Fridays

Disruptive Students, Fatemeh Farajnejad

2017-09-09T06:00:32+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Topic: Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately. Agree or disagree? Nowadays there is at least one disobedient child in almost every family. First of all the most paramount matter is to know the hyper students psychologically. It's not fair to call the students hyperactive because of our impatience whilst only an expert should be the judge in this regard/note that whether a student is hyper or not. In my opinion separating those students can have way very important negative effects on them. These children are fundamentally problematic and if we separate them they may think that they are rejected from school, others and even society. However Therefore, this is not the solution. We, the adults, are supposed to find some useful ways to overcome this problem. I assume that the administrators of school should make the class and school more enjoyable for all of the students so that they can learn easily and have no wasted time to think about misbehaving lazy doings. In this way everyone in class can understand everything and no one would be bothered. Another way is to distract them. For example make we can keep them as busy as possible they can so that they have no time to make noise and distract the class. The third solution is to make theme attend in sport classes. This way they can release/free their energy, play more and have more fun which can cause them more relaxation. On the other hand provided that if we don't do anything about naughty children, others may suffer from them causing . This can cause others a low quality of learning, learning acquisition of inappropriate behavior and losing their interest to in school. The less interested the students, the lower the quality of learning. This can not only can affect their learning but it also can influence on their education and even future life. In conclusion, due to the above mentioned reasons something certain measures/actions should be done taken about naughty/unruly students but I strongly believe that the solution is not separation. This it is highly recommended that we consulting a psychologist rather than choosing some wrong solutions which can harm these children.

TV Programs, Sarang Rose

2017-09-09T06:00:14+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Task: Some people say that having a lot of TV channels is good, while others argue that it reduces the quality of programs. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Nowadays, in many countries tens, if not, hundreds of TV stations are broadcasting programs. While some argue that it would be far better to have limited TV channels, I do believe that it is a positive development. It is often felt that numerous TV channels will lead to low-quality program production. Producing high quality TV shows such as series, movies and news is an excessively time consuming task, for they consist of various activities ranging from recording, composing music to edit all of which require quality time. Thus, from the opponents' perspective, producing a lot of TV programs causes that less time to be allocated to each program which in turn could reduce the quality. In addition, novelty plays a pivotal role in producing eye catching programs. However, with the increase in the number of by increasing TV channels, is creating new ideas would be a demanding job to create new ideas, so it would be quite common if producers duplicated ideas which are used in other channels, and, therefore, this would will trigger producing low-quality programs. I, however, do believe that having a lot of TV channels is beneficial. Havinge numerous channels could lead to professional channels. Simply put, each channel produces programs in a particular field. For instance, these days there are quite a few channels which just broadcast either news or movies. This trend could lead to high quality production in that they focus on a particular subject and recruit individuals who are expert in that subject. In addition, I would argue that having numerous channels could launch cut-throat competition among producers which in turn could enhance the quality of programs in order to attract more viewers/audience. Thus, individuals benefit from this competition. In conclusion, I do believe that having a lot of TV channels could raise the quality.

Unemployment and Benefits, Sarvenaz Mirsaghi

2017-09-09T06:00:00+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Is giving unemployed benefits a waste of money?! One of the most important factors that directly affect effects the economy of a country is its employment ratiorate. In the past few years that the world is has been facing a harsh economic recession, unemployment has become a controversial subject among the countries. Even some industrial countries ones like Germany are struggling with this issue. The higher the unemployment percentage goes, the more adversely it affects it has on the economy and industry of the respective situations of a country. Yet governments are responsible for both making job opportunities and also unemployment of the people. If they cannot provide their people with proper and enough job fields, they should allocate a portion of the country's ies budget to jobless people. Some of these unemployed individuals ments have families or might be under debts whom, due to the country's low economic quality and companies' y's downsizings, were dismissed. Friday m work. They are not able to find other jobs, still they are in charge of their family's health, education, garment and nutrition which if not prepared, can have widespread effects on the family institution and it's its demise/collapse/ruination. This is the point that/where governments should undergo the responsibility and act in an influential manner. On the other hand, many of those unemployeds are young adults who recently got graduated from universities and seeking for a job, but find if difficult to find a position with a proper amount of salary. They turn out to be hopeless and aimless adolescents which who might suffer from psychological problems due to this issue. Unfortunately we see that the number of unemployed young people is exceeding of that of employed ones in countries like Iran. Indicating the aforementioned side effects that unemployment has in people of a country, I opine that the a government is responsible for the people's lives in terms of profession, and if they are not able to act upon their needs and requirements , they should look for alternatives in order to guarantee the people's lives. Not only is providing them with facilities by governments is not a waste of money, but it is for the sake of avoiding all those problems that might occur in a society.

World's Poverty, Amin

2017-09-09T05:59:39+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Every country has poor people and every country has different ways of dealing with the poor. What are some of the reasons for world poverty? What can we do to help the poor? Amin Wouldn't it be eye-opening news, if you heard about four 4 out of ten people are engaged in poverty? World poverty is one the most severe problems lack of attention to which it has converted it to even the worst challenge throughout the world. This essay focuses on a number of factors contributing to the issue and then offers feasible resolutions to address it. World poverty stems from quite different yet widespread causes, thereby having diverse reasons. Hence, not only unindustrialized but also even fully developed countries are tackling the problem. Geographically located at a region where they do not possess fertile natural resources, undeveloped countries, particularly in Africa, are experiencing casualties resulting from starvation per annum. Exploiting resources of undeveloped countries and at the same breath depriving the nations of their own supplies, industrial countries are also playing their role in world poverty. In addition, the main culprit of world poverty, in whether developing or none-developing countries, seems to be traced in education. If everyone does have an equal opportunity to be educated, the world will witness a humane life with much less without poverty. For industrial countries the nature of poverty 's nature is completely different. Such countries are likely to suffer from capitalism according to which monetary monitory supports are not fairly distributed among the nations. Plus, lazy people in the countries are not interested in possessing a job and leading a successful life-style, despite substantial state supports. A variety of solutions have been devised to remove/eliminate poverty in the world. For famine-stricken countries deprived of natural resources, the UN should implement its financial aid with the help of wealthier countries. Secondly, underdeveloped countries' nations will not benefit from the resources of their own countries, unless the UN prevents the industrial countries from taking advantage of the poor countries' supplies. Besides, providing free yet premium quality education for all children and at the same time supervising their parents to stop misusing their children, the governments in developing countries should look forward to fell poverty in the next generations. For fully-developed countries resolutions include following up on policies based on which capitals are evenly distributed evenly among the public. The governments are also advised not to offer the needy any regular cash payment. Instead, they had better/should provide the poor with hot food and quarters to make sure they will make their best effort to raise their living standards. (food stamps) In conclusion, the seeds of poverty may vary in every spot of the world. Adequate knowledge is required to identify the main causes in each country to devise a powerful strategy to cut poverty off the humane life.

Youths and Olds, Shirin

2017-09-09T05:59:26+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Do you agree or disagree? There is nothing that young people can teach older people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your position. We always hear this statement " the elderly are more seasoned than the young" I have a leg up on in this situation" from our grandmothers, the question raised here is " does it really make any sensemean?". Maybe in old times, it had some significance,meant a bit, because most tasks you did 've done needed previous experience. I don't want/intend to deny the importance of experience, but In from my point of view, when you get older, and gain experience in each state of your life, you become cautious, because you can anticipate lot of problems, and this way of thinking balks you from doing to do whatever you want. On the other hand, young people have more encourage to think out of the box. Lack of experience in some situations gives the confidence to them for risking. And as all of us know, creativity nowadays talks. For example, we hear in news, the new minister who is chosen by president is too young for his position. Although everybody knows these types of jobs need a lot of practice, but why are they chosen? As long as the minister is old with bunch ofsome experience, he keeps the existing condition stable. Because he can't manage to take new risks, but a young minister has this courage to shake everything to get a better result. Also, it happens a lot/frequently in big companies. An old boss always works on in the same a firm, buying. Buy everything from the same suppliers and selling their products to the same companiesy. And upon the entrance of a young boss, all the algorithms change. In point of fact, our world is going to have more technological advances and moving at your own pace, without paying attention to these changes, is impossible. Having better skills to learn how they should they live in this modern world, youths can teach their older counterparts older one to use it for their daily tasks such as buying something, paying bills, and other transactions.so on. In conclusion, youths have a lot to teach, and a lot to learn.