MondaysGMAT-GRE-TOEFL-IELTS-آموزشگاه زبان صبای سحر-چمران جنوب، بلوار جلال آل احمد، جنب داروخانه شبانه روزی جلال آل احمد، پلاک 87، طبقه سوم
تلفن: 42-88679341https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/508-monday-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-monday-99-04-162024-04-30T00:43:39+00:00IELTSTOEFLCENTERinfo@ieltstoeflcenter.comJoomla! - Open Source Content ManagementAmirshahin Shahinnejad, Education2020-07-07T17:57:12+00:002020-07-07T17:57:12+00:00https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/508-monday-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-monday-99-04-16/3630-amirshahin-shahinnejad-educationHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.04.16/Amirshahin Shahinnejad, Education.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
In some countries it is thought advisable that children begin formal education at four years old,
while in others they do not have to start school until they are seven or eight.
How far do you agree with either of these views?
Introduction…
Although some educational experts believe that early school at the age of four would benefit both
children and their parents, I don't find their arguments plausible. First of all, children, having lots of
energy and craving to explore their surroundings, learn lots of new ideas by roaming free in novel
environments. Through trial and error, they will have the chance to put their childish ideas into
action and taste the sweetness of success or the bitterness of failure. Group activities, either role
playing or playing hide and seek, are proven to have an undeniable role in shaping a child's
character. By being engaged with different games accompanied by their fellow counterparts,
children have the opportunity to develop their social skills, which may not be possible when sitting in
classroom and expected to get/produce/achieve certain results. This method of teaching, I suppose,
neither incorporates creativity, nor expands children's abstract ideas.
On the other hand, there are some professionals which who are advocates for formal education
at the age of seven or eight. I, too, consider this idea more favorable to a child's mental and practical
growth, despite the fact that this education system imposes lots of responsibilities on the parents
and they have to be actively engaged with their children. The first apparent drawback, however, is
that not many a parent, living modern urban lives in which both parents work, can manage to spend
enough time with their child. Nonetheless, they can fill their child's day with lots of fun and
informative activities, for instance attending music classes, sport clubs, and art workshops and so on.
This method, although time consuming, seems to be more effective in a child's development and its
benefits are thought to outweigh its disadvantages.
To summarize, both aforementioned systems are proven to have their own pros and cons in a
child's development, socially and practically. Comparing the outcomes, I consider the latter to be
more beneficial to children's growth and provide providing them with more intellectual and
functional skills.
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.04.16/Amirshahin Shahinnejad, Education.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
In some countries it is thought advisable that children begin formal education at four years old,
while in others they do not have to start school until they are seven or eight.
How far do you agree with either of these views?
Introduction…
Although some educational experts believe that early school at the age of four would benefit both
children and their parents, I don't find their arguments plausible. First of all, children, having lots of
energy and craving to explore their surroundings, learn lots of new ideas by roaming free in novel
environments. Through trial and error, they will have the chance to put their childish ideas into
action and taste the sweetness of success or the bitterness of failure. Group activities, either role
playing or playing hide and seek, are proven to have an undeniable role in shaping a child's
character. By being engaged with different games accompanied by their fellow counterparts,
children have the opportunity to develop their social skills, which may not be possible when sitting in
classroom and expected to get/produce/achieve certain results. This method of teaching, I suppose,
neither incorporates creativity, nor expands children's abstract ideas.
On the other hand, there are some professionals which who are advocates for formal education
at the age of seven or eight. I, too, consider this idea more favorable to a child's mental and practical
growth, despite the fact that this education system imposes lots of responsibilities on the parents
and they have to be actively engaged with their children. The first apparent drawback, however, is
that not many a parent, living modern urban lives in which both parents work, can manage to spend
enough time with their child. Nonetheless, they can fill their child's day with lots of fun and
informative activities, for instance attending music classes, sport clubs, and art workshops and so on.
This method, although time consuming, seems to be more effective in a child's development and its
benefits are thought to outweigh its disadvantages.
To summarize, both aforementioned systems are proven to have their own pros and cons in a
child's development, socially and practically. Comparing the outcomes, I consider the latter to be
more beneficial to children's growth and provide providing them with more intellectual and
functional skills.
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Climate2020-07-07T17:56:54+00:002020-07-07T17:56:54+00:00https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/508-monday-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-monday-99-04-16/3629-climateHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.04.16/Climate.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Some people prefer to live in hot climates. Whereas others love the
lifestyles in countries with cold climate.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Climate plays a magnificent significant role in a country's culture in
all over the world on in tradition, and even on the economy. People
sometimes debate whether it is better to live in a hot climate or a
cold climate.
Those who prefer in a hot climate will point out that warm weather
leads to a more relaxed lifestyle.in warmer countries, people can
enjoy the beauty of nature more frequently and can do activities like
swimming, jogging, surfing , etc. the \ a Warm climate is not only
pleasant but also is far kind to the poor. Warmth means people can
survive more easily this is important to elders that need a warmer
environments. This may indeed be true, but many diseases, such as
malaria, flourish in warm climates.
While those people who like colder weather will say the cold is
bracing and helps people to be more active and productive. They will
argue, moreover, that people have learned to be very ingenious
because of cold. People enjoy the beauty of snow such as making a
snowman, snow fights, skiing, and so on. The argument will probably
never end because of the verity variety of beliefs, experiences live in
many climates. And
Of course, many of them always want to enjoy both types of climate
at the same time of year like Persia,n our country, wherethat people
can fly inwith less than 2 hours you can see from the coldest to the
hottest place.
In conclusion, climate is a very contentious/controversial subject
topic. This essay discussed why some people love cold or hot climate
for and their advantages and disadvantages of them. Of course, I,personally, love a 4-season climate, and cannotdo not tolerate of
cold or hot.
GHOLAMREA JALILI
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.04.16/Climate.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Some people prefer to live in hot climates. Whereas others love the
lifestyles in countries with cold climate.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Climate plays a magnificent significant role in a country's culture in
all over the world on in tradition, and even on the economy. People
sometimes debate whether it is better to live in a hot climate or a
cold climate.
Those who prefer in a hot climate will point out that warm weather
leads to a more relaxed lifestyle.in warmer countries, people can
enjoy the beauty of nature more frequently and can do activities like
swimming, jogging, surfing , etc. the \ a Warm climate is not only
pleasant but also is far kind to the poor. Warmth means people can
survive more easily this is important to elders that need a warmer
environments. This may indeed be true, but many diseases, such as
malaria, flourish in warm climates.
While those people who like colder weather will say the cold is
bracing and helps people to be more active and productive. They will
argue, moreover, that people have learned to be very ingenious
because of cold. People enjoy the beauty of snow such as making a
snowman, snow fights, skiing, and so on. The argument will probably
never end because of the verity variety of beliefs, experiences live in
many climates. And
Of course, many of them always want to enjoy both types of climate
at the same time of year like Persia,n our country, wherethat people
can fly inwith less than 2 hours you can see from the coldest to the
hottest place.
In conclusion, climate is a very contentious/controversial subject
topic. This essay discussed why some people love cold or hot climate
for and their advantages and disadvantages of them. Of course, I,personally, love a 4-season climate, and cannotdo not tolerate of
cold or hot.
GHOLAMREA JALILI
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Individuals Can Do Nothing to Change Society2020-07-07T17:56:21+00:002020-07-07T17:56:21+00:00https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/508-monday-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-monday-99-04-16/3628-individuals-can-do-nothing-to-change-societyHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.04.16/Individuals Can Do Nothing to Change Society.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Individuals can do nothing to change society. Any new developments can
only be brought about by governments and large institutions. How far do
you agree or disagree?
Who really has the economic and political clout to make substantial changes?
Some claim any changes can be brought just by regimes and organizations, How
far is that true? Can individuals stand against this trend?
I firmly believe that there are a number of reasons for this argument, Firstly, there
is no doubt that the government compared to the ordinary members of society is
a leading authority to take the action on special eventsoccasions and anything
which could bring any changes in on a large-scale, Due to the fact that, these
large organizations are legally responsible for making laws, orders, and
regulations as well as protecting the environment and other vital functions for the
society.
Moreover, nowadays powerful institutions and governments can affect all the
globe, they affect the behaviors, beliefs and opportunities of individuals, For
instance they have their own broadcast and propaganda systems which have a
massive impact on the whole community so they are more likely to be able to
bring significant and fundamental changes to the countries.
On the other hand, there are others who point to many cases in which the
individuals have brought numerous substantial changes in the past in areas like
invention and they claim this trend will continue to grow in the long run. Although
this group who point to the cases in which individuals invent something
extraordinary, they do not mention that these cases need a great deal of money
and time to expand which usually just the government can afford.
To sum up even though in most few cases individuals might have a role to play
into make making changes on a small scale, for major developmentsin largescale they need support from governments and powerful organizations is needed
to gain success.
Q :
Who is does really possess the economic and political clout to make substantial
changes?
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.04.16/Individuals Can Do Nothing to Change Society.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Individuals can do nothing to change society. Any new developments can
only be brought about by governments and large institutions. How far do
you agree or disagree?
Who really has the economic and political clout to make substantial changes?
Some claim any changes can be brought just by regimes and organizations, How
far is that true? Can individuals stand against this trend?
I firmly believe that there are a number of reasons for this argument, Firstly, there
is no doubt that the government compared to the ordinary members of society is
a leading authority to take the action on special eventsoccasions and anything
which could bring any changes in on a large-scale, Due to the fact that, these
large organizations are legally responsible for making laws, orders, and
regulations as well as protecting the environment and other vital functions for the
society.
Moreover, nowadays powerful institutions and governments can affect all the
globe, they affect the behaviors, beliefs and opportunities of individuals, For
instance they have their own broadcast and propaganda systems which have a
massive impact on the whole community so they are more likely to be able to
bring significant and fundamental changes to the countries.
On the other hand, there are others who point to many cases in which the
individuals have brought numerous substantial changes in the past in areas like
invention and they claim this trend will continue to grow in the long run. Although
this group who point to the cases in which individuals invent something
extraordinary, they do not mention that these cases need a great deal of money
and time to expand which usually just the government can afford.
To sum up even though in most few cases individuals might have a role to play
into make making changes on a small scale, for major developmentsin largescale they need support from governments and powerful organizations is needed
to gain success.
Q :
Who is does really possess the economic and political clout to make substantial
changes?
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Maedeh Mirazimi, Speak a Foreign Language2020-07-07T17:56:12+00:002020-07-07T17:56:12+00:00https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/508-monday-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-monday-99-04-16/3627-maedeh-mirazimi-speak-a-foreign-languageHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.04.16/Maedeh Mirazimi, Speak a Foreign Language.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Question: Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause
serious social problems, as well as practical problems.
To what extend extent you do you agree or disagree with this statement.
My essay:
The language barrier is one of the critical impediments (challenges) to successful
communication for people who tend to apply to go abroad to study and work. Some people
argue that illiteracy in the dominant local language in a foreign country may lead to social as
well as practical challenges for individuals who live overseas. I totally agree with this statement.
To begin with, migrants who do not speak or understand the widely used language in a country
are likely to face with problems in adapting to the new environment. They may find themselves
unable to deal with daily simple activities such as going shopping and contacting banks.
Moreover, the misunderstanding and cultural conflicts due to the lack of foreign languages
ability may marginalize them from the local society. In some cases, they even violate the local
regulations because of illiteracy which makes them unable to understand the rules to follow.
FurthermoreHowever, immigrants with high potential for both verbal and written communication
skills in the foreign languages may have a better chance of getting a well-paid job. As an
example, last year, I lost a postdoctoral fellowship offered by a university in Netherlands due to
illiteracy in Dutch which is the official language of the country. In addition, misunderstanding
cultural conflicts between immigrants and local individuals may lead to mental health problems
such as stress and depression. However, the advent of voice-to-voice translator apps these
days helps people solve such kinds of problems.
To sum up, immigrants should learn the language spoken by most of the people of the foreign
country they want to live in. So, they are able to communicate well and integrate into the new
environment with troubles.
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.04.16/Maedeh Mirazimi, Speak a Foreign Language.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Question: Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause
serious social problems, as well as practical problems.
To what extend extent you do you agree or disagree with this statement.
My essay:
The language barrier is one of the critical impediments (challenges) to successful
communication for people who tend to apply to go abroad to study and work. Some people
argue that illiteracy in the dominant local language in a foreign country may lead to social as
well as practical challenges for individuals who live overseas. I totally agree with this statement.
To begin with, migrants who do not speak or understand the widely used language in a country
are likely to face with problems in adapting to the new environment. They may find themselves
unable to deal with daily simple activities such as going shopping and contacting banks.
Moreover, the misunderstanding and cultural conflicts due to the lack of foreign languages
ability may marginalize them from the local society. In some cases, they even violate the local
regulations because of illiteracy which makes them unable to understand the rules to follow.
FurthermoreHowever, immigrants with high potential for both verbal and written communication
skills in the foreign languages may have a better chance of getting a well-paid job. As an
example, last year, I lost a postdoctoral fellowship offered by a university in Netherlands due to
illiteracy in Dutch which is the official language of the country. In addition, misunderstanding
cultural conflicts between immigrants and local individuals may lead to mental health problems
such as stress and depression. However, the advent of voice-to-voice translator apps these
days helps people solve such kinds of problems.
To sum up, immigrants should learn the language spoken by most of the people of the foreign
country they want to live in. So, they are able to communicate well and integrate into the new
environment with troubles.
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Niki, Animal Testing2020-07-07T17:56:02+00:002020-07-07T17:56:02+00:00https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/508-monday-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-monday-99-04-16/3626-niki-animal-testingHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.04.16/Niki, Animal Testing.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Using animals to test the safety of cosmetics or drugs used for medical reasons is never acceptable. To
what extent do you agree with this statement?
IntroductionFirst and foremost, following opponents of animal testing, I opine that it is crucial to perceive the
preciousness of all creatures in the world, particularly including animals which are completely the same
as humans in terms of feeling. In other words, some animals’ characteristics such as pain and fear are
exactly similar to menmankind, so testing or killing them so as to protect individuals is indeed injustice.
However, despite the modernstate-of-the-art world in technology, no efficient solution is still achieved
in simulating the human body and its features other than animal testing. Therefore, my firm conviction
is that animal testing can be used minimally by scientists in order to produce effective medicine
especially for hard diseases for instance, cancer, some types of autoimmune illnesses and fatal ones.
Even though the mentioned measure is unfair, researchers have to apply it inevitably for the sake of
human survival.
On the other hand, I strongly believe that there is no reasonable factor ground in animal testing which is
used for cosmetics products. It is obvious not only is such an industry a luxury but also it benefits
relevant businesses in economic terms, so animals’ valuable animals’ life must not be spoilt in this
regard. By and large, only when the governments ban researchers from testing animals for cosmetics,
will the minimum essential examination be implemented all over the world, by which/whereby animals’
value will be preserved.
Conclusion.
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.04.16/Niki, Animal Testing.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Using animals to test the safety of cosmetics or drugs used for medical reasons is never acceptable. To
what extent do you agree with this statement?
IntroductionFirst and foremost, following opponents of animal testing, I opine that it is crucial to perceive the
preciousness of all creatures in the world, particularly including animals which are completely the same
as humans in terms of feeling. In other words, some animals’ characteristics such as pain and fear are
exactly similar to menmankind, so testing or killing them so as to protect individuals is indeed injustice.
However, despite the modernstate-of-the-art world in technology, no efficient solution is still achieved
in simulating the human body and its features other than animal testing. Therefore, my firm conviction
is that animal testing can be used minimally by scientists in order to produce effective medicine
especially for hard diseases for instance, cancer, some types of autoimmune illnesses and fatal ones.
Even though the mentioned measure is unfair, researchers have to apply it inevitably for the sake of
human survival.
On the other hand, I strongly believe that there is no reasonable factor ground in animal testing which is
used for cosmetics products. It is obvious not only is such an industry a luxury but also it benefits
relevant businesses in economic terms, so animals’ valuable animals’ life must not be spoilt in this
regard. By and large, only when the governments ban researchers from testing animals for cosmetics,
will the minimum essential examination be implemented all over the world, by which/whereby animals’
value will be preserved.
Conclusion.
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Niloo, New or Previouse Professors2020-07-07T17:55:53+00:002020-07-07T17:55:53+00:00https://ieltstoeflcenter.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/508-monday-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-monday-99-04-16/3625-niloo-new-or-previouse-professorsHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.04.16/Niloo, New or Previouse Professors.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Do you prefer to take a course taught by a professor with whom
you have not had classes before or a course taught by a professor
whose class you have taken before?
It is crystal clear that no one can ever deny the significant role of
professors' on students’ life and from my viewpoint these kinds of
questions can have variable answers because it depends on people's
personality and their situations. Some reasons persuade me to put
forward that take taking courses with several professors is a better
option which I will explain with a couple of examples.
At the outset, you can learn diverse subjects in various spheres when
you communicate with different people, so it is obvious that each
professor has a unique way for of teaching, so you can face new ways
which provide more chance to adapt you to new methods and
conditions and it is a pleasant opportunity to become familiar with
numerous perspectives. For instance, if you have young lecturers rather
than older ones, you would be using by new technology to exhibit your
lessons such as using Powerpoint in your class presentation or your
young masters' outlook will be in line with the current state of your
society.
Another noteworthy point is that not each professor cannot be a
specialistspecific inon each field, so it is a given fact that taking a class
with different professors helps students to learn new issues which the
previous professor does may not know. For example, your civil masters
teacher/instructor cannot teach you physical education or dance history
owning to the fact that there is not in their area.
To recap, for students' success we need various professors who are
professional in their spheres. Besides, it can be more challenging for
students, if they are not be familiar with their new lecturers and also
they can communicate with different masters by with diverse
perspectives which can aid pupils to in adapting themselves with to new
strategies, so these conditions can be more beneficial for students'
future.
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1399/Writing Workshop Monday 99.04.16/Niloo, New or Previouse Professors.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Do you prefer to take a course taught by a professor with whom
you have not had classes before or a course taught by a professor
whose class you have taken before?
It is crystal clear that no one can ever deny the significant role of
professors' on students’ life and from my viewpoint these kinds of
questions can have variable answers because it depends on people's
personality and their situations. Some reasons persuade me to put
forward that take taking courses with several professors is a better
option which I will explain with a couple of examples.
At the outset, you can learn diverse subjects in various spheres when
you communicate with different people, so it is obvious that each
professor has a unique way for of teaching, so you can face new ways
which provide more chance to adapt you to new methods and
conditions and it is a pleasant opportunity to become familiar with
numerous perspectives. For instance, if you have young lecturers rather
than older ones, you would be using by new technology to exhibit your
lessons such as using Powerpoint in your class presentation or your
young masters' outlook will be in line with the current state of your
society.
Another noteworthy point is that not each professor cannot be a
specialistspecific inon each field, so it is a given fact that taking a class
with different professors helps students to learn new issues which the
previous professor does may not know. For example, your civil masters
teacher/instructor cannot teach you physical education or dance history
owning to the fact that there is not in their area.
To recap, for students' success we need various professors who are
professional in their spheres. Besides, it can be more challenging for
students, if they are not be familiar with their new lecturers and also
they can communicate with different masters by with diverse
perspectives which can aid pupils to in adapting themselves with to new
strategies, so these conditions can be more beneficial for students'
future.
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>