جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

It is clear that many places in the world rely heavily on tourism as a key to economic resources . however , it also can cause problems if it is not well-managed . A huge influx of tourists can lead to depletion of resources as well as, uniqueness and environment of the destination over time . Every year millions of people travel around the world . This phenomena phenomenon can cause tension between among people from different backgrounds. Visitors may have no understanding about local people's culture . There are a few countries which are trying to fill this gap . For instance, people are required German certification to get Germany's Visa or in Quebec if you have French certification , the Government offers bonuses . Although tourism creates Job opportunities , although they may beare low-level such as hotel services and bar work . it also makes governments improve substructures like public transportation since visitors tend to use public transportation in order to decrease their costs and it also helps them to communicate with local people more and more . Tourism means increase in population which can put pressure on natural resources and encourage over-consumption . This problem is even more evident in spots where food and water are already scarce . To sum it up , even though tourism has benefits, but it also can cause severe damages like cultural tension . So it must be managed well , otherwise officials should wait for a huge breakdown in the area .

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

It is more important for the government to spend money on art and music museums than on facilities like playgrounds, public swimming pools? How to allocate the budget for different sections of the society has sparked a heated debate for decades. Some people believe that the government should fund all the organizations the same, but the others oppose this idea and give the priority to crucial parts. I personally maintain that more money should go to welfare services. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my arguments. The first and foremost reason that comes to mind is health. With respect to the positive effects of exercise on health, the government should provide well-equipped facilities. There are many people with chronic diseases such as diabetes which should they access sports facilities, exercise can play a key role in controlling their illness. Moreover, suffering from obesity, people can lose or control their weight with access to gyms. The statistics shows that the more investments governments make in public sport, the more budget of health they could save. Besides, due to the fact that we are living in a stressful world, should people in charge consider sports facilities for employees, their function will be increased. Second, some individuals hold that sport environments can protect people especially adolescents from social harms like an addiction. In other words, these places can play a vital role in their sociality. For instance, the young generation can discuss with others, benefit from their experiences especially those of adults which in turn improve their social skills, and people can set an ambitious goal and pursue it with their peers. However, we should not neglect the arts. It goes without saying that the world without arts would be mundane. Besides, painting, sculpturing, and handicraft of countries are imperative to their tourism industry, thereby contributing to the governments’ turnover. To make a long story short, I opine that the priority of the governors should be the welfare of people and they ought to sort out citizen’s priorities based on it. To put it simply, the pressing issues of the country, namely health, should be their first priority.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behavior to children? Learning the recognition between right and wrong at an early age is indispensable for children’s growth and progress. Although some nations believed that punishment is an impressive effective procedure to ensure them to do the right thing, I personally consider it is not certainly an outstanding manner of teaching children magnificent important values. First of all, punishment might blemish children’s feelings and thereby create negative influence on its their heart and soul. By way of illustration, if offsprings say improper words, it would be better for parents or teachers to tell them it is inappropriate/improper/rudenot accurate to use those words, clarify to help them truly understand why that behavior is inaccurateunacceptable. If a child does wrong innocentlyout of clean-handed, ordering him/her to stand in a corner will just plant the seed of hatred which is not healthy for their growth. Secondly, punishment is not as humane efficient as education is. Parents and teachers should set an example include decent samples for children to chasefollow. Children require appropriate instruction. Recent research indicates that 80% of children who receive direction from their parents are often regarded as worthy apprenticestudiousd students and treat behave in with an ethical demeanor. By contrast, punished children are more likely to resent it and behave badly to release the stress. As a matter of fact, punishment should be on the basis of reasons. It must serve the education target. For instance, a child breaking a glass should be encouraged to earn money to purchase a new glass by assisting his/her parents in doing the household chores. To summarize, punishing children is not what parents and teachers should take into account as a top precedence. Conducting children and giving positive feedbackmaking affirmative errand clear to them concernsoutweigh all the above factors all else.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement . The extended family (grandparents,cousins,aunts and uncels) is less important now than it was in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer . I am totally diasagree with this statement and It is obviouse that the extended family is one of the precious gifts in our life but nowadays living with them is a bit faded and just communication with them becomes less which dose does not mean they get trivial . Four reasons persuade me to put forward this viewpoint. First of all, Today people are less inclined to have children or more children even some parents prefer not to not have a kid which can have logical reasons, so this makes them to not be aunts or uncels uncles for next generations . It is clear that single children never can be aunts or uncles . The second point is that, nowadays people are too much too busy and they are engrossed in their works . For instance in my country because of trubulent turbulent economic conditions people have to work hard to dispel meet/fulfil their basic needs and they do not have enough time to be with their family and if they find time , they prefer to rest at home . I remmember when I was a Notary public employee , I was so tired during the week that I just wanted to stay at home and sleep on weekends. Thirdly, Today modern life has changed people's behaviour and personality . They would rather to pass their time with their friends than their families because they feel they are having more fun when they are with their friends also they have more in common which is also true . In addition, today's children are more independent than they were in the past . Children of previous generations were more dependent on their parents or other members of family for helping out financially , emotionally or in chores. Last but not least , according due to today's globalization people immigrates from their hometown to other country countries to get meet more demands or facilities, so this situations makes the families less connected. For example my uncle has been living in Italy since 2005 and we have not seen him yet and we just talk to him occasionally with/through some applications like Skype .Ultimately, family and extended family are inseparable part of our life but because of the busyness hectic lifestyle of today , their presence has diminished and this dose does not mean that they are less important .