Fridays

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Fossil fuels (e.g. coals, oil and gas) are the main source of energy for most countries. However, alternative sources of energy (e.g. wind and solar) have been encouraged for use by some countries. To what extent is this a positive or negative development? Renewable and non-renewable resources are terms which we have been hearing through media and social media for decades.one of the most sought-after sources is fossil fuel which has been consumed for ages but due to being non-renewable, it became a hot debates as to what extent we are allowed to use this source. Nowadays governments turn to alternative resources such as wind and solar in order to provide their needed energies. As coals, fossil fuels and gases are considered to be pressing problems which are on the slippery slope of running out, countries change their approaches in order to replace them with solar, wind and other sources which are abundant and continuous, in other words, all energy stations could produce immediate and continual energy. for example, the sun is going to shine for billions of years so these stations are going to be sustainable. Also we should take one of the fossil fuel repercussions into accounts. All the mentioned approaches are considered as green or clean energies, by which I mean, unlike non-renewable resources, green energies do not produce as much CO2 or other toxic gases and this would lead to less greenhouse gas emission, a healthy healthier environments and low risk of global warming. Having said that, these ways of producing energy could have downsides as well. Firstly, comparing with fossil fuel, it they cost excessive amount of money in order to develop stations or manufacturing needed components like purchasing a solar panel that cost great proportions of money. secondly, the continuous of production is highly rely reliant on climate changes. Although a new mechanism has been built in-in solar panels or other methods in order to save energy within, still there would be problems if there would werebe no sun rays by two days or more. To cut a long story short, I affirm/subscribe to with clean energy because I believe that merits of renewable resources outweigh the demerits of it and governments should invest in these in order to prevent our environment to face sever consequences.