FridaysGMAT-GRE-TOEFL-IELTS-آموزشگاه زبان صبای سحر-چمران جنوب، بلوار جلال آل احمد، جنب داروخانه شبانه روزی جلال آل احمد، پلاک 87، طبقه سوم
تلفن: 42-88679341https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/498-fridays-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-friday-99-03-092024-05-05T19:17:12+00:00IELTSTOEFLCENTERinfo@ieltstoeflcenter.comJoomla! - Open Source Content ManagementEducation2020-05-29T14:50:58+00:002020-05-29T14:50:58+00:00https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/498-fridays-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-friday-99-03-09/3566-educationHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.03.09/Education.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Some people think universities should accept equal numbers of male
and female students in every subject. Others believe that this is an
unacceptable policy.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The issue of keeping a balance between the numbers of male and
female students in course degrees in universities has been frequently
discussed by many. Although some say such a policy should be
implemented in all subjects, others, including myself, believe that it is
not beneficial.
Admitting an equal number of male and female applicants in some
courses will probably render many of them unable to find a job later.
For instance, more and more female students tend to major in a
nursing degree, in this respect, it is slightly likely for male graduated in
this field to be able to find a relevant job in hospitals on account of a lot
of job vacancies considered for female competitors. Furthermore, it
would be unfair to base admission to universities fields on gender. To
be more precise, universities should continue to select candidates
(depending on/according to) their qualifications of applicants. In this
way, both of them not only have the same opportunity but also this
policy helps them working hard to achieve good/high grades at school
in order to be permitted for to entering the universities.
Despite the arguments have been discussed above, Meanwhile some
believe considering the same number of places for each gender in all
courses would be unfair, it is argued by others that this approach would
promote gender equality. Due to the reason that social taboos which
are attached to studying some particular courses prescribed to a certain
gender will be broken, it which means that it allows all candidates to
study their favored courses regardless of those taboos in public’s
opinion.In conclusion, I tend to disagree with accepting an equal number of
female and male students in all subjects at universities since it can
complicate finding a job later and promote gender bias and also is
unfair. Thus the selection of university students would should be based
on merit or qualification. It is absolutely crucial for university staff to
process candidate’s application based on merit or qualification
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.03.09/Education.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Some people think universities should accept equal numbers of male
and female students in every subject. Others believe that this is an
unacceptable policy.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The issue of keeping a balance between the numbers of male and
female students in course degrees in universities has been frequently
discussed by many. Although some say such a policy should be
implemented in all subjects, others, including myself, believe that it is
not beneficial.
Admitting an equal number of male and female applicants in some
courses will probably render many of them unable to find a job later.
For instance, more and more female students tend to major in a
nursing degree, in this respect, it is slightly likely for male graduated in
this field to be able to find a relevant job in hospitals on account of a lot
of job vacancies considered for female competitors. Furthermore, it
would be unfair to base admission to universities fields on gender. To
be more precise, universities should continue to select candidates
(depending on/according to) their qualifications of applicants. In this
way, both of them not only have the same opportunity but also this
policy helps them working hard to achieve good/high grades at school
in order to be permitted for to entering the universities.
Despite the arguments have been discussed above, Meanwhile some
believe considering the same number of places for each gender in all
courses would be unfair, it is argued by others that this approach would
promote gender equality. Due to the reason that social taboos which
are attached to studying some particular courses prescribed to a certain
gender will be broken, it which means that it allows all candidates to
study their favored courses regardless of those taboos in public’s
opinion.In conclusion, I tend to disagree with accepting an equal number of
female and male students in all subjects at universities since it can
complicate finding a job later and promote gender bias and also is
unfair. Thus the selection of university students would should be based
on merit or qualification. It is absolutely crucial for university staff to
process candidate’s application based on merit or qualification
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Faranak, Public Education System2020-05-29T14:50:48+00:002020-05-29T14:50:48+00:00https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/498-fridays-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-friday-99-03-09/3565-faranak-public-education-systemHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.03.09/Faranak, Public Education System.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Every government’s didactic programs aim to raise youths’ ’s skills,
talents, interests and capability to the best of their own. This can be
decided only by paying more attention to nowadays today’s needs of
generations. This argument specially focuses on one of the greatest
country countries in the world, where which I do not have any clear
clue about, since I was born and raised in a third-world country. My
only piece of information is based on series and movies. So I decided to
elaborate what are negative and positive aspects there are in a public
education system.
To begin with, the most rational justification is that a perfect system
needs to be flexible. Each youth young person has different needs,
characteristics and talents. Every curriculum must be like a wheel which
can be easily stir steered in any usable direction. It must give each
teacher enough freedom to decide what to teach. So many
unbelievable benefits can be reaped of this kind of method. Owing to
the experience of structureran educator, and since they are in on the
front-line of the education system, giving them the power of making
down-to-earth decisions, will cover many flaws of each teaching
system.
On the other hand, this method may be faced with a dilemma. If an
educator in a system is dated, he or she have has not been trained
effectively, this in turn, comes with irreversible damages. Simply put,
there are no industries where they have manufactured their products in
the same ways as 100 years ago. This can be generalized to all aspectsof society. Public schools’ teachers must be educated each year with
new methods and up-to-date material of psychology. It will guide them
to decide perfectly whenever they have to teach in a class.
Another compelling argument about a system is how much modern
technology is included in it. The advent of modern life, build uphas
brought along possibilities other skills which were did not exist in
decades before. As I read the critic’s critics’ reviews about USA’s
currenttoday's USA public education system, it has not upgraded. So
eventually it will stop working. It is missing the opportunity to bring
technology into mainstream public schools.
The last but not the least, as the USA is a country which now belongs to
different walks of life, people with diverse backgrounds, the new
educational structure must contain manifold aspects of different
cultures. Nowadays, generations must learn to live together and
reverence each others. It must be reflected in the curriculum. This
should be the way that how we raise our next generations.
To sum up, considering the points discussed above, if the public
education system of USA does not meet themtoday’s educational
requirements, it faces a big problem. It must be changed from the root.
However, the outcomes of science, economy and industry of USA
shows different results. I have doubts about the accuracy of this
arguments. I maintain with by changing some out-of-date aspects of
didactic curriculum, it achieves its nations’ ambitiousambitions.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.03.09/Faranak, Public Education System.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Every government’s didactic programs aim to raise youths’ ’s skills,
talents, interests and capability to the best of their own. This can be
decided only by paying more attention to nowadays today’s needs of
generations. This argument specially focuses on one of the greatest
country countries in the world, where which I do not have any clear
clue about, since I was born and raised in a third-world country. My
only piece of information is based on series and movies. So I decided to
elaborate what are negative and positive aspects there are in a public
education system.
To begin with, the most rational justification is that a perfect system
needs to be flexible. Each youth young person has different needs,
characteristics and talents. Every curriculum must be like a wheel which
can be easily stir steered in any usable direction. It must give each
teacher enough freedom to decide what to teach. So many
unbelievable benefits can be reaped of this kind of method. Owing to
the experience of structureran educator, and since they are in on the
front-line of the education system, giving them the power of making
down-to-earth decisions, will cover many flaws of each teaching
system.
On the other hand, this method may be faced with a dilemma. If an
educator in a system is dated, he or she have has not been trained
effectively, this in turn, comes with irreversible damages. Simply put,
there are no industries where they have manufactured their products in
the same ways as 100 years ago. This can be generalized to all aspectsof society. Public schools’ teachers must be educated each year with
new methods and up-to-date material of psychology. It will guide them
to decide perfectly whenever they have to teach in a class.
Another compelling argument about a system is how much modern
technology is included in it. The advent of modern life, build uphas
brought along possibilities other skills which were did not exist in
decades before. As I read the critic’s critics’ reviews about USA’s
currenttoday's USA public education system, it has not upgraded. So
eventually it will stop working. It is missing the opportunity to bring
technology into mainstream public schools.
The last but not the least, as the USA is a country which now belongs to
different walks of life, people with diverse backgrounds, the new
educational structure must contain manifold aspects of different
cultures. Nowadays, generations must learn to live together and
reverence each others. It must be reflected in the curriculum. This
should be the way that how we raise our next generations.
To sum up, considering the points discussed above, if the public
education system of USA does not meet themtoday’s educational
requirements, it faces a big problem. It must be changed from the root.
However, the outcomes of science, economy and industry of USA
shows different results. I have doubts about the accuracy of this
arguments. I maintain with by changing some out-of-date aspects of
didactic curriculum, it achieves its nations’ ambitiousambitions.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Shideh, Business2020-05-29T14:50:34+00:002020-05-29T14:50:34+00:00https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/498-fridays-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-friday-99-03-09/3564-shideh-businessHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.03.09/Shideh, Business.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Many people believe that big businesses in addition to generating profits should be involved
in and responsible for the social life of the community. To what extent do you agree or
disagree? Give your opinion.
Nowadays, many companies are ramping up their focus on social responsibility which not
only will make their business more profitable, but also more attractive images will be
projected to both customers and shareholders, leading to having more positive effects on the
bottom line.
In the current century, the modernist sophisticated trend has affected all aspects of our dayto-day lives, including people’ both lifestyle and expectations such as the way of trading.
Generally, the public are willing to be attracted to more reliable trustworthy enterprises
especially when a part of the trade’s benefits are channeled to overcome the social and
environmental issues. Therefore, community-oriented companies can build an outstanding
reputation and validity by considering humans’ rights, protecting the environment,
attempting to obliterate poverty on all local, national or global scales, so they would be able
to attract and retain their customers. For instance, Tesla as a well-known company has
produced electric automatic cars which can be contributed to the reduction of air pollution as
well as individuals’ satisfactory satisfaction due to its sustainability and efficiency.
On the other hand, by applying this policy, employees working on those manufacturers would
reap more benefits when they are eager to make a difference in the world in addition to
enhancing their ability and expanding their knowledge to reach their goal. Moreover, in this
workplace, members’ morale would be bolstered, result in significant increase in
productivity.
However, embracing social responsibility movements goes a long way to achieve success,
hence the importance of accurate plans and programs. Also, the initial and inevitable
prohibitive expenses cannot be denied. That is why the majority of small businesses are not
likely to win the competition in the demanding job markets.
In conclusion, by getting involved in the social life of the community and regarding the
responsibility, the companies would find more opportunities to cultivate an attractive brand
to have a rise in the numbers of loyal customers and consequently more top-notch
employees, leading to conducting a lucrative and successful business in thea long-term.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.03.09/Shideh, Business.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Many people believe that big businesses in addition to generating profits should be involved
in and responsible for the social life of the community. To what extent do you agree or
disagree? Give your opinion.
Nowadays, many companies are ramping up their focus on social responsibility which not
only will make their business more profitable, but also more attractive images will be
projected to both customers and shareholders, leading to having more positive effects on the
bottom line.
In the current century, the modernist sophisticated trend has affected all aspects of our dayto-day lives, including people’ both lifestyle and expectations such as the way of trading.
Generally, the public are willing to be attracted to more reliable trustworthy enterprises
especially when a part of the trade’s benefits are channeled to overcome the social and
environmental issues. Therefore, community-oriented companies can build an outstanding
reputation and validity by considering humans’ rights, protecting the environment,
attempting to obliterate poverty on all local, national or global scales, so they would be able
to attract and retain their customers. For instance, Tesla as a well-known company has
produced electric automatic cars which can be contributed to the reduction of air pollution as
well as individuals’ satisfactory satisfaction due to its sustainability and efficiency.
On the other hand, by applying this policy, employees working on those manufacturers would
reap more benefits when they are eager to make a difference in the world in addition to
enhancing their ability and expanding their knowledge to reach their goal. Moreover, in this
workplace, members’ morale would be bolstered, result in significant increase in
productivity.
However, embracing social responsibility movements goes a long way to achieve success,
hence the importance of accurate plans and programs. Also, the initial and inevitable
prohibitive expenses cannot be denied. That is why the majority of small businesses are not
likely to win the competition in the demanding job markets.
In conclusion, by getting involved in the social life of the community and regarding the
responsibility, the companies would find more opportunities to cultivate an attractive brand
to have a rise in the numbers of loyal customers and consequently more top-notch
employees, leading to conducting a lucrative and successful business in thea long-term.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Yegane, Entertainers2020-05-29T14:50:22+00:002020-05-29T14:50:22+00:00https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/498-fridays-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-friday-99-03-09/3563-yegane-entertainersHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.03.09/Yegane, Entertainers.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Some people believe that entertainers are paid too much and their impact on society is
negative, while others disagree and believe that they deserve the money they make because
of their positive effect on others. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Despite earning a huge amount of money, famous people might affect society negatively
according to some. However, many others oppose this opinion and assert these people have
merits for their communities. Since entertainers are presumed as role-models by the majority
of people, they might bring and expand some moral cultures which require the highest salary or
bring immoral behavior among people, especially the youth.
Nowadays, making offense ofmocking other people is one of the ways which entertainers are
using to attract more people to increase their followers and their income. Many comedians are
trying to gain the attention of young generations by making sexiest racist or cultural jokes and
telling them in funny and hilarious ways to entertain people. Consequently, young people who
are sensitive and flexible in learning new things follow them and try to repeat their unsuitable
jokes or imitated their gestures. Therefore, these kinds of entertainers are likely to teach
immoral lessons alongside earning unfair money from their plethora of followers. However,
appropriate cultures might be taught by celebrities.
There are numerous famous people who are advantageous for their societies. Since these
people wish to be popular based on the positive movements, they are attempting to show the
moral aspects of their lives. For example, some celebrities take part in charities in order to help
poor people or seek for to alleviating alleviate environmental problems by joining some
campaigns and investing huge money in these types of organizations. Hence, people are liable
to learn the culture of donation to charities or the importance of the environment. For this
reason, these celebrities are deserved to be paid too this much due to their movements for
societies to flourish.
I do opine that people should be cautious about the action of entertainers and their impacts on
people’s minds and societiessociety. Also, these impacts must be considered in case of
payment. In other words, entertainers should be paid based on their duties and the
consequences of their jobs.
In sum, the action of famous people and their impacts on people and societies society should
be taken into account, although they achieve afflux unlimited money regardless of their
influences, or whether they deserve it. Also, by heightening the people's awareness, the
negative effects of entertainers are likely to be limited and they earn less money due to fewer
followers.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.03.09/Yegane, Entertainers.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Some people believe that entertainers are paid too much and their impact on society is
negative, while others disagree and believe that they deserve the money they make because
of their positive effect on others. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Despite earning a huge amount of money, famous people might affect society negatively
according to some. However, many others oppose this opinion and assert these people have
merits for their communities. Since entertainers are presumed as role-models by the majority
of people, they might bring and expand some moral cultures which require the highest salary or
bring immoral behavior among people, especially the youth.
Nowadays, making offense ofmocking other people is one of the ways which entertainers are
using to attract more people to increase their followers and their income. Many comedians are
trying to gain the attention of young generations by making sexiest racist or cultural jokes and
telling them in funny and hilarious ways to entertain people. Consequently, young people who
are sensitive and flexible in learning new things follow them and try to repeat their unsuitable
jokes or imitated their gestures. Therefore, these kinds of entertainers are likely to teach
immoral lessons alongside earning unfair money from their plethora of followers. However,
appropriate cultures might be taught by celebrities.
There are numerous famous people who are advantageous for their societies. Since these
people wish to be popular based on the positive movements, they are attempting to show the
moral aspects of their lives. For example, some celebrities take part in charities in order to help
poor people or seek for to alleviating alleviate environmental problems by joining some
campaigns and investing huge money in these types of organizations. Hence, people are liable
to learn the culture of donation to charities or the importance of the environment. For this
reason, these celebrities are deserved to be paid too this much due to their movements for
societies to flourish.
I do opine that people should be cautious about the action of entertainers and their impacts on
people’s minds and societiessociety. Also, these impacts must be considered in case of
payment. In other words, entertainers should be paid based on their duties and the
consequences of their jobs.
In sum, the action of famous people and their impacts on people and societies society should
be taken into account, although they achieve afflux unlimited money regardless of their
influences, or whether they deserve it. Also, by heightening the people's awareness, the
negative effects of entertainers are likely to be limited and they earn less money due to fewer
followers.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Zkariaee, Toy2020-05-29T14:50:04+00:002020-05-29T14:50:04+00:00https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/498-fridays-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-friday-99-03-09/3562-zkariaee-toyHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.03.09/Zkariaee, Toy.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with.
What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys? 82
****************************
Nowadays, a group of fathers and mothers are purchasing a wide range kind of toys for their sons and
girls. Though, toys play an inevitable role in children’s learning and growing up especially in their
imagination and learning, buying a wide range of those has some drawbacks.
On the one hand, playing with toys results in both reinforcing the things they have learnt and sparking
imagination in exploring the world. Children need to play with different types of toys whether simple
toys, let them to know how they work and what their parts are, or energy burning toys such as balls and
mini basketball or educational and learning toys which help them in intellectual activatesactivities. That
is why having varied toys are is useful in upbringinggrow up of children. Moreover, if children have many
types of toys not only will it preventavoid them from sibling fights/rivalry but also they will engage them
with playing and their mother can perform various household activates activities with ease.
In on the other hand, having a large number of toys, children will not completely understand the value
of their possessory possessions and sometimes they do not have enough time to play with all of them.
Also if parents give too much and too often toys, it can spoil children which in turn results in negative
effects on children’s characters for example not only do they don’t not appreciating appreciate for
ordinary gifts but also expect special and expensive toys.
In conclusion, I think even though/although toys/playthings are useful and have profoundly positive
effects on children’s growing up, parents need to avoid buying a large number of toys which renders
them prone to negative behaviors.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.03.09/Zkariaee, Toy.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with.
What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys? 82
****************************
Nowadays, a group of fathers and mothers are purchasing a wide range kind of toys for their sons and
girls. Though, toys play an inevitable role in children’s learning and growing up especially in their
imagination and learning, buying a wide range of those has some drawbacks.
On the one hand, playing with toys results in both reinforcing the things they have learnt and sparking
imagination in exploring the world. Children need to play with different types of toys whether simple
toys, let them to know how they work and what their parts are, or energy burning toys such as balls and
mini basketball or educational and learning toys which help them in intellectual activatesactivities. That
is why having varied toys are is useful in upbringinggrow up of children. Moreover, if children have many
types of toys not only will it preventavoid them from sibling fights/rivalry but also they will engage them
with playing and their mother can perform various household activates activities with ease.
In on the other hand, having a large number of toys, children will not completely understand the value
of their possessory possessions and sometimes they do not have enough time to play with all of them.
Also if parents give too much and too often toys, it can spoil children which in turn results in negative
effects on children’s characters for example not only do they don’t not appreciating appreciate for
ordinary gifts but also expect special and expensive toys.
In conclusion, I think even though/although toys/playthings are useful and have profoundly positive
effects on children’s growing up, parents need to avoid buying a large number of toys which renders
them prone to negative behaviors.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>