Mondays GMAT-GRE-TOEFL-IELTS-آموزشگاه زبان صبای سحر-چمران جنوب، بلوار جلال آل احمد، جنب داروخانه شبانه روزی جلال آل احمد، پلاک 87، طبقه سوم تلفن: 42-88679341 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/492-monday-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-monday-99-02-15 2024-05-05T02:04:41+00:00 IELTSTOEFLCENTER info@ieltstoeflcenter.com Joomla! - Open Source Content Management Mohammad, Uniforms 2020-05-07T04:01:21+00:00 2020-05-07T04:01:21+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/492-monday-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-monday-99-02-15/3521-mohammad-uniforms Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <body> <table width="80%" border="1" align="center"> <tr> <td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Mohammad, Uniforms.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p align="left" dir="ltr"> Many organizations and companies ask their staff to wear a uniform. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? What kind of jobs should have a work uniform? In many companies around the world, employees are required to wear uniforms. Personally, I believe with the exception of a small number of jobs implementing a uniform system is mainly advantageous to the company rather than the personnel. Firstly, having all the employees dressed similarly gives a company a distinct advantage of cultivating a positive public image and conveying a sense of brand awareness within the locality and the working society. Such strong and distinct can the created identity be that it may penetrate the market, wining all the prospective customers. This also manages to create an impression among the staff that this is where they belong, and this sense of belonging will consequently pave the way to/for company success/success for the company. Secondly, a customer can readily recognize the individual as part of the authorized personnel who have uniforms on, and so can trust them and ask for help. This becomes salient in establishments such as car showrooms, where the customer needs to be informed and receive help in making decagons. Granted that uniforms act as an identification mark for customers and turn the staff member into walking advertisements, promoting a better image for the firm, but this also proves to be successful to take away the employees&#39; uniqueness. The consequences of wearing branded work attire, albeit favorable for the managers, can be unfortunate for their staff, boring them to the point that they lose their interest in their tasks, which may cause a decline in productivity, or in extreme cases, a rebellion against their higher-ups. However, some careers necessitate certain dressing codes. Ignoring them will cost not only the company or organization but also the personnel. Only dressed in heavily protected suits, resistant to fire and shock, are firefighters are able to venture in/into a flaming house or a precarious, falling building. Doctors, as another case in point, due to health issues and hygiene are required to have specific clothing to perform various tasks such as surgery or medical examination. To conclude, although in some working environments wearing a uniform is mandatory which serves both the company and personnel’s interests, others, I believe, can remove the restrictions on their obligatory working suits since it is only to the benefit of the managers. </tr> </table> </body> </html> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <body> <table width="80%" border="1" align="center"> <tr> <td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Mohammad, Uniforms.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p align="left" dir="ltr"> Many organizations and companies ask their staff to wear a uniform. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? What kind of jobs should have a work uniform? In many companies around the world, employees are required to wear uniforms. Personally, I believe with the exception of a small number of jobs implementing a uniform system is mainly advantageous to the company rather than the personnel. Firstly, having all the employees dressed similarly gives a company a distinct advantage of cultivating a positive public image and conveying a sense of brand awareness within the locality and the working society. Such strong and distinct can the created identity be that it may penetrate the market, wining all the prospective customers. This also manages to create an impression among the staff that this is where they belong, and this sense of belonging will consequently pave the way to/for company success/success for the company. Secondly, a customer can readily recognize the individual as part of the authorized personnel who have uniforms on, and so can trust them and ask for help. This becomes salient in establishments such as car showrooms, where the customer needs to be informed and receive help in making decagons. Granted that uniforms act as an identification mark for customers and turn the staff member into walking advertisements, promoting a better image for the firm, but this also proves to be successful to take away the employees&#39; uniqueness. The consequences of wearing branded work attire, albeit favorable for the managers, can be unfortunate for their staff, boring them to the point that they lose their interest in their tasks, which may cause a decline in productivity, or in extreme cases, a rebellion against their higher-ups. However, some careers necessitate certain dressing codes. Ignoring them will cost not only the company or organization but also the personnel. Only dressed in heavily protected suits, resistant to fire and shock, are firefighters are able to venture in/into a flaming house or a precarious, falling building. Doctors, as another case in point, due to health issues and hygiene are required to have specific clothing to perform various tasks such as surgery or medical examination. To conclude, although in some working environments wearing a uniform is mandatory which serves both the company and personnel’s interests, others, I believe, can remove the restrictions on their obligatory working suits since it is only to the benefit of the managers. </tr> </table> </body> </html> Zakariaee, Debt for Buy 2020-05-04T18:06:07+00:00 2020-05-04T18:06:07+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/492-monday-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-monday-99-02-15/3520-zakariaee-debt-for-buy Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <body> <table width="80%" border="1" align="center"> <tr> <td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Zakariaee, Debt for Buy.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p align="left" dir="ltr"> Some people get into debt by buying things they don’t need and cannot afford. What are the reason for this behavior? What action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem? ********************************************** Some groups believe if they are not able to buy luxury thingsitems, which are unnecessary in most of the times, they will feel like a second-class citizen. That’s why they fall in debt and it is necessitate necessary to explain the consequence of liability for them. Nowadays, changing expectations from the life, consumerism has many drawbacks in daily life. Buying and spending their money, people is are find it hard very hard for them to say “I cannot afford to buy”. They want to ride the newest model of car, go on trips all around the world, have modern and beautiful furniture as well as smartphones and laptops in somehow waysanyway possible, while they may not have not an enough income for their demandrequests and if they don’t do not adjust their expenditures, they have to get into deficit. Furthermore, Families need to change their life style and avoid having a tendency to show their abilities in buying goods which are not affordable to them/do not have an affordable price for them. Governments have to help raising raise public awareness against the consumer- driven economy and explain that’s its profound negative’s effects not only in families’ finance financial situations, but also in leading to economic stagnation. Expensing Expended in unnecessary methods, the amounts of the money can be invested in productions and developing infrastructures. Moreover, individuals get into debt because of lack of finance financial information, and they do not know how the vortex of liabilities can cause them to bigger problems. An exorbitant interest rates leads to a finance financial problems that people have could not imagined and are not informed about its consequence of that. To sum up, I strongly believe that falling in debt to own an unnecessary goods in life is one of the main effects of the consumerist world and it is necessary to update inforrm people regarding to the consequence of thosethat’s manners. Good/bad/nice/ugly/stuff/things/something/ </tr> </table> </body> </html> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <body> <table width="80%" border="1" align="center"> <tr> <td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Zakariaee, Debt for Buy.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p align="left" dir="ltr"> Some people get into debt by buying things they don’t need and cannot afford. What are the reason for this behavior? What action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem? ********************************************** Some groups believe if they are not able to buy luxury thingsitems, which are unnecessary in most of the times, they will feel like a second-class citizen. That’s why they fall in debt and it is necessitate necessary to explain the consequence of liability for them. Nowadays, changing expectations from the life, consumerism has many drawbacks in daily life. Buying and spending their money, people is are find it hard very hard for them to say “I cannot afford to buy”. They want to ride the newest model of car, go on trips all around the world, have modern and beautiful furniture as well as smartphones and laptops in somehow waysanyway possible, while they may not have not an enough income for their demandrequests and if they don’t do not adjust their expenditures, they have to get into deficit. Furthermore, Families need to change their life style and avoid having a tendency to show their abilities in buying goods which are not affordable to them/do not have an affordable price for them. Governments have to help raising raise public awareness against the consumer- driven economy and explain that’s its profound negative’s effects not only in families’ finance financial situations, but also in leading to economic stagnation. Expensing Expended in unnecessary methods, the amounts of the money can be invested in productions and developing infrastructures. Moreover, individuals get into debt because of lack of finance financial information, and they do not know how the vortex of liabilities can cause them to bigger problems. An exorbitant interest rates leads to a finance financial problems that people have could not imagined and are not informed about its consequence of that. To sum up, I strongly believe that falling in debt to own an unnecessary goods in life is one of the main effects of the consumerist world and it is necessary to update inforrm people regarding to the consequence of thosethat’s manners. Good/bad/nice/ugly/stuff/things/something/ </tr> </table> </body> </html> Yeganeh, Nursing Homes 2020-05-04T18:05:57+00:00 2020-05-04T18:05:57+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/492-monday-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-monday-99-02-15/3519-yeganeh-nursing-homes Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <body> <table width="80%" border="1" align="center"> <tr> <td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Yeganeh, Nursing Homes.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p align="left" dir="ltr"> In Britain when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government hast to pay for this care. Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example from your knowledge or experience. In the particular parts of the world, there are some homes where old people can gather and live together under the specific supervision of medical staff. However, the cost of care is paid by the government. Since the condition of families is varied, the government is obligated to support the elderly and nursing homes to some extent. Governments should take the social class and the family condition of old people who register for such centers into account in order to pay the care costs. In fact, although financial situations are different among for people, there are many affluent families who can be responsible for their old members. For instance, helping the government by paying money to nursing homes where their relatives are living. Consequently, the government might be focused on people with poor backgrounds. More importantly, the age of families is another crucial aspect. Some family members are disabled or too old to work/old or disabled themselves to work and pay for other members and it might be a heavy burden to take care of them at home. There are some people at the age of 60-70 who should take care of their parents. Therefore, the government should establish its pension system for the care of elderly citizens. However, the government should compensate for these old and disabled people regardless of their sex, social background or degree. Governments should show their gratitude by providing adequate facilities for elderly people. There were times when old people spend spent their energy on their countries to flourish during their golden age and authorities levied taxes on the people's earnings during their work life. Therefore, the government should pay back this money as financial support during their retirement life. In sum, despite the fact that government should support and pay in order to look after their aging population in nursing homes at first stagein the first place, some charities including wealthy families are likely to take part in this matter at secondly. This action with charities will assist the government and bring more prosperity among old people. </tr> </table> </body> </html> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <body> <table width="80%" border="1" align="center"> <tr> <td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Yeganeh, Nursing Homes.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p align="left" dir="ltr"> In Britain when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government hast to pay for this care. Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example from your knowledge or experience. In the particular parts of the world, there are some homes where old people can gather and live together under the specific supervision of medical staff. However, the cost of care is paid by the government. Since the condition of families is varied, the government is obligated to support the elderly and nursing homes to some extent. Governments should take the social class and the family condition of old people who register for such centers into account in order to pay the care costs. In fact, although financial situations are different among for people, there are many affluent families who can be responsible for their old members. For instance, helping the government by paying money to nursing homes where their relatives are living. Consequently, the government might be focused on people with poor backgrounds. More importantly, the age of families is another crucial aspect. Some family members are disabled or too old to work/old or disabled themselves to work and pay for other members and it might be a heavy burden to take care of them at home. There are some people at the age of 60-70 who should take care of their parents. Therefore, the government should establish its pension system for the care of elderly citizens. However, the government should compensate for these old and disabled people regardless of their sex, social background or degree. Governments should show their gratitude by providing adequate facilities for elderly people. There were times when old people spend spent their energy on their countries to flourish during their golden age and authorities levied taxes on the people's earnings during their work life. Therefore, the government should pay back this money as financial support during their retirement life. In sum, despite the fact that government should support and pay in order to look after their aging population in nursing homes at first stagein the first place, some charities including wealthy families are likely to take part in this matter at secondly. This action with charities will assist the government and bring more prosperity among old people. </tr> </table> </body> </html> Shideh, Work 2020-05-04T18:05:46+00:00 2020-05-04T18:05:46+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/492-monday-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-monday-99-02-15/3518-shideh-work Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <body> <table width="80%" border="1" align="center"> <tr> <td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Shideh, Work.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p align="left" dir="ltr"> Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations. Nowadays in our fast-paced world, people have been involved in looking for their ideal job and it has been contoroversial among them as to whether they should hold down a job in one organization or switch it. However, both of views include some benefits and downside. Generally, working in a certain company and also with the same employer for many years builds a reputation of dependability because the employees have enough time to demonstrate their remarkable capabilities and loyalty. Also, according to the business strategy, many resources are invested to in training the members in a long-term, so in spite of significant expenses to the company, it is worth to developing the workers’ potential which could not be fulfilled by those altering their positions continuously. Moreover, staying at the same job allows a staff member not only to form a strong relationship with the colleagues, but also gain access to the some especial job’s perquisites such as receiving a retirement pension. However, sometimes there might be less progress when the staff prefer a comfort zone and are afraid of any changes. On the other hand, there can be some merits by changing the job to finally find finally a situation that would fit an employee’s interests and skills, thus after a while searching for desirable work in a creear, he/she could find a better opportunity to stick with 10 or 20 years without getting burned out. Furthurmore, switching jobs can open the doors to finding more chances of learning and growing, escaping dead-end jobs as well as finding superior positions and consiquently consequently obtaining high-income requiring a long period of time for staff members going through the same organisation, although following this trend may either take a considrable amount of time or cause to lose loss of some reasonable/decent jobs. In conclusion, by working at different places employees can enhance their knowledge and broaden their experience to find a siatisfied satisfying constant stable organisation achieving its long-lasting benefits. </tr> </table> </body> </html> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <body> <table width="80%" border="1" align="center"> <tr> <td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Shideh, Work.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p align="left" dir="ltr"> Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations. Nowadays in our fast-paced world, people have been involved in looking for their ideal job and it has been contoroversial among them as to whether they should hold down a job in one organization or switch it. However, both of views include some benefits and downside. Generally, working in a certain company and also with the same employer for many years builds a reputation of dependability because the employees have enough time to demonstrate their remarkable capabilities and loyalty. Also, according to the business strategy, many resources are invested to in training the members in a long-term, so in spite of significant expenses to the company, it is worth to developing the workers’ potential which could not be fulfilled by those altering their positions continuously. Moreover, staying at the same job allows a staff member not only to form a strong relationship with the colleagues, but also gain access to the some especial job’s perquisites such as receiving a retirement pension. However, sometimes there might be less progress when the staff prefer a comfort zone and are afraid of any changes. On the other hand, there can be some merits by changing the job to finally find finally a situation that would fit an employee’s interests and skills, thus after a while searching for desirable work in a creear, he/she could find a better opportunity to stick with 10 or 20 years without getting burned out. Furthurmore, switching jobs can open the doors to finding more chances of learning and growing, escaping dead-end jobs as well as finding superior positions and consiquently consequently obtaining high-income requiring a long period of time for staff members going through the same organisation, although following this trend may either take a considrable amount of time or cause to lose loss of some reasonable/decent jobs. In conclusion, by working at different places employees can enhance their knowledge and broaden their experience to find a siatisfied satisfying constant stable organisation achieving its long-lasting benefits. </tr> </table> </body> </html> Pouya Yektaei, Unemployment Rates of the US and Japan 2020-05-04T18:05:35+00:00 2020-05-04T18:05:35+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/492-monday-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-monday-99-02-15/3517-pouya-yektaei-unemployment-rates-of-the-us-and-japan Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <body> <table width="80%" border="1" align="center"> <tr> <td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Pouya Yektaei, Unemployment Rates of the US and Japan.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p align="left" dir="ltr"> From the graph we can receive information about unemployment tally in the corresponding period from March 1993 to March 1999. A glance at the graph indicates that during this period, the unemployment rate in the US and Japan had opposite trends. Although the US’ unemployment rate fluctuated, generally the trend was downwards while Japan was facing an upwards trend. In March 1993 the unemployment rates in the US and Japan were 7% and 2.5% respectively. However, the US unemployment rate dipped to 5% after fluctuating around just under and just above 5% since March 1996 while that of Japan saw an exponential growth to 5%. Both unemployment rates were at the same level by March 1999. Overall, it is clear that despite fluctuations, the unemployment rate of the US experienced a 2-percent decrease while that of Japan saw a 2.5-percent increase in the course of six years. </tr> </table> </body> </html> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <body> <table width="80%" border="1" align="center"> <tr> <td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Pouya Yektaei, Unemployment Rates of the US and Japan.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p align="left" dir="ltr"> From the graph we can receive information about unemployment tally in the corresponding period from March 1993 to March 1999. A glance at the graph indicates that during this period, the unemployment rate in the US and Japan had opposite trends. Although the US’ unemployment rate fluctuated, generally the trend was downwards while Japan was facing an upwards trend. In March 1993 the unemployment rates in the US and Japan were 7% and 2.5% respectively. However, the US unemployment rate dipped to 5% after fluctuating around just under and just above 5% since March 1996 while that of Japan saw an exponential growth to 5%. Both unemployment rates were at the same level by March 1999. Overall, it is clear that despite fluctuations, the unemployment rate of the US experienced a 2-percent decrease while that of Japan saw a 2.5-percent increase in the course of six years. </tr> </table> </body> </html> Nuclear Family 2020-05-04T18:05:24+00:00 2020-05-04T18:05:24+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/492-monday-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-monday-99-02-15/3516-nuclear-family Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <body> <table width="80%" border="1" align="center"> <tr> <td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Nuclear Family.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p align="left" dir="ltr"> The nuclear family is well adapted to move geographically due to its size. Do you think children benefit in any way for moving? Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? The small family that is normally included includes parents and children can easily move everywhere because of the extent of it. In my opinion shifting can be beneficial for the children but of course there could be some detriments too, but it seems to me the profits are more important and valuable than the disadvantages. First of all relocating can be extremely informative and entertaining for children, due tobecause being in a new place will help them to discover and obtain a vast information about culture, geography and anthropology, it can be an opportunity to make fiends with new friends and improve children’s communication skills as well. Considering that when a family moves to a new place it is crucial that all the family members participate notably about in make making decisions like where they must go and also division of the responsibilities like packing, it can be a practice for their future to be responsible and successful in social life. On the other hand, relocating all the time can be easily detrimental in different ways, for instance while a family is living in a particular area children have their friends in school or in the neighborhood, they get used to their teachers and perhaps they have plans for a particular time. Therefore, when family decided decides to move it can hurt children emotionally it will be hard for them to leave their friends, schools, or plans besides the mental damage can affect their future or stay with them for the rest of their life. As a result, relocating can have many advantages for the nuclear families as it is easy for them but it can hurt their children too if they are not aware about their children’s emotions. Nuclear family = mom, dad, children عمھ خالھ بابیزرگ مامان بزرگ و بقیھ = Extended family </tr> </table> </body> </html> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <body> <table width="80%" border="1" align="center"> <tr> <td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Nuclear Family.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p align="left" dir="ltr"> The nuclear family is well adapted to move geographically due to its size. Do you think children benefit in any way for moving? Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? The small family that is normally included includes parents and children can easily move everywhere because of the extent of it. In my opinion shifting can be beneficial for the children but of course there could be some detriments too, but it seems to me the profits are more important and valuable than the disadvantages. First of all relocating can be extremely informative and entertaining for children, due tobecause being in a new place will help them to discover and obtain a vast information about culture, geography and anthropology, it can be an opportunity to make fiends with new friends and improve children’s communication skills as well. Considering that when a family moves to a new place it is crucial that all the family members participate notably about in make making decisions like where they must go and also division of the responsibilities like packing, it can be a practice for their future to be responsible and successful in social life. On the other hand, relocating all the time can be easily detrimental in different ways, for instance while a family is living in a particular area children have their friends in school or in the neighborhood, they get used to their teachers and perhaps they have plans for a particular time. Therefore, when family decided decides to move it can hurt children emotionally it will be hard for them to leave their friends, schools, or plans besides the mental damage can affect their future or stay with them for the rest of their life. As a result, relocating can have many advantages for the nuclear families as it is easy for them but it can hurt their children too if they are not aware about their children’s emotions. Nuclear family = mom, dad, children عمھ خالھ بابیزرگ مامان بزرگ و بقیھ = Extended family </tr> </table> </body> </html> Niloo, Independent Decisions Children Nowdays 2020-05-04T18:05:12+00:00 2020-05-04T18:05:12+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/492-monday-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-monday-99-02-15/3515-niloo-independent-decisions-children-nowdays Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <body> <table width="80%" border="1" align="center"> <tr> <td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Niloo, Independent Decisions Children Nowdays.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p align="left" dir="ltr"> Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. It is obvious that the family is the most valuable gift that we can ever have and no one can ever deny the significant role of parents in people's life but nowadays this role has diminished a bit compared tothan the past and I feel this is for some main reasons which I will explain with a couple of examples. First of all, children's knowledge has increased than compared to the past which it can be extremely beneficial for them, so they might have update more up to date information than their parents because they educating are educated at a school and university, so they learn diverse objects subjects/areas in various subjects which this makes them more independent of their parents for their decisions. For instance, the number of universities and schools were was less than that of nowadays and also the new generation of families are more serious abouttended for children's education. Another point is that, technology and the Internet have a positiveeffective effect on people's awareness, so they can have several ample/plenty of information and even introduce them to different issues which helps them to allow their children to be more independent in their decisions. For example, my mother always follows psychology pages on Instagram and now she realizes that if she gives me freedom of actions, I will be more a successful person in the future. Last but not least, nowadays children be are more rebellious and fearless which is conducive to their gaining various experiences onwith their own in different areas. For instance, traveling to far countries with inadequate budget and without accurate planning at a young age. To recap, today's children have more knowledge than their families and past decades’ children and also technology and the Internet have been raised people's awareness. Although, new offsprings be are more rebellious and fearless, it this can have both advantages and disadvantages and it would be better if children consulted with their families out of respectrespectfully. All of these reasons lead to another to the new generation to be more independent in makingto make their decisions. </tr> </table> </body> </html> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <body> <table width="80%" border="1" align="center"> <tr> <td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Niloo, Independent Decisions Children Nowdays.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p align="left" dir="ltr"> Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. It is obvious that the family is the most valuable gift that we can ever have and no one can ever deny the significant role of parents in people's life but nowadays this role has diminished a bit compared tothan the past and I feel this is for some main reasons which I will explain with a couple of examples. First of all, children's knowledge has increased than compared to the past which it can be extremely beneficial for them, so they might have update more up to date information than their parents because they educating are educated at a school and university, so they learn diverse objects subjects/areas in various subjects which this makes them more independent of their parents for their decisions. For instance, the number of universities and schools were was less than that of nowadays and also the new generation of families are more serious abouttended for children's education. Another point is that, technology and the Internet have a positiveeffective effect on people's awareness, so they can have several ample/plenty of information and even introduce them to different issues which helps them to allow their children to be more independent in their decisions. For example, my mother always follows psychology pages on Instagram and now she realizes that if she gives me freedom of actions, I will be more a successful person in the future. Last but not least, nowadays children be are more rebellious and fearless which is conducive to their gaining various experiences onwith their own in different areas. For instance, traveling to far countries with inadequate budget and without accurate planning at a young age. To recap, today's children have more knowledge than their families and past decades’ children and also technology and the Internet have been raised people's awareness. Although, new offsprings be are more rebellious and fearless, it this can have both advantages and disadvantages and it would be better if children consulted with their families out of respectrespectfully. All of these reasons lead to another to the new generation to be more independent in makingto make their decisions. </tr> </table> </body> </html> Bahare Bagherikia, Education 2020-05-04T18:05:02+00:00 2020-05-04T18:05:02+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/492-monday-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-monday-99-02-15/3514-bahare-bagherikia-education Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <body> <table width="80%" border="1" align="center"> <tr> <td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Bahare Bagherikia, Education.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p align="left" dir="ltr"> Task2 : In many countries these days, the number of people continuing their education after school has increased, and the range of courses at universities and colleges has in increased too. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? The popularity and importance of knowledge and awareness in societies has increased over the past decades. The growing number of universities’ population is per se a great evidence for this phenomenon. I would argue that the more cultured and skilled communities, the easier and faster societies’ developments and improvements will be realized. Firstly, the changing world’s requirements necessitate individuals taking step towards being more involved in the present developments and technology by pursuing their education to high levels. The newly emerged emerging issues and situations which did not use to be even 50 years ago need to be massively paid more attention to and studied by students and researchers. As a result, the recently introduced courses are massively found interesting, applicable کار بردی و کار آمدand detailed to be taken in colleges by pupils. Not only are these classes highly consistent with the developing global environment, but thanks to the variety of course, they are greatly considered powerful means for individuals to achieve their goals which seems more appealing and favorable to them. In brief, universities being full of courses populated with an increasing number of students would be a reasonable answer to our current global circumstances as well as persons’ inner satisfaction in the long term. Secondly, requiring more updated up to date knowledge than before, jobs play an effective role in starting and encouraging this trend .it is no longer sufficient to just work with your dad as his heir to keep his legacy alive. To do this, a lot of books and articles should be read. On the other hand, technology has pretty much altered everything in every aspect of our life with more practical ones. So to keep up with it, it is an inevitable fact that universities and colleges standing at the front line prepare and equip individuals with the essential knowledge and awareness which are needed by occupations as well as in daily life. Bringing more convenient economic conveniencein terms of economic situation, this way eases people’s life similarly as it has been easing for years.By way of conclusion, an ever increasing number of people pursuing higher education in universities in which courses with more variety are offered cater to our societies’ society’s progress as much as persons’ private person’s life. </tr> </table> </body> </html> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <body> <table width="80%" border="1" align="center"> <tr> <td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Bahare Bagherikia, Education.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p align="left" dir="ltr"> Task2 : In many countries these days, the number of people continuing their education after school has increased, and the range of courses at universities and colleges has in increased too. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? The popularity and importance of knowledge and awareness in societies has increased over the past decades. The growing number of universities’ population is per se a great evidence for this phenomenon. I would argue that the more cultured and skilled communities, the easier and faster societies’ developments and improvements will be realized. Firstly, the changing world’s requirements necessitate individuals taking step towards being more involved in the present developments and technology by pursuing their education to high levels. The newly emerged emerging issues and situations which did not use to be even 50 years ago need to be massively paid more attention to and studied by students and researchers. As a result, the recently introduced courses are massively found interesting, applicable کار بردی و کار آمدand detailed to be taken in colleges by pupils. Not only are these classes highly consistent with the developing global environment, but thanks to the variety of course, they are greatly considered powerful means for individuals to achieve their goals which seems more appealing and favorable to them. In brief, universities being full of courses populated with an increasing number of students would be a reasonable answer to our current global circumstances as well as persons’ inner satisfaction in the long term. Secondly, requiring more updated up to date knowledge than before, jobs play an effective role in starting and encouraging this trend .it is no longer sufficient to just work with your dad as his heir to keep his legacy alive. To do this, a lot of books and articles should be read. On the other hand, technology has pretty much altered everything in every aspect of our life with more practical ones. So to keep up with it, it is an inevitable fact that universities and colleges standing at the front line prepare and equip individuals with the essential knowledge and awareness which are needed by occupations as well as in daily life. Bringing more convenient economic conveniencein terms of economic situation, this way eases people’s life similarly as it has been easing for years.By way of conclusion, an ever increasing number of people pursuing higher education in universities in which courses with more variety are offered cater to our societies’ society’s progress as much as persons’ private person’s life. </tr> </table> </body> </html> Amirreza Barghamadi, Environmental 2020-05-04T18:04:49+00:00 2020-05-04T18:04:49+00:00 http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/492-monday-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-monday-99-02-15/3513-amirreza-barghamadi-environmental Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <body> <table width="80%" border="1" align="center"> <tr> <td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Amirreza Barghamadi, Environmental.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p align="left" dir="ltr"> Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do? Such are the negative consequences of our activities on the environment, that many experts agree that destroying the environment poses a direct threat to humanity. As a result, we should tackle this problem with some constructive approaches both individually and governmentally. This essay will discuss some harmful activities for the nature and will come up with some solutions to solve or alleviate this problem. Environmentally-wise, air pollution is a terrible devastating issue which occurs when a myriad dangerous quantity of substances are introduced into earth’s atmosphere. Sources about this issue include many gases, among which greenhouse gases are the worst air pollutants. These gases are related to ozone layer depletion and global warming directly. Generally, greenhouse gases are released when fossil fuel is burned. Moreover, the other underlying causes of the problem is are/include deforestation and destroying destruction of natural habitats due to our need for more land to solve/deal with overpopulation in metropolitan cities around the world. Governments can address this issue by bringing in new policies to split the population over their cities and people can use green energy instead of fossil fuel. The another environmental problem is the extreme use of plastic which has irreparable damages to the environment and wildlife in particular. Initially, plastics are harmful for animals because they eat it and feed it to their children in by mistake. In addition, this material could poison our food chain as many animals eat it in mistake. An effective solution could be recycling all plastics that we use. Governments could encourage people to split up their wastes and also they could build recycle factory around cities. In conclusion, as far as environmental problems are concerned, with by implementing some solutions for each problem by both government and people we could prevent large-scale destruction of the environment and save humankind. </tr> </table> </body> </html> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <body> <table width="80%" border="1" align="center"> <tr> <td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.02.15/Amirreza Barghamadi, Environmental.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p align="left" dir="ltr"> Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do? Such are the negative consequences of our activities on the environment, that many experts agree that destroying the environment poses a direct threat to humanity. As a result, we should tackle this problem with some constructive approaches both individually and governmentally. This essay will discuss some harmful activities for the nature and will come up with some solutions to solve or alleviate this problem. Environmentally-wise, air pollution is a terrible devastating issue which occurs when a myriad dangerous quantity of substances are introduced into earth’s atmosphere. Sources about this issue include many gases, among which greenhouse gases are the worst air pollutants. These gases are related to ozone layer depletion and global warming directly. Generally, greenhouse gases are released when fossil fuel is burned. Moreover, the other underlying causes of the problem is are/include deforestation and destroying destruction of natural habitats due to our need for more land to solve/deal with overpopulation in metropolitan cities around the world. Governments can address this issue by bringing in new policies to split the population over their cities and people can use green energy instead of fossil fuel. The another environmental problem is the extreme use of plastic which has irreparable damages to the environment and wildlife in particular. Initially, plastics are harmful for animals because they eat it and feed it to their children in by mistake. In addition, this material could poison our food chain as many animals eat it in mistake. An effective solution could be recycling all plastics that we use. Governments could encourage people to split up their wastes and also they could build recycle factory around cities. In conclusion, as far as environmental problems are concerned, with by implementing some solutions for each problem by both government and people we could prevent large-scale destruction of the environment and save humankind. </tr> </table> </body> </html>