Mondays GMAT-GRE-TOEFL-IELTS-آموزشگاه زبان صبای سحر-چمران جنوب، بلوار جلال آل احمد، جنب داروخانه شبانه روزی جلال آل احمد، پلاک 87، طبقه سوم تلفن: 42-88679341 https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/242-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-06-13 2024-05-04T23:10:29+00:00 IELTSTOEFLCENTER info@ieltstoeflcenter.com Joomla! - Open Source Content Management Advertisement, Ahmad Jalali 2017-09-04T17:47:51+00:00 2017-09-04T17:47:51+00:00 https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/242-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-06-13/1469-advertisement-ahmad-jalali <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.06.13/Advertisement, Ahmad Jalali.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Almost every successful company is using advertisements to increase their sales. What features make an advertisement effective? Is advertising good or bad? By gaining benefit from various commercial activities, many businesses can introduce their manufactured goods and extend the rate of their sales. In general, if the promotion practices does not cross the boundaries of ethics, it would be quite helpful. There are several features that can make an advertisement more impressive. First, it should be believable. You should convince your costumer that what is being told on your advertisement is true. If people do not believe what you say, they will not buy/accept your words and as a in result, your advertisement would be a failure. Second, it should be honest. If you lie about on your advertisement, the consumer of your making would be undissatisfied and will never buy anything from you again. By being truthful in your promotions, you can gain/win the trust of your costumers and being a trustworthy businessman can be an advertisement itself. Advertisement is valuable indeed. It can help smaller companies to introduce their productions and help them grow into bigger businesses. The stronger companies in a society, the more powerful economyic that society would have. Also customers who do not know what to buy can receive help from different commercials and choose what is best for their interest. But if it tries to seduce people, it can be so harmful. Sometimes poor quality productions sell more than high quality ones because of the incredibly excellent production of their advertisement. In conclusion, creating believable commercials which are honest to customers can lead us to more successful advertisements. Also advertisements can help both producers and consumers of the products. On the other hand, by powerful advertisements customers can end up buying the wrong commodity.manufacture.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.06.13/Advertisement, Ahmad Jalali.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Almost every successful company is using advertisements to increase their sales. What features make an advertisement effective? Is advertising good or bad? By gaining benefit from various commercial activities, many businesses can introduce their manufactured goods and extend the rate of their sales. In general, if the promotion practices does not cross the boundaries of ethics, it would be quite helpful. There are several features that can make an advertisement more impressive. First, it should be believable. You should convince your costumer that what is being told on your advertisement is true. If people do not believe what you say, they will not buy/accept your words and as a in result, your advertisement would be a failure. Second, it should be honest. If you lie about on your advertisement, the consumer of your making would be undissatisfied and will never buy anything from you again. By being truthful in your promotions, you can gain/win the trust of your costumers and being a trustworthy businessman can be an advertisement itself. Advertisement is valuable indeed. It can help smaller companies to introduce their productions and help them grow into bigger businesses. The stronger companies in a society, the more powerful economyic that society would have. Also customers who do not know what to buy can receive help from different commercials and choose what is best for their interest. But if it tries to seduce people, it can be so harmful. Sometimes poor quality productions sell more than high quality ones because of the incredibly excellent production of their advertisement. In conclusion, creating believable commercials which are honest to customers can lead us to more successful advertisements. Also advertisements can help both producers and consumers of the products. On the other hand, by powerful advertisements customers can end up buying the wrong commodity.manufacture.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Constructing in the Countryside, Nazak 2017-09-04T17:47:32+00:00 2017-09-04T17:47:32+00:00 https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/242-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-06-13/1468-constructing-in-the-countryside-nazak <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.06.13/Constructing in the Countryside, Nazak.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new home there. What is your opinion about this? Nowadays, with the increasing population in metropolises, people need new places to live in, while the cities mostly are over-populated. Therefore, this fact necessitates people seeking for the new settlements around the big cities which means they should think of the available space in the countryside. However, this caused a controversial debate among people who care about conserving the environment. Living in the countryside makes people develop constructions. Thereby, many natural resources will be destroyed to this end. Opponents believe that urbanisation in former rural areas will have dire consequences. They consider the fact that as a result of engineering projects, people damage the natural ecosystem. For instance, building new houses requires many trees to be cut down and even in some places results in deforestation. Not only does this action harms crucially our planet, but also accelerates the global warming. On the other hand, supporters state that there is no other choice for creating suitable inhabits habitat/places of residents for citizens. Building numerous skyscrapers has also harmful impacts on the environment. In from their view point, although protecting the countryside is notably important, people can also live in harmony with nature. Having more parks and preserving riversides and designing more ponds and lakes can help the natural condition to stay healthy. To sum up, I, myself, believe that people need to learn how to have co-existence with nature. In my opinion, although we must take care of our planet and the environment, we are obligated to provide our population some proper places to live in. Reaching this aim, however, requires great consideration not to harm our natural ecosystem.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.06.13/Constructing in the Countryside, Nazak.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new home there. What is your opinion about this? Nowadays, with the increasing population in metropolises, people need new places to live in, while the cities mostly are over-populated. Therefore, this fact necessitates people seeking for the new settlements around the big cities which means they should think of the available space in the countryside. However, this caused a controversial debate among people who care about conserving the environment. Living in the countryside makes people develop constructions. Thereby, many natural resources will be destroyed to this end. Opponents believe that urbanisation in former rural areas will have dire consequences. They consider the fact that as a result of engineering projects, people damage the natural ecosystem. For instance, building new houses requires many trees to be cut down and even in some places results in deforestation. Not only does this action harms crucially our planet, but also accelerates the global warming. On the other hand, supporters state that there is no other choice for creating suitable inhabits habitat/places of residents for citizens. Building numerous skyscrapers has also harmful impacts on the environment. In from their view point, although protecting the countryside is notably important, people can also live in harmony with nature. Having more parks and preserving riversides and designing more ponds and lakes can help the natural condition to stay healthy. To sum up, I, myself, believe that people need to learn how to have co-existence with nature. In my opinion, although we must take care of our planet and the environment, we are obligated to provide our population some proper places to live in. Reaching this aim, however, requires great consideration not to harm our natural ecosystem.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Parents are The Best Teacher, Amir Vazirizadeh 2017-09-04T17:47:19+00:00 2017-09-04T17:47:19+00:00 https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/242-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-06-13/1467-parents-are-the-best-teacher-amir-vazirizadeh <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.06.13/Parents are The Best Teacher, Amir Vazirizadeh.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Amir Vazirizadeh Do you agree or disagree with following statement? Parents are the best teacher .use specific reasons and examples support your answer The important role of training and education of children is undeniable such that we can observe the effect of them in society directly. I believe that the parents have more efficiencytly in upbringing of children in comparison to school teachers. The Three most common reasons are the influence of children from parents, their close relationship and the length of time it they passes together in childhood. One of the characteristics of the kids is that they want to do things that adults do. For instance, when a father or mother smokes cigarettes in front of the children, so they learn how to smoke because children they are curious which and it confirms that parents can influence/affect/have a great effect on penetrate the children's behavior by their actions and reactions,. For this reason, they play a role in their kids' subsequent successed of kids subsequently. It is my opinion that one of the most beautiful relationships in our life are is between mother/father and the child because they are basically shaped by pure love so parents teach their children skills or anything else carefully and with all their focus .It should also be added that parents know the best manner to teach their children and have more flexibility in type of training. Children take spend most of their time with parents until the age of seven and in this period, capacity of learning is incredible by in comparison to others. Speaking in to the mother's tongue is a clear certain evidence for proving this claim or another example is that the majority of famous composers, started learning in their when they were childhood so parents should notice what they teach them because children they are more talented and absorb meanings more easily easier in these ages. Parents's Double Impact on Kids, lovely relationships and role of parents in childhood are the factors that shows why they are the best teachers for children.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.06.13/Parents are The Best Teacher, Amir Vazirizadeh.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Amir Vazirizadeh Do you agree or disagree with following statement? Parents are the best teacher .use specific reasons and examples support your answer The important role of training and education of children is undeniable such that we can observe the effect of them in society directly. I believe that the parents have more efficiencytly in upbringing of children in comparison to school teachers. The Three most common reasons are the influence of children from parents, their close relationship and the length of time it they passes together in childhood. One of the characteristics of the kids is that they want to do things that adults do. For instance, when a father or mother smokes cigarettes in front of the children, so they learn how to smoke because children they are curious which and it confirms that parents can influence/affect/have a great effect on penetrate the children's behavior by their actions and reactions,. For this reason, they play a role in their kids' subsequent successed of kids subsequently. It is my opinion that one of the most beautiful relationships in our life are is between mother/father and the child because they are basically shaped by pure love so parents teach their children skills or anything else carefully and with all their focus .It should also be added that parents know the best manner to teach their children and have more flexibility in type of training. Children take spend most of their time with parents until the age of seven and in this period, capacity of learning is incredible by in comparison to others. Speaking in to the mother's tongue is a clear certain evidence for proving this claim or another example is that the majority of famous composers, started learning in their when they were childhood so parents should notice what they teach them because children they are more talented and absorb meanings more easily easier in these ages. Parents's Double Impact on Kids, lovely relationships and role of parents in childhood are the factors that shows why they are the best teachers for children.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Public Heath, Erfane 2017-09-04T17:46:54+00:00 2017-09-04T17:46:54+00:00 https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/242-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-06-13/1466-public-heath-erfane <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.06.13/Public Heath, Erfane.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sport facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and other measures are required. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Nowadays, the machines do most of the tasks in the industry and the agriculture. As a result, in comparison with their previous generation, people's life style is becoming more and more sedentary. Furthermore, people are using lots of unhealthy foods and thiswhich could be a threat for their health. Moreover, the level of stress is increasing due to living in the urban areas. Regarding this facts, governments must establish a policy in order to keep society in a proper health manner. Some believe this might be achieved by constructing more sport facilities while the others believe there are other solutions. The scientific evidence has shown that doing daily exercises would prevent lots of diseases such as heart and brain failure, depression, blood pressure or diabetes. As a result, not only might governments provide inexpensive or even free sport facilities, but also might encourage people to use them by advertisements in media. On the other hand, lots of many diseases have their roots in improper diet, so having some planes a plan in this section might improve public health. For example, imposing more tax for fast food restaurants and making people aware of side effects of these kinds of foods. Moreover, people must be encouraged to use more vegetables and reduce the intake amount of sugar and fat. Another way to help public health might be establishing some free consulting centers for those wishing to quit smoking or using drugs because these are also seriously destructive for society's health. Furthermore, the free sociologic counselling consulting centers would help individuals reduce their stress. In conclusion, I believe increasing the number of gyms would be an effective action but/however it is not enough for creating a healthy nation because public health is the outcome of multiple factors such as individuals' awareness of health facts as well as using them.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.06.13/Public Heath, Erfane.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sport facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and other measures are required. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Nowadays, the machines do most of the tasks in the industry and the agriculture. As a result, in comparison with their previous generation, people's life style is becoming more and more sedentary. Furthermore, people are using lots of unhealthy foods and thiswhich could be a threat for their health. Moreover, the level of stress is increasing due to living in the urban areas. Regarding this facts, governments must establish a policy in order to keep society in a proper health manner. Some believe this might be achieved by constructing more sport facilities while the others believe there are other solutions. The scientific evidence has shown that doing daily exercises would prevent lots of diseases such as heart and brain failure, depression, blood pressure or diabetes. As a result, not only might governments provide inexpensive or even free sport facilities, but also might encourage people to use them by advertisements in media. On the other hand, lots of many diseases have their roots in improper diet, so having some planes a plan in this section might improve public health. For example, imposing more tax for fast food restaurants and making people aware of side effects of these kinds of foods. Moreover, people must be encouraged to use more vegetables and reduce the intake amount of sugar and fat. Another way to help public health might be establishing some free consulting centers for those wishing to quit smoking or using drugs because these are also seriously destructive for society's health. Furthermore, the free sociologic counselling consulting centers would help individuals reduce their stress. In conclusion, I believe increasing the number of gyms would be an effective action but/however it is not enough for creating a healthy nation because public health is the outcome of multiple factors such as individuals' awareness of health facts as well as using them.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Public Transport, Mehdi Samie 2017-09-04T17:46:40+00:00 2017-09-04T17:46:40+00:00 https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/242-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-06-13/1465-public-transport-mehdi-samie <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.06.13/Public Transport, Mehdi Samie.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Thanks to the improvements in technology and mainly in transportation, a number of highly developed countries now enjoy a fast and high quality transportation between different destinations in their country. Whether this large amount of money should be spentd on (the?) improving current public transportation in cities or constructing new railway lines will be covered in this essay. First and foremost, having a relatively high amount of time consumed for transportation is on the top the list of "major concerns" for people in highly developed countries. Based on the study conducted by JSI JIS school of psychology the more people's time spentd on transportation, the more the level of anxiety they carry, so to address this problematic matter in some countries which where the amount number of people heading from one city to another one is relatively high, authorities have invested in building new railway lines that can transport passengers with great speed in a fast way, namely in Japan. On the other hand, one might argue that having this large amount of money directeding to railway construction ,in inner cities there would be an absolute chaos regarding public transportation due to lack of investment, thus however significant is the importance of high-tech trains between cities, the city's public transportation itself should not be forgetforgotten/ignored. Furthermore, I firmly believe that if the number of people in a country heading from one city to another one on a regular basis is not of a high rate, the investment in new railways is redundant and can be spentd on other priorities. To sum up, from my point of view in a country that where people relocate from one city to another one in a significant numbers not only should do the governments should spend money on fast and high quality transportation between cities, but they should take care of the public transportation in cities too, so there should be a balance between investments otherwise there would be dire consequences. Time: 35 Mins</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.06.13/Public Transport, Mehdi Samie.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Thanks to the improvements in technology and mainly in transportation, a number of highly developed countries now enjoy a fast and high quality transportation between different destinations in their country. Whether this large amount of money should be spentd on (the?) improving current public transportation in cities or constructing new railway lines will be covered in this essay. First and foremost, having a relatively high amount of time consumed for transportation is on the top the list of "major concerns" for people in highly developed countries. Based on the study conducted by JSI JIS school of psychology the more people's time spentd on transportation, the more the level of anxiety they carry, so to address this problematic matter in some countries which where the amount number of people heading from one city to another one is relatively high, authorities have invested in building new railway lines that can transport passengers with great speed in a fast way, namely in Japan. On the other hand, one might argue that having this large amount of money directeding to railway construction ,in inner cities there would be an absolute chaos regarding public transportation due to lack of investment, thus however significant is the importance of high-tech trains between cities, the city's public transportation itself should not be forgetforgotten/ignored. Furthermore, I firmly believe that if the number of people in a country heading from one city to another one on a regular basis is not of a high rate, the investment in new railways is redundant and can be spentd on other priorities. To sum up, from my point of view in a country that where people relocate from one city to another one in a significant numbers not only should do the governments should spend money on fast and high quality transportation between cities, but they should take care of the public transportation in cities too, so there should be a balance between investments otherwise there would be dire consequences. Time: 35 Mins</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Study, Ali Sedaghat 2017-09-04T17:46:18+00:00 2017-09-04T17:46:18+00:00 https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/242-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-06-13/1464-study-ali-sedaghat <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.06.13/Study, Ali Sedaghat.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in future , such as those related to science and technology. discuss both views and give your own opinion. Without hesitation the university time and study play a crucial role in everyone's whole life. The courses students enrolling in, shape their characteristics and way of life. In this text we would like to will discuss the importance of usefulness and their interest in likelihood of their courses. I believe market oriented study in university has more benefits. The idea of studying whatever you like is supported by many people. It is like living a life with passion which is joyful,. this joy can inspire students, which may results in more hard working and deeper understanding of what they study. This study time runs like a dream for them without little boredom. They may form a new boundary by their restless effort,. Nevertheless, what is the usage?! On the other sidehand, university time is like investment and passes very fast. with the commencement of after university time, real life starts ,people need a job to earn a living , usefulness and market oriented courses are very important by then. For example I have seen many graduates d students who want to immigrate to another country because they couldn't find an appropriate job. Moreover, there are many educated people who suffer disappointment and psychological problems since they have difficulty finding do not have any job. They can't exchange pitch their degree for a decent and receive goods for living. On the one hand, there are many benefits for students to follow their desires and there is no accounting for tastes! on the other hand, earning a suitable living is important in life. As a result, they had better/ it is better they choose their courses market oriented and find their interest among them.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.06.13/Study, Ali Sedaghat.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in future , such as those related to science and technology. discuss both views and give your own opinion. Without hesitation the university time and study play a crucial role in everyone's whole life. The courses students enrolling in, shape their characteristics and way of life. In this text we would like to will discuss the importance of usefulness and their interest in likelihood of their courses. I believe market oriented study in university has more benefits. The idea of studying whatever you like is supported by many people. It is like living a life with passion which is joyful,. this joy can inspire students, which may results in more hard working and deeper understanding of what they study. This study time runs like a dream for them without little boredom. They may form a new boundary by their restless effort,. Nevertheless, what is the usage?! On the other sidehand, university time is like investment and passes very fast. with the commencement of after university time, real life starts ,people need a job to earn a living , usefulness and market oriented courses are very important by then. For example I have seen many graduates d students who want to immigrate to another country because they couldn't find an appropriate job. Moreover, there are many educated people who suffer disappointment and psychological problems since they have difficulty finding do not have any job. They can't exchange pitch their degree for a decent and receive goods for living. On the one hand, there are many benefits for students to follow their desires and there is no accounting for tastes! on the other hand, earning a suitable living is important in life. As a result, they had better/ it is better they choose their courses market oriented and find their interest among them.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Theory Practice Skills, Maryam Ghavamian 2017-09-04T17:45:55+00:00 2017-09-04T17:45:55+00:00 https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/242-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-06-13/1463-theory-practice-skills-maryam-ghavamian <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.06.13/Theory Practice Skills, Maryam Ghavamian.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some People say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills. Do you agree or disagree? It is true that the overwhelming majority of teaching modules are theory based especially in the first year of study while the students should prepare themselves for the job market. In my view, both of them play a crucial role in an effective educational system. On the one hand, the theories are the infrastructure of every science which cannot be excluded from compulsory modules. The students should acquire a basic knowledge to comprehend the complicated realities. Therefore, these years could be a proper time to develop the essential concept in academic subjects and prepare them for further learning. For instance, the focus on memorizing the math formulas as a fundamental form of knowledge (skill) may be considered unnecessary while being familiar with some an accounting software may play an effectively essential role for an employee, but (nonetheless)if an individual does not recognize the basics of problem-solving, he will not be able to employ these tools either. Consequently, this expertise will be quiet quite inefficient in the company. On the other hand, efficient skills are absolutely crucial in order to master a field. The undergraduates who are not familiar with such skills will need supplementary training to become adapted in a specific carrier which means they have wasted their time in universities. An accountant who just knows the mathematical formulas on the paper to calculate the payment salary can hardly find a proper job due to lack of information in the modern accounting software domain. In my opinion, the best solution to have an effectively positive education system is to balance theory and practice during the teaching process in all levels and run the training course at the last few years to prepare the students for the workplace. In conclusion, although it seems academic subjects has have dedicated the majority of teaching hours in the schools, while the practical skills may be more useful in a job, the theories are the infrastructure of every science which should be considered simultaneously to provide a professional qualification.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.06.13/Theory Practice Skills, Maryam Ghavamian.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some People say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills. Do you agree or disagree? It is true that the overwhelming majority of teaching modules are theory based especially in the first year of study while the students should prepare themselves for the job market. In my view, both of them play a crucial role in an effective educational system. On the one hand, the theories are the infrastructure of every science which cannot be excluded from compulsory modules. The students should acquire a basic knowledge to comprehend the complicated realities. Therefore, these years could be a proper time to develop the essential concept in academic subjects and prepare them for further learning. For instance, the focus on memorizing the math formulas as a fundamental form of knowledge (skill) may be considered unnecessary while being familiar with some an accounting software may play an effectively essential role for an employee, but (nonetheless)if an individual does not recognize the basics of problem-solving, he will not be able to employ these tools either. Consequently, this expertise will be quiet quite inefficient in the company. On the other hand, efficient skills are absolutely crucial in order to master a field. The undergraduates who are not familiar with such skills will need supplementary training to become adapted in a specific carrier which means they have wasted their time in universities. An accountant who just knows the mathematical formulas on the paper to calculate the payment salary can hardly find a proper job due to lack of information in the modern accounting software domain. In my opinion, the best solution to have an effectively positive education system is to balance theory and practice during the teaching process in all levels and run the training course at the last few years to prepare the students for the workplace. In conclusion, although it seems academic subjects has have dedicated the majority of teaching hours in the schools, while the practical skills may be more useful in a job, the theories are the infrastructure of every science which should be considered simultaneously to provide a professional qualification.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table>