جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Nowadays many people have access to computers on a wide basis and a large number of children play computer games. What are the negative impacts of children playing computer games and what can be done to minimize the bad effects? Many individuals have been utilizing computers to such a considerable extent in this day and age. Furthermore, most children use digital games, issuing negative impacts on their social life and physicalmental health. Some solutions will be submitted to minimize its effect. Digital games are quite addictive, and children feel trapped in these games. With the passage of time, children would rather opt for an aloof lifestyle in default of socializing with others or going for outdoor activities. Secondly, children’s eyesight could be impaired as a consequence of extreme exposure to the computer games. Thirdly, most of (the) games today’s children play are really/extremely violent, which might lead to children’s aggressive behavior in the worst-case scenario. Some measures should be taken to address the severity of these games which are/include: parents should monitor the time expended by their children not to let them exceed the given time. Only when children do not play too much, are some of the repercussions of playing with consoles significantly minimized. In other words, poor eyesight, aggressive behavior are less likely to transpire. Finally, parents and teachers should shoulder the responsibility to make them interested in outdoor activities, or rather true-to-life games such as seek and hide play or playing football, and so forth. This could also be conducive to being more extroverted due to being in touch with others in reality. To conclude, supervising children during playing with the aforementioned games and allocating specific time to children’s virtual games could minimize the detrimental influence on children’s societal, physical, and mental health.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Do you agree or disagree that it is difficult for people today to save money than grandparents when they were young. No one can deny that nowadays the economic situation is tough for most people and plays a paramount role in people's life. The questions arise as to whether saving money in today's modern life is easier than pervious decades or not. Personally, I think these days saving money has some challenges which makes it difficult for some reasons which I will explain at length in the subsequent paragraphs. To begin with, living standards has have been changing decade by decade which causes gap generation, so it is a given that the level of individuals' expectations corresponds with their time. In other words, in our grandparents' time people did were not aware enough to much care much about high education, learning arts, traveling or dedicating time to their hubbieshobbies, thus they did not spend their money in these fields, hence they had more money to save. For instance, during the 1990s the number of universities In Iran was less than two hundred which prevented students who did not access education (them) in their town from entering universities who did not access educational (them) in their town, so in this case many expenses could be eliminated such as price of home rents. Another point to consider is that, the rate of technological advancement in the modern age has risen sharply which people should update their gadgets (Tech devices) to get along with their circumstances. For example, families who theirwhose children study abroad should have smart phones to communicate with them efficiently. Besides, nowadays social media and advertising gravitate individuals to materialism and consumerism which causes people to spend their money on their unnecessary goods. The best example is, that Instagram propels teenagers to the fashion industry which is one of the most expensive ones and therefore, they have less money to save.To recap, even though some people believe that nowadays people are more acknowledgeable in this field which is conducive to saving money easily (being more homo economics), I strongly believe otherwise maintaining that this way of thinking is nothing but a tunnel vision which ignores the importance of the abovementioned facts.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think that parents should teach children how to be a good member of the society. However, it is believed that school is the place to learn this. The manner of children is important for when they will grow up and enter the society. In my opinion, both parents and school play important roles in children’s behavior and attitude. First of all, parents have a major roles because when a baby is born at first by nature it is like itstheir parents, so they show the behavior of their parents. Therefore, parents have to be suitable models for their children. For instance, the parents should behave well with toward other people, so their children would learn how they should behaveior. On the other hand, school is the same as a second home for children and these times/in this era teachers have very important roles. In school the behavior and attitude of children will be complete. Children play with their friends or do some activity in groups. Therefore, they learn how to work in a team and behave with toward other people when they will become adult. In conclusion, parents and school both are important for behavior of children and if they learn to behave well toward other people, they will be a good member of the society.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Part time work for high-schoolers One of the most challenging dilemmas for parents is whether to give the chance of working in society to their children in their teenage yearswho are before they becoming an adult. As teenagers are extremely vulnerable, some people profoundly feel that working in at this these ages could exposedisposes this sensitive age group/our teenagers to perilous mental damages. Nevertheless, I personally believe that it is very astounding rare/golden opportunity for adolescents to improve their abilities by working parttime jobs and finally it can prepare them to reach the zenith of their future profession. Following an appropriate job have has some outstanding privileges which are indispensable for this these ages. The first privilege is having self-confidence which will be attained by working in this ages. It makes sense a person who believes in himself would be prosper in his future career. For instance, my cousin is an astonishing example for this. In his adolescent adolescencehood he worked as a photographer assistant. Meanwhile, he was studying photography in school. Today he is adjunct professor of photography, with huge wealth and impressive prestige. At the second, I think a teenager who closely is in touch with society can earn some essential skills for adult life. In another words/simply put, in adolescent ages with by obtaining some crucial abilities like relating properly with people and regulating our relationship in overwhelming circumstances, we undoubtedly will experience a more healthy adult life. For example, a teenager who has been deceived by others, will be prepared in adult life to anticipate the danger and prevent it. Furthermore, we can instruct him to manage this damages and we can develop his skills to cope with the problems what he will face in his future. virgule eventually, I strongly believe that not only is doing a part-time job is not hazardous but also it can vaccinate the teens’ brain effectively from varies mental diseases in their adult life. It seems to be great if we encourage teenagers to learn how to protect themselves from dangers which they may face to.face sth/be faced with sth not only am I not only can I

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both this views and give your own opinion. There are two different notions regarding investing in whether . Or …. Some people believe it is better to be improved or developed the existing publics transportation such as regular trains and buses while the others prefer high-speed railways which are connecting between cities. From my point of view, both of these ideas have their advantages. On the one hand, nowadays thanks to high costs of accommodation and daily expenses in big cities, people tend to live further away from city centers. Also, some people work around or out of their city, so high-speed rail could be both the safety and efficient. To put it clearly, people traveling to or from work could save a large amount of time on the road, . besides, they are more likely to have safe travel in comparison with when they drive their car. Take a person who travels every day between cities as an example; they he not only should concentrate on the road to prevent an accident but also they he can spend more time to commuting due to traffic. On the other hand, unlike high-speed trains, which connect the cities, public transport enables citizens to travel within the city. Not only does public transportation decline reduce the traffic in a city, but it also has a huge effect in reducing the pollution created by fossil fuels of cars. So the more personal vehicles are existing in cities, the more pollution could be created. In addition, people commuting to and from work feel less exhaustion due to the less traffic. So they could dedicate their time to resting or studying instead of driving. In conclusion, I think in the a metropolis, the government should invest equally in the fast rail system and public transportation. However, it is also reasonable for the authorities to invest more money into the existing public transportation, especially in small cities.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Nowadays families move to different countries for work. Some people think it has a negative effect on children, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. After the revolution in technology, providing a unique situation has been provided in which people have more opportunities to experience living in other countries for various purposes, particularly find a job. Whereas many subscribe to the belief that immigrant children may experience difficulties that have a psychological impact on them, others argue the positive effects are substantial. Admittedly, relocating to other places means that considerable changes may occur. Initially, children generally encounter plenty of unfamiliar situations that may contribute to insecurity which means that they are constantly in fear of losing something in their minds. For instance, when a child moves to a new place, he should leave their his old friends, and startingmaking a new circle of ones. Moreover, their patriotic feeling and sense of belonging to their country could weaken since they miss a lot of opportunities to celebrate their national events. There is a deluge of merits of moving to different nationscountries for adolescents; the most significant one is that a new language could be quickly acquired by constant exposure in an environment. In other words, grammar, vocabulary, and structure easily are conveyed to children from new places and individuals. Furthermore, children have a chance to expand their knowledge about varied cultures, the way people think, and life; as a result, this unparalleled condition may result in the intellectual ability to evaluation evaluate alien situations. The latest surveys indicate that many successful people are capable of making decisions in tough situations. In conclusion, in my view living in a different country positively affects children in all aspects. Obtaining new languages and being an open-minded and faster decision maker are just few examples of many possible benefits.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

People benefit more from travelling in their own country than travelling to foreign countries. Travelling broadens one's perspective towards the world. It adjusts desires with reality and confronts individuals with the other ways of living. From ancient times, people were encouraged to travel, not only within their home country but also the unseen foreign countries. However, some people believe that spending time exploring their country would be more beneficial. I personally go for the second which is travelling to foreign countries for the below mentioned reasons. From my point of view, travelling to foreign countries can give you the opportunity to experience the culture which cannot be found in your home country. People who are living in the same district tend to have common thoughts and approaches towards the world. Confronting with a new culture is a great source to expand one's outlook. For instance, a person coming from an industrialized country can find his or her meaning of life in a less modern eastern country with a rich culture. He or she may find this new culture full of happiness which is/may be rare in his or her country with all the emphasize emphasis on money. In addition, each region has its unique natural reservoirs and scenic landscapes. By only travelling withing domestic regions, we are missing the chance of realizing the true beauty of Earth. Imagine if Markopoulos marco polo refused to go for the unseen world and explore beyond his comfort zone. How many beauties What a beauty would have been remained undiscovered. In summation, I strongly believe that people should consider travelling to foreign countries due to the importance of experiencing new cultures which can broaden their perspective and also to enjoy the beautiful natural scenes that cannot be seen in their home countries. I am'm looking forward to witnessing a new era in which/where travelling to foreign countries would be embraced warmly with by people and facilitated specially for my home country.