جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Being a celebrity_ such as famous film star or sports personality_ brings problems as well as benefits. Do you think that being a celebrity brings more benefits or more problem? There is a range of different views on the question whether being a well-known personality brings the life about upsides or drawbacks. Some believe that gaining reputation is a great opportunity for the one who owns it, that is to say be a famous person might bring nothing but joy and success, while others hold the opposite view in terms of facing plausible problems they might deal with. I would argue the negative impacts of being a world renowned individual, firstly. The main and significant point that is worthy to mention is that celebrities almost always are under microscope in consequence of which their private lives leads to deterioration in a long run. Furthermore, being in the limelight might also poses a threat for the image of the one; hence, they are always in worry of facing rumors and media’s misleading ….. . Thus, be someone known by many has a potential change of their lives’ to a routine punishment with a burden of responsibility lies in their hand. On the contrary, lives of celebrities have also advantages noteworthy to point out. The most significant matter that drawn people’s temptation to fame is social standing elevation in terms of being in fan-following’s spotlight and earn too much respect. To add more, not only deos being have well-known bring individuals purchasing power domination, but also they feeling as a role model for others which boosts burst their confidence. By way of conclusion, the issue of being famous is a two-edged sword; that is to say, it is both a curse and opportunity. All in all, there is a variety of opinion around this subject but I hold the belief that demerits of being a celebrity outweigh its merits.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with. What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys? As families lifestyle are moving forward to having less child in comparison with before, children have fewer playmates. In this regard, parents try to compensate their loneliness with buying more toys, following this issue, the question of whether this act is a good solution or not has emerged as one of the important psychological matters facing parents in today’s world. In this essay, I will explore the pros and cons of this behavior before giving my own opinion. On the one hand, as the parents mostly have an outdoor job these days, children are left alone … plenty of time. Having proper toy can help them overcome their loneliness. Besides, many of these playthings can teach children life lessons and make them ready for their future role in different society. Most of the baby girls, for instance, practice motherhood by taking a good care of their little doll. They waking their doll up every morning and feed them like their real child. On the other hand, many experts argue that preparing too many toys for children can spoil them. In other words, in this point of view, this outwardly extreme kindness from parents, not only decrease their level of joyous from any new thing, since they are getting used to achieve new things easily and frequently, but also diminish their ability to communicate with their peers, because they have just learned to pass their time by plenty of stuff, and they do not know how to play with other children. Furthermore, some toys can make children aggressive and threaten unconsciously their future personality instead of having a positive influence. For example, a child who plays with a toy gun today can acquire the real gun in his future life. As a result, the main conclusion to be drawn from this discussion is that were I to choose, I would never vote for this newly careless behavior of parents because beyond the shadow of a doubt, if families try to find some suitable games for their children, it would have some advantages, but even though I believe despite some benefits with this idea, the demerits of it clearly outweigh its merits.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In many countries, children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. In this day and age, children's preparation for future life is one … the tremendous argues in modern society. Certainly, for achieving high level of successful in upcoming life, experience and knowledge are similar to two wings of bird that should work together. Children are engaging in some sorts of paid work during their childhood is one … the major debate nowadays. This controversial issue is going to be discussed in this essay. Generally, experience comes from working background and knowledge from studying. Some individuals strongly persist that children should focus on education during adolescence and working especially paid job lead to dilapidate their concentration to their main goal but after they have got diploma, they can find a job. Nonetheless, from my estimation, working during childhood has a huge influence to mental puberty and cause better chance to find appropriate job or field of study in university. Having specific job, without consideration of paying money or not, help individuals to broaden their vision and open the doors of life for them. For instance, during my childhood, I was crazy fan of vehicles and always try to find technical or non-technical information about them, so my parents talked to one the local car repair shop and I worked there as trainee during summer holiday for more than three years. This experience had a big influence to my point of view that encouraged me to select mechanical engineering in college. To sum up, experience and knowledge are like to two sides of coins and for achieving great successful you should combine these two aspects during the child- stage and had no fear to face with them.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

some people think that Genetically modified (GM) crops are a positive development. Others, however, argue that they are potentially dangerous. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. In recent years ,noticeable advances have been made in the field of genetic alteration .some people believe this brings many advantages. On this essay, I am going to deal with arguements for and against this controversial issue. The people who are advocate this method of production argue that genetically modified crops are more resistant to pest and weeds .consequently, the food production can be massively increased.secondly, bio-engineered techniques can manipulate genes and eliminate allergy-causing properties in some food like peanuts or increased nutrition value by adding vitamins , for instance golden rice is one of the achievements of this science, in some part of Asian countries people especially kids suffer from lack of vitamin A and it is not only lead to blindness but also even death ,so to solve this problem they enrich the rice with beta-carotene that the second type of vitamin A.besides , fruit and vegetables which are mutated can also last much longer.this means that they can be stored for much longer periods. On the other hand, opponents claim that there might me a lot of potential danger. They are concerned because scientists have not proved yet if gene modification is fully safe for people, and also if there will be long-term consequences of the environment and the wildlife. people would not be sure of the quality and content of their products because there is no International regulatory system to control and test adequately for crops safety as food .Another aspect, people are being worried about is the chemical pollution from the products used on crops and if animals would be contaminated by eating GM crops and further danger for humans who consume fresh meat. As a conclusion, I think tempering with nature by mixing genes among species is not right and people should raise awareness of the possible effects. In addition,More studies must be conducted on the long-term consequences of genetic modification in order for any speculations to be avoided.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Happiness is considered very important in life. Why is it difficult to define? What factors are important in achieving happiness? Some think that money is the key factor in our lives to make us happy, while many others believe that happiness will be brought to our lives by a vast variety of objects, such as self-satisfaction, acceptance in respective society, and etc. The first step to examine the nature of happiness is to ask: what exactly is happiness? First of all, since happiness is an abstract and controversial subject, it is perceptible yet hard to explain, maybe because there is not any comprehensive criterion in order to gauge the amount of it. Secondly, Although Everybody are supposedly looking to find the sense of cheerfulness in their lives, it is such a personal issue which each individual has his own attitude of it and we can not easily judge people about their manner of obtaining pleasure. As mentioned, some may understand it as welfare and fortune and Since economics play an important role in our lives, many perceive it as a result of well-being. It should be noticed that every one of us are different to each other, so as our approaches to exhilaration. I believe there are several important factors which can make the sense of joyfulness and satisfaction inside us. The first and foremost, feeling positive about ourselves and our performance in work and duties, family, friends and capabilities is of high importance. In addition, having comfort and prosperity will lead us to peace and calmness, and we will be delighted as the outcome. It is necessary to note that contentment plays a serious role in everyone's feelings too. All in All, Happiness is one of the mysterious aspects of human beings. I believe it is highly related to everyone's point of view, and we may be able to provide some objects which will somehow result in happiness, but we can not fully understand its essence. Some people believe that children should be allowed to stay at home and play until they are six or seven years old. Others believe that it is important for yosung children to go to school as soon as possible. What do you think are the advantages of attending school from a young age?

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Every year several languages die out. Some people believe that it is not important because life will be easier if there are few languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Throughout history, by virtue of wars, diseases and technological improvements, many languages have disappeared, hence the imminent disappearance of the related cultures. Some others, however, argue that in the route of evolution these losses are inevitable and these will end up with some benefits such as easy understandable communication. On the one hand, there is a backlash in some quarters against neglecting to preventing languages from extinction. They believe that a local language is more than just words. It links a community with its past and heritage. Therefore, if a society stop speaking their language, they will lose a part of themselves. Moreover, when a language dies out, not only does the world lose cultural, intellectual and linguistic diversity, but also cultural identity. Thus, they have the firm intention of maintaining and keeping alive their mother tongue owing to reduce the cultural impact of this potentially hazardous phenomenon. On the other hand, many people argue that it is not necessary to rescue an endangered language. The death of a way of speak is organic and a process of evolution. they think that attempting to save a language represents a need to cling to past rather than focusing on moving forward. Furthermore, the decrease in the number of languages makes communication more straightforward and subsequently travelling easier because no longer do people have to know more local tongue to communicate with the residents. Consequently, whilst many tongues vanish from the earth every day, the cultural innovation and the technological advancements speed up and accelerate, so it does not seem to be a today’s concern to make a special effort keep the languages alive.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people use the internet to search for solutions to their medical problems. Is it a positive or negative development? Give your own opinion and examples from your experience. There is a controversial question as to whether surfing the Internet in order to get remedies commensurate with our disease is an appropriate approach or not. I, for one, assert that using search engines is beneficial in terms of knowing more about illness, nor does finding medicine. There are several factors in order to support this perspective. First and foremost, in today’s technological world, people are used to searching on the Internet in every topic, and it leads to them acquiring today’s wisdom, but distinguishing illness, people might endanger themselves by which I mean demonstrating the kind of a disease requires some tests which are merely done by doctors. A further well-known factor is that a major segment of medicines has side effects which doctors admittedly struggle with studying several years under consideration of mentors in order to learn them, therefore, it is not reasonable that patients simply google knowledge to attain. Although receiving medical treatment on the Internet causes some drawbacks, the contribution of the internet when it comes to increasing information of sickness is undeniable. As a case in point, it must be said that people who are unfamiliar with herbal medicines could have remarkable access to this traditional knowledge by the Internet, and adding some vegetarian cuisine to their balanced diet when they have a notably minor ailment, or preventing to catch a disease. In conclusion, from my point of view, it is inadvisable that individuals surfing the Internet to achieve medical treatment without assisting doctors in demonstrating their disease. Yet, it could be useful to accomplish data about their illness.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

W05: In many cities today, most people live in large apartment blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages? Over the last half century, a large number of people have chosen to live in apartments. Apartments not only offer people affordable accommodation in urban areas, but also assist governments in better managing of the cities’ land. Nevertheless, this type of houses has been putting some kinds of constraints on their residents which eclipse its benefits. This essay will discuss both sides of this issue. One of the greatest advantages of living in an apartment is that it requires a small area of land and provides a lot of flats. As a result, they are cheaper and more affordable than single-family detached homes. Besides, cost of maintenance for an apartment would be shared with residents and this will contribute to the family economy. It should be mentioned that unlike detached homes, apartments are safer to leave alone and there is always at least one of … neighbors to protect them from robbery. However, they are not always the best place to live. This is partly because they are usually noisy and crowded places. Inhabitants are generally with different cultural backgrounds, which ends in a lot of conflicts between them, in contrast to detached homes, which there are more private places and almost no one to argue with! Furthermore, risk of fire in apartments is undeniably high since fire in a flat can fully destroy an apartment. In conclusion, although many people prefer to live in detached houses, the ever-increasing price of lands in cities propels them into living in apartments and therefore, a set of rules and regulations of apartment accommodation should be made to improve the quality of life.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe that all children should have a pet or an animal to look after. Other people disagree, however saying that this depends on a child’s circumstances. Consider these opposing views, and give your own opinion. It is often said that for children it is excellent to care animals. However, this is a debatable topic that some people disagree. This essay will discuss the debate and give a concluding view. One the one hand, those who support the idea of caring pets or animals in every house or flat by means of children point to the increase of children activity in such situations. For example, if a child allocate his or her time to play with a dog, it leads to more walking and running. Furthermore, it is also true that the looking after an animal during childhood causes to increasing the knowledge of the child about animals and also they learn about suitable behave with them in their future life. Finally, it seems that animals caring in the childhood can be helpful for having more discipline. For example, children have to set some exact time for feeding to pets and playing with them. By contrast, opponents of this view point out that all of the homes do not have enough space for pets and animals. In addition, the costs of caring animals do not allow all levels of the society to have one. For example, in terms of medical care, a dog needs an enormous amount of money for vaccination and special drugs in different ages against sicknesses. It seems advisable that looking after animals depends on some essential factors like home size and affordability for supporting them rather than just thinking about children interests.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Smoking is a major cause of serious illness and death throughout the world today. In the interest of the public health, governments should ban cigarettes and other tobacco products. Do you agree or disagree? Carrying out extended researches on the cause of incurable diseases, scientists reveals smoking could be a pivotal cause of numerous diseases including strokes and cancer. That is why, some people assume not only taking a prohibitionist approach such as introducing laws against consuming drugs is a completely beneficial decision, but also people had better observe them. I, personally, believe imposing such rules on individuals lead to they assuming it a violation of their liberties. In other words, first and the most significant step is making a mutual trust. Only when members of the public become aware of the detrimental effects of tobacco, would they be eager to make a contribution to reduce the number of consumers. The best point is raising people’s awareness. For example, the government need to allocate certain amounts of budget to making movies and series about this issue and broadcast them through ubiquitous media. Despite the obvious drawbacks of these tempting hobbies, some people take profits from them. The case in point is some young members suffering from being nervous. They consider cigarette a tranquilizer item and giving up smoking is unacceptable to them, hence their dependency. Therefore, authorities should respect their way of thinking and convince them before imposing rules. By way of conclusion, I wholeheartedly disagree with the given statement. Further and even more important, I hold to the conservative view that before legislating new rules, the authorities should think about its possible effects on the minority of the inhabitants. Because it may leave some unsolvable difficulties in society and even isolate these groups of people.