Mondays GMAT-GRE-TOEFL-IELTS-آموزشگاه زبان صبای سحر-چمران جنوب، بلوار جلال آل احمد، جنب داروخانه شبانه روزی جلال آل احمد، پلاک 87، طبقه سوم تلفن: 42-88679341 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/436-monday-writing-workshop-1398/writing-workshop-monday-98-06-25 2024-05-01T23:56:35+00:00 IELTSTOEFLCENTER info@ieltstoeflcenter.com Joomla! - Open Source Content Management Aida Mofakhami, Plastic Waste 2019-09-17T13:24:30+00:00 2019-09-17T13:24:30+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/436-monday-writing-workshop-1398/writing-workshop-monday-98-06-25/3126-aida-mofakhami-plastic-waste Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1398/Writing Workshop Monday 98.06.25/Aida Mofakhami, Plastic Waste.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Plastic waste, chips and nuts’ packages or other kinds of litter all around the city is are becoming an important issue which highlights/emphasizes/underpin strikes the necessity of recycling these days. By new methods of recycling, these pieces of trash could alter to usable goods again which not only save a large amount of time and energy but also can survive the environment from being polluted to a great extent. Some believes that it is only incumbent on the government to adopt an efficient method or even to create a new law by which recycling becomes more popular among citizens. While I do agree that the government could have a major role in this regard, I think people also must be educated about the recycling culture. First, the vast majority of our daily foods is going directly to the wastegarbage along with other nonfood waste such as plastics or papers which make up about 20% of domestic waste. Although this is a disaster that is happening in most developing countries, there is are almost no facilities for people to separate these amounts of waste while disposing of them. Therefore, the first priority should be on informing the importance of categorizing of wastes; that is, people need to learn how they could divide their household waste into different groups such as bio-waste, plastics, glasses and papers. On the other hand, in the aforementioned countries there is little scarcity of facilities for waste disposal compared to the amount of garbage that is produced each day. Regarding this, the authorities could have a serious responsibility to improve their systems in order being to be able to reuse the separated wastes. taking advantage of new technologies, the government could devise new methods by which collecting waste and recycling could be much more accessible. In conclusion, imposing severe laws could play a role as a motivator to encourage people to separate their rubbish. However, being educated about the importance of this behavior is far more beneficial. So it is vital that the governments make their effort firstly to inform people about the advantages of recycling and then bringingimposing laws when it’s necessary to make this newly learnedconstructive behavior abide in people minds.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1398/Writing Workshop Monday 98.06.25/Aida Mofakhami, Plastic Waste.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Plastic waste, chips and nuts’ packages or other kinds of litter all around the city is are becoming an important issue which highlights/emphasizes/underpin strikes the necessity of recycling these days. By new methods of recycling, these pieces of trash could alter to usable goods again which not only save a large amount of time and energy but also can survive the environment from being polluted to a great extent. Some believes that it is only incumbent on the government to adopt an efficient method or even to create a new law by which recycling becomes more popular among citizens. While I do agree that the government could have a major role in this regard, I think people also must be educated about the recycling culture. First, the vast majority of our daily foods is going directly to the wastegarbage along with other nonfood waste such as plastics or papers which make up about 20% of domestic waste. Although this is a disaster that is happening in most developing countries, there is are almost no facilities for people to separate these amounts of waste while disposing of them. Therefore, the first priority should be on informing the importance of categorizing of wastes; that is, people need to learn how they could divide their household waste into different groups such as bio-waste, plastics, glasses and papers. On the other hand, in the aforementioned countries there is little scarcity of facilities for waste disposal compared to the amount of garbage that is produced each day. Regarding this, the authorities could have a serious responsibility to improve their systems in order being to be able to reuse the separated wastes. taking advantage of new technologies, the government could devise new methods by which collecting waste and recycling could be much more accessible. In conclusion, imposing severe laws could play a role as a motivator to encourage people to separate their rubbish. However, being educated about the importance of this behavior is far more beneficial. So it is vital that the governments make their effort firstly to inform people about the advantages of recycling and then bringingimposing laws when it’s necessary to make this newly learnedconstructive behavior abide in people minds.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Anahita Rahmati, Job Satisfaction 2019-09-17T13:24:15+00:00 2019-09-17T13:24:15+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/436-monday-writing-workshop-1398/writing-workshop-monday-98-06-25/3125-anahita-rahmati-job-satisfaction Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1398/Writing Workshop Monday 98.06.25/Anahita Rahmati, Job Satisfaction.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Topic As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing. What factors contribute to job satisfaction? How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? Answer Nowadays, many people spend the most part of their life at work. They passed theall main part of their lifetime with colleagues and bosses. Hence, the most important aspects of one’s job are satisfaction and feeling safety. This factor could directly effect affect on health. Although, it is true that, there are a lot of factors to in job satisfaction such as: salary, position. and Job description. , All of the people should consider that they could not always be satisfy100satisfied100% with their job. I agree that the realistic realistism are exists to in many people but in my idea people should consider their expectations according to the fact for feeling enjoy. On one hand, it is important to investigate one’s satisfaction factors and the work environments of work have has to be choose chosen on this basis. On the other hand, sometimes it is essential to create this satisfaction at work. For example, if the space of the workroom is not so delightful, there are a lot of stuffsornaments to decorating decorate and make it more pleasant. I think if somebody, cannot feel comfortable at work, they must seeking the main reason and try to solve it. Paraphrasesimply put, they ought to investigate the exact problem. Weather Whether it refers has to do withto personality or the wrong place to work. If it refers to personality, finding the clue is necessary and most counselorsconsoler can be beneficial. If the problem is choosing the wrong place to work in, it is possible the job has not been choice chosen based on qualification. For in conclusion, even though it is unlikely that everyone has a big chance to get a job and feel pleasant completely, I think it is unrealistic to expect full that prompt more job satisfaction and they ought to find more reasons to create enjoy at work.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1398/Writing Workshop Monday 98.06.25/Anahita Rahmati, Job Satisfaction.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Topic As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing. What factors contribute to job satisfaction? How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? Answer Nowadays, many people spend the most part of their life at work. They passed theall main part of their lifetime with colleagues and bosses. Hence, the most important aspects of one’s job are satisfaction and feeling safety. This factor could directly effect affect on health. Although, it is true that, there are a lot of factors to in job satisfaction such as: salary, position. and Job description. , All of the people should consider that they could not always be satisfy100satisfied100% with their job. I agree that the realistic realistism are exists to in many people but in my idea people should consider their expectations according to the fact for feeling enjoy. On one hand, it is important to investigate one’s satisfaction factors and the work environments of work have has to be choose chosen on this basis. On the other hand, sometimes it is essential to create this satisfaction at work. For example, if the space of the workroom is not so delightful, there are a lot of stuffsornaments to decorating decorate and make it more pleasant. I think if somebody, cannot feel comfortable at work, they must seeking the main reason and try to solve it. Paraphrasesimply put, they ought to investigate the exact problem. Weather Whether it refers has to do withto personality or the wrong place to work. If it refers to personality, finding the clue is necessary and most counselorsconsoler can be beneficial. If the problem is choosing the wrong place to work in, it is possible the job has not been choice chosen based on qualification. For in conclusion, even though it is unlikely that everyone has a big chance to get a job and feel pleasant completely, I think it is unrealistic to expect full that prompt more job satisfaction and they ought to find more reasons to create enjoy at work.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Javad, Price of Petrol 2019-09-17T13:24:00+00:00 2019-09-17T13:24:00+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/436-monday-writing-workshop-1398/writing-workshop-monday-98-06-25/3124-javad-price-of-petrol Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1398/Writing Workshop Monday 98.06.25/Javad, Price of Petrol.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement? What other measures do you think might be effective? The matter of fossil fuels consumptions has been always one of the gravest problems of today’s countries. There many people who advocate the rise in price of this fuel as the best method of alleviating the whole question of traffic and pollution. In my view, this method has many drawbacks and substantial method will be presented in this essay. Considering the higher price for petrol might appears as an appealing idea at first glance, but in closer inception it can be realized that when people need to use their personal vehicle, there is no barrier for them to pay the price. This can be seen in many European countries such as France and Italy which despite putting high price for fuels are experiencing proliferation in usage of fossil fuels and the level of green gases are continuing to soar. Another reason for rejecting this view is that price increment in this field can automatically bring galloping inflation for that country and the problem of traffic and pollution remain unsolved. As an illustration, any increase in petrol prices leads to an increase in the price of transportation and thiswhich can affect every product which needs to be transported. Therefore, people should spend more money on purchasing everything they need. Turning to other methods for ameliorating this condition, the first remedy would be increasing people’s awareness. Education about how and when to use private cars in every stage ranging from the school’s curriculum to television advertisements can help. Another solution would be the development of renewable energy methods sources such as wind and solar energy. Providing more option for people in terms of fuels leads them to lessen fossil fuel usage. Overall, it seems advisable that solving the question of pollution and traffic should be based on correct education and developing alternative technologies rather than the increment in the petrol price.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1398/Writing Workshop Monday 98.06.25/Javad, Price of Petrol.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement? What other measures do you think might be effective? The matter of fossil fuels consumptions has been always one of the gravest problems of today’s countries. There many people who advocate the rise in price of this fuel as the best method of alleviating the whole question of traffic and pollution. In my view, this method has many drawbacks and substantial method will be presented in this essay. Considering the higher price for petrol might appears as an appealing idea at first glance, but in closer inception it can be realized that when people need to use their personal vehicle, there is no barrier for them to pay the price. This can be seen in many European countries such as France and Italy which despite putting high price for fuels are experiencing proliferation in usage of fossil fuels and the level of green gases are continuing to soar. Another reason for rejecting this view is that price increment in this field can automatically bring galloping inflation for that country and the problem of traffic and pollution remain unsolved. As an illustration, any increase in petrol prices leads to an increase in the price of transportation and thiswhich can affect every product which needs to be transported. Therefore, people should spend more money on purchasing everything they need. Turning to other methods for ameliorating this condition, the first remedy would be increasing people’s awareness. Education about how and when to use private cars in every stage ranging from the school’s curriculum to television advertisements can help. Another solution would be the development of renewable energy methods sources such as wind and solar energy. Providing more option for people in terms of fuels leads them to lessen fossil fuel usage. Overall, it seems advisable that solving the question of pollution and traffic should be based on correct education and developing alternative technologies rather than the increment in the petrol price.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Kian, Shopping 2019-09-17T13:23:46+00:00 2019-09-17T13:23:46+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/436-monday-writing-workshop-1398/writing-workshop-monday-98-06-25/3123-kian-shopping Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1398/Writing Workshop Monday 98.06.25/Kian, Shopping.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">In the past, shopping was a routine domestic task. Many people nowadays regarded regard it as a hobby. To what extent do you think this is a positive trend? It is true that in the past most of the people went on shopping, on a daily basis, solely with the aim of purchasing the necessities. However, nowadays the trend is altered. I hold that although spending time in the aforementioned way has brought benefits and convenience for people, there are demerits that should not be neglected. As will now be discussed. It is a general belief that the advent of the shopping centres caused a myriad of small shops and businesses to close-down which seems as like a drawback but it should be noted that it brought many advantages for the customers and consumers and above all else business owners. First and foremost, places such as malls provide a considerable number of various utilities like restaurants, children’s play-grounds, free-parking space, to name but a few and collectively, a place for entertainment and social interactions for all of the age-groups. Another contributing factor which is exquisitely beneficial to individuals is that by buying products or services from one shop, they could gain a rebate vouchers for other shops or even the daily/weekly lotteries, to say the least. Furthermore, existing existence of an avalanche of similar businesses in the vicinity of their counterparts increases the competitions for business-owners to find ways to absorb customers like more rebates or gift cards, which in the end makes the expenditure of time in such places more appealing for individuals. I would like to stress that although consuming time in malls could be very entertaining and often beneficial for people, but shopping centres psychologically encourages humanbeings to consumerism which is a tremendous pitfall, especially for the economical stateuss of individuals and families. A great example of such behaviour is that by being prone to many appealing commodities, most of the time we unconsciously allocate money on to merchandises that are is not essential in our lives and could be deemed to be a waste of money. To put it in a nutshell, I maintain that the merits of spending time at shopping as a hobby clearly outweigh the drawbacks, hensehence, individuals should apply themselves for enhancing their abilities to withstand against the temptations of the moment when vast amounts of choices are popping in front of them.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1398/Writing Workshop Monday 98.06.25/Kian, Shopping.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">In the past, shopping was a routine domestic task. Many people nowadays regarded regard it as a hobby. To what extent do you think this is a positive trend? It is true that in the past most of the people went on shopping, on a daily basis, solely with the aim of purchasing the necessities. However, nowadays the trend is altered. I hold that although spending time in the aforementioned way has brought benefits and convenience for people, there are demerits that should not be neglected. As will now be discussed. It is a general belief that the advent of the shopping centres caused a myriad of small shops and businesses to close-down which seems as like a drawback but it should be noted that it brought many advantages for the customers and consumers and above all else business owners. First and foremost, places such as malls provide a considerable number of various utilities like restaurants, children’s play-grounds, free-parking space, to name but a few and collectively, a place for entertainment and social interactions for all of the age-groups. Another contributing factor which is exquisitely beneficial to individuals is that by buying products or services from one shop, they could gain a rebate vouchers for other shops or even the daily/weekly lotteries, to say the least. Furthermore, existing existence of an avalanche of similar businesses in the vicinity of their counterparts increases the competitions for business-owners to find ways to absorb customers like more rebates or gift cards, which in the end makes the expenditure of time in such places more appealing for individuals. I would like to stress that although consuming time in malls could be very entertaining and often beneficial for people, but shopping centres psychologically encourages humanbeings to consumerism which is a tremendous pitfall, especially for the economical stateuss of individuals and families. A great example of such behaviour is that by being prone to many appealing commodities, most of the time we unconsciously allocate money on to merchandises that are is not essential in our lives and could be deemed to be a waste of money. To put it in a nutshell, I maintain that the merits of spending time at shopping as a hobby clearly outweigh the drawbacks, hensehence, individuals should apply themselves for enhancing their abilities to withstand against the temptations of the moment when vast amounts of choices are popping in front of them.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Mohammad Razavi, Work 2019-09-17T13:23:33+00:00 2019-09-17T13:23:33+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/436-monday-writing-workshop-1398/writing-workshop-monday-98-06-25/3122-mohammad-razavi-work Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1398/Writing Workshop Monday 98.06.25/Mohammad Razavi, Work.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Other think that it is better to work for different organizations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Working for one company from the beginning of one’s career to retirement for some people is the ultimate aim but some people think this perspective leads to lose losing opportunities and we should not get stuck in one job and should try other positions in other companies. Most of our valuable time is occupied with work. Therefore, it is pretty important to know which one is better for us. I want to represent some advantages and drawbacks of these viewpoints and then specify my belief. Firstly, working in one company makes you familiar to with everybody and every position in that company. If you are painfully shy, this item feature could be the a great advantage. Moreover, sometimes working in one firm could guarantee that you receive a pension. Being a new recruitentry in the company, there will beoffers a little opportunity to attain high positions in that company, but by being a veteran, there will be a good prospect for promotion. Secondly, despite what I was mentioned earlier, spending the entire career in one company could kill some potential. If somebody encounters to new situations, he or shethey could achieve a lot of knowledge in various aspects of his or hertheir proficiency. In addition, you should be aware that if you want seek to promote quick promotionrapidly, sometimes there is not anyno way except changing your job and grasping new opportunities. On the other hand, if you change your employer regularly, it will be meantmean that you are not loyal to your employers. Finally, I should say that both of these views are radical opinions and we should choose the moderate ones for career improvement. We should know when changing is better and when is not and by perception of the situation we could reach to our targets.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1398/Writing Workshop Monday 98.06.25/Mohammad Razavi, Work.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Other think that it is better to work for different organizations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Working for one company from the beginning of one’s career to retirement for some people is the ultimate aim but some people think this perspective leads to lose losing opportunities and we should not get stuck in one job and should try other positions in other companies. Most of our valuable time is occupied with work. Therefore, it is pretty important to know which one is better for us. I want to represent some advantages and drawbacks of these viewpoints and then specify my belief. Firstly, working in one company makes you familiar to with everybody and every position in that company. If you are painfully shy, this item feature could be the a great advantage. Moreover, sometimes working in one firm could guarantee that you receive a pension. Being a new recruitentry in the company, there will beoffers a little opportunity to attain high positions in that company, but by being a veteran, there will be a good prospect for promotion. Secondly, despite what I was mentioned earlier, spending the entire career in one company could kill some potential. If somebody encounters to new situations, he or shethey could achieve a lot of knowledge in various aspects of his or hertheir proficiency. In addition, you should be aware that if you want seek to promote quick promotionrapidly, sometimes there is not anyno way except changing your job and grasping new opportunities. On the other hand, if you change your employer regularly, it will be meantmean that you are not loyal to your employers. Finally, I should say that both of these views are radical opinions and we should choose the moderate ones for career improvement. We should know when changing is better and when is not and by perception of the situation we could reach to our targets.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Nasrin, Recycling 2019-09-17T13:23:19+00:00 2019-09-17T13:23:19+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/436-monday-writing-workshop-1398/writing-workshop-monday-98-06-25/3121-nasrin-recycling Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1398/Writing Workshop Monday 98.06.25/Nasrin, Recycling.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
 To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste? We live in consumer societies where people buy a lot of merchandise such as clothes, decoration and packed food, and consequently an enormous amount of litter are is produced at homes. Environmentally- friendly ways to dispose of waste should be taken by the government and one of the most effective ways is to make the recycling a priority for householdsers. By making home recycling a mandatory, people will be forced to obey the law and separate their household garbage into different bins. These such legislations could act as a deterrent and there could be a punishment for individuals who fail to adhere to this law ranging from fines to community service. The experience of other countries proves that by introducing laws, recycling will become a habit but aiming reaching this goal is so extremely energy consuming since there should be special monitors to supervise the wastes disposal from houses. Making people recycle with legal obligation could not be much effective if people do not believe in the necessity of recycling wholeheartedly. Firstly, the government should promote social knowledge about environmental conservation. One of the best steps to start is teaching children from the school and informing homeowners about the environmentally impact of household waste. Secondly, the state should adopt some encouragement policies to motivate people to recycle such as tax incentives. The money which is intended to supervise people lest they breakfrom breaking the law of recycling can act as a motivation. Finally, the recycling facilities could be improved, so that waste is processed more effectively regardless of whether or not people separate it correctly at home. In conclusion, although by introducing laws the government will be able to force people to recycle, there are many other measures that could be taken to solve the problem of household waste. 290 words</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1398/Writing Workshop Monday 98.06.25/Nasrin, Recycling.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
 To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste? We live in consumer societies where people buy a lot of merchandise such as clothes, decoration and packed food, and consequently an enormous amount of litter are is produced at homes. Environmentally- friendly ways to dispose of waste should be taken by the government and one of the most effective ways is to make the recycling a priority for householdsers. By making home recycling a mandatory, people will be forced to obey the law and separate their household garbage into different bins. These such legislations could act as a deterrent and there could be a punishment for individuals who fail to adhere to this law ranging from fines to community service. The experience of other countries proves that by introducing laws, recycling will become a habit but aiming reaching this goal is so extremely energy consuming since there should be special monitors to supervise the wastes disposal from houses. Making people recycle with legal obligation could not be much effective if people do not believe in the necessity of recycling wholeheartedly. Firstly, the government should promote social knowledge about environmental conservation. One of the best steps to start is teaching children from the school and informing homeowners about the environmentally impact of household waste. Secondly, the state should adopt some encouragement policies to motivate people to recycle such as tax incentives. The money which is intended to supervise people lest they breakfrom breaking the law of recycling can act as a motivation. Finally, the recycling facilities could be improved, so that waste is processed more effectively regardless of whether or not people separate it correctly at home. In conclusion, although by introducing laws the government will be able to force people to recycle, there are many other measures that could be taken to solve the problem of household waste. 290 words</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Pouya, Medical Care 2019-09-17T13:23:05+00:00 2019-09-17T13:23:05+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/436-monday-writing-workshop-1398/writing-workshop-monday-98-06-25/3120-pouya-medical-care Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1398/Writing Workshop Monday 98.06.25/Pouya, Medical Care.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? Today the development in medical care and the enhancement in quality of public health causes people to live more and the average of life expectancy has been going up. Although it has several good influences, some problems probably are raised by increasing the life span of the people. I generally agree with this idea that the advantages of this improvement are a lot more than its disadvantages and then it was will be discussed in the following lines. First, it is obvious that people need medical services more as they get older and there are financial burdens on the governments to cover the cost of the medical services as the life span is increasing. There have been several instances in which some countries encounter with problems of growing the population of aged people. In these cases involving insurance companies to cover these expenses is the best solution, although, it is needed necessary that people should have paid their insurance premium in the years before they wanted to use it. On the other hand, increasing life expectancy has some advantages for society. First, as people are living longer their experiences in their work and life go up and others can fully utilize the experiences of each old-man as a lesson learned. Secondly, the talented people usually obtain their best achievement at the age over 50 years old and increasing of the life span lets them this opportunity to gain more success during their life. Third, by increasing the life expectancy the elderly people must and can use their retirement period. Encouraging aged people to enjoy their lives and spend their time with their families has a lot of advantages such as increasing exhilaration and happiness in the whole of society. To sum up, I contend that if the government can satisfy the old age needs such as medical care by the insurance industry and support people financially and also emotionally as they are living longer, the increasing increase inof the life span will have positive results for the society, but if not, living more longer will not seem like such a good choice!</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1398/Writing Workshop Monday 98.06.25/Pouya, Medical Care.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? Today the development in medical care and the enhancement in quality of public health causes people to live more and the average of life expectancy has been going up. Although it has several good influences, some problems probably are raised by increasing the life span of the people. I generally agree with this idea that the advantages of this improvement are a lot more than its disadvantages and then it was will be discussed in the following lines. First, it is obvious that people need medical services more as they get older and there are financial burdens on the governments to cover the cost of the medical services as the life span is increasing. There have been several instances in which some countries encounter with problems of growing the population of aged people. In these cases involving insurance companies to cover these expenses is the best solution, although, it is needed necessary that people should have paid their insurance premium in the years before they wanted to use it. On the other hand, increasing life expectancy has some advantages for society. First, as people are living longer their experiences in their work and life go up and others can fully utilize the experiences of each old-man as a lesson learned. Secondly, the talented people usually obtain their best achievement at the age over 50 years old and increasing of the life span lets them this opportunity to gain more success during their life. Third, by increasing the life expectancy the elderly people must and can use their retirement period. Encouraging aged people to enjoy their lives and spend their time with their families has a lot of advantages such as increasing exhilaration and happiness in the whole of society. To sum up, I contend that if the government can satisfy the old age needs such as medical care by the insurance industry and support people financially and also emotionally as they are living longer, the increasing increase inof the life span will have positive results for the society, but if not, living more longer will not seem like such a good choice!</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Sara Hashempour, Communicating Information 2019-09-17T13:22:54+00:00 2019-09-17T13:22:54+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/436-monday-writing-workshop-1398/writing-workshop-monday-98-06-25/3119-sara-hashempour-communicating-information Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1398/Writing Workshop Monday 98.06.25/Sara Hashempour, Communicating Information.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Compare the advantages and disadvantages of three of the following as media for communicating information . State which you consider to be the most effective  Comics  Books  Radio  Television  Film  Theatre Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from own knowledge or experience. These days, it is noticeable that the media are a main form of communication. Studies show that they have a powerful influence in shaping our lives . We can find the a variety of the media types such as books , radio, comics, film, theatre , tv . All of which for exchanging information have advantages and disadvantages and do not attract all types of audiences. I believe that radio, television and books play the most important role in people’s life. Inescapable fact that of evidence shows that TV is the most popular media among the people . It is attractive due to some reasons . First and foremost , nowadays, a vast majority of people have access to it . They can listen to and view it at the same time , it which makes it marvelous. Moreover , TV is the a source of entertainment and education. News channels such as BBC ,VOA enable us to view the current events in also instantly occurring around the world. Geography channels provide useful information about the environment or wildlife. Other channels like movies , child , discovery find are seen the wholeall over the day . A the radio is another kind of media which you use to listen to programs that are broadcast such as music and news. We can accessible it in anywhere any any time , during while driving or traveling . Although the radio is less costly than the other media devices like TV , it lacks no access to any visual features which TV has. In my view , radio is good for checking live traffic during driving . Additionally therefore , it is not a suitable device for the deaf either. In contrast to this, TV is the best choice for them. Books are the one of the oldest communication media. Books are the accumulated version of knowledge , experience and history. Reading books can give us insight into different cultures and civilizations that can learn a lot of things. On the other hand, information of the book could be outdated in many cases so people cannot trust them easily and most try to find the latest version of it . In conclusion, we have find plenty of evidence to support the view that the most effective media for communicating information is TV . The benefits of them is outweigh the costs . The rapid growing of TV channels are is a good example of this process.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1398/Writing Workshop Monday 98.06.25/Sara Hashempour, Communicating Information.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Compare the advantages and disadvantages of three of the following as media for communicating information . State which you consider to be the most effective  Comics  Books  Radio  Television  Film  Theatre Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from own knowledge or experience. These days, it is noticeable that the media are a main form of communication. Studies show that they have a powerful influence in shaping our lives . We can find the a variety of the media types such as books , radio, comics, film, theatre , tv . All of which for exchanging information have advantages and disadvantages and do not attract all types of audiences. I believe that radio, television and books play the most important role in people’s life. Inescapable fact that of evidence shows that TV is the most popular media among the people . It is attractive due to some reasons . First and foremost , nowadays, a vast majority of people have access to it . They can listen to and view it at the same time , it which makes it marvelous. Moreover , TV is the a source of entertainment and education. News channels such as BBC ,VOA enable us to view the current events in also instantly occurring around the world. Geography channels provide useful information about the environment or wildlife. Other channels like movies , child , discovery find are seen the wholeall over the day . A the radio is another kind of media which you use to listen to programs that are broadcast such as music and news. We can accessible it in anywhere any any time , during while driving or traveling . Although the radio is less costly than the other media devices like TV , it lacks no access to any visual features which TV has. In my view , radio is good for checking live traffic during driving . Additionally therefore , it is not a suitable device for the deaf either. In contrast to this, TV is the best choice for them. Books are the one of the oldest communication media. Books are the accumulated version of knowledge , experience and history. Reading books can give us insight into different cultures and civilizations that can learn a lot of things. On the other hand, information of the book could be outdated in many cases so people cannot trust them easily and most try to find the latest version of it . In conclusion, we have find plenty of evidence to support the view that the most effective media for communicating information is TV . The benefits of them is outweigh the costs . The rapid growing of TV channels are is a good example of this process.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Setareh Rabbani, Price of Petrol 2019-09-17T13:22:39+00:00 2019-09-17T13:22:39+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/436-monday-writing-workshop-1398/writing-workshop-monday-98-06-25/3118-setareh-rabbani-price-of-petrol Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1398/Writing Workshop Monday 98.06.25/Setareh Rabbani, Price of Petrol.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? There is a general belief that increasing the price of petrol can easily solve the traffic and decline air pollution. While I do agree with this view, I do not think that it is the best option. There is a simple rule in economics which shows that price and consumption change in opposite direction. Therefore, elevation of the fuel price would lead to decreased consumption of it like any other good. When the price of one good increase, people have to manage their using behavior in order to deal with their limited income. In this view, it is expected that people would use their own cars less and society would face less problems related to traffic and different kind of pollutions caused by cars. On the other hand, if states do not improve the public transportation along with increasing the petrol price, not only would they solve no problems, but also they would cause one. For example people who do not have a decent access to public transportation, would have to limit other expenses in order to compensate their decreased disposable income. They would probably omit some of their leisure activities or high quality food which would have other consequences on their health and quality of life. In conclusion, even though increasing the petrol price could be the easiest way to promote people to use less of their private cars, I believe that this is not our best shot. Even so, in my opinion, improving the access of people to public transport, such as buses or metro, would simply promote people to use them more to escape from traffic jams.These pie charts illustrate the proportion of sodium, saturated fats and added sugars in different meals of Americans’ staple diet. These three nutrients are the base of an unhealthy Diet which could lead to chronic diseases. It is obvious that breakfast is the healthiest meal among the four different meals which are taken by Americans during a typical day. Dinner is usually rich in sodium and saturated fats and snakes usually have plenty of added sugars. Looking into more details, we can witnessed that breakfast have only 14 to 16 percent of unhealthy nutrients (14 percent salt and 16 percent fat and added sugars). Lunch usually has 19 percent of added sugars, 26 percent of saturated fat and 29 percent of sodium. Snakes are significant by high proportion of added sugar that is 42 percent. Finally, dinner has a high percentage of sodium and saturated fat (43% and 37% respectively). To sum up/overall, this chart shows that Americans intake too much sodium and added sugars in their dinner and refreshments and breakfast is the healthiest meal for them.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1398/Writing Workshop Monday 98.06.25/Setareh Rabbani, Price of Petrol.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? There is a general belief that increasing the price of petrol can easily solve the traffic and decline air pollution. While I do agree with this view, I do not think that it is the best option. There is a simple rule in economics which shows that price and consumption change in opposite direction. Therefore, elevation of the fuel price would lead to decreased consumption of it like any other good. When the price of one good increase, people have to manage their using behavior in order to deal with their limited income. In this view, it is expected that people would use their own cars less and society would face less problems related to traffic and different kind of pollutions caused by cars. On the other hand, if states do not improve the public transportation along with increasing the petrol price, not only would they solve no problems, but also they would cause one. For example people who do not have a decent access to public transportation, would have to limit other expenses in order to compensate their decreased disposable income. They would probably omit some of their leisure activities or high quality food which would have other consequences on their health and quality of life. In conclusion, even though increasing the petrol price could be the easiest way to promote people to use less of their private cars, I believe that this is not our best shot. Even so, in my opinion, improving the access of people to public transport, such as buses or metro, would simply promote people to use them more to escape from traffic jams.These pie charts illustrate the proportion of sodium, saturated fats and added sugars in different meals of Americans’ staple diet. These three nutrients are the base of an unhealthy Diet which could lead to chronic diseases. It is obvious that breakfast is the healthiest meal among the four different meals which are taken by Americans during a typical day. Dinner is usually rich in sodium and saturated fats and snakes usually have plenty of added sugars. Looking into more details, we can witnessed that breakfast have only 14 to 16 percent of unhealthy nutrients (14 percent salt and 16 percent fat and added sugars). Lunch usually has 19 percent of added sugars, 26 percent of saturated fat and 29 percent of sodium. Snakes are significant by high proportion of added sugar that is 42 percent. Finally, dinner has a high percentage of sodium and saturated fat (43% and 37% respectively). To sum up/overall, this chart shows that Americans intake too much sodium and added sugars in their dinner and refreshments and breakfast is the healthiest meal for them.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table>