جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Governments and big companies should work together to reverse environmental damage, rather than making individuals responsible for that. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion with relevant examples. Preservation of the environment is a heated debate amongst many people from all walks of life across the globe, and when it comes to this notion I maintain that though it is mainly incumbent upon the authorities and manufacturers to save the only planet known to harbor life, I subscribe to the view that the significant role of the ordinary members of society to this purpose should not overlook. Producing a large portion of the industrial pollution, major corporations, by and large, do not care about damages they are causing to old Mother Nature. With the power of the law in most societies, lawmakers can introduce appropriate laws to limit the emission of greenhouse gases and other major pollutants contributing to environmental damages. In other words, only when both the governments and big companies cooperate with one another, can we expect to reduce the adverse impacts of environmental problems. Having said that, I opine that the role of individuals should not be omitted, albeit apparently insignificant. Humans, though minor, can take part in preserving the environment. Undoubtedly, the damages an individual can cause to nature is not comparable with those that of a large factory, but if the majority of people reduce their damages to nature we can expect unpredictably incredibly desirable results. A typical example of this could be a day without personal means of transportation in metropolitan areas. Not only are such plans practical ones to reduce air pollution in urban areas, but they are also a giant step to effective teamwork to address this life-threatening problem. To cut a long story short, I argue that to save our planet we all have to cooperate together or sooner or later we will regret the damages harms we have made. It is high time we all cooperated to save the environment or future generations will fall into serious problems.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In recent years some countries have experienced very rapid economic development. This has resulted in much higher standards of living in urban areas but not in the country sides. This situation may bring some problems for the country as a whole. What are these problems? How might they be reduced? Nowadays, many countries’ economic progression rate has are plunged dramatically, so it triggers a better welfare level in cities as opposed to rural areas. Therefore, it leads to countrywide problems. There are several issues that economic growth is causing, although governments could undoubtedly take steps to address those issues. First of all, economic development is generating job opportunities with a higher salary in urban areas. As a result, people who are living in the countryside will try to move to urban areas due to accessing more employment chances. Thus, this type of immigration causes the need for housing and services, and it leads to the creation of massive slum areas. Secondly, villages are the source for producing Agricultural and livestock products. If the workforces leaves their countryside and move to the major cities, Rural areas will face shortages of workforces. Then, it will bring about generating less food. In consequence, the inequality that has emerged from economic growth may result in the growing of slums and less food production. Numerous methods can be taken by the governments of these countries to overcome these problems. At first, they must create significant infrastructures such as hospital, school, banks, and construct a strong network of roads and transportation to connect the countryside to urban areas. Moreover, the government should consider incentives as a giving subsidy to business owners and factories to relocate to rural areas which where building facilities and infrastructures are boosting this relocation. Hence, to preventfor the preventing of this trend/immigration not only does weit need the political will, but also governments should make a considerable investment. In conclusion, the rapid growth of the economy is leading to living standards inequality between the countryside and cities, so for reducing this problem, the states should take measures such as building facilities and consider subsidies for industry and business people.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

It has recently been announced that a large shopping center may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. Accompanied by a violently rapid pace and excessive hunger for economic benefit, the definition of development is descending to the progress which definitely affects all aspects of human life especially that of the living place and constructions. Although I am completely acquainted with the advantages of new huge buildings like malls gathering all sort of facilities in one point, I go for the idea of “Every every affair requires its own condition”, hence my contradictory position. First of all, sectioning into different parts, life is becoming a less integrated phenomenon due to our new lifestyles. In this novel way, not only do we break our time into various portions dedicated to some apart separate activities like educatingeducation, jobs and personal life, but also we divide our presence in unbelievably far distances according to the form of our new cities. The latter, of course, is done, hoping to reach revive the lost quality of life. Shortly, we are almost obliged to work under an unbearable tension in our workplaces so that rarely can you find a person who is not finishing his/her job wishing to go “home sweet home”. A large shopping mall attracting many people to the neighborhood renders it almost like CBDs. Simply asked, is that sweet home is to be drowned in that suffering torturous pollution and situated in an overwhelming populated area likewise the work-place? Living this damaged fragmentary life, I opine that, we have lost enough not to ruin our zesty neighborhood which is safe and sound enough to redress our frustrated souls. The supporters usually refer to the economic effects concurring with the emergence of these malls like new job opportunities or even some new infra-instructions coming with them like public transportation and new roads, on the other hand. Ostensibly, they promote new job vacancies in local areas but obviously, many of them are occupied with their own employees and the remains rest are typically some low positions with unacceptable wages. Much Worse of it, with new incompatible businesses coming by these malls, the local market will be ruined. I can remember an old family book store in my uncle’s neighborhood which no sooner had the new mall found its place there than it was obliged to shut down. The fact is that many of the local businesses left their work and I think had not they not voted to those newcomers, they would not have to be being a worker of those unidentifiable lords. In a nutshell, these shiny buildings lackhave not a morally acceptable place in the heart of neighborhood since the quality of life and the innate power of independence will be lost, albeit they are besthad better be suited in CBDs or outskirts.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Do you agree or disagree? It is difficult for teachers to be both popular and effective in helping students in learning. There has been a heated debate over how to improve students’ learning for decades. Education experts place a premium on the relationship between teachers and students. I personally believe that an intimate relationship can facilitate the process of education. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my arguments. To begin with, technology has unleashed a series of changes which have increased the generation gaps. These changes include the proliferation of youth’s toughness against the adults and their advice and not having regard to for social norms. As a result, the young generation is experiencing a different world from the previous ones. This different world can make it difficult for teachers to cope with the students. In my opinion, the only factor which can bring about guiding the students and increasing their learning is cultivating a warm relationship with them. My experiences have suggested that whenever I behaved friendly with my students and they considered me their own friend, they listened to me more enthusiastically. In fact, when you treat them kindly, they tell you about their opinions and interests. In that case, you can teach them according to their interests and design the activities which are derived from their favorite issues and activities, so their participation and learning will be at a high rate. Moreover, in light of the given changes, the young individuals are more exposed to identity problems which can disrupt their study, because they have a direct relationship with each other. It is undeniable that schools play a decisive role in the personality development of the students. Therefore, the school can play its own role if teachers develop emotional ties with children. If they are able to communicate with their students efficiently, the students will let them know about their problems and ask their advice. In fact, they are not to resolve their issues single-handedly and deteriorate aggravates their situationthem because of lack of experiences. As a result, teachers can contribute to improving the students’ function indirectly. To conclude, according to my experiences, the better relationship you have with your students, the higher scores they get. I wholeheartedly believe that the school appeals for to the students if the school’s teaching staff behave as a kindteacher instead of a tough guard. However, it should be considered that behaving in this way can bring about satisfactory results in the event of balancing kindness and firmness.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

It is stated that nowadays, it is more vital to be a risk taker and do your tasks as fast as possible instead of working with slow pace and ensuring that everything is working properly. I partly approve of this statements, because I believe than we can benefit from these trends both. On the one hand, although making risks and doing tasks quickly might have some negative points, sometimes they provide a lot of benefits for people. With the aid of risks people can achieve more success in their careers. Many prosperous people undergo some difficult tasks and make fast decision in order to become more successful. For example, for people who are working at market, sometimes it is crucial to take risks to outcompete other competitors such as buying the whole products of a specific company. Moreover, it is true that taking risks and fast decisions may bring some failures to people, but they can learn from their mistakes and improve their skills to attain success in future. On the other hand, admittedly, working slowly and ensuring that everything is proper offer a lot of advantages too. Considering all of the aspects of a decision in work can lead to better achievement. When people work with patience, they can experience more pleasure in their profession. Furthermore, doing tasks in a peaceful status causes people stay healthier. By performing risky tasks and quick decisions people experience more stress which is not pleasant. They can do their works in a calm and relax condition by making sure that everything is right. To put it in a nutshell, I uphold this point of view that people can achieve valuable results both from taking risks and working quickly and doing their duties nice and calm in serene statue and ensuring that everything is working in its perfect way.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people prefer to live in a house, while others feel that there are more advantages to living in an apartment. Are there more advantages than disadvantages of living in a house compared with living in an apartment? It is quite evident that when it comes to choosing a place to live, society is sharply polarized. Some would go as far as to claim that if you have not experienced living in a house, you have not lived a quality life. Although I would not consider as much excellence in living in a house, I still harbor the thought that houses are not on par with flats, and they provide more convenience than do apartments. No one can deny the comforts that a private house can present to its residents. These would range from privacy aspects to the amenities one is able to experience within the place. Privacy, for instance, is a paramount factor for many citizens. Having a dedicated territory parting the whole building from the neighboring houses is a distinctive feature that offers an entirely private environment to the residents. You can throw a big party without anyone noticing the identities of the guests or even asking about the matter, whereas in a flat perhaps you would have to let the guardsmen know of the event beforehand to have a hassle-free gathering. Moreover, living in a house will carry a sense of freedom with itself, meaning that it feels like you genuinely own the property and are not sharing any communal sections with any other entity, as it is the case in apartments. Living in an apartment, however, can provide more security compared to a mansion. Since in apartments there are other people living in the same building, the safety is somehow doubled. For instance, if a family plans to go on a trip, the presence of the other members in the building would prevent a potential burglary. Another point worth mentioning is the fact that in some apartments people have the luxury of using built-in sports facilities which are not generally found in the houses, yet with enough budget, it is viable feasible to make the same setting in a house.It is, of course, difficult to draw a hard line between these two options, and it really comes down to personal preference. However, I could reason that since for many people privacy and freedom have more weight to them, living in a house would better fulfill their criteria of choosing a place to reside in.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Today more people are travelling than ever before. Why is this the case? What are the benefits of travelling for the traveler? Today, millions of people visit other countries to spend their leisure time. In fact, the number of travelers is noticeably growing each year. There are many reasons behind this trend such as rising income, the growing number of internet users and captivating advertisements. Firstly, household income has increased and air travel has become considerably cheaper than before; therefore, people can afford to visit more places across the globe. In addition, the internet has helped people travel easier and more conveniently. For instance, people can buy an e-ticket and book a room through the net in the shortest time. Moreover, advertisement advertising has a significant impact on travelling. People watch fascinating online or offline ads which make them travel and visit those attractive places. It is undeniable that travelling brings a lot of benefits for the travelers. As people travel to another country, they get familiar with a new culture. For example, when westerners go to the Asian countries, they taste exotic dishes they have never eaten before and enjoy watching unique and colorful festivals which they could have only seen on TV before. Furthermore, travelling helps people ease their stress. It is obvious that nowadays life can get stressful and one of the ways to reduce the level of stress is to travel. For instance, taking a short trip to seaside resorts can be release stress and improve your performance at work. In summary, travelling has increased compared to the past because of the number of growing internet users, attractive advertisements and affordable prices. People get a lot of benefits from travelling including acquaintance with new cultures and stress relief.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Governments and big companies should work together to reverse environmental damage, rather than making individuals responsible for that. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and relevant examples. Protection of the environment should be a primary concern especially in developed and industrial countries. Although people’s role is undeniable in protecting the environment, I would argue that the government and huge industries should cooperate in saving the planet. The government plays an active role in participating in sustainable development and the protection of the environment. Firstly, the state has the power to introduce laws for industries and individuals and impose harsh punishments and fines for activities which damage the environment such as deforestation and logging. For example, in some countries like Iran there is no punishment for dropping litter on the ground, as a result some people do not care about leaving their garbage in the nature. Secondly, by improving the public transport system and imposing taxes on fuel, the use of private cars and also the amount of the greenhouse emissions will be decreased. Thirdly, media can alert people about the consequences of the destruction of the nature environment. Finally, if the government encouraged the consumers to use renewable energy sources, there would be less use of fossil fuels and therefore less harms to environment. conservation of the environment needs an active cooperation. Tackling environmental problems is a burden that the government cannot carry without big companies’ assistance. If everybody was held accountable for the difference they make to environment, there would be not such a deterioration in standards. For example, producers should avoid making over-packaged goods, decrease their use of papers, contribute to recycling and be responsible for their wastes. In conclusion, I believe that only when the government and big companies take the responsibility for li ving in harmony with nature and conserve the environment can we claim that we have taken steps to protect the environment.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

The mass media, including television, radio and newspapers, have great influence in shaping people`s ideas. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Over the last half century, diverse kinds of media have emerged, which are almost utilized by every type of organization, whether governmental or private ones. This essay agrees that mass media is without a doubt have a vast impact on every corner of the people’s life and ideas. There is a psychological belief which states that, if you want to implement varies types of concepts into individual`s mind, whether it is right or wrong, real or unreal, you must frequently show and repeatedly tell them the notion you want them to have, until they unconsciously forced by their own mind to believe and furthermore act accordingly whatto want you want them to do. One of the major sections that use this type of belief is business. Commercial companies and even individual businesses use variety of mass media such as public television, social media and radio to form a mind frame for every man, woman and even a child, to persuade them for purchasing goods and products that most the time they do not need. In spite of the fact that mass media could be utilize for deception of people, conversely it could be used for many positive actions such as awareness amid people around the world about severity of global warming which could drive them to take actions and confront these types of pitfalls as soon as possible. Another positive category which utilize mass media is personal hygiene, which boost people`s awareness about individual hygiene plus the surroundings that they are living in. To sum up, although mass media has merits and demerits and also are being used for negative or positive desires, it is definitely affecting people`s ideas and beliefs. But, are do really the advantages of this type of influencing influence outweigh the drawbacks?