Mondays

Environment, Shahroq

2018-06-26T06:27:49+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do? Humans have been responsible for an array of damages to the environment. I believe tackling these deleterious impacts should be a complementary partnership between authorities and individuals. Humans’ lifestyle has been imposing numerous harmful effects on the environment and wildlife. Firstly, the amount of waste, which is produced on a daily basis, is a matter of concern. Made mostly with non-recyclable materials such as plastic, the majority of this waste ends up in landfills outside of the cities and oceans, and they will remain in the environment for decades before synthesizing. The whole process creates environmental hazards and health issues for people and animals living in those areas and destroys wildlife habitats. For example, there has been a raft of disturbing reports about sea mammals’ death caused by swallowing plastic bags in recent years. In addition, they have been contaminating the water supplies such as wells, therefore, more and more people being afflicted by infectious diseases. Secondly, human uncontrolled poaching leads to many species facing extinction; for instance, animals such as elephants, rhinos, and sharks, which are cruelly either killed or mutilated for their ivories, horns, and fins, are on the verge of extinction, thus disrupting of wildlife cycle on the earth. Government and individuals, however, can take positive steps to tackle these problems. To begin with, the government can educate people on deleterious effects of producing too much rubbish. Publicity campaigns and adding to the school curriculum, if promoted and devised effectively, can make people more conscious of advantages of using more eco-friendly items. Furthermore, the government could levy high taxes on articles such as single-use plastic kitchenware and non-degradable food packaging which has widely being consumed. Also, what people can do is to shoulder more responsibility to mitigate these damaging effects. They can carry their own bags when shopping, thereby a huge decline in overall production of waste. Moreover, people should be encouraged to refuse to buy both artefacts and foods made with any endangered animal organs, which not only leads to less demand but hopefully makes killing animals less desirable/sought-after/financially attractive profession, for never has plunging the profit failed to deter illegal hunters.In conclusion, it seems that human activities in many ways have negatively impacted the environment, yet both authorities and individuals can take numerous actions to address these issues unless we do not concern about the destruction of the environment.

Increasing the Price of Fuel to Solve Environmental Hazards, Pejvak Bayati

2018-06-26T06:27:38+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

To solve the ever-increasing environmental hazards throughout the world, the best way is to increase the price of fuel. What is your opinion on the above assumption? Over the last century, the greatest environmental degradation has been made by humans. That this is one of the most significant challenges every country has is undeniable. There is a lot of controversy as to which solution is better to overcome this major problem. Some experts believe that improving environmental conditions can be done by raising the fuel rate. Although at first this will decrease the fuel consumption, the side effects of this action should be carefully taken into account. Many economists and environmentalists believe that the price of fuel should be much more according to the environmental damages it causes. Raising the fuel costs would not only reduces unnecessary car trips but also encourages people to utilize green energy more than ever. In this circumstance, more people tend to benefit from alternative modes of transportation. In addition, no doubt that the more expensive fuel becomes, the better quality will be produced. On the contrary, some pundits dispute the idea of increasing the price of fuel and are of the opinion that it will raise the cost of other products, especially daily necessary ones. Moreover, it will bring the poverty level to nothing but misery. To put it simply, it will cause to inflation. Although it may restrain some car owners, this will not prevent prosperous people from using their cars. In conclusion, I think that raising the price of fuel cannot be a general solution and will not contribute significantly to the environmental protection. Decreasing environmental hazards needs a set of solutions from both government and society and a single solution remains the problem with subsequent ones in our hands.

New Homes, Radin Zahedi

2018-06-26T06:27:25+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In Many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. What is your opinion about this? These days due to rapid growth of population, there are not enough places for people to live in there while the urban area is full of occupied homes. Besides, city centers could not take new buildings anymore so the only available place to construct new houses would be countryside. A certain group of people believe that what is actually important in not making new place of residence in rural districts is preserving nature. Some people rightly claim that although new homes are needed, it is more essential to protect the countryside as massive construction could harm nature. it is true that since the machines which do operations in there produce hazardous items such as pollutions and noises while these pollutants will ruin nature. Moreover, trees should be cut down and habitats of animals should be destroyed to provide proper lands for making new buildings. Therefore, making new buildings requires vanishing the nature. As an example, it should be said that in some cities of Iran, near 30 percent of nature resources are ruined due to this trend. It should be argued that it is the government that should hold the responsibility of providing new places to live while protecting the countryside. For instance, authorities can buy dilapidated houses and build new skyscrapers as they hold more people in it. Furthermore, governments can manage the population of a city and give them funding to live in other cities which have empty houses or are less crowded therefore there is no need to build new homes in certain cities. Considering all the facts above, it is rational to conclude that it is more important to protect the countryside than making new homes as the disadvantage of this phenomenon to these area is irrecoverable while value of nature is priceless thus governments should provide effective solutions.

Part Time Job, Amir Arsalan Tahouni

2018-06-26T06:27:13+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Topic: Some countries encourage teenagers to have part-time job and see it as a good thing, while others disagree. Give your opinion and explain both views. Many juveniles who step in their adolescence want to have a part-time job in order to gain experience and be able to afford some of their costs and they do not care about its relativeness with their own field of work. However, many will not accredit these jobs as a suitable activity for their pastimes. In this essay we will argue both views. The mentioned work seekers will probably find a place in a café house, or maybe a retail store and so on. If they are lucky, they will find a job on a big corporation related to their current study. Clearly, being involved in a job and getting salary would be outstanding for everybody, especially for them who want to get apart from their parents and start their own personal lives. In Addition, they can test themselves with obstacles and everyday challenges, which would make them become sophisticated and full-grown. On the other hand, they will have less time to spend on their study. Although they are in their decisive years, they may get much too busy with their work and lose track of their education procedure. Since they usually are involved in a job which is not related to their education, that [job] will distract them and would be harmful. Furthermore, as long as money would be an illusory object for the human kind, youths may be decoyed and get enticed by it, making them drawn in it. All in all, attending a job for students have its own circumstances. First of all, they should have enough time to spend on their studies and university forces. Secondly, the job should be related to their main field of work, so it can be accounted as a work experience and they can picture a prospect for themselves in it for the future.

Students, Amir G

2018-06-26T06:27:00+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

School teachers are more responsible for social and intellectual development of students than parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? In this day and age the educational system plays a crucially important role in fostering the learners. While many believe parents are more responsible for their children’s progress, others, however, argue that it is incumbent upon teachers to improve next generations’ competency in a way that they can face their life independently. Although there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary, I strongly believe that both the school teachers and the parents have the same authority to nurture the pupils. School children spend most of their time at schools, hence the significant role of teachers. I believe not only do the teachers have a deeper influence on their mental progress, but surely they have an extreme impact on their spiritual point of view. Furthermore, teachers are specifically trained to work with children. They know how they have to react with aggressive children or those who suffer from different kinds of mental disorders. Mostly student trust their teachers rather than their parents, and this is another special privilege of teachers with which they can have long-life impact on their students. Having said that, no one can deny the highly significant position of parents. If parents do not spend enough time on their children, they cannot expect to see a successful result. Wealthy children whose parents spend most of their time with their job are a case in point. Although these days perhaps both parents work out of home to make a leaving, I believe at least one of them must reduce his/her working hour to dedicate that time on his/her children. Alone and in some cases angry owing to the absence of their parents, children nowadays rarely see both parents together. Social and individual development of children is once again under the spotlight. Although I would tend with the ones who are in favor of importance of teachers, my votes does not go completely to them. I would argue that the role of parent is an undeniable fact. In other words, both the teachers and parents have equally importance role in development of pupils.

When a Country Develops its Technology, The Traditional Skill

2018-06-26T06:26:47+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

aaWhen a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. Nowadays, technology development is one of the major goals of any government. By new technology, improving our economy, science and other necessary field will happen and lead to make a better life for our society. This development tends to destroy traditional skill and fade away in future. My firm conviction is that we are responsible to our community to preserve our customs and represent them to our offspring. I prefer to argue about this topic in two contrast point of view. Some individuals prefer to use updated technologies for any purpose and always try to find a solution in effective way hence this idea can easily prove keeping the traditional skill alive is pointless. For instance, with considering high rise of population using old-fashioned methods in agriculture was outdated. By performing new inventions, we can cultivate three times as equal as harvest in compare of traditional ways and save a lot of time, water and money too. On the other hand, some argues believe that using technology will survive traditional skills and keep them alive. We should commitment to future generations and convey our heritage to them. Using new methods based on technology like internet have a big influence to show our culture to other nations. For example, by publishing advertising on internet for Masouleh village, numerous tourists will be attracted to this area and finally help the people to preserve their customs and handicrafts stuff. To sum up, with using new technology we can keep our tradition and develop it. Not only advance technology has no conflict with traditional skills but also can keep them alive. We should protect our customs that heritage from our ancestors and modify them with new requirement of society and deliver them to the posterity.