Mondays

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

To solve the ever-increasing environmental hazards throughout the world, the best way is to increase the price of fuel. What is your opinion on the above assumption? Over the last century, the greatest environmental degradation has been made by humans. That this is one of the most significant challenges every country has is undeniable. There is a lot of controversy as to which solution is better to overcome this major problem. Some experts believe that improving environmental conditions can be done by raising the fuel rate. Although at first this will decrease the fuel consumption, the side effects of this action should be carefully taken into account. Many economists and environmentalists believe that the price of fuel should be much more according to the environmental damages it causes. Raising the fuel costs would not only reduces unnecessary car trips but also encourages people to utilize green energy more than ever. In this circumstance, more people tend to benefit from alternative modes of transportation. In addition, no doubt that the more expensive fuel becomes, the better quality will be produced. On the contrary, some pundits dispute the idea of increasing the price of fuel and are of the opinion that it will raise the cost of other products, especially daily necessary ones. Moreover, it will bring the poverty level to nothing but misery. To put it simply, it will cause to inflation. Although it may restrain some car owners, this will not prevent prosperous people from using their cars. In conclusion, I think that raising the price of fuel cannot be a general solution and will not contribute significantly to the environmental protection. Decreasing environmental hazards needs a set of solutions from both government and society and a single solution remains the problem with subsequent ones in our hands.