Mondays

Bahareh Bagherikia, Family

2019-08-20T14:54:56+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

With divorce rates and family breakdown increasing globally. It is generally accepted that families today are not as close as they used to be. Discuss the causes of this problem and offer some possible solutions to it. Countries have been characterized by very strong family ties and family unit is the cornerstone of the society. Unfortunately, unsuccessful marriages, nowadays, send out the message of family disintegration and failure. Two main contributing factors will be discussed in the following paragraphs. To begin with, despite all the advantages and benefits having been brought by new technologies, our social life has been widely affected and suffered from them. Not surprisingly, owing to the attractiveness of the virtual world provided by the internet, people would choose and rather check their social media like face book that than talk to real friends and family members. To elaborate on, the internet, simply, is the limitless, endless information sea that any trivial question on even useless subjects can be easily answered by surfing followed by some clicks on it. As a result, you can simply get engrossed in this enjoyable environment and lose track of time. It is greatly believed by sociologists that family gatherings at dinner/lunch time without any gadgets can incredibly improve people relationships .Consequently, at least a 30-minute daily time period allocated time to your beloved ones including chatting, watching TV with them can undoubtedly decrease breakdown. In addition to what was said above, more highly educated people with well-paid jobs and excellent social positions create a sense of independency and confidence in them. As a result, separation for couples as well as partners gets/grows largely easier to a large extendsextent. For instance, women used to be financially dependent to on their husbands but in today’s world employed females have fewer tendencies to climb down in front of/ acquiesce to their husbands’ unreasonable requests and sayings. Investigated Investigating the main reasons of family breakdown, sociologists and psychologists must give a serious attention to make create/devise some educational and informative programs in order to inform individuals about the importance of family and new approaches towards this constantly improvingtechnologies and its influence on our relationships. The government, meanwhile, should be highly serious to make an effort to facilitate this trend for the previously mentioned group. By way of conclusion, despite all changes due to technology technological advancements and other educational and financial developments and adjustments, the importance of families in a society is an undeniable fact. So to keep them safe from any harm led leading to divorces and family breakdowns, it is high time everyone had to step forward to make themselves and their surroundings aware of family importance and factors threatening it.

Kian, Vegetarianism

2019-08-20T14:54:42+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Task 2 Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole. Discuss this view and give your opinion. Vegetarianism is actually a lifestyle which encourages individuals to eat nothing but vegetables and floras. In general, there are a lot of forces at play here in support of the view of non-meat eaters, as will now be discussed. Over the past four decades’ decades, vegetarianism has became become more and more popular among people, especially young ones and the trend is set to continue. Firstly, the main contributing factor which is almost agreeable among most of the individuals around the world is that in order for us to have fresh meats and fish, faunas are being slathered slaughtered with the most appalling procedures and uncivilized methods, by way of illustration, consider the way of killing sharks which is happening right now especially in far-east in order for people to have a 400$ steak sandwich. Secondly, the opponents of meat-and-fish-eaters have drawn our attention to the fact that animals’ meat are is one of the major ways of diffusion spread of varies various kinds of diseases, besides. They hold that consuming meat or fish can cause many illnesses in people, to say the least. Lastly, according to very outstanding scientists, one of the principal elements of global warming is the produce production of methane gas released from the stomach of cows, additionally the upkeep of these faunas needs an enormous volume of water which is another peculiar concern we have in the modern world. To cut a long story short, it is undeniable that humans need a vast amount of vegetables in their diet, owing to the useful vitamins that plants consists oncontain, having said that, we must not forget that humans are omnivorous and we definitely need meat and fish in our food; seen in this light, I opine that innumerable actions are required to completely rearrange the methods by which we produce meats and fishes and also finding ways that could control the emission of the methane gas.

Mojtaba Raznahan, Proportion of Older People

2019-08-20T14:54:29+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Some think this good, while others believe this a problem for a county. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Much has been discussed about the problems associated with an aging population, yet some might still harbor a positive thought towards this, whereas others would not find this trend healthy for society. I believe this transformation is challenging, and it might hinder the financial development of countries. The younger generation can always learn from the experience of the elderly; this might be a sound argument for some to accept this change in the age demographic of a country. That is because over the course of time, older people have been collecting some invaluable experience in different aspects of life, which could be of use and passed down to the youth when needed. For instance, when a country is struggling with a national turmoil, the government could benefit from the senior members of society by consulting them to find solutions for the crisis. If countries do not have a considerable number of elderly people around, this option would not be on the table, leading to a possible nationwide issue. Nonetheless, having an old population will definitely have its own serious predicaments along the way. A very evident one is having an ailing economy. That is to say, as citizens age, the percentage of the young workforce would decrease, resulting in a shortage of labor. Therefore, the country will most likely enter a period when despite having enough job vacancies, the majority of them will be left unfilled. As a result, the government will face severe financial problems. Some Scandinavian counties are actually suffering from this very issue discussed above. Desperate for a fresh workforce, many of such countries are now asking foreign professionals to come to the country to help grow the economy. It might be safe to suggest that while having a society with the proportion of elderly people higher than their younger counterparts presents some merits, the gravity of the situation that it will carry is more concerning since it is related to the economy of a country, which is obviously is crucial.Rising fitfully in the first few years, the sales are predicted to jump in two stages, reaching a high of 4000 $ in … and 6500 $ in … .

Niki, Uniformity of Countries

2019-08-20T14:54:17+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is positive or negative development? Nowadays, people have more choices for purchasing or visiting compared to the past. This issue is affected by uniformity of countries all over the world. However, its negative impacts on the tradition of each country cannot be denied. In my opinion, similarity among countries plays an important role in ousting eliminating some limitations for people. In other words, everyone can access a large number of various products with different brands more easily. Not only will they buy more items, but also they can visit several shopping malls with new design. Therefore, the mentioned advantage has facilitated people’s life. On the other hand, in historical terms, tradition is another main factor for any country. Even though availability of more items aids people in life, it can has have some negative effects on traditional jobs or customs of the country. For instance, those who work in traditional fields will lose their job and income regrettably. In addition, some handcraft products are absolutely precious that which leads to creating more job opportunities which in turn preserves the traditions of the country. Last but not least, only if countries’ cultural heritage is preserved, will the tourism be developed dramatically. Most of the tourists travel to the other places at which artefacts and traditional customs can be observed. Also, I strongly believe that income of any country will be increased considerably through raising the rise in the number of tourists, so the manner the government attracts them is vital. Consequently, further to the above explanation, similarity of countries can be quite effective in people’s life. However, preserving cultural heritage of each country is inextricably bound up with its traditions and customs. Eventually, the mentioned diversity brings about more and more positive impacts in the world.

Setareh Rabbani, Petrol Price

2019-08-20T14:54:04+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? There is a general belief that increasing the price of petrol can easily solve the traffic and decline air pollution. While I do agree with this view, I do not think that it is the best option. There is a simple rule in economics which shows that price and consumption change in the opposite direction. Therefore, elevation of the fuel price would lead to decreased consumption of it like any other goods. When the price of one good product increases, people have to manage their using behavior in order to deal with their limited income. In this view, it is expected that people would use their own cars less and society would face less/fewer problems related to traffic and different kinds of pollutions caused by cars. On the other hand, if states do not improve their public transportation along with increasing the petrol price, not only would they solve no problems, but also they would cause a new one. For example people who do not have a decent access to public transportation, would have to limit other expenses in order to compensate their decreased disposable income. They would probably omit some of their leisure activities or high quality food which would have other consequences on their health and quality of life. In conclusion, even though increasing the petrol price could be the easiest way to promote people to use less of their private cars less, I believe that this is not our best shot/option. Even so, in my opinion, improving the access of people to public transport, such as buses or metro, would simply promote people to use them more often to escape from traffic jams.These pie charts illustrate the proportion of sodium, saturated fats and added sugars in different meals of Americans’ staple diet. These three nutrients are the base of an unhealthy Diet which could lead to chronic diseases. It is obvious that breakfast is the healthiest meal among four different meals which are taken by Americans during a typical day. Dinner is usually rich in sodium and saturated fats and snakes usually have plenty of added sugars. Looking into more details witnessed that breakfast have only 14 to 16 percent of unhealthy nutrients (14 percent salt and 16 percent fat and added sugars). Lunch usually has 19 percent of added sugars, 26 percent of saturated fat and 29 percent of sodium. Snakes are significant by high proportion of added sugar that is 42 percent. Finally, dinner has high percent of sodium and saturated fat (43% and 37% respectively). To sum up, this chart shows that Americans intake too much sodium and added sugars in their dinner and refreshments and breakfast is the healthiest meal for them.