جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Writing Task 2 Topic: Every year several languages die out. Some people that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer language in the world. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion? There is this view supporting the notion that the extermination of some languages happening every year has positive effects on people due to the fact that it makes life easier for human all over the world. However, the opponents of this view insist on the importance of the various existence languages in the world. I believe that both of these viewpoints are equally important. Existence of different languages is appealing to many people for some effective reasons. Firstly, different languages show various cultures which reflect historical and cultural heritages that can help people from losing their identity all over the world. Furthermore, extermination of a language leads to lose of a civilization, its history, or even its achievements. Moreover, learning another language makes the opportunity for people to being more creative and innovative. On the other hand, some support the view that if several language fade away during every year can makes our lives more comfortable due to the fact that people can communicate with one another easier, and it does not need to learn different languages for communication or catch a good job. For example, if people in all over the world speak with just one language, they can communicate together more easily. In addition, people can be informed about the news or read some novels of international famous authors in their mother language. This can lead people to think in the same way and may result in more peace for the world as the whole. In conclusion, although some support the view that extermination of several language annually will make our lives easier, others persist its dire consequences on our cultures and backgrounds. I, personally, think that all these points should be considered all together.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills. Do you agree or disagree For many years education has been all about teaching a lot of core subjects to students. It seems in our time we need to start thinking about new methods and go toward more practical ways to educate students. There are several reasons why students would not need to be taught for core skills. Pedagogical pioneers used to believe that subjects such as math, science, and language should be an integral part of any educational system. While this notion might be valid for a time, in our age, they are not clearly considered as a necessity. Thanks to advancement in technology especially in computer and software, those skills should not be normally acquired and memorized. Having all this knowledge available at our laptops and smartphones, we can make use of them endlessly. I believe there are many other practical things to learn which is are more beneficial for students. Whereas we do not need individuals who were brought up with rote-learning methods, the demand for creative and innovative graduates are is rising. In addition, It is not just that creativity and innovation that companies are looking for. They are constantly trying to recruit graduatesd who are able to come up with new ideas for enhancing their profitability. So demand for school and university students whose curriculum is based on practical knowledge is rising all the time. In conclusion, my view is that we need more and more people with practical skills and schools and university administrations should anticipate society requirement all the time and adapt their syllabus with to those needs.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. It is considered by some that parents should teach children to be a good member of society while others hold the opinion that these values should be taught by teachers. I think both have approximately equally significant roles but if I should choose one, I would agree with the idea of parents as effective role-models for their offsprings. On one hand as psychologists claim, each individual's first years of life are the most important period. It is the time that children start imitating their parents and this is why the way of role-models' impression are is considerable. Most children obey their parents because they are supported from the early years of their lives and receive the attention and care they (are?) really needed. Thus, parents have sufficient time before beginning the school period to be with their child and make fundamental impression on them. On the other hand, we have always heard such expression that "school is our second home"., this sentence shows the substantial role of school for each student. Children start obeying their teachers and making friends and also learn how to communicate at school; moreover, they learn a lot from academic courses that might change their future professional life as a member of society. Hence, we cannot ignore the importance of school impact on people of each society. In the end, I would like to conclude that although both parents and school with the whole environment and stuff staff are significant in children's social life, but parents are much extremely impact influential leaders from very early days of everyone's life; so, they should care and be responsible in teaching their child how to be a good member of society.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people feel that robots are very important to humans' future development, while others think they are dangerous and have negative effects on the society. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Human history is full of stories of inventions and progress. From the first time when our ancestors made the first tool by crashing two pieces of stones to nowadays that scientists and engineers are working on humanlike machines, there are some people who have looked at these phenomena with fear and doubt. However, it seems that numbers of people who risk and embrace these new tools are more and from their viewpoints, robots are kinds of tools. The First group of people argue that robots can completely take our position in the future, and we would be their slaves very soon. These people usually refer to the artificial intelligence that nowadays some companies try to put it in their products as a decision-making unit in their products' processors, and it would be frightening when these pieces of equipment could behave based on their choices. Moreover, it seems that by using robots in businesses many people will become unemployed and it could make cause many challenging issues for society and its governors. On the other hand, it appears that many people welcome robotic technologies with open arms. These people maintain that robots can compensate the lack of workforce in the future because the pace of humans' progress have has accelerated and we will need more hands in this way. In addition, robots can be employed in some conditions that humankind is not able to go to or work in. For instance, these days we send advanced robots to other planets where our physical limitations do not let us to go. Furthermore, robots make our life more comfortable than the past and we can assign our tediously repetitive duties to them and focus on creative activities mainly. In conclusion, although there is concern about the robotic progress, it would seem that these kinds of worries come from the lack of knowledge about this technology while sometimes it is exacerbated by media, and like other innovations that have been created in the past and now have been accepted by all people, these machines will be our companions in the future.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Nowadays people use social media to keep in touch with others and be aware of news. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? We are living in a world, where wired technology has almost become as obsoleted as dinosaurs. These days we can easily connect to our loved ones or watch their latest activity by with only touch of a button. The latest news is spreading in social media even before the announcement of professional news agencies with detailed pictures and movies. The advantages and disadvantages of this new media has become a controversial topic amongst critics, and while many strongly defend the positive points, some argue that the drawbacks far outweigh the benefits. This essay elaborate both stances, and at the end I will write about my own viewpoint. Whether we like virtual world or not, we must accept that the cyberspace provided us so many benefits we hardly could imagine 20 years ago. Free instance messaging or long-distance call was simply an imagination in science fiction book, but now thanks to the Internet and social media people around the globe enjoy this of communication with their friends or relatives. Not so many years ago news was strictly under strict governmental surveillance, but now fortunately though governments hardly can manage the news like what they did before. Cyberbullying is one of the disadvantages of social media. Teenagers in most cases are the main target of this kind of crime, and predators can easily abuse their victims using public social media such as Facebook or Myspace. Spread of fake news, however, is another negative point of using social media. While a rumor or a fake piece of news can easily spread all round the world in less than an hour, the official news agencies are unable to announce the correct one owing to internal bureaucracy and traditional method they are still using. By way of conclusion, I think the advent of the Internet and social media is one of the most useful inventions of human in 21 century, and just like every other phenomenon it serves a double-edged sword. I mean if we do not use it in a properly it can have huge negative impacts on our lives.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Nowadays people use social media to keep in touch with others and be aware of news. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? We are living in a world, where wired technology has almost become as obsolete as dinosaurs. These days, we can easily connect to our loved ones or watch their latest activity with only touch of a button. The latest news is spreading around the globe before the announcement of professional news agencies with detailed pictures and related movies. The advantages and disadvantages of this new media has have become a controversial topic amongst critics, and while many strongly defend the positive points, some argue that the downsides far outweigh the benefits. This essay elaborates both stances, and at the end I will write about my own viewpoint. Whether we like the virtual world or not, we must accept that the cyberspace has provided us with so many benefits, we hardly even imagined as recently as 20 years ago. Free instantce messaging and longdistance calls are simply two advancements we hardly could even imagine before, but now thanks to the Internet and social media people around the globe enjoy this way of communication with their friends or relatives everywhere. Not so many years ago news was under a strict governmental surveillance, but now fortunately governments hardly can manage the news like what they did before. However, Cyberbullying is one of the disadvantages of social media. Teenagers in most cases are the main target of this kind of crime, and predators easily abuse their victims using public social media such as Facebook or Myspace. Spread of fake news, however, is another negative point/drawback/setback of using social media. While a rumor or a fake piece of news can easily spread all round the world in less than an hour. The official news agencies are unable to announce the correct one owing to internal bureaucracy and traditional methods they are still using. By way of conclusion, I think the advent of the Internet and social media are is onetwo of the most useful inventions of humans in the 21st century, and just like every other phenomenon it theyserves as a double-edged sword. I mean if we do not use it them properly it they can have hugely negative impacts on our lives.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

The rising levels of congestion and air pollution found in most of the world's cities can be attributed directly to the rapidly increasing number of private cars in use. In order to reverse this decline in the quality of life in cities, attempts must be made to encourage people to use their cars less and public transport more. Discuss possible ways to encourage the use of public transport. Traffic has been recognized as the chronic headache that metropolitans have been facing during the last half century across the world. Concerned with its' its severe adverse consequences such as air pollution, authorities have taken several measures to slow down or stop the trend by encouraging public transport. In this essay, we I will discuss a few of those initiatives. Financial motivations can always stimulates people not to use their own car/discourage people from using private transport. Everyday every day, people living in large cities have to budget quite a considerable amount for their daily transportation costs, so it would be highly appealing if they could reduce it to much lower amounts. The less they can spend on transportation, the more they can allocate to their other expenditures. Therefore, most of the time cheaper public transportation can convince people to use buses or the subway instead of their own private cars. At the same time, officials should pay enough attention to the quality and accessibility of the public transportation. These two criteria also play a significant roles in individuals' preferences to for public transport. Some may choose to drive their own cars because of its their comfort even at the expense of higher fuel costs, hence the necessity of considering all three factors of price, comfort and frequency together at the same time. Moreover, I think, governments can even go further and devise some rewarding plans to motivate people not to use their private cars. For example, I may recommend to introducinge some bonuses of free tickets or subscription for those who have consumed a determined defined minimum of fuel volume every month; these people would be entitled to buy tickets of buses, trains or metros half price or subscribe to ride public transports modes free of charge for 3 months in a year. In addition, what constantly matters for to citizens in their daily commuting is speed. They always prefer to travel with faster vehicles to save their time, so it must be duly regarded by officials when they invest in new railways or infrastructures. All in all, I believe that we should not allow technological advancements such as car mass production to ruin our environment and should utilize all the sources and take all the appropriate measures to control the circumstances in the best way.