جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? This essay argues that although highways and roads are essential parts of logistics but for the economic perspective, it makes more sense for the government to assign a greater budget on to railways rather than roads. Railways are generally more secured and require less maintenance as well as helping industries to expand rapidly by providing sufficient reliable transportation methods for them. Businesses and manufactories manufacturers are really depended dependent on transportation in order to get access to their raw materials which is called supply and they also need logistics for delivering their products and goods to their customers. It can be claimed that though roadways are much more flexible comparing to trains, the ratio of collisions happening on the railroads is much too fewer than roadways and when it comes to business, safety and sustainability usually comes first. another advantage of focusing on development of railways instead of highways and roads is that the former requires less maintenance budget than the latter because of differences in rates of accidents and depreciationcorruptions. It should also be considered that for businesses, delivering stuff cargo by trains is much too easier, cheaper and usually faster than buying a car and hiring a driver for the shipping process of that business. On the other hand, road trips are the major travelling method because of its ease of process. Most small cities and towns do not own a train station and it’s it is harder to reach to a lot of destinations using trains than driving personal vehicles and using roadways; trains are not able to stop at every single location their passengers ask. To conclude, even though roads are often used by tourists and railroads are usually used for business purposes for the logistics, investing more on in them helps the economy to develop faster and more steadily and it seems to be a better choice in the long-term perspective.

Go to top