obviously, if they have a safer way to commute, why would they choose driving in on dangerous roads? For sure, if they have had a cheaper available substitute, also offering less fewer casualties, they would absolutely use it. Train accidents are so rare. Therefore, it could be an efficient replacement for private cars and buses. If a city hadhas strong integrated subway stations, covering all over the city, people would surely take a the cheaper, less stressful and faster train instead of their own cars. Furthermore, sometimes people are too young or old to have a driving license, but they could easily reach their destinations by public trains, no matter how old they are or what situation they have. Last but not least, today's people, especially in metropolises suffer from air pollution, which is mostly caused by traffic congestion. By developing rail networks, gradually trains and subways would supersede cars and roads, hence less pollutions and cleaner air. In conclusion, as I mentioned before, trains in comparison with other transportation vehicles, not only has have less casualties, but also would lead to cleaner air and more convenient travel. For all these reasons, although we must take the geographical situation into considerations, generally I believe that it is a prudent idea and should take/get a priority.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Using a computer every day can have more negative than positive effects on young children. Do you agree or disagree? Over the last half century, computer prevalence has evolved day by day, so that it has become a part of many families and whether or not, with numerous advantages, it has shown its darkness to those who whom which use computers every day. Although, I agree with the opinion expressed, I would rather to split the disadvantages of sitting constantly in front of a screen into two parts: physical damage and mental damageshealth. The physical damages have more effects on the limbs as a toolkit for using computers such as wrist, eyes and the waist. However, overusinge the computer can take a toll on mental health because it can increase children's anxiety and can hugely increase the risk of depression, insomnia, reluctancet to get up for school in the morning and also excessive use of social networking sites to create relationships rather than spending time with family or friends may destroy real-life relationships. It is clear than that improper usage will lead to many problemsis not as useful as its applications. I think, since children do not have any good prospects of drawing back for overusing, a great deal of solving this matter must be undertaken by parents by laying down some rules in this regard and deducting its usage time to be sure that use of technology is in a constructive way.