Fridays GMAT-GRE-TOEFL-IELTS-آموزشگاه زبان صبای سحر-چمران جنوب، بلوار جلال آل احمد، جنب داروخانه شبانه روزی جلال آل احمد، پلاک 87، طبقه سوم تلفن: 42-88679341 https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/194-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-11-29 2024-05-03T15:12:02+00:00 IELTSTOEFLCENTER info@ieltstoeflcenter.com Joomla! - Open Source Content Management Applying for Jobs and Personal Information 2017-02-17T16:51:36+00:00 2017-02-17T16:51:36+00:00 https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/194-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-11-29/1142-applying-for-jobs-and-personal-information <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.11.29/Applying for Jobs and Personal Information.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Nowadays human resources plays a key role in every company. Therefore, employers pay more attention to hire highly qualified employees, that is to say, employers concentrate on employees' both personal attitudes and professional skills, whereas people believe that their managers interfere in their lives with personal information. Some people believe that each person's life/personal information is related to himself/herself. Moreover, they have separated their work from other parts of their lives. Not only do they not believe in this kind of selection, but they also believe that companies should rely on the employees' skills, experience and also their knowledge regardless of their personal trends. A significant person who had a quick temper and an inefficient lifestyle is Albert Einstein. Knowing about seemingly less relevant information about employees might lead us to criticize/ judge unfairly. From another point of view, people's private lives have great effects on their whole life. The more moral the interviewee is, the higher score that person gets to take a job. Although some rules look seem ruthless, they help the company so that they have/to have a suitable/good selection/to select properly. Managers consider all aspects of people's lives such as, single, or married or divorced/martial status state and their reasons to know or identify their responsibility. Besides, putting them on in a suitable place due to getting/obtaining high efficiency. For example, companies could count on someone who is single for some assignments due to . Due to the fact that they can leave their family in-laws easier than married ones for a couple of days. Knowing about their hobbies and interests helps managers to find out strengths and weaknesses in order to so that adapt to related jobs. In conclusion, the existence of efficiency, considerable experience and talented workforces is are valuable for any company. Meanwhile, the workplace 's atmosphere must be considered by the their managers. To this end, we should accept some interference that administrators apply on.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.11.29/Applying for Jobs and Personal Information.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Nowadays human resources plays a key role in every company. Therefore, employers pay more attention to hire highly qualified employees, that is to say, employers concentrate on employees' both personal attitudes and professional skills, whereas people believe that their managers interfere in their lives with personal information. Some people believe that each person's life/personal information is related to himself/herself. Moreover, they have separated their work from other parts of their lives. Not only do they not believe in this kind of selection, but they also believe that companies should rely on the employees' skills, experience and also their knowledge regardless of their personal trends. A significant person who had a quick temper and an inefficient lifestyle is Albert Einstein. Knowing about seemingly less relevant information about employees might lead us to criticize/ judge unfairly. From another point of view, people's private lives have great effects on their whole life. The more moral the interviewee is, the higher score that person gets to take a job. Although some rules look seem ruthless, they help the company so that they have/to have a suitable/good selection/to select properly. Managers consider all aspects of people's lives such as, single, or married or divorced/martial status state and their reasons to know or identify their responsibility. Besides, putting them on in a suitable place due to getting/obtaining high efficiency. For example, companies could count on someone who is single for some assignments due to . Due to the fact that they can leave their family in-laws easier than married ones for a couple of days. Knowing about their hobbies and interests helps managers to find out strengths and weaknesses in order to so that adapt to related jobs. In conclusion, the existence of efficiency, considerable experience and talented workforces is are valuable for any company. Meanwhile, the workplace 's atmosphere must be considered by the their managers. To this end, we should accept some interference that administrators apply on.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Different Genders Abilities, Fatemeh Jamali 2017-02-17T16:51:19+00:00 2017-02-17T16:51:19+00:00 https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/194-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-11-29/1141-different-genders-abilities-fatemeh-jamali <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.11.29/Different Genders Abilities, Fatemeh Jamali.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people think men and women have different natural abilities that make them suitable for different types of work. Others, however, believe that both men and women can be equally suited to do any type of work. Discuss both view and give your opinion. Every individual has (his/her) own individuality. Nature has caused both men and women to (to) have their individual characters. All these different personalities enable them to do different tasks. Due to this, some people opine that it would be better for both se*es to have tasks which suit their personality and skill sets. Others, however, think that both of them are equal and they can do every each job. Therefore, this essay would analyze both perspectives. To begin with, it can be said that both males and females have their own charactersistic which enables them to perform well in certain tasks. For example, women can be responsible for housework house work and bringing up children, inasmuch as women are kind, and they are best suited for this job. Similarly, there are matching points between men’s activities and their personality. For instance, men are physically stronger than women. These qualities make them suitable for earning livelihood/making a living bread and making decisions for their families. Apart from that, they can also support their families emotionally as well as in security matters. Despite the qualities that have been mentioned in the pervious paragraph, we cannot ignore the changing trend which is taking place in the modern world. Nowadays people are speaking about equal rights and educations more than ever before. This have has given women the opportunity to overcome occasioned women breaking obstacles to their outdoor working. They can appear in important positions such as being a politician. In the same way, men also do housekeeping tasks by looking after their children and doing chores. Thus, it cannot be said that both of the genders are designed suitable to do only one type of work. From my point of view, women are performing well in professions like teaching, and nursing, and those kinds of jobs suits their natural talents and skills. On the other hand, men can work in places where strong physical labor is needed. In a nutshell, it can be said that apart from individuals and different abilities to do several tasks, considering today's current norms both males and females, it will be wrong to think they cannot do each other’s responsibilities.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.11.29/Different Genders Abilities, Fatemeh Jamali.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people think men and women have different natural abilities that make them suitable for different types of work. Others, however, believe that both men and women can be equally suited to do any type of work. Discuss both view and give your opinion. Every individual has (his/her) own individuality. Nature has caused both men and women to (to) have their individual characters. All these different personalities enable them to do different tasks. Due to this, some people opine that it would be better for both se*es to have tasks which suit their personality and skill sets. Others, however, think that both of them are equal and they can do every each job. Therefore, this essay would analyze both perspectives. To begin with, it can be said that both males and females have their own charactersistic which enables them to perform well in certain tasks. For example, women can be responsible for housework house work and bringing up children, inasmuch as women are kind, and they are best suited for this job. Similarly, there are matching points between men’s activities and their personality. For instance, men are physically stronger than women. These qualities make them suitable for earning livelihood/making a living bread and making decisions for their families. Apart from that, they can also support their families emotionally as well as in security matters. Despite the qualities that have been mentioned in the pervious paragraph, we cannot ignore the changing trend which is taking place in the modern world. Nowadays people are speaking about equal rights and educations more than ever before. This have has given women the opportunity to overcome occasioned women breaking obstacles to their outdoor working. They can appear in important positions such as being a politician. In the same way, men also do housekeeping tasks by looking after their children and doing chores. Thus, it cannot be said that both of the genders are designed suitable to do only one type of work. From my point of view, women are performing well in professions like teaching, and nursing, and those kinds of jobs suits their natural talents and skills. On the other hand, men can work in places where strong physical labor is needed. In a nutshell, it can be said that apart from individuals and different abilities to do several tasks, considering today's current norms both males and females, it will be wrong to think they cannot do each other’s responsibilities.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Heavy Traffic's Problems, Sarang Rose 2017-02-17T16:51:04+00:00 2017-02-17T16:51:04+00:00 https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/194-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-11-29/1140-heavy-traffic-s-problems-sarang-rose <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.11.29/Heavy Traffic's Problems, Sarang Rose.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Task: Nowadays many countries are facing the problem of heavy traffic and congestion. Describe the situation in your home country and suggest some solutions. Being stuck Sticking(Stuck) in bumper to bumper traffic is one of the most irritating issues in many countries and my country is not an exception. There are numerous underlying causes which lead to heavy traffic in cities some of which as well as some practical solutions will be discussed here. From my point of view, the first and foremost reason leading to congested traffic is the lack of public transportation facilities. For instance, not only does Iran suffer from the severe shortage of adequate subway’s stations, but also both trains and stations’ qualitiesy are not acceptable, so citizens are not eager to use public transportation as an alternative choice of their own cars/private transport. Consequently, driving the private cars is quite common, although most individuals are aware of the adverse effects of this trend on crowded streets.transportation. Last but not least, unfettered production of cars regardless of the roads and highways’ capacity leads to terrible traffic. In spite of the aforementioned reasons, undoubtedly some effective prompt measures can be taken to settle this issue. From my perspective, using the public transportation means plays a vital role in reducing the traffic congestion, so governments should shoulder the responsibility to encourage citizens to use more public vehicles instead of their own (????) by both enhancing the quality and increasing the quantity of public vehicles. Furthermore, it is incumbent upon legislators to introduce and implement stringent laws which can limit the car manufacture as long as the essential infrastructures for driving new cars, namely roads and highways, is not developed. In conclusion, my personal conviction is that heavy traffic is an inevitable outcome of living in modern society. however, statesmen should address this issue and take it into account as an urgent priority. They can resolve decide this problem by applying reasonable laws besides improving the public transportation facilities.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.11.29/Heavy Traffic's Problems, Sarang Rose.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Task: Nowadays many countries are facing the problem of heavy traffic and congestion. Describe the situation in your home country and suggest some solutions. Being stuck Sticking(Stuck) in bumper to bumper traffic is one of the most irritating issues in many countries and my country is not an exception. There are numerous underlying causes which lead to heavy traffic in cities some of which as well as some practical solutions will be discussed here. From my point of view, the first and foremost reason leading to congested traffic is the lack of public transportation facilities. For instance, not only does Iran suffer from the severe shortage of adequate subway’s stations, but also both trains and stations’ qualitiesy are not acceptable, so citizens are not eager to use public transportation as an alternative choice of their own cars/private transport. Consequently, driving the private cars is quite common, although most individuals are aware of the adverse effects of this trend on crowded streets.transportation. Last but not least, unfettered production of cars regardless of the roads and highways’ capacity leads to terrible traffic. In spite of the aforementioned reasons, undoubtedly some effective prompt measures can be taken to settle this issue. From my perspective, using the public transportation means plays a vital role in reducing the traffic congestion, so governments should shoulder the responsibility to encourage citizens to use more public vehicles instead of their own (????) by both enhancing the quality and increasing the quantity of public vehicles. Furthermore, it is incumbent upon legislators to introduce and implement stringent laws which can limit the car manufacture as long as the essential infrastructures for driving new cars, namely roads and highways, is not developed. In conclusion, my personal conviction is that heavy traffic is an inevitable outcome of living in modern society. however, statesmen should address this issue and take it into account as an urgent priority. They can resolve decide this problem by applying reasonable laws besides improving the public transportation facilities.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> International Cooperation, Tina 2017-02-17T16:50:51+00:00 2017-02-17T16:50:51+00:00 https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/194-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-11-29/1139-international-cooperation-tina <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.11.29/International Cooperation, Tina.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people believe that the main benefit of international cooperation is the protection of the environment, while others think that the main benefits are in the world of business. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Nowadays, many companies are extending their ties with overseas partners. It is often argued that this is for the sake of protecting the environment, whilst others are of the opinion that international businesses are the winners of this trend. I believe that that both the environment and businesses can benefit from this cooperation. It is certainly true that due to lack of resources such as copper, oil, gas, etc., or for the aim of preserving them, some countries are ought to acquire some goods from other countries. For instance, Iran has been facing an enormous drop in the rainfall. Lakes and dams have dried up over the past decades and many cities are facing challenges to provide water to their residents. The water shortage has initiated the idea of virtual water trade, i.e. the hidden flow of water in foods and other commodities. Using this kind of cooperation can benefit countries facing scarce water resources and will enable them to make the most out of their limited water supplies. However, there are many who think companies engaged in international business are the main beneficiary. Sometimes, it is not possible to purchase an item at the requested quantity or quality domestically, and companies have to outsource. In some cases, it might help them to cut costs and consequently end users can enjoy a lower price. In conclusion, there are varying opinions on international cooperation. In my opinion, one has to be realistic and consider every aspect when judging international trade and its impacts. In the modern age, international trade is inevitable and countries have to collaborate with each other to produce the goods that they have competitive advantage in.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.11.29/International Cooperation, Tina.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people believe that the main benefit of international cooperation is the protection of the environment, while others think that the main benefits are in the world of business. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Nowadays, many companies are extending their ties with overseas partners. It is often argued that this is for the sake of protecting the environment, whilst others are of the opinion that international businesses are the winners of this trend. I believe that that both the environment and businesses can benefit from this cooperation. It is certainly true that due to lack of resources such as copper, oil, gas, etc., or for the aim of preserving them, some countries are ought to acquire some goods from other countries. For instance, Iran has been facing an enormous drop in the rainfall. Lakes and dams have dried up over the past decades and many cities are facing challenges to provide water to their residents. The water shortage has initiated the idea of virtual water trade, i.e. the hidden flow of water in foods and other commodities. Using this kind of cooperation can benefit countries facing scarce water resources and will enable them to make the most out of their limited water supplies. However, there are many who think companies engaged in international business are the main beneficiary. Sometimes, it is not possible to purchase an item at the requested quantity or quality domestically, and companies have to outsource. In some cases, it might help them to cut costs and consequently end users can enjoy a lower price. In conclusion, there are varying opinions on international cooperation. In my opinion, one has to be realistic and consider every aspect when judging international trade and its impacts. In the modern age, international trade is inevitable and countries have to collaborate with each other to produce the goods that they have competitive advantage in.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Modern and Old Buildings, Sanaz Nasr 2017-02-17T16:50:36+00:00 2017-02-17T16:50:36+00:00 https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/194-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-11-29/1138-modern-and-old-buildings-sanaz-nasr <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.11.29/Modern and Old Buildings, Sanaz Nasr.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">In the past, buildings often reflected the culture of a society but today all modern buildings look alike and cities throughout the world are becoming more and more similar. What do you think is the reason for this, and is it a good thing or bad thing? Every city should have its own characteristics due to its culture, climate or local materials. However, in this day and age, we all witness that different cities have similar materials to each other and buildings do not reflect the character of the city anymore. To start, in most large cities all around the world we face the land scarcity scarce problem which leads to soaring land prices the price of lands and therefore, tall buildings may be are the proper approach to this problem, in order to provideing a considerable number of floors which are is affordable for people to buy. Those skyscrapers are made of concrete and steel. Thus, local materials such as timber and stone for buildings are no longer useable, but prefabricated materials are preferred by builders. Consequently, when you see a picture from downtown of a city you are not able to distinguish whether the photo has been taken in Berlin, Tokyo or New York. Although we should not stand in the way of progress, I concur that the cities should stick to their individuality. A clear example is Paris, where in Paris builders are not allowed to use irrelevant materials to town especially in downtown and the municipality has is banned skyscrapers to be built lest skyline of the city should would spoil. On the other hand, some of those skyscrapers are considered to be a landmark in a town, for instance the Twin towers in Kuala Lumpur. A landmark not only is a sign of a city, but also has the potential to be an economic hub for tourismit. By way of conclusion, I opine that it is regrettable that modern cities look resemblesimilar/alike. However, an it is unavoidable consequence of overpopulation in metropolises is overresemblance. Even if structures of buildings have no other not another alternatives, the face of cities can maintain their own character to value their cultural diversity.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.11.29/Modern and Old Buildings, Sanaz Nasr.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">In the past, buildings often reflected the culture of a society but today all modern buildings look alike and cities throughout the world are becoming more and more similar. What do you think is the reason for this, and is it a good thing or bad thing? Every city should have its own characteristics due to its culture, climate or local materials. However, in this day and age, we all witness that different cities have similar materials to each other and buildings do not reflect the character of the city anymore. To start, in most large cities all around the world we face the land scarcity scarce problem which leads to soaring land prices the price of lands and therefore, tall buildings may be are the proper approach to this problem, in order to provideing a considerable number of floors which are is affordable for people to buy. Those skyscrapers are made of concrete and steel. Thus, local materials such as timber and stone for buildings are no longer useable, but prefabricated materials are preferred by builders. Consequently, when you see a picture from downtown of a city you are not able to distinguish whether the photo has been taken in Berlin, Tokyo or New York. Although we should not stand in the way of progress, I concur that the cities should stick to their individuality. A clear example is Paris, where in Paris builders are not allowed to use irrelevant materials to town especially in downtown and the municipality has is banned skyscrapers to be built lest skyline of the city should would spoil. On the other hand, some of those skyscrapers are considered to be a landmark in a town, for instance the Twin towers in Kuala Lumpur. A landmark not only is a sign of a city, but also has the potential to be an economic hub for tourismit. By way of conclusion, I opine that it is regrettable that modern cities look resemblesimilar/alike. However, an it is unavoidable consequence of overpopulation in metropolises is overresemblance. Even if structures of buildings have no other not another alternatives, the face of cities can maintain their own character to value their cultural diversity.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Pointless-invaluable History, Saeed Shokravi 2017-02-17T16:50:23+00:00 2017-02-17T16:50:23+00:00 https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/194-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-11-29/1137-pointless-invaluable-history-saeed-shokravi <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.11.29/Pointless-invaluable History, Saeed Shokravi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people think studying from the past offers no benefits to today’s life, while others believe that history is a valuable source of information for us. Discuss both view and give your own opinion. There are two major opinions about the role of history in our present life. Although a lot of people insist that there would be nothing to gain from doing research on what happened in the past, I suppose history does teach us precious lessons. On the one hand, I understand why some people think it is pointless to learn from the past. First of all, history is the field that is rarely used in people’s lives and therefore, they would rather to pay attention to science or technology than to focus on something that brings no values to present or future. Second, each historical event might be interpreted differently based on different perspectives. For instance, the most vivid example for this is the messiah in different religions. As a result, there is no guarantee of the accuracy of the information obtained. Thus, not only do they find studying history useless, but also a waste of time. On the other hand, a majority of people, especially me :D, myself included, would argue that studying from the past events is essential for two main reasons. Firstly, It/History helps young people have thorough insights into their own culture and how their country has evolved. This is particularly true in case of Iran. In my opinion, the youth need to understand how their ancestors defended the nation against intruders throughout many dynasties and were martyred for their freedom which would help the new generation develop a sense of patriotism and pride in/inside them. Furthermore, history depicts the mistakes made in the past, hence helping people avoid similar ones in the future. In conclusion, despite the fact that acquiring about historical events is redundant according to some people, it seems to be of great value to me.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.11.29/Pointless-invaluable History, Saeed Shokravi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people think studying from the past offers no benefits to today’s life, while others believe that history is a valuable source of information for us. Discuss both view and give your own opinion. There are two major opinions about the role of history in our present life. Although a lot of people insist that there would be nothing to gain from doing research on what happened in the past, I suppose history does teach us precious lessons. On the one hand, I understand why some people think it is pointless to learn from the past. First of all, history is the field that is rarely used in people’s lives and therefore, they would rather to pay attention to science or technology than to focus on something that brings no values to present or future. Second, each historical event might be interpreted differently based on different perspectives. For instance, the most vivid example for this is the messiah in different religions. As a result, there is no guarantee of the accuracy of the information obtained. Thus, not only do they find studying history useless, but also a waste of time. On the other hand, a majority of people, especially me :D, myself included, would argue that studying from the past events is essential for two main reasons. Firstly, It/History helps young people have thorough insights into their own culture and how their country has evolved. This is particularly true in case of Iran. In my opinion, the youth need to understand how their ancestors defended the nation against intruders throughout many dynasties and were martyred for their freedom which would help the new generation develop a sense of patriotism and pride in/inside them. Furthermore, history depicts the mistakes made in the past, hence helping people avoid similar ones in the future. In conclusion, despite the fact that acquiring about historical events is redundant according to some people, it seems to be of great value to me.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Railways, Tina Vosoughi 2017-02-17T16:50:10+00:00 2017-02-17T16:50:10+00:00 https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/194-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-11-29/1136-railways-tina-vosoughi <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.11.29/Railways, Tina Vosoughi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">==Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.to what extent extand do you agree or disagree with this statement? These days a great number of people believe that the amount of money which is spending spent on railways should be increased instead of more investment for roadway systems. In from my point of view railways have a lot of advantages, but the benefits of roadway systems outweigh outway them. The Roadway system is suitable for short distances unlike the railway system which only suits for long distance transporting. Using roads for conveying goods is cheaper and more economical than railways and also they can provide door to door or warehouse to warehouse services; this reduces cartage, loading and unloading expenses besides the railways which are limited to some restricted stations. The capital outlay for the roadway system is much lower than the railways. The cost of constructing, operating and maintaining roads is cheaper than railway transportation. overall, this leads to a decline in the budget which should be spentd on transport system. Statistics has have indicated that the expenditure of building roads is almost half of the amount of money which should be allocated for establishing railways with the same condition. Although, there are a lot of profits for the roadway system, the drawbacks are undeniable. Railways are more appropriate as well as convenient for bulky and heavy goods over long distances. Some trains are specialized for carrying products which cannot be transported by roadways or airways. Railways are least affected by weather conditions compared to other methods of transport so they are almost always every time available. The most important strength strong point about railways is their safety .There are is a few accidents by means of them in contrast to other modes terms of transportation such as roadways. Generally ,there are is some advantages about every transport system, so all of them are functional but these days according to our newest knowledges and technologies, in my opinion, the roadway system is perhaps the most functional one. Roads are not only very convenient for different uses, but also cheap to build in comparison to other systems.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.11.29/Railways, Tina Vosoughi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">==Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.to what extent extand do you agree or disagree with this statement? These days a great number of people believe that the amount of money which is spending spent on railways should be increased instead of more investment for roadway systems. In from my point of view railways have a lot of advantages, but the benefits of roadway systems outweigh outway them. The Roadway system is suitable for short distances unlike the railway system which only suits for long distance transporting. Using roads for conveying goods is cheaper and more economical than railways and also they can provide door to door or warehouse to warehouse services; this reduces cartage, loading and unloading expenses besides the railways which are limited to some restricted stations. The capital outlay for the roadway system is much lower than the railways. The cost of constructing, operating and maintaining roads is cheaper than railway transportation. overall, this leads to a decline in the budget which should be spentd on transport system. Statistics has have indicated that the expenditure of building roads is almost half of the amount of money which should be allocated for establishing railways with the same condition. Although, there are a lot of profits for the roadway system, the drawbacks are undeniable. Railways are more appropriate as well as convenient for bulky and heavy goods over long distances. Some trains are specialized for carrying products which cannot be transported by roadways or airways. Railways are least affected by weather conditions compared to other methods of transport so they are almost always every time available. The most important strength strong point about railways is their safety .There are is a few accidents by means of them in contrast to other modes terms of transportation such as roadways. Generally ,there are is some advantages about every transport system, so all of them are functional but these days according to our newest knowledges and technologies, in my opinion, the roadway system is perhaps the most functional one. Roads are not only very convenient for different uses, but also cheap to build in comparison to other systems.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Teaching Practical Skills in Academic Institutions, Hossein Talebi 2017-02-17T16:49:39+00:00 2017-02-17T16:49:39+00:00 https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/194-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-11-29/1135-teaching-practical-skills-in-academic-institutions-hossein-talebi <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.11.29/Teaching Practical Skills in Academic Institutions, Hossein Talebi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Academic institutions should only deal with academic studies and passing examinations. Skills such as cookery, woodwork and tailoring are better to be taught at home by family members and friends. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own experience. Topics which should be taught in universities have always been a subject of serious disagreements among critics, inasmuch as some of them opine that practical skills should be included take part in academic curriculum subject while many others think exactly the opposite. These critics believe that universities are responsible for people’s scientific nurture and educating them about the fundamentals of science. They think practical skills, such as carpentry, are based on individuals’ personal experience. Therefore, these subjects could not be taught educated in classes as academic lessons, and everybody who is enthusiastic to learn such skills should attend in their workshops, and gaining experience is the compulsory key for mastering them. On the other hand, proponents assert that the time has come to change the public attitude toward such abilities, and redesign them according to scientific facts and rules. By such an action not only could every person who wants to learn them be presented in classes or simply be provided with some references, but also he/she can solely develop an improved skill based on academic fundamentals. In addition, by formulating formulizing these abilities authorities make them regular and capable of passing from person to person.everybody to another one. Instructing these types of skills in academic institutes, from my point of view, as a totally theoretical courses, however fully developed and redesigned they are, would not be as effective as a practical workshop which provides the opportunity of honing their hand skills physically for individuals. Besides, most of such crafts were instructed in shops from fathers to their sons, and they are not keen on sharinge the secrets of their abilities with others. Therefore, composing technical resources for educating these skills out of family workshops would be a major problem while learning them under the supervision of a senior member of the family is quite popular. In conclusion, although teaching practical skills in universities appears to be a good idea, inasmuch as enhancing these skills requires personally, physical experience, and providing resources, which would be referred to, is not a target that would easily be achieved, I think academic institutions should focus more on academic studies rather than practicing to teach educate skills like woodwork or tailoring.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.11.29/Teaching Practical Skills in Academic Institutions, Hossein Talebi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Academic institutions should only deal with academic studies and passing examinations. Skills such as cookery, woodwork and tailoring are better to be taught at home by family members and friends. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own experience. Topics which should be taught in universities have always been a subject of serious disagreements among critics, inasmuch as some of them opine that practical skills should be included take part in academic curriculum subject while many others think exactly the opposite. These critics believe that universities are responsible for people’s scientific nurture and educating them about the fundamentals of science. They think practical skills, such as carpentry, are based on individuals’ personal experience. Therefore, these subjects could not be taught educated in classes as academic lessons, and everybody who is enthusiastic to learn such skills should attend in their workshops, and gaining experience is the compulsory key for mastering them. On the other hand, proponents assert that the time has come to change the public attitude toward such abilities, and redesign them according to scientific facts and rules. By such an action not only could every person who wants to learn them be presented in classes or simply be provided with some references, but also he/she can solely develop an improved skill based on academic fundamentals. In addition, by formulating formulizing these abilities authorities make them regular and capable of passing from person to person.everybody to another one. Instructing these types of skills in academic institutes, from my point of view, as a totally theoretical courses, however fully developed and redesigned they are, would not be as effective as a practical workshop which provides the opportunity of honing their hand skills physically for individuals. Besides, most of such crafts were instructed in shops from fathers to their sons, and they are not keen on sharinge the secrets of their abilities with others. Therefore, composing technical resources for educating these skills out of family workshops would be a major problem while learning them under the supervision of a senior member of the family is quite popular. In conclusion, although teaching practical skills in universities appears to be a good idea, inasmuch as enhancing these skills requires personally, physical experience, and providing resources, which would be referred to, is not a target that would easily be achieved, I think academic institutions should focus more on academic studies rather than practicing to teach educate skills like woodwork or tailoring.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Training Courses for Parents, Sara Kasaei 2017-02-17T16:49:13+00:00 2017-02-17T16:49:13+00:00 https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/194-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-11-29/1134-training-courses-for-parents-sara-kasaei <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.11.29/Training Courses for Parents, Sara Kasaei.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">It is necessary for parents to attend parenting training course to bring their children up. Do you agree or disagree? During the recent years, the necessity of parenting classes has been a controversial subject. While many people tend to advocate traditional methods of nurturing kids, I would argue that these types of courses would be undoubtedly beneficial for parents, especially the young ones. Those supporting parenting classes build their argument on two major foundations: the scientifically approved materials and having a brilliant chance to socialize with other parents. The former asserts that these courses are taught by professional trainers and psychologists having vast information about both the needs and the challenges of children throughout the different stages of their life. The latter is commonly postulated as the inevitable positive effect of being in a supportive group where you can share your parental concerns as well as experiences and receive positive feedbacks. Therefore, not only could they raise their knowledge, but also they could use it as a chance to relieve their stress. This approach could usefully contribute to developing a young generation who are confidentce, independentce and self-motivated. On the other hand, what needs to be taken into account considered is that the majority of traditional upbringing methods are considered inappropriate in the modern psychology. One salient example of this is aggressive punishments such as insulting which have been is proved to have permanent effect on the child's mental developments and caused serious disorders. Namely, depression or lack of confidence. As a result, parents cannot rely on these methods only. In brief, from my perspective, both parents should participate in training courses to broaden their horizons about the new methods of nurturing their children.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.11.29/Training Courses for Parents, Sara Kasaei.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">It is necessary for parents to attend parenting training course to bring their children up. Do you agree or disagree? During the recent years, the necessity of parenting classes has been a controversial subject. While many people tend to advocate traditional methods of nurturing kids, I would argue that these types of courses would be undoubtedly beneficial for parents, especially the young ones. Those supporting parenting classes build their argument on two major foundations: the scientifically approved materials and having a brilliant chance to socialize with other parents. The former asserts that these courses are taught by professional trainers and psychologists having vast information about both the needs and the challenges of children throughout the different stages of their life. The latter is commonly postulated as the inevitable positive effect of being in a supportive group where you can share your parental concerns as well as experiences and receive positive feedbacks. Therefore, not only could they raise their knowledge, but also they could use it as a chance to relieve their stress. This approach could usefully contribute to developing a young generation who are confidentce, independentce and self-motivated. On the other hand, what needs to be taken into account considered is that the majority of traditional upbringing methods are considered inappropriate in the modern psychology. One salient example of this is aggressive punishments such as insulting which have been is proved to have permanent effect on the child's mental developments and caused serious disorders. Namely, depression or lack of confidence. As a result, parents cannot rely on these methods only. In brief, from my perspective, both parents should participate in training courses to broaden their horizons about the new methods of nurturing their children.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table>