جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Traffic jams and inexorable pollutions caused by cars’ fumes are have been two big main issues for modern megacities in recent years. Some argue that, omitting the subsidy on fuels like petrol by the government, is the best way to solve the problem for of traffic and pollution. I agree with this as an encouraging measure to increase the price for petrol in order to decline decrease the pollution and traffic problems provided that, other aspects of such a decision would be taken seriously too. First, the problem for of heavy traffic is mostly because of using private cars for short ways which is an environmentally-destructive behavior that results in omnipresent pollution and traffic. Although elevating driving up the cost for petrol would discourage people from overusing their own cars, the government should devise a method in which the quality of the public transportation system increases in a way that it becomes a viable alternative for daily travels. For example, the government could dedicate some of the profit/revenue of increasing fuels’ price to buy new and convenient trains for urban travels. Also, the problem of pollution has many reasons these days one of which is using fossil fuels that release a large amount of co2 and other damaging substances that makes the globe warmer and more polluted. for this issue increasing the petrol price may have a role to in keeping the urban air pollution reduced, but we should consider that the best way for overcoming this would be finding a good replacement for fossil fuels, like renewable energy. This issue will be accomplished if all nations take it seriously and collaborate with each other worldwide. In conclusion, although I believe increasing the petrol prices is an undeniably a wise measure, the government should consider toenhance enhancing the public vehicles in order to make it possible for citizens to easily access them all around the city. it is important to think more deeply about pollution problem worldwide. Keep, consider, mind, enjoy,

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe that to become successful in sports one should have a natural talent. Others think that perseverance and practice are a crucial part to success. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Success in sport fields has once again come under the spotlight, and while an overwhelming majority of people subscribe to the view that champions are born with specific abilities, others, however, claim that willpower along with a regular program can certainly pave the way to for crests of success. When it comes to this notion, I hold the idea that both genius and following a professionally regular program are two pillars of success. Recent research on the human brain reveals that the structure of every person has its very own neural circuits, hence its distinctive ability. This in fact explains why every person has his unique characteristics and abilities. Iranian national goal keeper, Ali Reza Beiranvandnaser Hejazi, is an obvious example of a person with a wealth of talent for sports, but lack of learning abilities in scientific subjects by his repeated failures in his courses during his school years. I believe in this day and age to shine at sports fields only God-givengod gifted talent is not enough, there are other factors at play. On the other hand, in many parts of the world professional research centers, shoulder to shoulder to sports organization, are working day and night to find more productive plans for their sportspeople. Gone are the days when a talented sportsperson could break the records. Nowadays, hardly a talented sportsperson can win a championship without developing his raw talent. Professional sports centers are today providing specialized training for ordinary but interested people to prepare them to compete with undeveloped but talented sportspeople. To cut a long a story short, I maintain that these days talented sportspeople can easily lose their chance for success in sports fields unless they follow a professional training program, and at the same time ordinary people can become a champion under certain trainings and following tough/vigorous exercises.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Banafsheh Some people say that all levels of education of education from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Many people believe that through education of a person from schools to universities, mostly there is a considerable time spent on learning facts instead of practical skill. To some extent I agree with this statement. I will discuss more about it further in this essay and support my point of view. First of all, it is obvious that our education system should be revised in terms of its application and productivity. It is admissible acceptable that we should learn theoretical knowledge, but if it is not put into practice, whatever we acquire will be useless. For instance, a graduate of mechanical engineering cannot may not even be able to even repair a pipe. Likewise, with other majors’ graduates cannot do too. In that, I totally agree that there is too much emphasis on teaching facts and it dose does not have sufficient practice on their technical aspects of learning. Nevertheless, it is essential to learn some facts. In many cases you cannot find a proper job due to the lack of academic knowledge and theoretical information. To give an idea, especially in our country in most conditions whenever you apply for a job, they want youdemand a university degree plus some years of experience but if you have just practical skills, they would not employ you. In conclusion, I agree with the argument that in order to avoid prevent students from spending their precious time on exceeding number of ineffective subjects, they should have a proper ambiance and training on experimental subjects because it isthey are more useful.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Throughout history, rarely can you find a society without not pursuing individuals who act as productive members. Having said that, whether children should learn this ability to be a valuable member of their community from their parents or their school is invariably a controversial issue. To begin with, affected their manner of life from parents, children spend a considerable proportion of life with themspending a lot of time with their parents, children are affected by their parents’ manners, by which I mean if parents teach their kids how to contribute to society effectively, children they would be aware of the role they must playing in their community. For example, how they are expected to behave which lest they violation violateof other people’s rights, or also to obey the rules. Nevertheless, if there is a contrast between whatever parental advice and what they do, it would give rise to the inverse/unitended consequences. On the other hand, this cannot be only the responsibility of the parents and the role played by school cannot be denied. Once children go to school, they experience a wider community where teachers and their peers have equally considerable influence as much as they have in the home. Moreover, carrying out some teamwork projects can permeate induce a positive image in their minds about how effective they can be just in a group of class so that they will be more of an effective person in society as a whole. To conclude, I personally opine that both parents and school can act simultaneously as the crucial elements which they can help children to be a productive members of their society.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think that government in is wasting money on the art and that money could be better spend spent elsewhere. To what extend extent do you agree with this view? There are numerous opponents on the governmental budget for art, disagreeing with spending national funds and financial resources on that field and related activities. They found it unnecessary and argue that this huge amount of money can be invested on in other important majors like health areas or welfare issues. While in some developing countries which where the fundamental structureinfrastructures are under inadequate content it would be logical and knowledgeable understandable that a significant amount of saved wealth be allocated for the most initial basic needs like food supplies or potable water, it could be generally different in developed countries. As public population pass throughgo beyond their first needs, it would be predictable that their stage status will be level elevatedup and changed spectacularly, so that the new sight point of view will be born. Certainly the first aspect of these new attitudes’ generation will be called as art. It it would be difficult to describe a complete and clear definition of this word, though anyone has experienced it several times on in his lifelonglifetime. Meanwhile some people believe that the art field is luxury and unnecessary there is are many pieces of historical evidences which proof prove that art are is able to impress on human beings’ emotions or can reflect our feeling not only in romance and love but also in violence and war. The art can be distributed all around the world in a new common language in a peaceful way. During the world wars in the midst of death and destruction the art shows people’s disagreement to with their governments. It is a universal weapon and the basin source of hope and appointment. So it could be hard to eliminate art and who would be able to imagine the world without art?. In conclusion as men mankind needs accommodation medical care and so onother needs for their body they need proper attention on to their mind and sense of humor. The Whole of this object subject could be acceptable if anyone went onstruck a balance and in their associated proper time and place.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

agree or disagree TVs, newspapers, magazines, and other media pay too much attention to the personal lives of famous people such as public figures and celebrities. Surrounded by countless types of media, people are spending a considerable piece of their sweet life to absorbabsorbing the information and programs coming from these media which are seemingly dedicated more to narrate some personal lives of some particular individuals. With by watching the mainstream audiences of all sorts of media around me struggling with these stories, doubtlessly, I go for the idea stated above. Logically, there is a structural condition of our new capitalist world patronizing the idea. Although we have gained a lot through this attitude, the economy is writing our otherwise free life with its decisive power. Just consider the numerous magazines, mounted in front of stores;, rarely can you find a copypiece of a magazine which is not adorned with some hot figures of the society in on its front page. Stopping by a kiosk, looking into what the costumers carry on their hand, easily you become able to assess the sales volume of different types of magazines. This is not an enigma to be solved; supply and demand. They can be of any kind or any socio-economic status. They just bloom in favor of benefit. Unfortunately, this is the role that the majority of people are playing unknowingly, in the whole economic cycle of this simple fact, to fill the pockets of those who are riding this market. The last one led to us understanding another sad psychological fact in current characteristics of humanity; laziness and running from the comprehension of mankind which renders us attracted to some superficial quotes as similar as to gossips; the boring fifth husband of her, the story of their unbelievably divorce, the broken artificial nails of her on the scene because of a mysterious accident. Experimentally, we can simply discern the world drowning by the massive presence of celebrities all over it. Only when you watch the world fairly, will you understand that the media is broadening its definition even to the walls of our town. Not only will you be imbibed with some daily broadcasted story of those recognized people by TVs or newspapers, but also you will not be abounded in a single moment of your loneliness in your own town. They will accompany your lifeyou into your bed, either a hot lovely girl advertising a meaningless unnecessary tool which have has changed her life as her white teeth spreading all over the frame telling us or an ostensibly ecstatic sophisticated man have has his hair carefully cut and oiled dreaming of a zesty future for our poor children and demanding our humorously precious vote. In a nutshell, obviously, all sorts of media are over-focusing the story of some specific faces, following our new attitudes toward the world like that of the economic profit, and killing our precious time which could otherwise be spent on some more wisely elected material.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

When designing a building, the most important factor is the intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree? With advances in construction technology, nowadays architects and urban developers have another factor on their drawing board to take into consideration as well as the purpose of the building: the building appearance. I do accept the intention of creating a construction is important, but cannot trivialize its outward view and believe this too is of great importance. The function of a building is undoubtedly the first objective to attain for a designer. To construct a magnificent work of public art without considering how it should serve the public will be unwise. A hospital which has is not designed to be a hospital or a stadium which is not suitable to accommodate people and equipment will be an act of stupidity, receiving bitter criticism from both officials and the public as they fail to function as perceived. However, as vitally significant as the intention seems, it does not overshadow the aesthetic point of view. In fact, considering the time we live in, now to put only basic functions into perspective will be ridiculously less than ambitious since other goals are technically viable. At a university, for instance, which is obviously a place to hold classes and educational programs, campuses, painted in creative ways, decorated with inspirational figures, and dressed with plants can be to motivate students and professors, serving their primary purpose. Moreover, in some cases the only aim to achieve is beautification. As a pieces of public art, some constructions such as towers, outstanding in a city inundated with numerous buildings in various sizes and figures, are mainly designed to represent the soul of an urban area. To conclude, albeit highly crucial, the intention of building a construction is, the aesthetic dimension should receive the attention it deserves as well, fusing both constructional and appealing elements.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefit the world as a whole. Discuss this view and give your own opinion. There is a general belief that being vegetarian is the best choice for human wellbeing in addition to the benefits that it has for the earth and all of its inhabitants. While I do not agree with this view, I think that this life style has some advantages. In this essay I am going to discuss the cons of this special diet and the most important reason which makes me not to recommend this diet. Nowadays we know that cows and ships sheep are the most substantial sources of methane, which is one of the influential gases effective inon global warming. Therefore, it would be very important to control and decrease the production of this gas by declining reduce/minimize/limit the use of meat. On the other hand, having a healthy life is dependent to on a healthy life style in which people should eat a lot of vegetables and fruits and beenbeans. In other words, with this kind of staple diet they would not be able to eat a lot of meat of or fish related todue to the limited capacity of the stomach. But being vegetarian or vegan is not a good choice for everyone. There are lots of vitamins and minerals in animals’ meat, like the group of B vitamins and ZinkZinc, which are crucial for anybody’s health. In addition, fishes are the best –and for some people the only- source of vitamin D3 and Omega3. It is very hard to take sufficient amounts of these micronutrients from other sources. In conclusion, even though it is very important to decrease the use of meat to save our planet, most of the people need to intake take in/consume some meat or fish weekly. HensHence, in my opinion, it is better to lower the intake of meat and fishes but not to cut them off from our diet.