Mondays

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Using animals to test the safety of cosmetics or drugs used for medical reasons is never acceptable. To what extent do you agree with this statement? IntroductionFirst and foremost, following opponents of animal testing, I opine that it is crucial to perceive the preciousness of all creatures in the world, particularly including animals which are completely the same as humans in terms of feeling. In other words, some animals’ characteristics such as pain and fear are exactly similar to menmankind, so testing or killing them so as to protect individuals is indeed injustice. However, despite the modernstate-of-the-art world in technology, no efficient solution is still achieved in simulating the human body and its features other than animal testing. Therefore, my firm conviction is that animal testing can be used minimally by scientists in order to produce effective medicine especially for hard diseases for instance, cancer, some types of autoimmune illnesses and fatal ones. Even though the mentioned measure is unfair, researchers have to apply it inevitably for the sake of human survival. On the other hand, I strongly believe that there is no reasonable factor ground in animal testing which is used for cosmetics products. It is obvious not only is such an industry a luxury but also it benefits relevant businesses in economic terms, so animals’ valuable animals’ life must not be spoilt in this regard. By and large, only when the governments ban researchers from testing animals for cosmetics, will the minimum essential examination be implemented all over the world, by which/whereby animals’ value will be preserved. Conclusion.