Fridays GMAT-GRE-TOEFL-IELTS-آموزشگاه زبان صبای سحر-چمران جنوب، بلوار جلال آل احمد، جنب داروخانه شبانه روزی جلال آل احمد، پلاک 87، طبقه سوم تلفن: 42-88679341 https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/467-fridays-writing-workshop-1398/writing-workshop-friday-98-11-11 2024-05-02T07:27:09+00:00 IELTSTOEFLCENTER info@ieltstoeflcenter.com Joomla! - Open Source Content Management Alireza Davari, Globalization 2020-02-01T06:04:15+00:00 2020-02-01T06:04:15+00:00 https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/467-fridays-writing-workshop-1398/writing-workshop-friday-98-11-11/3380-alireza-davari-globalization Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1398/Writing Workshop Friday 98.11.11/Alireza Davari, Globalization.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Globalization has brought about more positive impacts than negative ones. To what extent do you agree with this statement? Globalization is the process in which simplifies business management is simplified in the world. This is due to the advancement in technology, transport, communication, education and regulations of trade that makes trade fair to all parties. However, globalization it has also increased the world's income disparity/gap and the detrimental economic consequences of environmental pollution. To begin with, worldwide integration has brought in diversification in the aspects mentioned. Initially, thanks to free transfer of capital, goods and services across national frontiers, as a result ofhas helped countries and people of the world interact and integrate. Therefore, technology advancement has paved the way for positive effects of globalization in developing countries as well as global transportation systems would allow business people to deliver their products to other parts of the world quickly and also it has enabled further studies so that the majority of people in developing countries are educated and skilled and finally, worldwide integration has made a breakthrough in communications which results in the interconnectedness of people and businesses across the world. By contrast, globalization does not economically benefit to members of the lower-class in developing countries so that the rate of economic growth in these countries has increased over the past few decades but due to global control of price fluctuation and producing production of low-cost products, the wages gap has increased between under-class and upper-class. Furthermore, increased consumption leads to raisinge the production of goods which in turn puts great pressure on the environment through increased transportation of raw materials and other manufactureds goods throughout the world. Ultimately, although globalization possesses both cons and pros, i I believe that benefits created by it far outweigh its disadvantages because its financial benefits can be used to solve problems caused by this global phenomenon.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1398/Writing Workshop Friday 98.11.11/Alireza Davari, Globalization.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Globalization has brought about more positive impacts than negative ones. To what extent do you agree with this statement? Globalization is the process in which simplifies business management is simplified in the world. This is due to the advancement in technology, transport, communication, education and regulations of trade that makes trade fair to all parties. However, globalization it has also increased the world's income disparity/gap and the detrimental economic consequences of environmental pollution. To begin with, worldwide integration has brought in diversification in the aspects mentioned. Initially, thanks to free transfer of capital, goods and services across national frontiers, as a result ofhas helped countries and people of the world interact and integrate. Therefore, technology advancement has paved the way for positive effects of globalization in developing countries as well as global transportation systems would allow business people to deliver their products to other parts of the world quickly and also it has enabled further studies so that the majority of people in developing countries are educated and skilled and finally, worldwide integration has made a breakthrough in communications which results in the interconnectedness of people and businesses across the world. By contrast, globalization does not economically benefit to members of the lower-class in developing countries so that the rate of economic growth in these countries has increased over the past few decades but due to global control of price fluctuation and producing production of low-cost products, the wages gap has increased between under-class and upper-class. Furthermore, increased consumption leads to raisinge the production of goods which in turn puts great pressure on the environment through increased transportation of raw materials and other manufactureds goods throughout the world. Ultimately, although globalization possesses both cons and pros, i I believe that benefits created by it far outweigh its disadvantages because its financial benefits can be used to solve problems caused by this global phenomenon.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Ali Khaleghifard, Theoretical vs Practical Courses 2020-02-01T06:00:10+00:00 2020-02-01T06:00:10+00:00 https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/467-fridays-writing-workshop-1398/writing-workshop-friday-98-11-11/3379-ali-khaleghifard-theoretical-vs-practical-courses Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1398/Writing Workshop Friday 98.11.11/Ali Khaleghifard, Theoretical vs Practical Courses.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills. Do you agree or disagree? Nowadays, the educational system focuses more on theories rather than practical courses. In my opinion, this concentration is too much and there should be more reasonably sensible harmony between both sides. Learning just facts in schools can be cited as the main culprits of the reason why the graduates are not prepared enough to enter the career market. They were had too much exposure to abstract knowledge, whilst finding a job needs experience in functional criteria. Therefore, they probably do not have to not use their knowledge and just start, from scratch, a job and gain related experience to be successful in it. Moreover, studying and not having actual practice on what you have learnt may lead to students being lazy. They may waste their time memorizing some information which rarely may they use in the future. Additionally, I believe that practical skills are sacrificed in the education system, although our world is based on realistic actual facts. If students have more courses which are more associated with real work environment and requirements, they will find their first jobs effortlessly by putting that experience in their résumé which is considered an impressive edge on in it. Furthermore, countries need more expert workers than researchers, and today’s curriculums just educates some potential researchers, not employees. Thus, leaning both sides, theoretical and practical, is more beneficial than only emphasizing on one side and forgetting/ignoring the other. Consequently, my strong conviction is that students’ programs should be filled more with practical courses, thereby establishing a seemingly rational balance between both course types.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1398/Writing Workshop Friday 98.11.11/Ali Khaleghifard, Theoretical vs Practical Courses.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills. Do you agree or disagree? Nowadays, the educational system focuses more on theories rather than practical courses. In my opinion, this concentration is too much and there should be more reasonably sensible harmony between both sides. Learning just facts in schools can be cited as the main culprits of the reason why the graduates are not prepared enough to enter the career market. They were had too much exposure to abstract knowledge, whilst finding a job needs experience in functional criteria. Therefore, they probably do not have to not use their knowledge and just start, from scratch, a job and gain related experience to be successful in it. Moreover, studying and not having actual practice on what you have learnt may lead to students being lazy. They may waste their time memorizing some information which rarely may they use in the future. Additionally, I believe that practical skills are sacrificed in the education system, although our world is based on realistic actual facts. If students have more courses which are more associated with real work environment and requirements, they will find their first jobs effortlessly by putting that experience in their résumé which is considered an impressive edge on in it. Furthermore, countries need more expert workers than researchers, and today’s curriculums just educates some potential researchers, not employees. Thus, leaning both sides, theoretical and practical, is more beneficial than only emphasizing on one side and forgetting/ignoring the other. Consequently, my strong conviction is that students’ programs should be filled more with practical courses, thereby establishing a seemingly rational balance between both course types.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Amir G, Community 2020-02-01T05:59:49+00:00 2020-02-01T05:59:49+00:00 https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/467-fridays-writing-workshop-1398/writing-workshop-friday-98-11-11/3378-amir-g-community Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1398/Writing Workshop Friday 98.11.11/Amir G, Community.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Economic progress is often used to measure a country’s success. However, some people believe that other factors are more important. What other factors should also be considered when measuring a country’s success? Do you think one factor is more important than others? While success in economy has always been considered one of the highly significant factors at play in a successful community by an overwhelming majority of members of society, many vote the view that though a prosperous economy can lead to a higher standard of living for almost everyone, there are other key factors, such as equality, freedom of speech and free education and healthcare which should not be overlooked. This short essay elaborates important factors of a successful society. Since a community consists of individuals with a wide range of interests, it goes without saying that not everyone is satisfied with living in a prosperous country lacking of democracy for example. Many people strongly hold the idea that their happiness does not necessarily consist in financial success. Living in a wealthy country where people suffer from different kinds of discriminations, lack of free education and right of speech certainly can dissatisfy the populace. On the other hand, the advocates of financial success reason that the economy is the main pillar of a modern society where other building blocks will be built on this crucially important block. They argue that not only is a strong economy to the benefit of those who are involved directly in economic activities, but it also can pave the way for those who are dealing with other important fields such as academics or journalists. To cut a long story short, I must confess that arguably the economy plays a vital role in success of a country, but this does not mean that we can achieve it at the price of sacrificing other important factors. It is high time people made struck a strike balance between materialistic ideology and other humanitarian values such as freedom and an egalitarian society. I believe gone are the days when people thought that everything is achievable for the wealthy.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1398/Writing Workshop Friday 98.11.11/Amir G, Community.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Economic progress is often used to measure a country’s success. However, some people believe that other factors are more important. What other factors should also be considered when measuring a country’s success? Do you think one factor is more important than others? While success in economy has always been considered one of the highly significant factors at play in a successful community by an overwhelming majority of members of society, many vote the view that though a prosperous economy can lead to a higher standard of living for almost everyone, there are other key factors, such as equality, freedom of speech and free education and healthcare which should not be overlooked. This short essay elaborates important factors of a successful society. Since a community consists of individuals with a wide range of interests, it goes without saying that not everyone is satisfied with living in a prosperous country lacking of democracy for example. Many people strongly hold the idea that their happiness does not necessarily consist in financial success. Living in a wealthy country where people suffer from different kinds of discriminations, lack of free education and right of speech certainly can dissatisfy the populace. On the other hand, the advocates of financial success reason that the economy is the main pillar of a modern society where other building blocks will be built on this crucially important block. They argue that not only is a strong economy to the benefit of those who are involved directly in economic activities, but it also can pave the way for those who are dealing with other important fields such as academics or journalists. To cut a long story short, I must confess that arguably the economy plays a vital role in success of a country, but this does not mean that we can achieve it at the price of sacrificing other important factors. It is high time people made struck a strike balance between materialistic ideology and other humanitarian values such as freedom and an egalitarian society. I believe gone are the days when people thought that everything is achievable for the wealthy.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Bayan, Self-employed 2020-02-01T05:58:28+00:00 2020-02-01T05:58:28+00:00 https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/467-fridays-writing-workshop-1398/writing-workshop-friday-98-11-11/3377-bayan-self-employed Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1398/Writing Workshop Friday 98.11.11/Bayan, Self-employed.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Nowadays many people choose to be self-employed, rather than to work for a company or organization. Why might this be the case? What could be the disadvantages of being self- employed? The reasons why individuals might choose to become self-employed are since because of some underlying motivations. They might include, for example, the need for independence, for status or pecuniary advantages. However, self-employment may come across as a double-edged sword that might have disadvantages too. Human motivations for opting to start their own job are differing from each other. Indeed, selfemployment can be classified into two types; those who have entered voluntarily for reasons such as flexible work hours, independence, job satisfaction and or anticipated higher incomes. , and those that have been pushed into self-employed employment because of the absence of any other attractive alternative or external forces, such as layoff and a subsequent lack of available paid employment work. To rep However although most of the people tend to start their businesses, it is essential that they considered its drawbacks. Firstly, establishing own business involves some inevitable ventures and responsibilities, perhaps the riskiest aspect of self-employed is the lack of financial security when persons have a conventional job they are assured about the amount of money earning month by month whilst in self-employed, the income stream may fluctuate through the year. Besides, they loss lose all the employees’ paid financial benefits such as medical and retirement insurance. Secondly, going into a new business might change their lifestyle and relationships because in starting a new business they have to dedicate more hours and working hard so there is no spare time to spend with families and friends which it leads to isolation. To recapitulate, although everybody is tempteds to has have their own job to follow their dreams or enjoy more freedom and independence in their career they should consider its disadvantages and do not make a wrong decision because it leads to dramatic difficulties that may change their life.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1398/Writing Workshop Friday 98.11.11/Bayan, Self-employed.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Nowadays many people choose to be self-employed, rather than to work for a company or organization. Why might this be the case? What could be the disadvantages of being self- employed? The reasons why individuals might choose to become self-employed are since because of some underlying motivations. They might include, for example, the need for independence, for status or pecuniary advantages. However, self-employment may come across as a double-edged sword that might have disadvantages too. Human motivations for opting to start their own job are differing from each other. Indeed, selfemployment can be classified into two types; those who have entered voluntarily for reasons such as flexible work hours, independence, job satisfaction and or anticipated higher incomes. , and those that have been pushed into self-employed employment because of the absence of any other attractive alternative or external forces, such as layoff and a subsequent lack of available paid employment work. To rep However although most of the people tend to start their businesses, it is essential that they considered its drawbacks. Firstly, establishing own business involves some inevitable ventures and responsibilities, perhaps the riskiest aspect of self-employed is the lack of financial security when persons have a conventional job they are assured about the amount of money earning month by month whilst in self-employed, the income stream may fluctuate through the year. Besides, they loss lose all the employees’ paid financial benefits such as medical and retirement insurance. Secondly, going into a new business might change their lifestyle and relationships because in starting a new business they have to dedicate more hours and working hard so there is no spare time to spend with families and friends which it leads to isolation. To recapitulate, although everybody is tempteds to has have their own job to follow their dreams or enjoy more freedom and independence in their career they should consider its disadvantages and do not make a wrong decision because it leads to dramatic difficulties that may change their life.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Bina, Smart Cars 2020-02-01T05:58:10+00:00 2020-02-01T05:58:10+00:00 https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/467-fridays-writing-workshop-1398/writing-workshop-friday-98-11-11/3376-bina-smart-cars Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1398/Writing Workshop Friday 98.11.11/Bina, Smart Cars.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">What do you think about using smart cars instead of actual cars? Generally speaking, research has shown that car accidents take thousands of people’s lives annually, and leave others with long-term injuries. These figures vary from a country to another, and depends on many factors one of which is human errors while driving. Some believe that innovating smart cars by utilizing artificial intelligence would decrease vehicle crashes in a near future. Now let’s talk about the advantages of smart cars usage. Our first problem with nowadays actual drivers is the human error which stems from human’s recklessness. Chances are that smart cars would diminish car accidents due to the high accuracy they have not only in analyzing the speed and distances but in estimating obstacles on the road as opposed to humans, not to mention smart cars ability to sink sync their speed to other cars to prevent possible crashes. For instance, a car sudden break would not be a trouble anymore when cars are synced to each other. Secondly, although nowadays drivers use some applications to avoid crowded routes, this would be quite disturbing for them to concentrate on driving and the application routes suggestions simultaneously. It can cause traffic jams or even car accidents. Having said that for smart cars it is totally a different story and they are meant to manage multiple tasks at the same time without any hardships, thus they can anticipate ahead traffic jams and pick the best way. That is why by using smart cars we can reduce expected car accidents. Last but not least, the modern world has made people busy enough to not to have a lot of leisure time and driving is time consuming on its own. I opine that replacing normal cars with smart ones provide people with the opportunity to free up more time. In other words, smart cars would take some responsibilities off people’s shoulders and assist them to in spending their time on more advantageous actions. To cut a long story short, the aforementioned points and examples have shown that spreading the usage of smart cars would be a pleasant/auspicious stepinnovation and can make a difference.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1398/Writing Workshop Friday 98.11.11/Bina, Smart Cars.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">What do you think about using smart cars instead of actual cars? Generally speaking, research has shown that car accidents take thousands of people’s lives annually, and leave others with long-term injuries. These figures vary from a country to another, and depends on many factors one of which is human errors while driving. Some believe that innovating smart cars by utilizing artificial intelligence would decrease vehicle crashes in a near future. Now let’s talk about the advantages of smart cars usage. Our first problem with nowadays actual drivers is the human error which stems from human’s recklessness. Chances are that smart cars would diminish car accidents due to the high accuracy they have not only in analyzing the speed and distances but in estimating obstacles on the road as opposed to humans, not to mention smart cars ability to sink sync their speed to other cars to prevent possible crashes. For instance, a car sudden break would not be a trouble anymore when cars are synced to each other. Secondly, although nowadays drivers use some applications to avoid crowded routes, this would be quite disturbing for them to concentrate on driving and the application routes suggestions simultaneously. It can cause traffic jams or even car accidents. Having said that for smart cars it is totally a different story and they are meant to manage multiple tasks at the same time without any hardships, thus they can anticipate ahead traffic jams and pick the best way. That is why by using smart cars we can reduce expected car accidents. Last but not least, the modern world has made people busy enough to not to have a lot of leisure time and driving is time consuming on its own. I opine that replacing normal cars with smart ones provide people with the opportunity to free up more time. In other words, smart cars would take some responsibilities off people’s shoulders and assist them to in spending their time on more advantageous actions. To cut a long story short, the aforementioned points and examples have shown that spreading the usage of smart cars would be a pleasant/auspicious stepinnovation and can make a difference.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Clean Environment 2020-02-01T05:57:57+00:00 2020-02-01T05:57:57+00:00 https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/467-fridays-writing-workshop-1398/writing-workshop-friday-98-11-11/3375-clean-environment Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1398/Writing Workshop Friday 98.11.11/Clean Environment.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most important ways to improve the people’s health is to clean the environment. What has made the planet earth a better place to live is owes owed to the advancements in health related issues. As humans have a mutual relationship with their surrounding environment, their health status is intertwined with the cleanliness of the area they live in. While some believe that there are other main factors that should be considered to enhance people’s health, I think that having a clean environment is the best way because it can prevent diseases from spreading, is necessary for a healthy food chain and also has mental advantages. First of all, it is an indisputable fact that unhygienic conditions prepare a base for diseases to be spread. For example, the Black Death led to a huge catastrophe, killing many people who were living in insanitary conditions. But improvements in people’s living environment and the discovery of antibiotics decreased its contagiousness. Besides, one of the main challenges that many countries are still facing is how to get rid of their hospital waste which can be a serious threat for those whose house is located near the area and are more prone to be affected. The more people have access to live in a clean environment, the more their health is guaranteed. Therefore, those who benefit from a standard living condition their general wellbeing would increase. Moreover, as animals and plants are humans’ ’s main food source, having a contaminated soil and water could lead to dire consequences. When crops are irrigated with dirt water supplies, their pollution is spread through the food chain, endangering everyone’s health whose survival depends on this cycle. Polluted air which contains harmful particles sits/is poised on the crops and grasses that are the main food for animals. When cattle graze in polluted fields, all the products that humans obtain from these creatures become dangerous to their health. As a consequence, in short time people may suffer from infectious disease and even deadly ones such as cancer in the long run. Finally, not only does a healthy environment improves humans’ physical health, but also it can boosts their mental health as well. Being in a clean nature could act as a therapeutic intervention for those whose life is overwhelmed by daily stresses. When people’s surrounding area is a mess, they may feel anxious and loss lose their focus to perform efficiently. As a result, by having a clean environment people would have a peaceful mind. To sum up, I believe that the main focus should be on preserving human’s living environment dirtfree. I suggest that governments impose a penalty for on the organizations whose acts has adverse consequences in contaminating the environment because in this way there would be a better welfare in the society, people are immune from illnesses and feel more relaxed.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1398/Writing Workshop Friday 98.11.11/Clean Environment.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most important ways to improve the people’s health is to clean the environment. What has made the planet earth a better place to live is owes owed to the advancements in health related issues. As humans have a mutual relationship with their surrounding environment, their health status is intertwined with the cleanliness of the area they live in. While some believe that there are other main factors that should be considered to enhance people’s health, I think that having a clean environment is the best way because it can prevent diseases from spreading, is necessary for a healthy food chain and also has mental advantages. First of all, it is an indisputable fact that unhygienic conditions prepare a base for diseases to be spread. For example, the Black Death led to a huge catastrophe, killing many people who were living in insanitary conditions. But improvements in people’s living environment and the discovery of antibiotics decreased its contagiousness. Besides, one of the main challenges that many countries are still facing is how to get rid of their hospital waste which can be a serious threat for those whose house is located near the area and are more prone to be affected. The more people have access to live in a clean environment, the more their health is guaranteed. Therefore, those who benefit from a standard living condition their general wellbeing would increase. Moreover, as animals and plants are humans’ ’s main food source, having a contaminated soil and water could lead to dire consequences. When crops are irrigated with dirt water supplies, their pollution is spread through the food chain, endangering everyone’s health whose survival depends on this cycle. Polluted air which contains harmful particles sits/is poised on the crops and grasses that are the main food for animals. When cattle graze in polluted fields, all the products that humans obtain from these creatures become dangerous to their health. As a consequence, in short time people may suffer from infectious disease and even deadly ones such as cancer in the long run. Finally, not only does a healthy environment improves humans’ physical health, but also it can boosts their mental health as well. Being in a clean nature could act as a therapeutic intervention for those whose life is overwhelmed by daily stresses. When people’s surrounding area is a mess, they may feel anxious and loss lose their focus to perform efficiently. As a result, by having a clean environment people would have a peaceful mind. To sum up, I believe that the main focus should be on preserving human’s living environment dirtfree. I suggest that governments impose a penalty for on the organizations whose acts has adverse consequences in contaminating the environment because in this way there would be a better welfare in the society, people are immune from illnesses and feel more relaxed.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Farkhondeh, Lose Friends by Imigration 2020-02-01T05:57:45+00:00 2020-02-01T05:57:45+00:00 https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/467-fridays-writing-workshop-1398/writing-workshop-friday-98-11-11/3374-farkhondeh-lose-friends-by-imigration Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1398/Writing Workshop Friday 98.11.11/Farkhondeh, Lose Friends by Imigration.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is often not a good idea to move to a new city or a new country because you will lose old friends. Nowadays, due to the growing of technology and human knowledge and expanding of transportation vehicles, people can easier change their place of living. However, it is easier now for people to choose where they want to live, but this decision can be enough challenging for them. One of the concerns which people have, is whether migration lead to lose their friends. I deeply believe that, not only does it not lead to miss our old friends, but also rather can cause toresult in finding new ones. In the following paragraphs, I will describe my reasons and examples in details. First and foremost, day to day the technology is advancing and through social media people can communicate with each other more than the past. However, by migration people don̕ t have eye to eye contact, but they can be related through WhatsApp and speak to each other by Skype. But it seems that the concern of losing friends is more mentally and subjective. People prefer to keep their relationships with people, who are familiar, because they know their behaviors and habits and can forecast their future reactions. Psychological studies show that, people prefer to be in connection with familiar people than starting new networks, even when their bonds are not pleasurable and satisfying enough. The reason is that, human beings tends to keep rather than to change and most of the time well-known issues is safer for individuals than anonymous ones. As my own experience, when I wanted to move to a new city to go to university, I was a little anxious to could find a new friends as good as my old friends. But my personal experience proved that, however although it seems at first a little concernedconcering, but in the long runperiod of time it can enrich our communicational skills. On the other hand, by moving the place, people can enlarge their communication boundaries, know other cultures and extend their experiences. When people limit themselves to their family members, old friends and compatriots, they will lose this opportunity to recognize new viewpoints and different ideas. For instance, when I compare myself to 10 ten years ago, I see that every new person in my life always hat has special effect on me and these experiences can gradually lead to maturity of an individual. Furthermore, people change over time and their characteristics, their challenges, their beliefs and values will transform and it is necessary that individuals along these changes build a new friendship, which is profitable commensurate with/ to their needs. In summary, if a person limit herself to a small community of people, she losesfail the opportunity to know other customs. Howeveralthough, the relationship with old friends is noteworthy, earning new attitudes and worldview is more important.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1398/Writing Workshop Friday 98.11.11/Farkhondeh, Lose Friends by Imigration.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is often not a good idea to move to a new city or a new country because you will lose old friends. Nowadays, due to the growing of technology and human knowledge and expanding of transportation vehicles, people can easier change their place of living. However, it is easier now for people to choose where they want to live, but this decision can be enough challenging for them. One of the concerns which people have, is whether migration lead to lose their friends. I deeply believe that, not only does it not lead to miss our old friends, but also rather can cause toresult in finding new ones. In the following paragraphs, I will describe my reasons and examples in details. First and foremost, day to day the technology is advancing and through social media people can communicate with each other more than the past. However, by migration people don̕ t have eye to eye contact, but they can be related through WhatsApp and speak to each other by Skype. But it seems that the concern of losing friends is more mentally and subjective. People prefer to keep their relationships with people, who are familiar, because they know their behaviors and habits and can forecast their future reactions. Psychological studies show that, people prefer to be in connection with familiar people than starting new networks, even when their bonds are not pleasurable and satisfying enough. The reason is that, human beings tends to keep rather than to change and most of the time well-known issues is safer for individuals than anonymous ones. As my own experience, when I wanted to move to a new city to go to university, I was a little anxious to could find a new friends as good as my old friends. But my personal experience proved that, however although it seems at first a little concernedconcering, but in the long runperiod of time it can enrich our communicational skills. On the other hand, by moving the place, people can enlarge their communication boundaries, know other cultures and extend their experiences. When people limit themselves to their family members, old friends and compatriots, they will lose this opportunity to recognize new viewpoints and different ideas. For instance, when I compare myself to 10 ten years ago, I see that every new person in my life always hat has special effect on me and these experiences can gradually lead to maturity of an individual. Furthermore, people change over time and their characteristics, their challenges, their beliefs and values will transform and it is necessary that individuals along these changes build a new friendship, which is profitable commensurate with/ to their needs. In summary, if a person limit herself to a small community of people, she losesfail the opportunity to know other customs. Howeveralthough, the relationship with old friends is noteworthy, earning new attitudes and worldview is more important.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> HaKuYa, The Proportions of British Students 2020-02-01T05:57:30+00:00 2020-02-01T05:57:30+00:00 https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/467-fridays-writing-workshop-1398/writing-workshop-friday-98-11-11/3373-hakuya-the-proportions-of-british-students Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1398/Writing Workshop Friday 98.11.11/HaKuYa, The Proportions of British Students.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">The charts above show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. The charts show the percentage of British students at a university in the UK who learned languages and are were able to speak another ones between years 2000 and 2010. The highest percentage of these data belongs to Spanish which was 30 % in year 2000 while in 2010 the number has increased magnificently further to 35 %. It shows also, the most common language that the pupils in that university are spoken. In 2000 German only and two other languages were the lowest ones, both with the equally amount of 10 % while in 2010 there are the same. The number of people who are spoken French only has increased 15 % to 10 % in the same way. In addition, no other languages only plus three others figures state the minority than the Spanish only and another language only in 2010. Another interesting fact is that the percentage of another language only has grown grew up as well: from 15 % to 20 %</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1398/Writing Workshop Friday 98.11.11/HaKuYa, The Proportions of British Students.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">The charts above show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. The charts show the percentage of British students at a university in the UK who learned languages and are were able to speak another ones between years 2000 and 2010. The highest percentage of these data belongs to Spanish which was 30 % in year 2000 while in 2010 the number has increased magnificently further to 35 %. It shows also, the most common language that the pupils in that university are spoken. In 2000 German only and two other languages were the lowest ones, both with the equally amount of 10 % while in 2010 there are the same. The number of people who are spoken French only has increased 15 % to 10 % in the same way. In addition, no other languages only plus three others figures state the minority than the Spanish only and another language only in 2010. Another interesting fact is that the percentage of another language only has grown grew up as well: from 15 % to 20 %</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Hengameh Yavari, Fossil Fuel 2020-02-01T05:57:17+00:00 2020-02-01T05:57:17+00:00 https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/467-fridays-writing-workshop-1398/writing-workshop-friday-98-11-11/3372-hengameh-yavari-fossil-fuel Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1398/Writing Workshop Friday 98.11.11/Hengameh Yavari, Fossil Fuel.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Fossil fuels (e.g. coals, oil and gas) are the main source of energy for most countries. However, alternative sources of energy (e.g. wind and solar) have been encouraged for use by some countries. To what extent is this a positive or negative development? Renewable and non-renewable resources are terms which we have been hearing through media and social media for decades.one of the most sought-after sources is fossil fuel which has been consumed for ages but due to being non-renewable, it became a hot debates as to what extent we are allowed to use this source. Nowadays governments turn to alternative resources such as wind and solar in order to provide their needed energies. As coals, fossil fuels and gases are considered to be pressing problems which are on the slippery slope of running out, countries change their approaches in order to replace them with solar, wind and other sources which are abundant and continuous, in other words, all energy stations could produce immediate and continual energy. for example, the sun is going to shine for billions of years so these stations are going to be sustainable. Also we should take one of the fossil fuel repercussions into accounts. All the mentioned approaches are considered as green or clean energies, by which I mean, unlike non-renewable resources, green energies do not produce as much CO2 or other toxic gases and this would lead to less greenhouse gas emission, a healthy healthier environments and low risk of global warming. Having said that, these ways of producing energy could have downsides as well. Firstly, comparing with fossil fuel, it they cost excessive amount of money in order to develop stations or manufacturing needed components like purchasing a solar panel that cost great proportions of money. secondly, the continuous of production is highly rely reliant on climate changes. Although a new mechanism has been built in-in solar panels or other methods in order to save energy within, still there would be problems if there would werebe no sun rays by two days or more. To cut a long story short, I affirm/subscribe to with clean energy because I believe that merits of renewable resources outweigh the demerits of it and governments should invest in these in order to prevent our environment to face sever consequences.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1398/Writing Workshop Friday 98.11.11/Hengameh Yavari, Fossil Fuel.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Fossil fuels (e.g. coals, oil and gas) are the main source of energy for most countries. However, alternative sources of energy (e.g. wind and solar) have been encouraged for use by some countries. To what extent is this a positive or negative development? Renewable and non-renewable resources are terms which we have been hearing through media and social media for decades.one of the most sought-after sources is fossil fuel which has been consumed for ages but due to being non-renewable, it became a hot debates as to what extent we are allowed to use this source. Nowadays governments turn to alternative resources such as wind and solar in order to provide their needed energies. As coals, fossil fuels and gases are considered to be pressing problems which are on the slippery slope of running out, countries change their approaches in order to replace them with solar, wind and other sources which are abundant and continuous, in other words, all energy stations could produce immediate and continual energy. for example, the sun is going to shine for billions of years so these stations are going to be sustainable. Also we should take one of the fossil fuel repercussions into accounts. All the mentioned approaches are considered as green or clean energies, by which I mean, unlike non-renewable resources, green energies do not produce as much CO2 or other toxic gases and this would lead to less greenhouse gas emission, a healthy healthier environments and low risk of global warming. Having said that, these ways of producing energy could have downsides as well. Firstly, comparing with fossil fuel, it they cost excessive amount of money in order to develop stations or manufacturing needed components like purchasing a solar panel that cost great proportions of money. secondly, the continuous of production is highly rely reliant on climate changes. Although a new mechanism has been built in-in solar panels or other methods in order to save energy within, still there would be problems if there would werebe no sun rays by two days or more. To cut a long story short, I affirm/subscribe to with clean energy because I believe that merits of renewable resources outweigh the demerits of it and governments should invest in these in order to prevent our environment to face sever consequences.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Mohammad, Success and Money 2020-02-01T05:57:00+00:00 2020-02-01T05:57:00+00:00 https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/467-fridays-writing-workshop-1398/writing-workshop-friday-98-11-11/3371-mohammad-success-and-money Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1398/Writing Workshop Friday 98.11.11/Mohammad, Success and Money.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">The best way to measure someone’s success is to look at how much money that person has. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? What is success? This certainly is the very one question which has passed centuries to be answered, attracting numerous, if not all, philosophers to define what is to many the aim of life. In spite of a great deal of variation, success has been commonly believed to be determined by wealth; however, such a notion, albeit prevalent, seems to be not only immoral but superficial as there are other indicators such as wellbeing which can reflect the extent of a person or community success. It is probably safe to say that in the public eye the amount of money a person makes is a key indicator of success. Wealth, in its broad sense, can make many dreams come true; dreams which are commonplace in different times and places. It seems that money is the deciding factor in political and social areas as it brings about power, credit, and respect; It will form your appearance, your possessions and even your family. This, whether based on our human instincts or cultural myths, stemming from media or flawed ideologies such as liberalism, is the hard reality which is widespread throughout the world, depending highly on what society chooses to value. However, according to many studies, wealth usually fails to properly reflect success. This complex state, if possible, necessitates adopting a broader range of indicators and assessment criteria among which richness is only negligibly valuable. Wellbeing, for example, is proved to be a far more efficient means to define success. In regard to an individual or a community, wellbeing can create a wider range of criteria that are closely linked to factors such as health and happiness which can play a more significant role in reaching the state of success. Many of an the affluent people who, although are allegedly thriving legends, living in the lap of luxury, and having their expiations expectations met, feel thirsty for happiness. Nonetheless, in a community where accumulating more wealth is a value,and consume this is not a big surprise. To conclude, placing a great deal of value on money and believing in it as a trustworthy indicator to represent someone’s success, areis a grave mistake albeit common, and a shift might be needed in our understanding of success since better ways existare to define it. Nevertheless, freeing our mindsets from constantly chasing economic values alone is certainly a step in the right direction.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1398/Writing Workshop Friday 98.11.11/Mohammad, Success and Money.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">The best way to measure someone’s success is to look at how much money that person has. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? What is success? This certainly is the very one question which has passed centuries to be answered, attracting numerous, if not all, philosophers to define what is to many the aim of life. In spite of a great deal of variation, success has been commonly believed to be determined by wealth; however, such a notion, albeit prevalent, seems to be not only immoral but superficial as there are other indicators such as wellbeing which can reflect the extent of a person or community success. It is probably safe to say that in the public eye the amount of money a person makes is a key indicator of success. Wealth, in its broad sense, can make many dreams come true; dreams which are commonplace in different times and places. It seems that money is the deciding factor in political and social areas as it brings about power, credit, and respect; It will form your appearance, your possessions and even your family. This, whether based on our human instincts or cultural myths, stemming from media or flawed ideologies such as liberalism, is the hard reality which is widespread throughout the world, depending highly on what society chooses to value. However, according to many studies, wealth usually fails to properly reflect success. This complex state, if possible, necessitates adopting a broader range of indicators and assessment criteria among which richness is only negligibly valuable. Wellbeing, for example, is proved to be a far more efficient means to define success. In regard to an individual or a community, wellbeing can create a wider range of criteria that are closely linked to factors such as health and happiness which can play a more significant role in reaching the state of success. Many of an the affluent people who, although are allegedly thriving legends, living in the lap of luxury, and having their expiations expectations met, feel thirsty for happiness. Nonetheless, in a community where accumulating more wealth is a value,and consume this is not a big surprise. To conclude, placing a great deal of value on money and believing in it as a trustworthy indicator to represent someone’s success, areis a grave mistake albeit common, and a shift might be needed in our understanding of success since better ways existare to define it. Nevertheless, freeing our mindsets from constantly chasing economic values alone is certainly a step in the right direction.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table>