Mondays

Hadis Bagheri, University

2020-03-30T18:56:42+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not in others. Some people, therefore, think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society. Those who choose to study less relevant subjects should not receive government funding. Would the advantage of such an educational policy outweigh the disadvantages? All subjects that are practised taught in the education system fundamentally had are been required and. What I am saying is that the reason for creating them had has been been the existence of demand, so I certainly do not think that less relevant is the reverse of being needed. Society should provide its members with the state university in all fields, but/albeit with by imposing reasonable entrance filters such as related exams or an average of high school scores. The first and more important element is one's interest and talent. Eliminating funds for some majors not only is a serious constraint for those who have financial limitation nut but also it causes misleading by placing financial incentives on some fields and leads to wrong chooses choices by students. It is a real fact that just working with pleasure that enables humankind to sacrifice and leads to significant success. Another argument in its favour is that society just may not see the direct impact of a group of subject matters such as art. While we can consider are art as a spiritual need that in the today’s society is of great sensibility and here is no denying that many physical problems are rooted in emotional problems, . in my opinion, it is an undeniable fact that all majors act as a chain and rely on each other. On balance, I see all majors as a need; either spiritually or physically. It is better to find another way or policy to attract students to more crucial majors than cutting funds. For example, allocating a higher salary in future can be an effective one.

Mohamad Reza, Car Use

2020-03-30T18:56:20+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

The table lists four countries in terms of journeys made by five different means of transport, and the bar chart compares the main reasons for which people in the USA use their cars travelling to work. It is apparent that cars are by far the most popular form of transport in all countries shown. Also, most Americans refer to lack of options as the primary reason for their willingness to drive to work. As can be seen from the table, most residents in all four countries tend to use their own cars rather than any other modes of transport. A hefty 90% of US citizens make their journey by their private vehicles, while the equivalent percentage for UK residents is just over 70%. These figures were followed by 68% and 47% car use in France and the Netherlands. It is striking that more than a quarter of travelers in this country opt to cycle, while this was nearly the last choice in the other three countries, standing relatively at between 1 and 2 percent. As far as walking is concerned, ranging from 5% to 18%, this form of travel comes second or third in the abovementioned countries. As it is shown in the bar chart, over 40% of people in the USA who were surveyed claim that they travel to work by car due to not having any other alternative. The necessity to use cars for work was cited as the second main reason, accounting for precisely 30% of the responses. Other reasons mentioned by applicants for using their private vehicles were convenience, speed and nightshifts with roughly 20%, 15% and 10% respectively.

Mojtaba, Petrol Price

2020-03-30T18:55:58+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

102 Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problem. To what extend extent do you agree or disagree? What other means do you agree or disagree? ************************************************* Rising traffic as well as air pollution and how to address them, is are at the far forefrontfront of public awareness. Putting cost of fuels up is presented as the best method for dealing with that issue. I think, though increasing the price of petrol is effective, but it cannot be impressive effective by itself and it is necessary to implement other ways too. Increasing the cost of gas or gasoil will led lead to a decrease in the using use of private own vehicles. Governments should impose heavier tax on fuels to force people, avoiding from unnecessary trips and using public transportation instead of their cars. The more the fuel expenditures, the less people take their own car. Moreover, additional revenues that gained from extra tax can be invested in developing public transportation by governments. In addition, motivate motivating residents to use public transportation is another way to decrease the traffic congestion and increasing increase in air quality. Accessibility and availability of public transit are very prominent to encourage people for to useusing that. Saving money, quick travel and help in reducing air pollution are advantages of using mass transit. If citizens feel completely at ease with public transportation system, they will prefer to use that instead of their automobiles. The banning of people’s own vehicles to from entering down town especially in rush-hour times is another method that can be useful to decline decrease daily traffic. By this limitation residents are forced to decrees decrease their daily trips or use public transit. Also determine determining a some criteria for cars before allowing them to entrancing into the cities is another way. For instance, in some cities, namely London, most vehicles, including cars and vans, need to meet certain emissions standards or their drivers must pay a daily charge to drive within the zone. In conclusion, not only rise raising the cost of petrol, but also other methods such as motivate motivating people to use public transit and restraining to drive driving private transportown vehicles can be work to deal with the growing traffic and air pollution.

Nasrin Shamloo, Scientific Research

2020-03-30T18:55:38+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Scientific Research should be carried out and controlled by the government rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree? The scientific achievements of a country can boost the economy. However, There has been a heated debate amongst individuals as to whether the responsibility of controlling and funding these researches should lay lie with the government or commercial institutes. I would argue that the solution is one of partnership. The merits of gaining scientific advances encourage the governments to play an active role in managing them in many societies which brings many advantages. To start with, the government can facilitate the research process with their authority and funding. Having the state's support, scientists can dedicate themselves to their study wholeheartedly. Moreover, the governments are mostly bombarded with critics criticism by their opponents. That is to say, there is a pressure on them to keep their promises which can assure researchers of financial assistance. However, some believe that the governments could not professionally lead scientific studies due to their lack of experience in academic issues and the task should be assigned to private institutions. These companies have valuable experience in completing projects by hiring university professors to guide young scientists and experts to accurately plan for their targets, thereby making a profit. The downside of this trend is that these organizations mostly accept projects with high probability of success, therefore many an innovative thesis would be unacceptable. That a striking feature of science is its unpredictability is an undeniable fact, so all ideas are worth searching. Since almost the government has the resources to cope with the losses incurred during the project I opine that it is better to have the government's fund and the private organization's management to gain the best result. In conclusion, the significance of scientific advances is a compelling reason to make the government support these researches/studies financially and appoint commercial companies to lead them.

Yeganeh, More Social

2020-03-30T18:55:17+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

You have eaten at a restaurant and it was such a terrible experience that you have decided to inform the manager by letter of what happened, and that you want your money back. 1) Describe the problem 2) Explain why you are unhappy 3) Say what you would like to happen next. Dear Sir Here is one of your regular customers. While I have found most of gourmet menu and excellent service here quite satisfactory thus far, I wish to lodge a complaint about the last night I was there for my birthday. As usual as every year, I decide to celebrate my birthday at your restaurant and we order pasta. Despite the fact that I told the waiter about my allergy to pepper, when the dish arrived, it was too spicy, and when I informed the waiter about this, he reacted rudely claiming that I was wrong. Although, eventually, the dish was replaced, I had to wait for them for more than one hour, which I found totally unacceptable, besides the pepper causes me some health problem the day after. According to issue mentioned above, given the fact that this foul-up was entirely the fault of your staff, I feel that I am entitled to request compensation in the form of reimbursement for my money, and suggest you to kindly investigate and take action against the staff on duty in both the kitchen and front of house. I would greatly appreciate your assistance in this matter. Should you have any further information please do not hesitate to call me, and I have supplied my number for your convenience. Yours faithfully Some people believe that technology has made man more social. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? In the present and modernized world, whether the introduction of sophisticated modern technology has revolutionized humans’ social lives has sparked many debates. Some people assert that the advent of technology has enhanced and improved the interaction ways of people, whereas as some others argue that this novel approach has made people more isolated in comparison with back then. I strongly believe that the former side is much more reliable and both sides are ascertained below. Convincing arguments can be made that the utilization of technology especially social media is of paramount significant which provides comprehensive convenience in people’s communications. To start with, by the use of this modern technology, people can connect freely and easily to various corners of the world with no fewer geographical barriers. In other words, technology has helped people to be just one click away from each other to start a communication; for this reason, the level of sociability among people and Keeping a feeling of proximity and closeness is increasing day by day. Moreover, people might expand their save upsavings by reducing their expenditures on passing the distancescommute in order to have meetings with others, which is another crucial factor to encourage people to being sociable. To delve more into details, peoples can use some applications such as Skype or Imo and Skyroom to hold numerous and cheap virtual real-time meetings instead of having expensive, difficult and time consuming journeys. So, more and more communications could be feasible they could have anywhere and anytime. Admittedly, it is conclusively clear that these technology technological advancements have decreased and diminished our real life interactions as well as surging the feeling of isolation especially among younger generations due to their addictive nature. The reason that ties lies behind this issue is dramatically reduction in crucial face-to-face interactions and spending quality time together. Even so, by an appropriate management and supervision people are liable to strike a balance between their real and virtual worlds. In summary, I would concede that although there are significant downsides to technological developments, its’ its multifold advantages cannot be denied. Hence, this technology has forced people to be more social and closer because of its convenience and affordability. Also, it is predicted that its popularity will continue to flourish in the future.