Fridays

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Nowadays, the number of people who smoke cigarettes, pipe or other types of tobacco products has been increased. Such a phenomenon has resulteds in several problems for non-smokers, especially in public places such as restaurants, bars, hotel lobbies s' lobby and likewise. The problem arises when non-smokers object in on one side, and on the other side smokers state that their freedom is shackled. I do disagree with the latter claim on the following ground: First and foremost, we must take into consideration the meaning of freedom and its borders. I do believe that people are free to the extent that their freedom does not violates others' right. In the recent case, the claim of smokers on limitation of freedom is illogical. They have to respect for other people who avoid cigarettes and smoking. However, in some offices, restaurants and other public environments, an open roof room is devised for those who would like to smoke while would notwithout bothering others. I think that such activities can help reduceing the amount of tobacco usage too. The second reason which I go against the statementinvolves is from the health perspective. In the recent decades, a large number of studies has have proven that smoking is the major root of several diseases such as cancer, heart strike disease or at least as the minor one, and that it intensifies problems such as Asthma. Moreover, according to researches on the damages of smoking, it has been revealed that the destructive consequences of cigarettes 's which affect nonsmokers, who are next to smokers, are much more than the smokers themselves. We see that talking about taking away the freedom of smokers is to do injustice against other people. All in all, taking all the above-mentioned points into account, refusing preventing people to smokefrom smoking in public places not only is not imposing limitation on their freedom but also it reduces the negative consequences of smoking on non-smokers and even it may compel smokers to reduce the number cigarettes they use. In addition, the amount incidence of dangerous illnesses such as various kinds of cancers would decrease which leads to less allocation of money in such a field in the society. As the a result, both healthful and financial benefits are brought to all.