جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. Others believe that this is an unacceptable policy. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. The issue of keeping a balance between the numbers of male and female students in course degrees in universities has been frequently discussed by many. Although some say such a policy should be implemented in all subjects, others, including myself, believe that it is not beneficial. Admitting an equal number of male and female applicants in some courses will probably render many of them unable to find a job later. For instance, more and more female students tend to major in a nursing degree, in this respect, it is slightly likely for male graduated in this field to be able to find a relevant job in hospitals on account of a lot of job vacancies considered for female competitors. Furthermore, it would be unfair to base admission to universities fields on gender. To be more precise, universities should continue to select candidates (depending on/according to) their qualifications of applicants. In this way, both of them not only have the same opportunity but also this policy helps them working hard to achieve good/high grades at school in order to be permitted for to entering the universities. Despite the arguments have been discussed above, Meanwhile some believe considering the same number of places for each gender in all courses would be unfair, it is argued by others that this approach would promote gender equality. Due to the reason that social taboos which are attached to studying some particular courses prescribed to a certain gender will be broken, it which means that it allows all candidates to study their favored courses regardless of those taboos in public’s opinion.In conclusion, I tend to disagree with accepting an equal number of female and male students in all subjects at universities since it can complicate finding a job later and promote gender bias and also is unfair. Thus the selection of university students would should be based on merit or qualification. It is absolutely crucial for university staff to process candidate’s application based on merit or qualification

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Every government’s didactic programs aim to raise youths’ ’s skills, talents, interests and capability to the best of their own. This can be decided only by paying more attention to nowadays today’s needs of generations. This argument specially focuses on one of the greatest country countries in the world, where which I do not have any clear clue about, since I was born and raised in a third-world country. My only piece of information is based on series and movies. So I decided to elaborate what are negative and positive aspects there are in a public education system. To begin with, the most rational justification is that a perfect system needs to be flexible. Each youth young person has different needs, characteristics and talents. Every curriculum must be like a wheel which can be easily stir steered in any usable direction. It must give each teacher enough freedom to decide what to teach. So many unbelievable benefits can be reaped of this kind of method. Owing to the experience of structureran educator, and since they are in on the front-line of the education system, giving them the power of making down-to-earth decisions, will cover many flaws of each teaching system. On the other hand, this method may be faced with a dilemma. If an educator in a system is dated, he or she have has not been trained effectively, this in turn, comes with irreversible damages. Simply put, there are no industries where they have manufactured their products in the same ways as 100 years ago. This can be generalized to all aspectsof society. Public schools’ teachers must be educated each year with new methods and up-to-date material of psychology. It will guide them to decide perfectly whenever they have to teach in a class. Another compelling argument about a system is how much modern technology is included in it. The advent of modern life, build uphas brought along possibilities other skills which were did not exist in decades before. As I read the critic’s critics’ reviews about USA’s currenttoday's USA public education system, it has not upgraded. So eventually it will stop working. It is missing the opportunity to bring technology into mainstream public schools. The last but not the least, as the USA is a country which now belongs to different walks of life, people with diverse backgrounds, the new educational structure must contain manifold aspects of different cultures. Nowadays, generations must learn to live together and reverence each others. It must be reflected in the curriculum. This should be the way that how we raise our next generations. To sum up, considering the points discussed above, if the public education system of USA does not meet themtoday’s educational requirements, it faces a big problem. It must be changed from the root. However, the outcomes of science, economy and industry of USA shows different results. I have doubts about the accuracy of this arguments. I maintain with by changing some out-of-date aspects of didactic curriculum, it achieves its nations’ ambitiousambitions.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Many people believe that big businesses in addition to generating profits should be involved in and responsible for the social life of the community. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. Nowadays, many companies are ramping up their focus on social responsibility which not only will make their business more profitable, but also more attractive images will be projected to both customers and shareholders, leading to having more positive effects on the bottom line. In the current century, the modernist sophisticated trend has affected all aspects of our dayto-day lives, including people’ both lifestyle and expectations such as the way of trading. Generally, the public are willing to be attracted to more reliable trustworthy enterprises especially when a part of the trade’s benefits are channeled to overcome the social and environmental issues. Therefore, community-oriented companies can build an outstanding reputation and validity by considering humans’ rights, protecting the environment, attempting to obliterate poverty on all local, national or global scales, so they would be able to attract and retain their customers. For instance, Tesla as a well-known company has produced electric automatic cars which can be contributed to the reduction of air pollution as well as individuals’ satisfactory satisfaction due to its sustainability and efficiency. On the other hand, by applying this policy, employees working on those manufacturers would reap more benefits when they are eager to make a difference in the world in addition to enhancing their ability and expanding their knowledge to reach their goal. Moreover, in this workplace, members’ morale would be bolstered, result in significant increase in productivity. However, embracing social responsibility movements goes a long way to achieve success, hence the importance of accurate plans and programs. Also, the initial and inevitable prohibitive expenses cannot be denied. That is why the majority of small businesses are not likely to win the competition in the demanding job markets. In conclusion, by getting involved in the social life of the community and regarding the responsibility, the companies would find more opportunities to cultivate an attractive brand to have a rise in the numbers of loyal customers and consequently more top-notch employees, leading to conducting a lucrative and successful business in thea long-term.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe that entertainers are paid too much and their impact on society is negative, while others disagree and believe that they deserve the money they make because of their positive effect on others. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Despite earning a huge amount of money, famous people might affect society negatively according to some. However, many others oppose this opinion and assert these people have merits for their communities. Since entertainers are presumed as role-models by the majority of people, they might bring and expand some moral cultures which require the highest salary or bring immoral behavior among people, especially the youth. Nowadays, making offense ofmocking other people is one of the ways which entertainers are using to attract more people to increase their followers and their income. Many comedians are trying to gain the attention of young generations by making sexiest racist or cultural jokes and telling them in funny and hilarious ways to entertain people. Consequently, young people who are sensitive and flexible in learning new things follow them and try to repeat their unsuitable jokes or imitated their gestures. Therefore, these kinds of entertainers are likely to teach immoral lessons alongside earning unfair money from their plethora of followers. However, appropriate cultures might be taught by celebrities. There are numerous famous people who are advantageous for their societies. Since these people wish to be popular based on the positive movements, they are attempting to show the moral aspects of their lives. For example, some celebrities take part in charities in order to help poor people or seek for to alleviating alleviate environmental problems by joining some campaigns and investing huge money in these types of organizations. Hence, people are liable to learn the culture of donation to charities or the importance of the environment. For this reason, these celebrities are deserved to be paid too this much due to their movements for societies to flourish. I do opine that people should be cautious about the action of entertainers and their impacts on people’s minds and societiessociety. Also, these impacts must be considered in case of payment. In other words, entertainers should be paid based on their duties and the consequences of their jobs. In sum, the action of famous people and their impacts on people and societies society should be taken into account, although they achieve afflux unlimited money regardless of their influences, or whether they deserve it. Also, by heightening the people's awareness, the negative effects of entertainers are likely to be limited and they earn less money due to fewer followers.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with. What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys? 82 **************************** Nowadays, a group of fathers and mothers are purchasing a wide range kind of toys for their sons and girls. Though, toys play an inevitable role in children’s learning and growing up especially in their imagination and learning, buying a wide range of those has some drawbacks. On the one hand, playing with toys results in both reinforcing the things they have learnt and sparking imagination in exploring the world. Children need to play with different types of toys whether simple toys, let them to know how they work and what their parts are, or energy burning toys such as balls and mini basketball or educational and learning toys which help them in intellectual activatesactivities. That is why having varied toys are is useful in upbringinggrow up of children. Moreover, if children have many types of toys not only will it preventavoid them from sibling fights/rivalry but also they will engage them with playing and their mother can perform various household activates activities with ease. In on the other hand, having a large number of toys, children will not completely understand the value of their possessory possessions and sometimes they do not have enough time to play with all of them. Also if parents give too much and too often toys, it can spoil children which in turn results in negative effects on children’s characters for example not only do they don’t not appreciating appreciate for ordinary gifts but also expect special and expensive toys. In conclusion, I think even though/although toys/playthings are useful and have profoundly positive effects on children’s growing up, parents need to avoid buying a large number of toys which renders them prone to negative behaviors.