Mondays GMAT-GRE-TOEFL-IELTS-آموزشگاه زبان صبای سحر-چمران جنوب، بلوار جلال آل احمد، جنب داروخانه شبانه روزی جلال آل احمد، پلاک 87، طبقه سوم تلفن: 42-88679341 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/387-monday-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-monday-97-12-06 2024-05-04T05:49:37+00:00 IELTSTOEFLCENTER info@ieltstoeflcenter.com Joomla! - Open Source Content Management Amir G, Buy Children 2019-02-26T04:41:43+00:00 2019-02-26T04:41:43+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/387-monday-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-monday-97-12-06/2775-amir-g-buy-children Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.12.06/Amir G, Buy Children.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some parents buy and allow their children to have anything they ask or want. Is this a good way to raise children? What consequences could this style of parenting have on children as they grow older? While many prefer their children to have whatever they wish, others, however, believe it is not accepted to provide children with everything they demand reasoning pampering children them in this way can spoil them, and prevent them from perseverance to achieve big targets in their future life. When it comes to this notion, I strongly maintain that this approach serves as double-edged sword. An overwhelming majority of people try to buy their children anything they demand, because they mainly hold the idea that children’s feelings are so sensitive that even a simple denial to their requests can result in an irreparable damage to children’s their emotions. Many a psychologist confirms this idea, and highly recommends to provide children with most of their demands. Famous research conducted by an a group of psychologists revealed that many of the dictators suffered from lack of attention, and more often than not they failed to receive what they dreamed about during their childhood. Furthermore, children who access to everything they want may get used to having what they demand, and perhaps this can lead to their future laziness and carelessness to their financial part of life. Having said that, some parents hold exactly the opposite idea reasoning that not only does buying children whatever they like not spoil them, but it also can hone their skills. The famous Iranian famous singer, Vigen, is a good example of a talented child living in an under medium middle strata stratum/class family, but his father buys a guitar for him, and this was just a start for national wide well-known Vigen. That providing kids with appropriate commodities can change their future is an indisputable fact. To cut a long story short, although provision of basic needs for children by their parents is a given, buying whatever children want should be done carefully or else it can ruin children’s their future. Only when parents teach their children money does not grow on trees, can they expect their children to become successful adults in future.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.12.06/Amir G, Buy Children.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some parents buy and allow their children to have anything they ask or want. Is this a good way to raise children? What consequences could this style of parenting have on children as they grow older? While many prefer their children to have whatever they wish, others, however, believe it is not accepted to provide children with everything they demand reasoning pampering children them in this way can spoil them, and prevent them from perseverance to achieve big targets in their future life. When it comes to this notion, I strongly maintain that this approach serves as double-edged sword. An overwhelming majority of people try to buy their children anything they demand, because they mainly hold the idea that children’s feelings are so sensitive that even a simple denial to their requests can result in an irreparable damage to children’s their emotions. Many a psychologist confirms this idea, and highly recommends to provide children with most of their demands. Famous research conducted by an a group of psychologists revealed that many of the dictators suffered from lack of attention, and more often than not they failed to receive what they dreamed about during their childhood. Furthermore, children who access to everything they want may get used to having what they demand, and perhaps this can lead to their future laziness and carelessness to their financial part of life. Having said that, some parents hold exactly the opposite idea reasoning that not only does buying children whatever they like not spoil them, but it also can hone their skills. The famous Iranian famous singer, Vigen, is a good example of a talented child living in an under medium middle strata stratum/class family, but his father buys a guitar for him, and this was just a start for national wide well-known Vigen. That providing kids with appropriate commodities can change their future is an indisputable fact. To cut a long story short, although provision of basic needs for children by their parents is a given, buying whatever children want should be done carefully or else it can ruin children’s their future. Only when parents teach their children money does not grow on trees, can they expect their children to become successful adults in future.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Libraries and Technology 2019-02-26T04:41:32+00:00 2019-02-26T04:41:32+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/387-monday-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-monday-97-12-06/2774-libraries-and-technology Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.12.06/Libraries and Technology.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">The main purpose of public libraries is to provide books and they shouldn't waste their limited resources and space on providing expensive hi-tech media such as computer software, videos and DVDs. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Some might see libraries as a place only for books, thus expecting them to merely provide printed ones. We are all aware that the notion stems from the high cost of newly developed technology which indeed has found its way into our modern lives, but there is a question as to how they the pivotal role of it be denied, albeit expensive? Libraries, by their all means, should not be limited to the shelves of printed books, while they have potential to be more than what they currently are. Thanks to the ever-increasing technology, lifestyles have been changed, as have the desires. Barely does one spend time at the counter of a library to ask for an intended book, while they already have extremely fast access to strong databases offered by way of technology on hand. Denying the impact of technology is translated to cutting scores of trees, though there is opportunity to watch people pursuing the purpose of book-reading on their cellphones regardless of the time and place limitation. Considering mass media and update technology a waste of money, the idea holders are absolutely living in denial, since the advantages which they have brought in their wakes are revealed to every sensible person. Therefore, it is a must to designate local budgets for enhancing libraries’ technological infrastructure, otherwise they would totally fall behind from today’s modern lives. Besides, printed books and electronic books are not exclusively apart from each other, while the presence of the latter would seemingly improve the value of the former as they are in charge of different readers’ requirements. On the basis of the above mentioned reasons, I assume that not only is the newly applied technology compatible with the traditional libraries, but also fully equipped libraries are mandatory particularly in our current time.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.12.06/Libraries and Technology.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">The main purpose of public libraries is to provide books and they shouldn't waste their limited resources and space on providing expensive hi-tech media such as computer software, videos and DVDs. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Some might see libraries as a place only for books, thus expecting them to merely provide printed ones. We are all aware that the notion stems from the high cost of newly developed technology which indeed has found its way into our modern lives, but there is a question as to how they the pivotal role of it be denied, albeit expensive? Libraries, by their all means, should not be limited to the shelves of printed books, while they have potential to be more than what they currently are. Thanks to the ever-increasing technology, lifestyles have been changed, as have the desires. Barely does one spend time at the counter of a library to ask for an intended book, while they already have extremely fast access to strong databases offered by way of technology on hand. Denying the impact of technology is translated to cutting scores of trees, though there is opportunity to watch people pursuing the purpose of book-reading on their cellphones regardless of the time and place limitation. Considering mass media and update technology a waste of money, the idea holders are absolutely living in denial, since the advantages which they have brought in their wakes are revealed to every sensible person. Therefore, it is a must to designate local budgets for enhancing libraries’ technological infrastructure, otherwise they would totally fall behind from today’s modern lives. Besides, printed books and electronic books are not exclusively apart from each other, while the presence of the latter would seemingly improve the value of the former as they are in charge of different readers’ requirements. On the basis of the above mentioned reasons, I assume that not only is the newly applied technology compatible with the traditional libraries, but also fully equipped libraries are mandatory particularly in our current time.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Mahtab, Internet Access vs. Public Transportation 2019-02-26T04:41:19+00:00 2019-02-26T04:41:19+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/387-monday-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-monday-97-12-06/2773-mahtab-internet-access-vs-public-transportation Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.12.06/Mahtab, Internet Access vs. Public Transportation.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. There has always been a great debate over how the governments should allocate the budget for various organizations to facilitate people’s lives. Between improving internet access and public transportation, I personally give priority to public transportation. First and foremost, compared to upgrading internet access, more people can receive benefit from the improvement of public transportation. Although developments in technology and communication have caused convenience and many changes in modern life, there are a lot of people that are still illiterate and cannot apply the internet to their lives. Moreover, the betterment of public transportation can connect developed urban areas to poverty-stricken rural areas. In as a result, this connection can made make many changes in their lives in terms of economic economy and socialsociety. For example, constructing railways for small cities including tourism tourist attractions can be a win-win situation for tourists and locals. Secondly, nowadays we are facing many environmental problems that public transportation has a key role to in overcome overcoming them. one of the most important of these problems is air pollution that we are all aware of its dire consequences and private vehicles are the major factor of that. Undoubtedly if public transportation is suitably qualified, people prefer to use the bus and subway. Furthermore, if people use cars lessless car, the amount of exhaust emission will be reduced. In addition, since people’s demand for cars decreases, there would be a decline in machine car manufacturing factories and their owners invest in public transportation. To sum up, I guess the government should devote part of its capital fund on to improving public transportation so development in economy and environment could be guaranteed.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.12.06/Mahtab, Internet Access vs. Public Transportation.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. There has always been a great debate over how the governments should allocate the budget for various organizations to facilitate people’s lives. Between improving internet access and public transportation, I personally give priority to public transportation. First and foremost, compared to upgrading internet access, more people can receive benefit from the improvement of public transportation. Although developments in technology and communication have caused convenience and many changes in modern life, there are a lot of people that are still illiterate and cannot apply the internet to their lives. Moreover, the betterment of public transportation can connect developed urban areas to poverty-stricken rural areas. In as a result, this connection can made make many changes in their lives in terms of economic economy and socialsociety. For example, constructing railways for small cities including tourism tourist attractions can be a win-win situation for tourists and locals. Secondly, nowadays we are facing many environmental problems that public transportation has a key role to in overcome overcoming them. one of the most important of these problems is air pollution that we are all aware of its dire consequences and private vehicles are the major factor of that. Undoubtedly if public transportation is suitably qualified, people prefer to use the bus and subway. Furthermore, if people use cars lessless car, the amount of exhaust emission will be reduced. In addition, since people’s demand for cars decreases, there would be a decline in machine car manufacturing factories and their owners invest in public transportation. To sum up, I guess the government should devote part of its capital fund on to improving public transportation so development in economy and environment could be guaranteed.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Mojtaba Raznahan, Univeristy Males and Females 2019-02-26T04:40:36+00:00 2019-02-26T04:40:36+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/387-monday-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-monday-97-12-06/2772-mojtaba-raznahan-univeristy-males-and-females Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.12.06/Mojtaba Raznahan, Univeristy Males and Females.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Topic: Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extend do you agree or disagree? While it is true that gender equality plays an incredibly crucial role in every society, when it comes to putting it into practice there are numerous hurdles that come in the way. On that account, I, to a certain degree, subscribe to the proposed view. On the one hand, there is no doubt that gender gap in any part of the society could present severe demerits. Poverty, societal health issues and parenting predicaments, just to name a few, are amongst the most notorious products of a gender-imbalanced culture. The Education system is one of the finest fields to commence the journey of tackling the aforesaid problem. Hence, the proportionate numerical appearance of genders could potentially provide a premier environment to bolster sexual equality. Every class at universities is a place to grasp an array of social skills alongside the wisdom that is being taught. Since each gender has their own burden and engagement within the society, they are in a way empowering one another. On the other hand, I opine that it is often troublesome to lay out a general rule to enforce Universities to admit the exact equal number of males and females into their curriculums. To elucidate, imagine a subject for which there is not an adequate number of both genders. What would happen here is that the University would either need to delay the commencement of that class up until the awaited gender registers for the subject, or proceed with the vacant seats. Moreover, in some majors there are naturally more female applicants than male. To cite and example, nursing is an expertise where which not only are women are more attracted to than men but also they perform better. For that reason, reserving seats on the basis of gender is akin to the fact that merit has no place in the education system. Nonetheless, there should be a form of endorsement for the spirit of this cause in order to foster a culture wherein there are no barriers for any person of any gender to enroll in any class. In conclusion, I, personally, am a proponent of gender equality in education systems, but I presume there must not be any rigid and ill-advised regulation for untangling such delicate social matters. However, promoting Universities to opt for taking an equal number of males and females, only when it is applicable, is a proper strategy.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.12.06/Mojtaba Raznahan, Univeristy Males and Females.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Topic: Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extend do you agree or disagree? While it is true that gender equality plays an incredibly crucial role in every society, when it comes to putting it into practice there are numerous hurdles that come in the way. On that account, I, to a certain degree, subscribe to the proposed view. On the one hand, there is no doubt that gender gap in any part of the society could present severe demerits. Poverty, societal health issues and parenting predicaments, just to name a few, are amongst the most notorious products of a gender-imbalanced culture. The Education system is one of the finest fields to commence the journey of tackling the aforesaid problem. Hence, the proportionate numerical appearance of genders could potentially provide a premier environment to bolster sexual equality. Every class at universities is a place to grasp an array of social skills alongside the wisdom that is being taught. Since each gender has their own burden and engagement within the society, they are in a way empowering one another. On the other hand, I opine that it is often troublesome to lay out a general rule to enforce Universities to admit the exact equal number of males and females into their curriculums. To elucidate, imagine a subject for which there is not an adequate number of both genders. What would happen here is that the University would either need to delay the commencement of that class up until the awaited gender registers for the subject, or proceed with the vacant seats. Moreover, in some majors there are naturally more female applicants than male. To cite and example, nursing is an expertise where which not only are women are more attracted to than men but also they perform better. For that reason, reserving seats on the basis of gender is akin to the fact that merit has no place in the education system. Nonetheless, there should be a form of endorsement for the spirit of this cause in order to foster a culture wherein there are no barriers for any person of any gender to enroll in any class. In conclusion, I, personally, am a proponent of gender equality in education systems, but I presume there must not be any rigid and ill-advised regulation for untangling such delicate social matters. However, promoting Universities to opt for taking an equal number of males and females, only when it is applicable, is a proper strategy.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Mosadegh, Differences Between Young Childrens' & Adults' Behaviors 2019-02-26T04:40:25+00:00 2019-02-26T04:40:25+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/387-monday-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-monday-97-12-06/2771-mosadegh-differences-between-young-childrens-adults-behaviors Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.12.06/Mosadegh, Differences Between Young Childrens' &amp; Adults' Behaviors.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">As children become adults, their social behavior changes in some ways. What are the main differences between young children’s social behavior and that of adults? To what extent are the changes that take place good? The fact of individuals’ manners and characters is rooted in their family and after that their society which they have belonged to. It is undeniable that everyone has their model of a behavior due to the different reasons such as diversities of individuals’ genes, different parents and also difference of the level of family culture and economy. Every offspring grows up in diverse conditions and becomes a special adults. The differences in children’s behavior till their adulthood refer to their personality and their exterior environment. The first role model for offspring in the family and society is parents. They act as their parents do and continue this behavior in school. Although children promote their family etiquettes in their school, they can imitate their peers’ behavior too. This situation almost happens in primary school and as they become older to reach teenage ages, they prefer to show themselves fashion-conscious and up-to-dated more than their counterparts. At the young ages children obey their parents’ commands more than young adults at teenage ages who show a lot counter-social manners which is pointed out as a transition period in youth. Teenagers always try to show off and fearlessly break the law in a community. The main reason for this behavior is that to find a place in society and also introduce them to it. W, while adults have their own place in society and know the presence of rules and regulations are useful and vital for every social structure, so they will obey rules. Not only do adults comply with all of regulations, but also they always try to solve the problems which citizens face and guide teenagers to respect the laws. There is no doubt that becoming older is a disputable fact which we have to follow the trend. Clearly, adolescent adolescenceperiod is the most appreciated level which leads to results from mental and emotional progress. Adults behave properly and logically compared to teenagers. This level of community has the benefit for society as they will take the role of parents and a decent position in market labor. The Youth burden a large amount of money on governments to learn basic sciences and skills too and also spend more time to becomebecoming useful for their country, unlike mature ones who can afford their needs and have benefits for their city. In conclusion, it is crystal clear that the benefits presence of adults are is more suitable beneficial than young children’s for every community. Adult ages are the most prosperous, they have both benefit for youngsters and elders and the whole society as well. There is a viewpoint that says maintains that for having a successful society, there it is necessity necessary to instruct the new generation from the beginning to have a prosperous victorious country.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.12.06/Mosadegh, Differences Between Young Childrens' &amp; Adults' Behaviors.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">As children become adults, their social behavior changes in some ways. What are the main differences between young children’s social behavior and that of adults? To what extent are the changes that take place good? The fact of individuals’ manners and characters is rooted in their family and after that their society which they have belonged to. It is undeniable that everyone has their model of a behavior due to the different reasons such as diversities of individuals’ genes, different parents and also difference of the level of family culture and economy. Every offspring grows up in diverse conditions and becomes a special adults. The differences in children’s behavior till their adulthood refer to their personality and their exterior environment. The first role model for offspring in the family and society is parents. They act as their parents do and continue this behavior in school. Although children promote their family etiquettes in their school, they can imitate their peers’ behavior too. This situation almost happens in primary school and as they become older to reach teenage ages, they prefer to show themselves fashion-conscious and up-to-dated more than their counterparts. At the young ages children obey their parents’ commands more than young adults at teenage ages who show a lot counter-social manners which is pointed out as a transition period in youth. Teenagers always try to show off and fearlessly break the law in a community. The main reason for this behavior is that to find a place in society and also introduce them to it. W, while adults have their own place in society and know the presence of rules and regulations are useful and vital for every social structure, so they will obey rules. Not only do adults comply with all of regulations, but also they always try to solve the problems which citizens face and guide teenagers to respect the laws. There is no doubt that becoming older is a disputable fact which we have to follow the trend. Clearly, adolescent adolescenceperiod is the most appreciated level which leads to results from mental and emotional progress. Adults behave properly and logically compared to teenagers. This level of community has the benefit for society as they will take the role of parents and a decent position in market labor. The Youth burden a large amount of money on governments to learn basic sciences and skills too and also spend more time to becomebecoming useful for their country, unlike mature ones who can afford their needs and have benefits for their city. In conclusion, it is crystal clear that the benefits presence of adults are is more suitable beneficial than young children’s for every community. Adult ages are the most prosperous, they have both benefit for youngsters and elders and the whole society as well. There is a viewpoint that says maintains that for having a successful society, there it is necessity necessary to instruct the new generation from the beginning to have a prosperous victorious country.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Mostafa Radmehr, Uraban Area 2019-02-26T04:40:14+00:00 2019-02-26T04:40:14+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/387-monday-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-monday-97-12-06/2770-mostafa-radmehr-uraban-area Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.12.06/Mostafa Radmehr, Uraban Area.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">In recent years some countries have experienced very rapid economic development. This has resulted in much higher standards of living in urban areas but not in the country side. This situation may bring some problems for the country as a whole. What are these problems? How might they be reduced? Nowadays, some people believe that the economic economycondition of some countries has grown promptly. Therefore, this occasion condition provides a decent quality of life for people who live in the cities while the quality of residents living in the rural area remains inappropriately. Generally, allocating more a larger budget to cities in comparison with the countryside country sides causes people who live in urban to have a better situation, so it leads to a few big troubles for the rural residents. The most serious one could be that people are willing to move into urban areas. This would mean that because of excellent amenities such as the hospitals, cinemas, and other facilities in the urban districts people tend to leave their hometown, consequently, the population of the cities will increase; moreover, not only will the traffic become critical but also the air quality of cities might be heavily polluted. Another devastating effect could be that if a large number of people leaves the rural areas the agricultural industry may be destroyed because the industry depends on the population of workers living in the country side. However, these problems are not insolvable provided that suitable measures are adopted. The most effective way to clear up the first problem might be that governments assign enough money to the rural areas. For instance, with construction of hospitals, roads and other infrastructures people will be encouraged to live in their own countryarea. And with regard to the second, it could be resolved if the government provided an opportunity for farmers such as giving a subvention to them. To sum up, governments should share budgets equally between cities and rural areas in order to provide a balanced situation in terms of the economic and social situation.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.12.06/Mostafa Radmehr, Uraban Area.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">In recent years some countries have experienced very rapid economic development. This has resulted in much higher standards of living in urban areas but not in the country side. This situation may bring some problems for the country as a whole. What are these problems? How might they be reduced? Nowadays, some people believe that the economic economycondition of some countries has grown promptly. Therefore, this occasion condition provides a decent quality of life for people who live in the cities while the quality of residents living in the rural area remains inappropriately. Generally, allocating more a larger budget to cities in comparison with the countryside country sides causes people who live in urban to have a better situation, so it leads to a few big troubles for the rural residents. The most serious one could be that people are willing to move into urban areas. This would mean that because of excellent amenities such as the hospitals, cinemas, and other facilities in the urban districts people tend to leave their hometown, consequently, the population of the cities will increase; moreover, not only will the traffic become critical but also the air quality of cities might be heavily polluted. Another devastating effect could be that if a large number of people leaves the rural areas the agricultural industry may be destroyed because the industry depends on the population of workers living in the country side. However, these problems are not insolvable provided that suitable measures are adopted. The most effective way to clear up the first problem might be that governments assign enough money to the rural areas. For instance, with construction of hospitals, roads and other infrastructures people will be encouraged to live in their own countryarea. And with regard to the second, it could be resolved if the government provided an opportunity for farmers such as giving a subvention to them. To sum up, governments should share budgets equally between cities and rural areas in order to provide a balanced situation in terms of the economic and social situation.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Saeid MH, The 21st Century 2019-02-26T04:40:02+00:00 2019-02-26T04:40:02+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/387-monday-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-monday-97-12-06/2769-saeid-mh-the-21st-century Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.12.06/Saeid MH, The 21st Century.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">The 21st century has begun. What changes do you think this new century will bring? The digital era has begun and I believe that information and communication technology plays the most pivotal role in this era (it). The contemporary modern life is full of surprises with an abundance of new challenges. We must get prepared for it if we don’t want to fall behind this ever- improving world. I would argue that the most significant change (major, boldest) in contrast with the past centuries is change in the form of works. In other words, most jobs were used to be physical in the past. Many workforces had been employed by companies in order to take part in doing a physical job. To exemplify, the process of manufacturing a car, a TV or any other device, but now most of these jobs are getting done by the help of robots. These electro-mechanical devices carrying out almost every piece of work from the process of manufacturing a car to assisting doctors in a surgical procedure. Furthermore, modes of communication has been changed drastically over the past years and still is developing. Communication has substantially became easier, however, it has brought a substantial mental and communication disorders to its wake. To exemplify, people used to manage to meet or at least to call each other on various occasions and that kind of communication was more upbeat in contrast with nowadays super brief greetings which is mostly a two words sentence, like: “Happy Birthday”. This trend although has its up sides, however, has become destructive to humans’ mental health and to reverse it we must arrange to stop it and to arrange meet friends and family whenever it is possible. In conclusion, the new era has substantially changed our lifestyle in a positive way, nevertheless, if it not get under control, it could effects peoples’ mental health negatively.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.12.06/Saeid MH, The 21st Century.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">The 21st century has begun. What changes do you think this new century will bring? The digital era has begun and I believe that information and communication technology plays the most pivotal role in this era (it). The contemporary modern life is full of surprises with an abundance of new challenges. We must get prepared for it if we don’t want to fall behind this ever- improving world. I would argue that the most significant change (major, boldest) in contrast with the past centuries is change in the form of works. In other words, most jobs were used to be physical in the past. Many workforces had been employed by companies in order to take part in doing a physical job. To exemplify, the process of manufacturing a car, a TV or any other device, but now most of these jobs are getting done by the help of robots. These electro-mechanical devices carrying out almost every piece of work from the process of manufacturing a car to assisting doctors in a surgical procedure. Furthermore, modes of communication has been changed drastically over the past years and still is developing. Communication has substantially became easier, however, it has brought a substantial mental and communication disorders to its wake. To exemplify, people used to manage to meet or at least to call each other on various occasions and that kind of communication was more upbeat in contrast with nowadays super brief greetings which is mostly a two words sentence, like: “Happy Birthday”. This trend although has its up sides, however, has become destructive to humans’ mental health and to reverse it we must arrange to stop it and to arrange meet friends and family whenever it is possible. In conclusion, the new era has substantially changed our lifestyle in a positive way, nevertheless, if it not get under control, it could effects peoples’ mental health negatively.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table>