جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

As can be seen, these diagrams share data about changes in chocolate bar brands’ market-share and their advertisement budget in the years 2000 and 2010. A glance at the first diagram reveals that in the year 2000 Fantasy and Rum Punch had the highest proportion of the market with 31% and 21% respectively. Air-Light and ChocTwist were closely behind with 19% and 17% respectively. And obviously Venus had the lowest proportion with mere 12%. From the second and the third diagram we realize that by the end of this period Venus and Choc-Twist both faced an increasein their advertising budget and/as well as their market-share. The former experienced an 18-percent-increase in its marketshare with a 1.5-million-dollars-increase in its budget and the latter saw a 2%-increase in its market share with half a million increase in its budget. By the end of this period Rum Punch had the highest decline in market-share with 13% and also it decreased its advertising budget half a million dollars. Air-Light is the second highest spender by the end of this period but its market-share came down/shrank by 1%. Also Fantasy kept its budget at the same level but its market-share fell by 6%. Overall, it is clear that there is a correspondence between the spending on advertisement and the market-share.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

since long ago, the matter of asking personal questions by employers has been a controversy. some people hold the idea that this information may be useful, indeed they can help better knowledge of employers towards their staff, some others and I believe that they are personal information and there is no reason that everyone should know themit. nobody can deny the fact that knowing some information such as employees’ hobbies and interests is useful and they can help to with promotionsatisfaction. for example, when a director knows the staff’s hobbies, he can create leisure time related to them their tastes. by this approach, he illustrates to the staff that they are valuable for their boss, so job performance will be increased. one of the best helpful information could be date of birth. for instance, a director can provide a small gift for the staff’s birthday. as far as I know this move have derives a positive feedback from the staff. so, those groups of information that contribute to promotion are acceptable. on the other hand, some information such as marital status, number of children are is unnecessary for jobs, and they do not affect on job performance. indeed they are privatethe privacy and nobody shouldn’t pass intrude on them, becuase because some people can abuse them. I personally believe that every employer should respect the privacy of employees, and do not push put pressure on the staff with the worthless questions. because in the modern world this group of questions do not affect on the job progression, and even they can be a negative factor on in job performance. in sum, I believe keeping some the restriction distance between employees and employers is necessary, and the questions should be asked by recruiters just related to job performance.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In this argument, the opposer/ opponent of new expressway recommends that in order to save both local businesses and citizens from displacing, the governor’s proposal should be denied. To support this recommendation, he has not pointed out any cogent assumption. As a result, this argument rests on a series of unsubstantiated assumptions and is therefore unpersuasive as it stands. To begin with, the argument unfairly assumes that owing to run a expressway through residential areas, it will sacrifice the citizens’ lives. The author provides no evidence to substantiate this assumption. Lacking such evidence it is entirely that he actually does not consider the situation thoroughly. Opposing a new chance of a state without having a survey is not reasonable. Every assumption must be based on varied types of statistics in order to consider the situation from manifold aspects. Even if the governor’s proposal was not credible, the argument cannot adequately respond to the concerns of an individual who asserts constructing of the mentioned expressway can add additional positive aspects to his life. The author should account for other alternative explanations in order to make his assertion sound. On the other hand, the proposal of governor relies on vague information. He or she must consider other possible alternative to increase jobs’ offers and tourism. Charts and survey must be held to ask citizens about this constructing. His claim must overlook the inevitable outcomes of this changes. Simply put, I cannot be convinced whether the accessibility of a state is the only factor for attracting tourism or there are other possibilities such as healthy places to accommodate or eating food. As a result, the proposal fails to substantiate this crucial assumptions. More specifically, without establishing that all factors affecting the running of an expressway, we cannot rely on this limited anecdotal evidences of both parts of this argument. Displacing local businesses is not always worse, change will come with some benefits. There is a chance that with the money which they were paid for their former places they can invest in bigger and better market. Or the more tourists in a city, the more opportunities to earn money. If this recommendation was proposed to my state, I prefer to fill a questionnaire to consider vast majority of public’s idea. In conclusion, the argument is logically flawed and therefore unconvincing on both sides as it stands. To strengthen it, both the opposer/ opponent and defender must either modify the proposal to provide incentives for building a new highway in a state or provide better evidence that displacing citizens may ruin better options of living. Such evidence might include the following: statistics showing thatsignificant number of people who are against or in favor of this project, a survey to assert the negative and positive outcomes of this change and assurance from well-known local to provide more information.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Getting enough sleep has been important discussion all around the world. Although, there are different sorts of articles about this issues to suggest that the teenagers should sleep nine hours during at night, in other thathowever, adults and children need to fall asleep seven to eight hours at night, providedwhereas, infants might sleep 16 hours. However, individual differences and cultures may have extremely influence to on the sleep's sleeping habits. For instance, some people have to work at night or another ones must study hard until midnight, therefore, they have not enough sleep. Consequently, they are going to confront suffer sleep debt. Albeit, it has been affecting in our life, for illustration, it can descent decrease the ability of people for to doing something or having significant decision. In the most of the time, teenagers do not have enough sleep, so they may encounter sleep deprivation that itwhich has a long term negative effects for them, for example, they cannot have serious focus on different branches/areas of their life, such as their studies or communications. They might compensate their shortage of sleep. Even if somebody sleeps much more times, it would havehas disadvantages. Such as, high blood pressure or heart attacks. In conclusion, people should pay attention to the benefits of having good and enough sleep, because of, it can help them to have a healthy and useful life. Furthermore, some people drink coffee or soft coffin drinking, because, they help them to awake. Experts and doctors do not confirm this way; they believe that these kinds of drinking have been harmful on to human health. If they feel sleepyfell asleep, they should only go to bed early at night.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In some societies, stress is now regarded as a major problem, and it is thought that people suffer from more stress than they did in the past. However, others feel that the amount of stress people have today is exaggerated. They say that previous generations were under more pressure, but the idea of suffering from stress did not exist. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. In this day and age, people are dealing with stressful conditions more in comparison with the past, so this issue regrettably triggers several diseases in individual’s individuals’ lives. First and foremost, it is an axiom that livelihood is inextricably bound up in people’s job. In other words, everyone must possess a satisfactory occupation so as to provide welfare for themselves. I opine that nowadays, the atmosphere of workplaces has been more stressful than they used to be. For instance, there are keen competitions among labor on the grounds that job opportunities are inadequate for the large size of population in societies. In addition, from an educational standpoint, unhealthy rivalry among pupils in order to pass main exams is another negative factor by which a multitude of students feel nervous considerably. Last but not least, in nutritional terms, the use of fast food unfortunately has received wide currency among people particularly the youth, so not only does it negatively affect anybody’s physical health but also it causes more stress in the body which in turn makes everyone be more susceptible to illness/getting ill. On the other hand, it is obvious that an enormous number of people used to get on with their life simply in the past. I strongly believe their expectations were not comparable with their descendants. For example, in terms of facilities, they had to do plentiful activities manually which were quite demanding but they did were not used to complaining of suffering from difficulties or stress. However, in fact, my firm conviction is that lack of income disparity in those days had much of a role to play in feeling content with lives. Consequently, further to the above explanation, despite given the low status of previous generations’ expectations, I firmly believe people today are more prone to be under pressure which stems from stressful conditions.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answers. In today's modern life the Internet and public transportation are two striking factors which are more increasingly merge merging with people's life, so governments should spend more money on these spheres and in my belief the Internet is precede the public transportation and two reasons persuade me to put forward this viewpoint which I will explain with a couple of examples. At the outset, nowadays people can use the internet for their daily tasks which previously they needed to commute toon the city forbefore, so if governments spend more money on the internet, most of the people can be teleworkers which can be more beneficial because in that circumstance the traffic and air pollution will be reduced. For example, in coronavirus time some developing countries such as Iran struggled with unpleasant internet connection which has had some irrecoverable damage because some people had to leave ignore/give up the quarantine to run their errands/accomplish their jobs. Another point is that governments by spending extra money to improve the Internet give an opportunity to society members to enhance their knowledge readily. For instance, in the example above all students in the world had online classes instead of had having actual classes, while if governments did had not provided these suitable conditions for their students, they would have jeopardized the lives of their main assets. To recap, although public transportation is one of the predominant points, in today's modern life the Internet has an effective impact on people's life because it can aim to enhance their knowledge and also they can telework in distinctive situations, so governments should spend more money in on this area/part.