جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

The media is increasing interest in famous people who have ordinary backgrounds. Why do you think people are interested in the lives of famous people? Do you think this is a good thing? An overwhelming majority of people across the world tend to know about celebrities’ personal life. In other words, this has become one of the main amusements in wide range of communities where tabloids and gossip rags have the highest rates of sold out printed media. The reasons behind this curiosity, besides the merits and demerits of such a tendency will be elaborated in the following lines. In almost most parts of the world people are keen on personal lives of iconic people because by and large famous stars in almost most parts of the globe are leading a luxurious lifestyle that most people are dreaming about. Drown/filled with in money and great happiness, superstars apparently are enjoying their life much more than ordinary people, and perhaps people who follow their life are interested to see what they could not reach, but their icons have attained. Undoubtedly, celebrities’ pretty face and attractive body is another factor at play. That most of the super stars benefit from their attractive appearance is an indisputable fact. Though many people enjoy to be at the center of attraction by others, most celebrities claim that they do not like to be under surveillance by both hidden and unhidden cameras when in public. The Majority of famous stars prefer to appear in public places as ordinary members of society to enjoy of being with other people. Many a star dreams of an evening jog with his family in a park near his home. Hardly a month goes by without hearing of a well-known couple separating because of a private picture or document released by a tabloid. To cut a long story short, not only can this tendency be to the benefit of celebrities, but it also can be to the benefit of the populace if people’s awareness improves. People have to realize that peeking over the private life of their superstars can be at the cost of their stars’ lives. It is high time people realized that they are not allowed to know every twist and turn of superstars.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? Nowadays, people in urban areas have different views about their number of family members that they prefer to live either alone or in a nuclear family as opposed to living in an extended family. While there are some benefits to living in a large family, I believe that this new lifestyle is a positive trend. On the one hand, traditional forms of the extended family provide a benefit to individual family members. Firstly, a larger family could instruct children to have better community relations in their society, workplace, and family. To illustrate, children in relationships and consulting with their siblings learn how they could communicate and treat with their opposite sex. Secondly, many problems in the larger family could easily be solved because they can split the problems between themselves. For example, when parents get older, they need care, their children cope with this problem easily by dividing the days of parental care between themselves. Therefore, abundant families could prepare children better for enrolment in society. On the other hand, there are several advantages of living lonely or in a small family. First of all, the most important benefits would be more freedom, tranquility, and independence. In particular, if a person needs to be calm and free to achieve his goals, living alone provides this for him. Moreover, in this new format of life, money has a decisive role in the family. Hence, having fewer children or small family is an exceptional opportunity to improve the family’s economic circumstancelevel. In consequence, the point of having a nuclear family Is to increase the pace of individual and family development. In conclusion, although once having a big family has advantages, In this modern era living alone or in a small family is increasing, that is an inevitable trend.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

The colleges is one of the significant educational systems in each country. Some think the tuition should be free in some subjects ,which are related to society, however others believe the students should pay the university fees for irrelevant subjects with the government. Some people argue the government should pay the university fees at the universities. It cause to eliminates discrimination among educational people ,who abandon their education because they can notcannot pay their tuition. These students find a good opportunities opportunity to pursue their education and acquire a skill, which can influence on their job opportunities. Besides, the scientific level of society will be dramatically improved and the number of educated people will be increased because of the money, and they get a better chance to select or work in their favorite majors. Some citizens believe the students should pay the university fees. There are a few students, who are wealthy and have no problem to pay the tuition, but the normal students have to choose a major that they might dislike due to less lower fees or if they study their favorite subjects, the students should work simultaneously with their education, so they have more motivation to continue their educate educationof their studies. In addition, the university fees make create a competecompetitive environment place for students, who compete with each other to get government funding because the governing privileges assign select the excellent outstanding students to cover their expenditure and their insurance. As a result, although the public believes in paying to pay the tuition, I definitely agree with those, who think the university fees should be free especially for indigenous people.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Many filmmakers made a movie based on books. When a movie is produced based on books, some people prefer to read books before watching films, other people choose to watch the movie first. What do you think? Many movies based on books have been produced which where the movie is has been more popular than the book. Some bookworms believe that most of the filmmakers do not feel bound to books, so they might change literature masterpieces according to their ideas. As a result, reading the story before watching the movie is important. However, the others guess the books and their movies are parallel and watching a movie translates into reading its book. I think if you read the story beforehand and then watch the movie, it can be more enjoyable. First and foremost, it has been proved that reading can improve imagination and creativity. When you are reading a book, you try to create your own imagination of the imagine characters, scenes, and places according to the writer’s descriptions, but when you watch a movie based on a book, in fact, you are observing the director’s imagination not yours. As a result, if you read it afterward, the characters and the scenes which the filmmaker has depicted will be in your mind. Second, there is no doubt that there are some limitations on in producing a movie, consequently, the films might not be able to show everything which has been mentioned in the text. In fact, the book is crammed into a movie. For instance, although the lord of the rings movie is an extraordinary picture, some parts of the book which is are related to the background of the story has have been omitted. Moreover, I personally believe that books can convey emotions and involve you in the story more readily than movies. To cite the reason, the former can take several days and the latter lasts for a few hours. For example, I watched Chernobyl series and then I read Voices from Chernobyl book. The feelings I have experienced through the book are not comparable. Finally, I think when you watch a movie at first, there is less possibility to read the book. In other words, you deprive yourself of a more detailed story and concepts. Besides, some movies might fall short of their books and the story be wasted. To sum up, I guess despite the fact that the benefits of books are more than those of pictures, the moviemovies also have their own benefits. The point is that none of them can be a substitute for the other.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree with this statement? Making people’s life easier and comfortable is one of the Government’s duties in countries. In the other hand, fast & safe transportation system and improved communication and health care are important aspects of the development of a country. To a certain point, I agree with the given statement. There are some reason that developing the railroads system are more useful than highways and roads. First of all, Governments can reduce the pollution in large cities by building more railroads and train stations. If railways systems are developed inhabitants will commute by train instead of personal cars which is safer and way of traveling to get to their office. Railroads systems cause comparatively less environmental damage while the road vehicles are the main reason for increasing pollution around the world. Secondly, nowadays, people spend a plenty of time on traffic in rush hours which can make them angry and tired. Therefore, using public transportation help people to save time. Such as reading relative books and improving their skills. And thirdly, taking public transportation is cheaper than using personal cars. In order that people can save money to do others that they interested. So, it’s possible for people to set aside some money to buy new car or what they need. In conclusion, the population of the world is increasing rapidly and that is why investing more money on faster and dependable transportation system is more logical than investing on the common transportation system. Invest on railroads system is the better choice for any government.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. In this day and age, many people tend to be well-versed and there is a multitude of ways to attain information. In order to having have a lot of information people have to gain it from many news outlets and also reliable people. I totally support the statement for the following reasons. Admittedly, nowadays a vast variety of news resources are available to people readily. Some of the news resources distort the information, hence, if people crave to be well-informed, they ought to follow many news resources to get comprehensive and reputable valid/reliable information. A lot of TV channels have become pervasive on satellites which produce a number lot of beneficial information and news from different aspects. Moreover, with the advent of the internet, there are a lot of websites which broadcast the news all around the globe. Not only does the net provide a lot of convenience for availability of the news for people, but also thanks to new technology on mobile phones people can be kept informed about the news wherever ever they are. equally importantly, although news resources provide a lot of information for people, there are some other ways to gain information. These days, people are connected with each other in many places in society or on the web and they can broaden gain their information with the help of each other. For example, in universities students can obtain a lot of information from their teachers. Furthermore, a lot of information can be derived with by interacting in the work place. In other words, people can benefit from the knowledge of their colleagues. To put it in a nutshell, with the aid of a vast variety of news resources people can have the opportunity to achieve a huge amount of information and more importantly they can get thorough information from the people who they are in touch with them.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the course is useful to an employer. What, in your opinion, should be the main function of a university? The educational institutes came to existence for the purpose of providing solutions to meeting humans’ daily needs. It is then evident that a direct connection between universities and citizens’ demands—which are what jobs are meant for—, has always existed. Conversely, some might harbor other contrasting thoughts reasoning that universities are also in charge of conveying conceptual subjects that do not necessarily provide practicality with them. I, however, believe that both proposed views, in conjunction with each other, would better define the precise nature of universities. To have a fully functional workforce, people need to be educated in their field of expertise. This is only achieved if we have a dedicated place for providing all the necessary knowledge for people’s prospective jobs, and universities, naturally, fit perfectly well with the above proposition. Moreover, at this day and age, business owners expect an array of both technical and soft skills from the employees. For that reason, it is sensible for graduates to, for instance, comprehend all the necessary know-how for an accountancy position. If graduates are not capable of such duties, then employers will need to invest extra funds and time in training the staff. Not every subject in universities is coherent with the outside market. There are, in fact, countless of concepts in modern science for which there are no real-life applications, yet this does not indicate to forgo such lessons. When the time comes, these courses will be incorporated into businesses, and people will start realizing their actual values in society. History, philosophy, and pure mathematics, to name a few, are proper examples of such fields. They all seem virtually useless in any career; nonetheless, universities need to keep teaching them to well-equip graduates for the future. That said, the role of the university is not only to facilitate the path toward existing job opportunities, but even more, it is to bear full responsibility for theforeseeable future where novel applications will be found for the previously impractical concepts.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think that it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools. Others, however, believe that boys and girls benefit more from attending mixed schools. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Nowadays, some countries have only single-sex schools, while in others exist both single-sex and mixed schools. However, there is an argument as to whether as separate schools are better than mixed schools or not. From on one hand, some educationalists believe that separate schools are more effective for both girls and boys because their environments reduce distraction and encourage students to have more concentration on their studies. Therefore, pupils could learn better in these environments. In addition, separate schools give students the opportunity to choose courses without gender bias. For example, girls can study math in girl’s girls’ schools more comfortably because boys are not present to make fun of them. On the other hand, some experts think that co educational schools help pupils learn to live and study together from an early age. In fact, students have the opportunity to interact with each other in mixed environments and they become more confident in their behaviour. Moreover, co educational systems would be more beneficial for students and less costly for governments. It is far easier to provide students with educational tools such as computers and labs at one place than duplicating the same facilities in two places. In conclusion, I believe that there are many advantages for both systems, and finally parents decide which system is preferable for their children. I prefer to go to a single-sex school in order that there is not gender bias which adversely affects on education. But, I hope that one day both genders can have equal chances to study where they like, either at a separate or mixed schools.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Many educators believe that international exchange trips are beneficial for students. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and include any relevant examples from your own experience. Participate in an educational program in a foreign country is a lifelong ambition for many students all over the world. In my opinion, being involved in such international programs has many advances for students if the education system provides the proper requisites for them. Being involve in an exchange program especially a foreign one has many advantages. Firstly, by studying abroad individuals expose themselves to a new environment and culture which can expand their knowledge about other countries and in general change their perception of the world. Secondly, students will improve their adaptability by getting out of their comfort zone. Thirdly, it will provide more opportunity for students by introducing them to a new academic world in which they can establish communication with more tutors and experts. For example, some of my friends have been funded by a grant from foreign institutions while doing post doctoral research overseas. Finally, these programs are also effective to challenge students to develop a global perspective. Students may encounter many difficulties during their study in a foreign country. Firstly, some of them may feel like a fish out of the water and cannot endure the differences or experience culture shock. Secondly, exchanging students needs to provide a raft of requirements such as accommodation, food and transportation. Thirdly, hence being apart from their family, students have to overcome many problems such as health ones and this may disturb their concentration. In conclusion, although by studying abroad individuals may experience much more hardships than their peers in their home country, they will enrich their personality and broaden their horizons.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged. Others believe that children who are taught to co-operate rather than compete become more useful adults. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Improving the sense of competition in children is one of the key issues that parents should concentrate on. However, children who are able to co-operate with their peers also benefit of its advantages, so it would be better for them to have an adequate ability on the two skills. In this essay, the compelling reasons for both arguments will be discussed. The sense of competition has been playing played a pivotal role in paving the way for success for centuries. This feeling has persuaded many a people person to take risks, so that they might achieve their goals in comparison to their counterparts who have not tried hard due to the lack of this sense. In other words, competition can incentivize individuals to surpass others, and making them more successful. If parents try to develop the sense of competition in their offsprings as they growing up, these children will be more likely to gain success in future. Being eager to be more productive and useful members of society, people need to learn how to co-operate with others in addition to have a fair competition with them. Having a strong sense of competition may well result in disappointment for those who lose the battle to their counterparts, yet others find out the causes of this failure owing to their believe in co-operation. This means that people with a deep/profoundhigh understanding of both competition and co-operation, have a stronger tendency to apply their past experience in taking their future’s decisions. These group of people are also able to use others’ experience through co-operation. In summary, although there are cogent arguments on both sides of the controversy, parents had better have a balanced concentration on both senses as they are rearing their charges. (286 words)