جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

As the population of the world is growing very quickly, the only long-term solution to the problem of overpopulation is for humans to settle in other planets. What benefits has the world got from space exploration? Do you think humans will ever live on other planets? In this day and age, finding new resources for living is a main issue which most of the countries are dealing with. Some countries have offered a multitude of solutions for this issue one of which is to meet our needs from other planets. In the First place, mankind has a question such as “what’s going on other planets?” or “can we go there someday?” It shows that willingness tofor finding new planets has been the dream of people for several years. I opine that, space research leads to achieving state-of-the-art technologies which in turn brings about high standard of living of human beings. For instance, new ways to of storing food or producing materials which have high resistance against the heat and frost. In addition, the space exploration may reveal new resources for our planet which can be accessible in distant future. For example, the Moon has water, the basic resource for people’s survival, and it abounds in solar energy which is a clean source of energy, so I think the investment in space exploration can be paid off someday in the future. However, some people suggest that government funding should be diverted toward improving the living standard of ordinary people instead of space research. Besides, in an optimistic approach, there is a possibility to connect with other creatures from outer space by which we will exploit and learning novel technologies. This will be useful for all the people of the world, even though Space travel requires a huge amounts of money and significant investment which only some governments can overcomeafford. So overall, I believe that time is ticking away for our planet, so any solutions to the space research will take some time to achieve and this will not happen in the near future.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe that preserving the natural environment is crucial, however, most make no effort to do so. Why do you think this is happening? What are some simple actions that could help the environment? Over recent years, a considerable number of people have supported the idea that natural resources should be protected from potential threats, yet most people do not apply effort to achieve this goal. Understanding the main reasons behind this negligent attitude could contribute to adopting appropriate measures to prevent the environment from deteriorating. Lack of public awareness is probably the foremost cause why a broad range of individuals seems unconscious of the environmental matters. To put it simply, not only do natural tendencies prefer to play down abstract problems, but also, they tend to speculate that they will happen in the distant future. Due to the fact that people have not faced the consequences of their actions, they have no clear minds about this vital issue. To illustrate, urban people often leave their trash in streams or canals blocking or limiting the water flow; and devastating floods are due to their ignorance. There are some fundamental resolutions that must be carried out to improve social knowledge. International campaigns in all forms of communication to train people about how indispensable the natural resources are and even calls for tough environmental regulations should be passed to maintain the planet for posterity. In addition, the press and social media could play a significant role in expanding knowledge about potentially natural hazards; persuading people to participate in campaigns. Another solution is that people could take waste apart thoughtfully, based on biodegradable, non-biodegradable. When individuals’ actions are coordinating coordinated with governments, it could result in the desired results. In conclusion, inadequate wisdom in the field of the environment could be regarded as the main reason why people ignore their behavior. The much sought-after result will happen as long as people and governments contribute closely in different ways.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Question: In some countries, owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people. Why might this be the case? Do you think this is a positive or negative situation? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience. Write at least 250 words. Answer: People mostly prefer to own a home rather than renting one. The reasons behind this preference should be researched in from both an economic perspective and the psychology of human beings. The Long-term financial benefits of possessing of a home, in some countries, is are truly a motive for people to find a way to buy their own house. In addition, the feeling of being secure, in case of owning a home rather than being a tenant in others’ house, can be seen as another stimulus of this behavior of people. When it comes to financial decisions, people often act rationally. In economies with inflation especially, such as Iran, where I was born and grew upbred/raised, it is quite reasonable to spend money on buying a house rather than “wasting” it by paying monthly rents. In those cases, buying a house is seen as an investment method to protect capital/the money. Although this situation is too negative, people’s behaviors are understandably the right reaction to it. Long-term financial motives cause people to find an economical way to buy their own house, such as taking out a low interest rate loan from banks. The second influential reason to why owing a home is of great importance for to people lies on in psychology of the human being. Being in possession of a home usually comes with a substantial sense of being secure. Owing a home means one protecting himself oneself against changes in rent prices and most essentially, enjoying from a static position of life rather than moving form from onea house to another one frequently. Furthermore, people feel a sense of belonging to their own home rather than to a rented home. They can easily change their own home to any shape that they want, as an instance by painting its walls with any favorable color. The sense which must be truly meant by the word of “ownership.” As a conclusion, in most places of the globe, people desire to own a home rather than renting one due to economical and psychological reasons. Owing a home, which is considered a capital, not only causes yields a financial benefit, especially from ain long-term perspective, but also creates a sense of security/being secure and having control on the place where we live. All in all, these positive senses leads people to have such a preferences.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe that immigrants should learn about the culture of the country that they immigrate to. Do you agree or disagree? Some individuals, think that newcomers should know about the social mores of the host country they immigrate to. I personally agree with this viewpoint, because it helps immigrants fit in with local community and also it allows local people to keep a harmonious society. Firstly, Individuals who knowing about the social standards of the host country can help them blend in with the local community. It means that, if newcomers learned about the culture of the community that they were enter into it would prevent them from stand out of societythe societies. For example, in the Middle east, people keep a shorter social distance in their formal meeting and they kiss each other when they want to greet, when they immigrate to the Western, this a small social distance is considered offensive in Western societiesthere. Therefore, in order to fit in with Western communities, and not stand out of the crowd, it is better to learn about their culture and keep a distance and avoid kissing. Secondly, respecting the customs of the country they go to it allows local people to keep a harmonious community. This is because, newcomers act in the a way that most people behave. For instance, most Indian people tend to wear religious/modest/revealing clothing and when Europeans enter to India their country they cannot wear tops and shorts. Thus, people who immigrate should learn about the traditions of the country they want to go to which causes/lead to/bring peace in the host country. To conclude, after analyzing what has been elaborated above, I believe that immigrants should know about the social customs of the host country they immigrate to, because it prevents them from being lonely or rejected and also brings peace to society and stay keep them away from them to stress and anxiety. Since the number of immigrate around the world is increasing every day, it would be best if they were aware of the advantageous advantages of knowing about the local community culture.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

The inventor and statesman Benjamin Franklin said, “Money never made a man happy yet, nor will it. There is nothing in its nature to produce happiness.” Do you agree with this statement? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your position. Thinking about money and whether it will bring us happiness or not, can be a challenging issue and there are various beliefs about this subject. In my view, money cannotcan not be a reason for happiness by itself but many things will be available with it which will make us and other people glad; such as helping paupers, buying gifts, traveling, having more fun with family and friends. At least if you have depression and you can’t do any of these things, you would be able to meet the therapist more and reach your wellbeing sooner. Studies have shown that giving gifts to others is a great factor to in becominge delighted even more than the times others give us gifts. So it can be the most important reason to show how the money will affect our happiness. The more money you have, the more gifts you are able to buy, although. Although there are a lot of people that do not expend money for these things or their life is more solitary to have anyone to buy a gift for. Further, all of us think about life and future a lot, for example about our career, our occupation, our children’s future and many other things which make us worry worried or discontented. Consequently, we will be less worry worried about these staff issues if we have enough money. However, some people are used to spending immediately whatever they earn and it is not important for them how much their finance is. I am relaxed I am depressed I am stressed We are used to hearing lies Thus, in conclusion, money can bring us happiness if we want. Life would be more fun and more easy as a result of having money, but there are plenty of people that/who they don’t want or they don’t know how to use money for this reason. Do you not love music Don’t you love music Can we not tell lies?

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuels should be the most important global priority today. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Given that environmentally damaging resources such as fossil fuels regrettably have much of a role to play in aggravating the earth’s condition, most of the governments put their every effort into implementing efficient infrastructures so as to replace such sources with green energies. First and foremost, I opine that since the size of population has risen significantly in comparison with the past, more pollutants have been produced all over the world. It is an axiom that the use of fossil fuels causes carbon dioxide emission considerably which triggers greenhouse effect which in turn contributes to destructive phenomena such as global warming. Obviously, this issue negatively affects the ozone layer whereby our planet unfortunately becomes less protected. Furthermore, not only does the mentioned factor affect the humans, but rather also it has detrimental impacts on animals’ lives, particularly endangered species which are on the verge of extinction. Their habitat may be destroyed through the deforestation and also desertification. By and large, environmental researchers should keep abreast of state-of-the-art-technologies and techniques so as to alleviate the environmental degradation for our planet. For instance, my firm conviction is that only if governments invest in the development of renewable resources such as wind and solar power, will the critical condition of earth be ameliorated. Moreover, in terms of natural resources supply, our descendants also will be hopefully guaranteed through such infinite/renewable safe alternatives. Therefore, I strongly believe that effective measures must be taken quickly for the harmful problems mentioned in the previous paragraph. Consequently, as far as environmental issues are concerned, we have unfortunately faced a crucial crisis in this day and age owing to significant fossil fuels consumption, so from my standpoint, improvements inof exploitation of environmentally friendly resources is the global priority in his period of time and it is likely to pay off.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

10/April/2021 It is easier for parents to raise their children today than it was 50 years ago. Agree or disagree? Hardly ever can anyone call into question the significant role of parents in children's life. The question arises as to whether bringing up kids nowadays is easier or not. I wholeheartedly adhere to this belief that in today's modern life children rearing is not more difficult compared to 50 years ago on the grounds that technology and lifestyle have advanced. First and most obvious, nowadays medical equipment and access to healthcare facilities are conducive to saving a lot of children's live. In other words, in the past the quality of health care was extremely poor and children may have died due to simple viruses or infections. The best example is, although Hepatitis A and B are dangerous diseases which can adversely affect infants, by discovering the vaccine in 1991 they are in control. Besides, public transportation has profoundly improved which offers safe and fast travels to families. For instance, parents can allow their children to use public vehicles such as the bus, the taxi, the subway to go to school which was not common 50 years ago. Therefore, it goes without saying that both advancements of in medical facilities and public transportation systems have made raising/rearing children easier compared to the past decades. Another striking point is about enhancing the education system which makes parents more knowledgeable than the past/previous time. For example, there are plenty of books are written about the right methods of child rearing, so families have less fewer challenges to face in terms of bringing up their kids. ,so parenting has less fewer challenges to face. Moreover, with the advent of thetechnology especially the internet, in today's modern life parents rarely spend quality time with their children, so they can undertake their tasks regardless of hearing children's grumbles owing to the fact that kids can spend their leisure time by playing online games or social media such as Tik Tok. Hence, as is clear today children rearing is more convenient based on the education system boosting and the internet. Last but not least, even though some people state that in today's modern life parents are more struggling with their hectic life style and they are extremely busy with their jobs, they have less time to take care of their children which is a big drawback,. however, I strongly believe otherwise maintaining that this mindset is nothing but a tunnel-vision which overlooks the importance of the abovementioned facts and as a matter of the fact babysitters would be solved this problem. To recap, on the basis of the reasons that I were mentioned above, in my view nowadays raising children is easier rather than 50 year ago.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste? Recycling is an essential factor to in havinghave a cleaner environment. There is a notion that the government could tackle this problem by putting introducing some strict laws as the only solution. I do not agree that a recycling law is the only measure that governments should take. To begin with, if recycling is made obligatory/a legal requirement more people will obey the law because there are certainly some people who will act only if they are bound by it. For example, the government could punish householders who do not separate all waste in different bins by ranging from a small fine like paying money to community service, so these measures would act as a deterrent. However, a new recycling law would be just one possible way to tackle the waste problem. Since the government cannot oversee or control the actions of all individuals many people break the laws. I believe that governments should do more than introducing a recycling law. That is to say, the governments are had better to educate people as well as enhance people's responsibility instead of putting in place strict low laws or punishingment them. Take children who are taught in school about recycling or homeowners could be informed about the environmental impact of household waste as an example; not only do they not they require any law, but they also feel responsible for an environmental issue. To conclude, enacting a law with regard to controlling the amount garbage produced that makes recycling a legal requirement will certainly encourage more people to adopt this practice. However, before enforcing it by law, the government has to ensure that adequate facilities are in place.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In future, more people will choose to go on holiday in their own country and not travel abroad on holiday. Do you agree or disagree? During centuries, travelling to new places has been one of the most exciting hobbies amongst mankind. People set planes to invest money and make the spare time to discover new places and broaden their perspective of life. I believe that in future people will expand their experience of travelling beyond their countries’ borders and I have a couple of reasons to elucidate my point of view. First and foremost, human’s nature and curiosity will result in desire to discover new countries and continents as there is evidence throughout history to prove this fact. Christopher Columbus sailed a long way to America and built an empire there. People tend to visit new places and get familiar to different foods, cultures, fauna and flora and this will inevitably lead to travelling abroad. Another point to mention is that by development of technology, there would be faster and easier ways of travelling. Although people are having/living/leading a more hectic lifestyle nowadays, the state-of-the-art facilities will pave the way to explore the world. Sophisticated means of transportation will be invented and people may travel across the earth/globe/world in just a blink. Besides, there is a widespread belief between academicians that in close future, people will be richer and more people can afford to travel to foreign countries. In conclusion, human beings intrinsically adore are keen to explore the world and therefore thereby enrich their experience. On the other hand, the brand-new technology will facilitate this process. I myself am looking forward to seeing the time travel machine to be invented sooner!