MondaysGMAT-GRE-TOEFL-IELTS-آموزشگاه زبان صبای سحر-چمران جنوب، بلوار جلال آل احمد، جنب داروخانه شبانه روزی جلال آل احمد، پلاک 87، طبقه سوم
تلفن: 42-88679341http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/492-monday-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-monday-99-02-152024-05-05T02:04:41+00:00IELTSTOEFLCENTERinfo@ieltstoeflcenter.comJoomla! - Open Source Content ManagementMohammad, Uniforms2020-05-07T04:01:21+00:002020-05-07T04:01:21+00:00http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/492-monday-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-monday-99-02-15/3521-mohammad-uniformsHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Mohammad, Uniforms.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Many organizations and companies ask their staff to wear a uniform. What are the advantages and
disadvantages of this? What kind of jobs should have a work uniform?
In many companies around the world, employees are required to wear uniforms. Personally, I believe
with the exception of a small number of jobs implementing a uniform system is mainly advantageous
to the company rather than the personnel.
Firstly, having all the employees dressed similarly gives a company a distinct advantage of cultivating
a positive public image and conveying a sense of brand awareness within the locality and the working
society. Such strong and distinct can the created identity be that it may penetrate the market, wining
all the prospective customers. This also manages to create an impression among the staff that this is
where they belong, and this sense of belonging will consequently pave the way to/for company
success/success for the company. Secondly, a customer can readily recognize the individual as part of
the authorized personnel who have uniforms on, and so can trust them and ask for help. This becomes
salient in establishments such as car showrooms, where the customer needs to be informed and
receive help in making decagons.
Granted that uniforms act as an identification mark for customers and turn the staff member into
walking advertisements, promoting a better image for the firm, but this also proves to be successful to
take away the employees' uniqueness. The consequences of wearing branded work attire, albeit
favorable for the managers, can be unfortunate for their staff, boring them to the point that they lose
their interest in their tasks, which may cause a decline in productivity, or in extreme cases, a rebellion
against their higher-ups.
However, some careers necessitate certain dressing codes. Ignoring them will cost not only the
company or organization but also the personnel. Only dressed in heavily protected suits, resistant to
fire and shock, are firefighters are able to venture in/into a flaming house or a precarious, falling
building. Doctors, as another case in point, due to health issues and hygiene are required to have
specific clothing to perform various tasks such as surgery or medical examination.
To conclude, although in some working environments wearing a uniform is mandatory which serves
both the company and personnel’s interests, others, I believe, can remove the restrictions on their
obligatory working suits since it is only to the benefit of the managers.
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Mohammad, Uniforms.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Many organizations and companies ask their staff to wear a uniform. What are the advantages and
disadvantages of this? What kind of jobs should have a work uniform?
In many companies around the world, employees are required to wear uniforms. Personally, I believe
with the exception of a small number of jobs implementing a uniform system is mainly advantageous
to the company rather than the personnel.
Firstly, having all the employees dressed similarly gives a company a distinct advantage of cultivating
a positive public image and conveying a sense of brand awareness within the locality and the working
society. Such strong and distinct can the created identity be that it may penetrate the market, wining
all the prospective customers. This also manages to create an impression among the staff that this is
where they belong, and this sense of belonging will consequently pave the way to/for company
success/success for the company. Secondly, a customer can readily recognize the individual as part of
the authorized personnel who have uniforms on, and so can trust them and ask for help. This becomes
salient in establishments such as car showrooms, where the customer needs to be informed and
receive help in making decagons.
Granted that uniforms act as an identification mark for customers and turn the staff member into
walking advertisements, promoting a better image for the firm, but this also proves to be successful to
take away the employees' uniqueness. The consequences of wearing branded work attire, albeit
favorable for the managers, can be unfortunate for their staff, boring them to the point that they lose
their interest in their tasks, which may cause a decline in productivity, or in extreme cases, a rebellion
against their higher-ups.
However, some careers necessitate certain dressing codes. Ignoring them will cost not only the
company or organization but also the personnel. Only dressed in heavily protected suits, resistant to
fire and shock, are firefighters are able to venture in/into a flaming house or a precarious, falling
building. Doctors, as another case in point, due to health issues and hygiene are required to have
specific clothing to perform various tasks such as surgery or medical examination.
To conclude, although in some working environments wearing a uniform is mandatory which serves
both the company and personnel’s interests, others, I believe, can remove the restrictions on their
obligatory working suits since it is only to the benefit of the managers.
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Zakariaee, Debt for Buy2020-05-04T18:06:07+00:002020-05-04T18:06:07+00:00http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/492-monday-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-monday-99-02-15/3520-zakariaee-debt-for-buyHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Zakariaee, Debt for Buy.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Some people get into debt by buying things they don’t need and cannot afford.
What are the reason for this behavior?
What action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem?
**********************************************
Some groups believe if they are not able to buy luxury thingsitems, which are unnecessary in most of the
times, they will feel like a second-class citizen. That’s why they fall in debt and it is necessitate necessary
to explain the consequence of liability for them.
Nowadays, changing expectations from the life, consumerism has many drawbacks in daily life. Buying
and spending their money, people is are find it hard very hard for them to say “I cannot afford to buy”.
They want to ride the newest model of car, go on trips all around the world, have modern and beautiful
furniture as well as smartphones and laptops in somehow waysanyway possible, while they may not
have not an enough income for their demandrequests and if they don’t do not adjust their expenditures,
they have to get into deficit.
Furthermore, Families need to change their life style and avoid having a tendency to show their abilities
in buying goods which are not affordable to them/do not have an affordable price for them.
Governments have to help raising raise public awareness against the consumer- driven economy and
explain that’s its profound negative’s effects not only in families’ finance financial situations, but also in
leading to economic stagnation. Expensing Expended in unnecessary methods, the amounts of the
money can be invested in productions and developing infrastructures.
Moreover, individuals get into debt because of lack of finance financial information, and they do not
know how the vortex of liabilities can cause them to bigger problems. An exorbitant interest rates leads
to a finance financial problems that people have could not imagined and are not informed about its
consequence of that.
To sum up, I strongly believe that falling in debt to own an unnecessary goods in life is one of the main
effects of the consumerist world and it is necessary to update inforrm people regarding to the
consequence of thosethat’s manners.
Good/bad/nice/ugly/stuff/things/something/
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Zakariaee, Debt for Buy.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Some people get into debt by buying things they don’t need and cannot afford.
What are the reason for this behavior?
What action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem?
**********************************************
Some groups believe if they are not able to buy luxury thingsitems, which are unnecessary in most of the
times, they will feel like a second-class citizen. That’s why they fall in debt and it is necessitate necessary
to explain the consequence of liability for them.
Nowadays, changing expectations from the life, consumerism has many drawbacks in daily life. Buying
and spending their money, people is are find it hard very hard for them to say “I cannot afford to buy”.
They want to ride the newest model of car, go on trips all around the world, have modern and beautiful
furniture as well as smartphones and laptops in somehow waysanyway possible, while they may not
have not an enough income for their demandrequests and if they don’t do not adjust their expenditures,
they have to get into deficit.
Furthermore, Families need to change their life style and avoid having a tendency to show their abilities
in buying goods which are not affordable to them/do not have an affordable price for them.
Governments have to help raising raise public awareness against the consumer- driven economy and
explain that’s its profound negative’s effects not only in families’ finance financial situations, but also in
leading to economic stagnation. Expensing Expended in unnecessary methods, the amounts of the
money can be invested in productions and developing infrastructures.
Moreover, individuals get into debt because of lack of finance financial information, and they do not
know how the vortex of liabilities can cause them to bigger problems. An exorbitant interest rates leads
to a finance financial problems that people have could not imagined and are not informed about its
consequence of that.
To sum up, I strongly believe that falling in debt to own an unnecessary goods in life is one of the main
effects of the consumerist world and it is necessary to update inforrm people regarding to the
consequence of thosethat’s manners.
Good/bad/nice/ugly/stuff/things/something/
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Yeganeh, Nursing Homes2020-05-04T18:05:57+00:002020-05-04T18:05:57+00:00http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/492-monday-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-monday-99-02-15/3519-yeganeh-nursing-homesHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Yeganeh, Nursing Homes.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
In Britain when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where
there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government hast to pay for this care.
Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example from your knowledge or
experience.
In the particular parts of the world, there are some homes where old people can gather and
live together under the specific supervision of medical staff. However, the cost of care is paid
by the government. Since the condition of families is varied, the government is obligated to
support the elderly and nursing homes to some extent.
Governments should take the social class and the family condition of old people who
register for such centers into account in order to pay the care costs. In fact, although
financial situations are different among for people, there are many affluent families who
can be responsible for their old members. For instance, helping the government by paying
money to nursing homes where their relatives are living. Consequently, the government
might be focused on people with poor backgrounds.
More importantly, the age of families is another crucial aspect. Some family members are
disabled or too old to work/old or disabled themselves to work and pay for other members
and it might be a heavy burden to take care of them at home. There are some people at the
age of 60-70 who should take care of their parents. Therefore, the government should
establish its pension system for the care of elderly citizens. However, the government
should compensate for these old and disabled people regardless of their sex, social
background or degree.
Governments should show their gratitude by providing adequate facilities for elderly
people. There were times when old people spend spent their energy on their countries to
flourish during their golden age and authorities levied taxes on the people's earnings during
their work life. Therefore, the government should pay back this money as financial support
during their retirement life.
In sum, despite the fact that government should support and pay in order to look after their
aging population in nursing homes at first stagein the first place, some charities including
wealthy families are likely to take part in this matter at secondly. This action with charities
will assist the government and bring more prosperity among old people.
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Yeganeh, Nursing Homes.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
In Britain when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where
there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government hast to pay for this care.
Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example from your knowledge or
experience.
In the particular parts of the world, there are some homes where old people can gather and
live together under the specific supervision of medical staff. However, the cost of care is paid
by the government. Since the condition of families is varied, the government is obligated to
support the elderly and nursing homes to some extent.
Governments should take the social class and the family condition of old people who
register for such centers into account in order to pay the care costs. In fact, although
financial situations are different among for people, there are many affluent families who
can be responsible for their old members. For instance, helping the government by paying
money to nursing homes where their relatives are living. Consequently, the government
might be focused on people with poor backgrounds.
More importantly, the age of families is another crucial aspect. Some family members are
disabled or too old to work/old or disabled themselves to work and pay for other members
and it might be a heavy burden to take care of them at home. There are some people at the
age of 60-70 who should take care of their parents. Therefore, the government should
establish its pension system for the care of elderly citizens. However, the government
should compensate for these old and disabled people regardless of their sex, social
background or degree.
Governments should show their gratitude by providing adequate facilities for elderly
people. There were times when old people spend spent their energy on their countries to
flourish during their golden age and authorities levied taxes on the people's earnings during
their work life. Therefore, the government should pay back this money as financial support
during their retirement life.
In sum, despite the fact that government should support and pay in order to look after their
aging population in nursing homes at first stagein the first place, some charities including
wealthy families are likely to take part in this matter at secondly. This action with charities
will assist the government and bring more prosperity among old people.
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Shideh, Work2020-05-04T18:05:46+00:002020-05-04T18:05:46+00:00http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/492-monday-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-monday-99-02-15/3518-shideh-workHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Shideh, Work.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is
better to work for different organisations.
Nowadays in our fast-paced world, people have been involved in looking for their ideal job
and it has been contoroversial among them as to whether they should hold down a job in one
organization or switch it. However, both of views include some benefits and downside.
Generally, working in a certain company and also with the same employer for many years
builds a reputation of dependability because the employees have enough time to
demonstrate their remarkable capabilities and loyalty. Also, according to the business
strategy, many resources are invested to in training the members in a long-term, so in spite of
significant expenses to the company, it is worth to developing the workers’ potential which
could not be fulfilled by those altering their positions continuously. Moreover, staying at the
same job allows a staff member not only to form a strong relationship with the colleagues,
but also gain access to the some especial job’s perquisites such as receiving a retirement
pension. However, sometimes there might be less progress when the staff prefer a comfort
zone and are afraid of any changes.
On the other hand, there can be some merits by changing the job to finally find finally a
situation that would fit an employee’s interests and skills, thus after a while searching for
desirable work in a creear, he/she could find a better opportunity to stick with 10 or 20 years
without getting burned out. Furthurmore, switching jobs can open the doors to finding more
chances of learning and growing, escaping dead-end jobs as well as finding superior positions
and consiquently consequently obtaining high-income requiring a long period of time for staff
members going through the same organisation, although following this trend may either take
a considrable amount of time or cause to lose loss of some reasonable/decent jobs.
In conclusion, by working at different places employees can enhance their knowledge and
broaden their experience to find a siatisfied satisfying constant stable organisation achieving
its long-lasting benefits.
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Shideh, Work.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is
better to work for different organisations.
Nowadays in our fast-paced world, people have been involved in looking for their ideal job
and it has been contoroversial among them as to whether they should hold down a job in one
organization or switch it. However, both of views include some benefits and downside.
Generally, working in a certain company and also with the same employer for many years
builds a reputation of dependability because the employees have enough time to
demonstrate their remarkable capabilities and loyalty. Also, according to the business
strategy, many resources are invested to in training the members in a long-term, so in spite of
significant expenses to the company, it is worth to developing the workers’ potential which
could not be fulfilled by those altering their positions continuously. Moreover, staying at the
same job allows a staff member not only to form a strong relationship with the colleagues,
but also gain access to the some especial job’s perquisites such as receiving a retirement
pension. However, sometimes there might be less progress when the staff prefer a comfort
zone and are afraid of any changes.
On the other hand, there can be some merits by changing the job to finally find finally a
situation that would fit an employee’s interests and skills, thus after a while searching for
desirable work in a creear, he/she could find a better opportunity to stick with 10 or 20 years
without getting burned out. Furthurmore, switching jobs can open the doors to finding more
chances of learning and growing, escaping dead-end jobs as well as finding superior positions
and consiquently consequently obtaining high-income requiring a long period of time for staff
members going through the same organisation, although following this trend may either take
a considrable amount of time or cause to lose loss of some reasonable/decent jobs.
In conclusion, by working at different places employees can enhance their knowledge and
broaden their experience to find a siatisfied satisfying constant stable organisation achieving
its long-lasting benefits.
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Pouya Yektaei, Unemployment Rates of the US and Japan2020-05-04T18:05:35+00:002020-05-04T18:05:35+00:00http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/492-monday-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-monday-99-02-15/3517-pouya-yektaei-unemployment-rates-of-the-us-and-japanHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Pouya Yektaei, Unemployment Rates of the US and Japan.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
From the graph we can receive information about
unemployment tally in the corresponding period from March
1993 to March 1999.
A glance at the graph indicates that during this period, the
unemployment rate in the US and Japan had opposite trends.
Although the US’ unemployment rate fluctuated, generally the
trend was downwards while Japan was facing an upwards
trend.
In March 1993 the unemployment rates in the US and Japan
were 7% and 2.5% respectively. However, the US
unemployment rate dipped to 5% after fluctuating around just
under and just above 5% since March 1996 while that of Japan
saw an exponential growth to 5%. Both unemployment rates
were at the same level by March 1999.
Overall, it is clear that despite fluctuations, the unemployment
rate of the US experienced a 2-percent decrease while that of
Japan saw a 2.5-percent increase in the course of six years.
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Pouya Yektaei, Unemployment Rates of the US and Japan.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
From the graph we can receive information about
unemployment tally in the corresponding period from March
1993 to March 1999.
A glance at the graph indicates that during this period, the
unemployment rate in the US and Japan had opposite trends.
Although the US’ unemployment rate fluctuated, generally the
trend was downwards while Japan was facing an upwards
trend.
In March 1993 the unemployment rates in the US and Japan
were 7% and 2.5% respectively. However, the US
unemployment rate dipped to 5% after fluctuating around just
under and just above 5% since March 1996 while that of Japan
saw an exponential growth to 5%. Both unemployment rates
were at the same level by March 1999.
Overall, it is clear that despite fluctuations, the unemployment
rate of the US experienced a 2-percent decrease while that of
Japan saw a 2.5-percent increase in the course of six years.
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Nuclear Family2020-05-04T18:05:24+00:002020-05-04T18:05:24+00:00http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/492-monday-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-monday-99-02-15/3516-nuclear-familyHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Nuclear Family.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
The nuclear family is well adapted to move geographically due to its size.
Do you think children benefit in any way for moving?
Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
The small family that is normally included includes parents and children can
easily move everywhere because of the extent of it. In my opinion shifting can be
beneficial for the children but of course there could be some detriments too, but
it seems to me the profits are more important and valuable than the
disadvantages.
First of all relocating can be extremely informative and entertaining for
children, due tobecause being in a new place will help them to discover and
obtain a vast information about culture, geography and anthropology, it can be an
opportunity to make fiends with new friends and improve children’s
communication skills as well. Considering that when a family moves to a new
place it is crucial that all the family members participate notably about in make
making decisions like where they must go and also division of the responsibilities
like packing, it can be a practice for their future to be responsible and successful
in social life.
On the other hand, relocating all the time can be easily detrimental in different
ways, for instance while a family is living in a particular area children have their
friends in school or in the neighborhood, they get used to their teachers and
perhaps they have plans for a particular time. Therefore, when family decided
decides to move it can hurt children emotionally it will be hard for them to leave
their friends, schools, or plans besides the mental damage can affect their future
or stay with them for the rest of their life.
As a result, relocating can have many advantages for the nuclear families as it is
easy for them but it can hurt their children too if they are not aware about their
children’s emotions.
Nuclear family = mom, dad, children
عمھ خالھ بابیزرگ مامان بزرگ و بقیھ = Extended family
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Nuclear Family.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
The nuclear family is well adapted to move geographically due to its size.
Do you think children benefit in any way for moving?
Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
The small family that is normally included includes parents and children can
easily move everywhere because of the extent of it. In my opinion shifting can be
beneficial for the children but of course there could be some detriments too, but
it seems to me the profits are more important and valuable than the
disadvantages.
First of all relocating can be extremely informative and entertaining for
children, due tobecause being in a new place will help them to discover and
obtain a vast information about culture, geography and anthropology, it can be an
opportunity to make fiends with new friends and improve children’s
communication skills as well. Considering that when a family moves to a new
place it is crucial that all the family members participate notably about in make
making decisions like where they must go and also division of the responsibilities
like packing, it can be a practice for their future to be responsible and successful
in social life.
On the other hand, relocating all the time can be easily detrimental in different
ways, for instance while a family is living in a particular area children have their
friends in school or in the neighborhood, they get used to their teachers and
perhaps they have plans for a particular time. Therefore, when family decided
decides to move it can hurt children emotionally it will be hard for them to leave
their friends, schools, or plans besides the mental damage can affect their future
or stay with them for the rest of their life.
As a result, relocating can have many advantages for the nuclear families as it is
easy for them but it can hurt their children too if they are not aware about their
children’s emotions.
Nuclear family = mom, dad, children
عمھ خالھ بابیزرگ مامان بزرگ و بقیھ = Extended family
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Niloo, Independent Decisions Children Nowdays2020-05-04T18:05:12+00:002020-05-04T18:05:12+00:00http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/492-monday-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-monday-99-02-15/3515-niloo-independent-decisions-children-nowdaysHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Niloo, Independent Decisions Children Nowdays.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past,
young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions
for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about
their own lives. Use specific reasons and examples to support your
answer.
It is obvious that the family is the most valuable gift that we can ever
have and no one can ever deny the significant role of parents in
people's life but nowadays this role has diminished a bit compared
tothan the past and I feel this is for some main reasons which I will
explain with a couple of examples.
First of all, children's knowledge has increased than compared to the
past which it can be extremely beneficial for them, so they might have
update more up to date information than their parents because they
educating are educated at a school and university, so they learn diverse
objects subjects/areas in various subjects which this makes them more
independent of their parents for their decisions. For instance, the
number of universities and schools were was less than that of
nowadays and also the new generation of families are more serious
abouttended for children's education.
Another point is that, technology and the Internet have a
positiveeffective effect on people's awareness, so they can have
several ample/plenty of information and even introduce them to different
issues which helps them to allow their children to be more independent
in their decisions. For example, my mother always follows psychology
pages on Instagram and now she realizes that if she gives me freedom
of actions, I will be more a successful person in the future.
Last but not least, nowadays children be are more rebellious and
fearless which is conducive to their gaining various experiences onwith
their own in different areas. For instance, traveling to far countries with
inadequate budget and without accurate planning at a young age.
To recap, today's children have more knowledge than their families and
past decades’ children and also technology and the Internet have been
raised people's awareness. Although, new offsprings be are more
rebellious and fearless, it this can have both advantages and
disadvantages and it would be better if children consulted with their
families out of respectrespectfully. All of these reasons lead to another
to the new generation to be more independent in makingto make their
decisions.
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Niloo, Independent Decisions Children Nowdays.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past,
young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions
for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about
their own lives. Use specific reasons and examples to support your
answer.
It is obvious that the family is the most valuable gift that we can ever
have and no one can ever deny the significant role of parents in
people's life but nowadays this role has diminished a bit compared
tothan the past and I feel this is for some main reasons which I will
explain with a couple of examples.
First of all, children's knowledge has increased than compared to the
past which it can be extremely beneficial for them, so they might have
update more up to date information than their parents because they
educating are educated at a school and university, so they learn diverse
objects subjects/areas in various subjects which this makes them more
independent of their parents for their decisions. For instance, the
number of universities and schools were was less than that of
nowadays and also the new generation of families are more serious
abouttended for children's education.
Another point is that, technology and the Internet have a
positiveeffective effect on people's awareness, so they can have
several ample/plenty of information and even introduce them to different
issues which helps them to allow their children to be more independent
in their decisions. For example, my mother always follows psychology
pages on Instagram and now she realizes that if she gives me freedom
of actions, I will be more a successful person in the future.
Last but not least, nowadays children be are more rebellious and
fearless which is conducive to their gaining various experiences onwith
their own in different areas. For instance, traveling to far countries with
inadequate budget and without accurate planning at a young age.
To recap, today's children have more knowledge than their families and
past decades’ children and also technology and the Internet have been
raised people's awareness. Although, new offsprings be are more
rebellious and fearless, it this can have both advantages and
disadvantages and it would be better if children consulted with their
families out of respectrespectfully. All of these reasons lead to another
to the new generation to be more independent in makingto make their
decisions.
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Bahare Bagherikia, Education2020-05-04T18:05:02+00:002020-05-04T18:05:02+00:00http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/492-monday-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-monday-99-02-15/3514-bahare-bagherikia-educationHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Bahare Bagherikia, Education.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Task2 :
In many countries these days, the number of people continuing their education
after school has increased, and the range of courses at universities and colleges
has in increased too.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
The popularity and importance of knowledge and awareness in societies has
increased over the past decades. The growing number of universities’ population
is per se a great evidence for this phenomenon. I would argue that the more
cultured and skilled communities, the easier and faster societies’ developments
and improvements will be realized.
Firstly, the changing world’s requirements necessitate individuals taking step
towards being more involved in the present developments and technology by
pursuing their education to high levels. The newly emerged emerging issues and
situations which did not use to be even 50 years ago need to be massively paid
more attention to and studied by students and researchers. As a result, the
recently introduced courses are massively found interesting, applicable کار بردی و
کار آمدand detailed to be taken in colleges by pupils. Not only are these classes
highly consistent with the developing global environment, but thanks to the
variety of course, they are greatly considered powerful means for individuals to
achieve their goals which seems more appealing and favorable to them. In brief,
universities being full of courses populated with an increasing number of students
would be a reasonable answer to our current global circumstances as well as
persons’ inner satisfaction in the long term.
Secondly, requiring more updated up to date knowledge than before, jobs play an
effective role in starting and encouraging this trend .it is no longer sufficient to
just work with your dad as his heir to keep his legacy alive. To do this, a lot of
books and articles should be read. On the other hand, technology has pretty
much altered everything in every aspect of our life with more practical ones. So to
keep up with it, it is an inevitable fact that universities and colleges standing at
the front line prepare and equip individuals with the essential knowledge and
awareness which are needed by occupations as well as in daily life. Bringing more
convenient economic conveniencein terms of economic situation, this way eases
people’s life similarly as it has been easing for years.By way of conclusion, an ever increasing number of people pursuing higher
education in universities in which courses with more variety are offered cater to
our societies’ society’s progress as much as persons’ private person’s life.
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Bahare Bagherikia, Education.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Task2 :
In many countries these days, the number of people continuing their education
after school has increased, and the range of courses at universities and colleges
has in increased too.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
The popularity and importance of knowledge and awareness in societies has
increased over the past decades. The growing number of universities’ population
is per se a great evidence for this phenomenon. I would argue that the more
cultured and skilled communities, the easier and faster societies’ developments
and improvements will be realized.
Firstly, the changing world’s requirements necessitate individuals taking step
towards being more involved in the present developments and technology by
pursuing their education to high levels. The newly emerged emerging issues and
situations which did not use to be even 50 years ago need to be massively paid
more attention to and studied by students and researchers. As a result, the
recently introduced courses are massively found interesting, applicable کار بردی و
کار آمدand detailed to be taken in colleges by pupils. Not only are these classes
highly consistent with the developing global environment, but thanks to the
variety of course, they are greatly considered powerful means for individuals to
achieve their goals which seems more appealing and favorable to them. In brief,
universities being full of courses populated with an increasing number of students
would be a reasonable answer to our current global circumstances as well as
persons’ inner satisfaction in the long term.
Secondly, requiring more updated up to date knowledge than before, jobs play an
effective role in starting and encouraging this trend .it is no longer sufficient to
just work with your dad as his heir to keep his legacy alive. To do this, a lot of
books and articles should be read. On the other hand, technology has pretty
much altered everything in every aspect of our life with more practical ones. So to
keep up with it, it is an inevitable fact that universities and colleges standing at
the front line prepare and equip individuals with the essential knowledge and
awareness which are needed by occupations as well as in daily life. Bringing more
convenient economic conveniencein terms of economic situation, this way eases
people’s life similarly as it has been easing for years.By way of conclusion, an ever increasing number of people pursuing higher
education in universities in which courses with more variety are offered cater to
our societies’ society’s progress as much as persons’ private person’s life.
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Amirreza Barghamadi, Environmental2020-05-04T18:04:49+00:002020-05-04T18:04:49+00:00http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/492-monday-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-monday-99-02-15/3513-amirreza-barghamadi-environmentalHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Amirreza Barghamadi, Environmental.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can
governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do?
Such are the negative consequences of our activities on the environment, that many experts
agree that destroying the environment poses a direct threat to humanity. As a result, we should
tackle this problem with some constructive approaches both individually and governmentally.
This essay will discuss some harmful activities for the nature and will come up with some
solutions to solve or alleviate this problem.
Environmentally-wise, air pollution is a terrible devastating issue which occurs when a myriad
dangerous quantity of substances are introduced into earth’s atmosphere. Sources about this
issue include many gases, among which greenhouse gases are the worst air pollutants. These
gases are related to ozone layer depletion and global warming directly. Generally, greenhouse
gases are released when fossil fuel is burned. Moreover, the other underlying causes of the
problem is are/include deforestation and destroying destruction of natural habitats due to our
need for more land to solve/deal with overpopulation in metropolitan cities around the world.
Governments can address this issue by bringing in new policies to split the population over their
cities and people can use green energy instead of fossil fuel.
The another environmental problem is the extreme use of plastic which has irreparable
damages to the environment and wildlife in particular. Initially, plastics are harmful for animals
because they eat it and feed it to their children in by mistake. In addition, this material could
poison our food chain as many animals eat it in mistake. An effective solution could be recycling
all plastics that we use. Governments could encourage people to split up their wastes and also
they could build recycle factory around cities.
In conclusion, as far as environmental problems are concerned, with by implementing some
solutions for each problem by both government and people we could prevent large-scale
destruction of the environment and save humankind.
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Amirreza Barghamadi, Environmental.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can
governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do?
Such are the negative consequences of our activities on the environment, that many experts
agree that destroying the environment poses a direct threat to humanity. As a result, we should
tackle this problem with some constructive approaches both individually and governmentally.
This essay will discuss some harmful activities for the nature and will come up with some
solutions to solve or alleviate this problem.
Environmentally-wise, air pollution is a terrible devastating issue which occurs when a myriad
dangerous quantity of substances are introduced into earth’s atmosphere. Sources about this
issue include many gases, among which greenhouse gases are the worst air pollutants. These
gases are related to ozone layer depletion and global warming directly. Generally, greenhouse
gases are released when fossil fuel is burned. Moreover, the other underlying causes of the
problem is are/include deforestation and destroying destruction of natural habitats due to our
need for more land to solve/deal with overpopulation in metropolitan cities around the world.
Governments can address this issue by bringing in new policies to split the population over their
cities and people can use green energy instead of fossil fuel.
The another environmental problem is the extreme use of plastic which has irreparable
damages to the environment and wildlife in particular. Initially, plastics are harmful for animals
because they eat it and feed it to their children in by mistake. In addition, this material could
poison our food chain as many animals eat it in mistake. An effective solution could be recycling
all plastics that we use. Governments could encourage people to split up their wastes and also
they could build recycle factory around cities.
In conclusion, as far as environmental problems are concerned, with by implementing some
solutions for each problem by both government and people we could prevent large-scale
destruction of the environment and save humankind.
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>