Fridays

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

The statement claims that every individual whose age is between 18 and 30, is obligated to spend a year for his/her nation. I partially disagree with that notion, since working for the nation’s service must be from a man’s responsibility and not an apathy apathetic obligation. To begin with, I am, personally, living in a country where spending military service for almost two years is a part of every boy’s duty who will reach 18. It can be postponed until the end of his education at University. This law leads to frustrate frustration in the life of a large portion of society/male citizens. Owing to my experience, I insist that, every government engender each youth generation to feel deferential toward their society, they should believe that they need to be at service of their countries anytime that they are necessaryneeded. Putting, in other words, one year of service is not enough for culminating your country, and we should take ourselves as children of our nation and accommodate its needs whenever and wherever it is needed. Another compelling argument against this obligation is what psychology demonstrates. Psychology prescience predicts that each human being who is forced to act usually lost loses his / her enthusiasm about doing that as his/ her responsibility. This, in turn, makes people careless. The inevitable outcome of this is no one will be triumphant of ending that service. They circumvent this obligation, . take my own country as an example. The male ones continued their studying without having any interest in it. That leads to a majority of people who do not love what they learn. That will not show an ideal outcome for the future of a nation. On the other hand, young people must be educated and learn acquire/develop some basics ability to be helpful in times of need. I believe that every nation should plan this kind of service and let each man or woman who proposes to attend this service as his/ her responsibility have options to fulfill this challengeobligation. Considering the points discussed above, the most rational conclusion to be drawn is that forcing a large group of youth to be at a nation’s service, unaware of their ability and interests, but puts their mental health in jeopardy. everyEach one should be able to choose to attend the service by their own choice/of their own volition and need to feel this as theirhis/ her responsibility.